← consensus_wnba · WNBA
2026-07-20
Day by day
these are the consensus_wnba picks — the book grading is currently serving, and the same set listed in the sheet below. The season figure in the header bar is that same book over the whole season; this is a recent window of it.
47–31 · 60% · +4.54u across the last 1 days
07/2047–3160%+4.54u4 games
WAS @ GSV7–7−1.86u
- Shakira Austin Under 9.5 REB15 vs 9.5no clean explanation
- Veronica Burton Under 9.5 PTS12 vs 9.5no clean explanation
- Veronica Burton Under 11.5 PTS12 vs 11.5 — missed by a hairno clean explanation
- Tiffany Hayes Over 5.5 PTS0 vs 5.5game script — blowout or foul trouble
- Janelle Salaun Over 1.5 3PM1 vs 1.5no clean explanation
- Veronica Burton Under 1.5 3PM2 vs 1.5no clean explanationBurton went 2-for-3 from deep on 26 minutes and 18% usage, hitting at an efficient 67% clip from three—well above her typical volume and accuracy, which was enough to clear the 1.5 line despite modest shot attempts.
MIN @ SEA14–10+0.44u
- Olivia Miles Under 6.5 AST8 vs 6.5no clean explanation
- Dominique Malonga Over 9.5 REB9 vs 9.5 — missed by a hairno clean explanation
- Jade Melbourne Over 7.5 PTS5 vs 7.5no clean explanation
- Natisha Hiedeman Over 2.5 REB1 vs 2.5no clean explanation
- Olivia Miles Under 4.5 REB8 vs 4.5no clean explanation
- Natisha Hiedeman Over 14.5 PTS12 vs 14.5no clean explanation
LVA @ TOR12–6+2.95u
- NaLyssa Smith Over 5.5 REB5 vs 5.5 — missed by a hairno clean explanation
- Marina Mabrey Over 22.5 PTS14 vs 22.5no clean explanation
- Marina Mabrey Over 21.5 PTS14 vs 21.5no clean explanation
- Marina Mabrey Over 2.5 3PM1 vs 2.5no clean explanation
- A'ja Wilson Over 9.5 REB6 vs 9.5no clean explanation
- Laura Juskaite Over 3.5 REB3 vs 3.5 — missed by a hairno clean explanation
NYL @ DAL14–8+3.01u
- Arike Ogunbowale Under 2.5 3PM3 vs 2.5no clean explanation
- Azzi Fudd Over 1.5 REB1 vs 1.5no clean explanationFudd played a game-high 43 minutes but grabbed just 1 rebound, failing to crash the glass despite heavy shot volume—a rare occurrence that underscores how perimeter-focused her game was in this matchup. With limited paint touches and no second-chance opportunities, she fell short of the 2-board threshold even in extended run.
- Pauline Astier Over 2.5 AST1 vs 2.5no clean explanationAstier's playmaking dried up despite 25 minutes of run, recording just 1 assist while turning the ball over once and posting a team-worst -7 rating. Her 20% usage rate and poor offensive efficiency (35% TS%) limited her ability to create for teammates in a game where the team struggled overall.
- Jonquel Jones Over 1.5 3PM1 vs 1.5no clean explanation
- Sabrina Ionescu Over 4.5 AST2 vs 4.5no clean explanation
- Arike Ogunbowale Under 16.5 PTS29 vs 16.5no clean explanationOgunbowale's elite free-throw shooting (8-8) and high usage rate (37%) powered her well past the under, as she compensated for below-average field-goal efficiency (9-24 FG) by drawing fouls and staying on the court for 38 minutes in a competitive game. The combination of volume opportunities and perfect shooting from the line nearly doubled the betting line.
Flat 1 unit per priced bet, settled at the price we posted. Voids are not bets — excluded from the record, the hit rate and the units. Open a day for the per-game split and why each loss lost.