← priced_lineedges · WNBA
2026-07-20
Day by day
these are the priced_lineedges picks — the book grading is currently serving, and the same set listed in the sheet below. The season figure in the header bar is that same book over the whole season; this is a recent window of it.
19–8 · 70% · +6.32u across the last 1 days · 3 voided, nothing staked
07/2019–8 ·3 void70%+6.32u4 games
NYL @ DAL4–5 ·3 void−2.24u
- Azzi Fudd Over 1.5 REB1 vs 1.5shots didn't fall — the read held upFudd played a game-high 43 minutes but grabbed just 1 rebound, failing to crash the glass despite heavy shot volume—a rare occurrence that underscores how perimeter-focused her game was in this matchup. With limited paint touches and no second-chance opportunities, she fell short of the 2-board threshold even in extended run.
- Pauline Astier Over 2.5 AST1 vs 2.5no clean explanationAstier's playmaking dried up despite 25 minutes of run, recording just 1 assist while turning the ball over once and posting a team-worst -7 rating. Her 20% usage rate and poor offensive efficiency (35% TS%) limited her ability to create for teammates in a game where the team struggled overall.
- Arike Ogunbowale Under 16.5 PTS29 vs 16.5shots didn't fall — the read held upOgunbowale's elite free-throw shooting (8-8) and high usage rate (37%) powered her well past the under, as she compensated for below-average field-goal efficiency (9-24 FG) by drawing fouls and staying on the court for 38 minutes in a competitive game. The combination of volume opportunities and perfect shooting from the line nearly doubled the betting line.
- Arike Ogunbowale Under 15.5 PTS29 vs 15.5shots didn't fall — the read held upOgunbowale nearly doubled the 15.5 line by dominating usage at 37% while staying efficient from three (3-5) and perfect from the free-throw line (8-8), combining volume with precision to reach 29 points across 38 minutes.
- Arike Ogunbowale Under 14.5 PTS29 vs 14.5shots didn't fall — the read held upOgunbowale nearly doubled the projection by playing all 38 minutes and dominating usage at 37%, converting 8-of-8 free throws and hitting timely three-pointers (3-5) to reach 29 points despite a modest 37% field-goal percentage. The Under's cushion evaporated against a player operating as the primary offensive engine in a high-volume role.
WAS @ GSV1–0+0.58u
MIN @ SEA6–2+2.93u
- Courtney Williams Under 16.5 PTS21 vs 16.5shots didn't fall — the read held upWilliams torched the under with efficient scoring, shooting 8-of-13 from the field (62%) and converting all four free throws to reach 21 points in 33 minutes. Her 71% true shooting and high-volume scoring night—despite a modest 21% usage rate—indicates she capitalized on premium looks and shot selection rather than heavy ball handling.
- Dominique Malonga Over 1.5 AST1 vs 1.5no clean explanationMalonga stayed volume-focused on scoring and rebounding (14 pts, 9 reb in 27 min) but generated just 1 assist, indicating the offense ran through her as a finisher rather than a facilitator despite the 25% usage rate. Two turnovers and limited ball-movement opportunities in what appeared to be a slower-paced game kept her below the 1.5 assist threshold.
LVA @ TOR8–1+5.05u
- Jewell Loyd Over 1.5 REB1 vs 1.5shots didn't fall — the read held upLoyd came up one rebound short despite solid scoring efficiency (11 pts on 65% TS in 23 min), as limited usage (19%) and modest playing time restricted her opportunity to crash the glass for a second board.
Flat 1 unit per priced bet, settled at the price we posted. Voids are not bets — excluded from the record, the hit rate and the units. Open a day for the per-game split and why each loss lost.