← consensus_wnba · WNBA
2026-08-02
Day by day
these are the consensus_wnba picks — the book grading is currently serving, and the same set listed in the sheet below. The season figure in the header bar is that same book over the whole season; this is a recent window of it.
27–26 · 51% · −6.31u across the last 1 days · 3 voided, nothing staked
08/0227–26 ·3 void51%−6.31u4 games
CON @ DAL1–6−5.26u
- Arike Ogunbowale Over 15.5 PTS15 vs 15.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held up
- Charlisse Leger-Walker Over 3.5 AST2 vs 3.5no clean explanation
- Olivia Nelson-Ododa Over 11.5 PTS8 vs 11.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Arike Ogunbowale Under 3.5 REB5 vs 3.5no clean explanation
- Paige Bueckers Over 5.5 AST4 vs 5.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Paige Bueckers Over 3.5 REB3 vs 3.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held upBueckers fell one rebound short despite playing 25 minutes, finishing with 3 boards as her offensive struggles (3-9 FG, 18% usage) limited her ability to generate extra possessions and offensive rebounding opportunities.
IND @ MIN12–12−3.58u
- Caitlin Clark Over 19.5 PTS19 vs 19.5 — missed by a hairno clean explanation
- Natasha Howard Under 12.5 PTS13 vs 12.5 — missed by a hairno clean explanation
- Caitlin Clark Over 3.5 REB1 vs 3.5no clean explanation
- Kayla McBride Over 2.5 3PM2 vs 2.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Aliyah Boston Under 3.5 AST7 vs 3.5no clean explanation
- Monique Billings Over 5.5 REB3 vs 5.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
TOR @ GSV4–3−0.11u
- Veronica Burton Under 1.5 3PM3 vs 1.5no clean explanation
- Isabelle Harrison Over 5.5 REB2 vs 5.5shots didn't fall — the read held upHarrison was held to just 2 rebounds in 17 minutes despite 27% usage, falling well short of the 5.5 line; her poor offensive efficiency (2-9 FG, 22% TS) likely limited second-chance opportunities and kept her off the glass.
- Isabelle Harrison Over 11.5 PTS4 vs 11.5no clean explanationHarrison's ice-cold 2-9 shooting (22% TS) left her far short at just 4 points, compounded by a blowout loss that limited her to 17 minutes and 27% usage. A combination of poor efficiency and reduced playing time in a lopsided game made the over an easy miss.
LAS @ POR10–5 ·3 void+2.64u
- Emily Engstler Over 8.5 PTS7 vs 8.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Dearica Hamby Under 7.5 REB10 vs 7.5shots didn't fall — the read held upHamby exceeded the 7.5 rebound line with 10 boards despite playing only 29 minutes, capitalizing on elite 73% true shooting and high volume touches (26% usage) that kept her heavily involved in the offensive glass. The under missed because she secured 0.34 rebounds per minute—well above her typical rate—in a game where she stayed out of foul trouble with just 4 fouls.
- Dearica Hamby Under 3.5 AST4 vs 3.5 — missed by a hairno clean explanationHamby's high usage rate (26%) and extended minutes (29) in a game where she was efficient (11-15 FG) created enough ball-handling opportunities to push her to exactly 4 assists, just one over the line. She stayed out of foul trouble (4 PF) and maintained possession, allowing her to facilitate slightly more than the under projection despite playing within her typical role.
- Nneka Ogwumike Over 2.5 AST2 vs 2.5shots didn't fall — the read held upOgwumike's ball-handling was minimal despite 30 minutes and high usage (31%), as she recorded just 2 assists while turning it over twice, suggesting the offense ran through her scoring rather than playmaking in this game.
- Emily Engstler Over 4.5 REB3 vs 4.5no clean explanationEngstler managed only 3 rebounds in 22 minutes of play, falling one board short of the 4.5 target; her limited floor time and 4 fouls (one shy of fouling out) restricted her rebounding opportunities despite a team that may have needed boards.
Flat 1 unit per priced bet, settled at the price we posted. Voids are not bets — excluded from the record, the hit rate and the units. Open a day for the per-game split and why each loss lost.