DIME
Get the picks

← consensus_wnba · WNBA

2026-07-22

Day by day

these are the consensus_wnba picks — the book grading is currently serving, and the same set listed in the sheet below. The season figure in the header bar is that same book over the whole season; this is a recent window of it.

44–29 · 60% · +4.25u across the last 1 days

07/2244–2960%+4.25u6 games

permalink to 2026-07-22 →

PHO @ LAS2–9−7.52u
  • Rae Burrell Over 2.5 AST2 vs 2.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
  • Kahleah Copper Over 3.5 REB2 vs 3.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
  • Kahleah Copper Over 21.5 PTS21 vs 21.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held up
  • Nneka Ogwumike Over 17.5 PTS13 vs 17.5shots didn't fall — the read held upOgwumike's 4-10 FG efficiency (40%) fell short despite 30 minutes and solid free-throw shooting (4-4), as her 21% usage rate limited volume opportunities to reach the 17.5-point threshold.
  • Natasha Mack Over 5.5 REB3 vs 5.5no clean explanationMack fell short of 5.5 rebounds despite efficient scoring (5-8 FG), limited by just 15 minutes of playing time and finishing with only 3 boards—a shortfall driven by her reduced opportunity on the court rather than poor rebounding activity.
  • Natasha Mack Over 6.5 REB3 vs 6.5shots didn't fall — the read held upMack grabbed just 3 rebounds in 15 minutes of action, held well below her over line despite efficient scoring (5-8 FG); the limited floor time was the primary culprit in missing the rebound total.
DAL @ POR1–3−2.30u
  • Sarah Ashlee Barker Over 4.5 REB3 vs 4.5game script — blowout or foul trouble
  • Emily Engstler Over 0.5 3PM0 vs 0.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
  • Carla Leite Over 14.5 PTS12 vs 14.5shots didn't fall — the read held upLeite's efficient 56% TS masked a cold shooting night—she connected on just 3-of-8 from the field (37.5% FG) and couldn't generate enough volume at 21% usage to reach 15 points despite 31 minutes played.
CON @ IND9–5+2.11u
  • Olivia Nelson-Ododa Over 6.5 REB1 vs 6.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
  • Leila Lacan Over 4.5 AST2 vs 4.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
  • Aliyah Boston Over 0.5 3PM0 vs 0.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
  • Charlisse Leger-Walker Over 2.5 REB2 vs 2.5shots didn't fall — the read held upLeger-Walker fell just short with 2 rebounds despite playing 27 minutes, held back by an inefficient offensive night (0-3 FG) that limited her involvement around the rim and a team blowout (-29 +/-) that reduced second-half rebounding opportunities.
  • Aliyah Boston Over 7.5 REB6 vs 7.5no clean explanationBoston's efficient 22-point night on 10-14 shooting came in just 20 minutes, limiting her board opportunities; she pulled down only 6 rebounds despite high usage, falling one short of the 7.5 line.
CHI @ NYL9–4+2.35u
  • Breanna Stewart Over 21.5 PTS20 vs 21.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held up
  • Kamilla Cardoso Over 7.5 REB5 vs 7.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
  • Kamilla Cardoso Over 12.5 PTS10 vs 12.5shots didn't fall — the read held upCardoso fell short despite getting 25 minutes and a healthy 22% usage rate, hampered by poor efficiency—she shot just 5-for-11 from the field and 0-for-0 from three while posting a 46% TS%, leaving her 2.5 points shy of the over. Five personal fouls also limited her effectiveness and may have caused the Bulls to manage her minutes or aggression down the stretch.
  • Azura Stevens Over 11.5 PTS8 vs 11.5shots didn't fall — the read held upStevens shot just 2-5 from the field despite playing 30 minutes, and her 13% usage rate—well below her typical offensive load—limited her scoring opportunities even though she stayed efficient at the line (4-4 FT).
LVA @ WAS8–3+2.95u
  • Jackie Young Over 1.5 3PM0 vs 1.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
  • Shakira Austin Over 9.5 REB6 vs 9.5shots didn't fall — the read held upAustin's efficient 25-point night (10-18 FG) kept her on the floor for 29 minutes, but limited her rebounding opportunities—she grabbed just 6 boards despite a 57% true shooting rate, suggesting the game flow favored her scoring over crashing the glass.
  • Chelsea Gray Over 6.5 AST4 vs 6.5shots didn't fall — the read held upGray's playmaking was bottlenecked by limited offensive touches—she logged just 22% usage despite 37 minutes, finishing with only 4 assists well short of the 6.5 line. The low usage rate, despite efficient scoring (65% TS), left her without enough ball-handling opportunities to generate assists.
MIN @ SEA15–5+6.66u
  • Olivia Miles Over 17.5 PTS13 vs 17.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
  • Natasha Howard Over 11.5 PTS11 vs 11.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held up
  • Natasha Howard Over 7.5 REB5 vs 7.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
  • Jade Melbourne Over 7.5 PTS4 vs 7.5no clean explanationMelbourne's 4 points fell short of the 7.5 line despite 28 minutes of floor time due to brutal 2-6 shooting (33% TS) and an 0-4 night from three, leaving her with minimal offensive impact despite high availability.
  • Natasha Howard Over 6.5 REB5 vs 6.5shots didn't fall — the read held upHoward played only 26 minutes and grabbed just 5 rebounds despite solid efficiency, falling one board short of the 6.5 line due to limited floor time and a low-usage role (18% usage). The blowout win (+12 +/-) likely reduced her rebounding opportunities in a game that didn't require extended minutes.

Flat 1 unit per priced bet, settled at the price we posted. Voids are not bets — excluded from the record, the hit rate and the units. Open a day for the per-game split and why each loss lost.