← disciplined_board · WNBA
2026-08-02
Day by day
these are the disciplined_board picks — the book grading is currently serving, and the same set listed in the sheet below. The season figure in the header bar is that same book over the whole season; this is a recent window of it.
15–15 · 50% · −2.24u across the last 1 days · 3 voided, nothing staked
08/0215–15 ·3 void50%−2.24u4 games
TOR @ GSV2–3−1.35u
- Janelle Salaun Under 1.5 AST2 vs 1.5no clean explanationSalaun's elevated 30-minute role and 28% usage rate gave her multiple opportunities to contribute on assists, and she delivered exactly 2—just enough to clear the 1.5 line despite a shoot-first performance (9-15 FG) that could have limited playmaking chances.
- Isabelle Harrison Over 5.5 REB2 vs 5.5shots didn't fall — the read held upHarrison was held to just 2 rebounds in 17 minutes despite 27% usage, falling well short of the 5.5 line; her poor offensive efficiency (2-9 FG, 22% TS) likely limited second-chance opportunities and kept her off the glass.
- Isabelle Harrison Over 11.5 PTS4 vs 11.5no clean explanationHarrison's ice-cold 2-9 shooting (22% TS) left her far short at just 4 points, compounded by a blowout loss that limited her to 17 minutes and 27% usage. A combination of poor efficiency and reduced playing time in a lopsided game made the over an easy miss.
CON @ DAL0–1−1.00u
- Paige Bueckers Over 3.5 REB3 vs 3.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held upBueckers fell one rebound short despite playing 25 minutes, finishing with 3 boards as her offensive struggles (3-9 FG, 18% usage) limited her ability to generate extra possessions and offensive rebounding opportunities.
IND @ MIN7–7−0.85u
- Natasha Howard Over 5.5 REB4 vs 5.5shots didn't fall — the read held upHoward fell one rebound short despite efficient scoring (6-9 FG), limited by 23 minutes of playing time and picking up 4 fouls that likely restricted her availability on the glass in the final quarter.
- Napheesa Collier Under 7.5 REB8 vs 7.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held upCollier cleared the under by one rebound despite modest usage (21%), grabbing 8 boards in 32 minutes as Minnesota's primary floor-spacer and secondary playmaker; the extra rebound came via heavy involvement in transition and offensive glass work that wasn't fully priced into the 7.5 line.
- Caitlin Clark Under 8.5 AST10 vs 8.5no clean explanationClark exceeded the assist line by distributing the ball at a high rate despite modest scoring efficiency (8-18 FG); her 30% usage and full 34 minutes gave her sufficient opportunities to reach double-digit dimes even in a low-efficiency shooting night.
- Kayla McBride Over 17.5 PTS10 vs 17.5no clean explanationMcBride's 40% shooting night (4-10 FG) fell well short of her scoring pace, and despite playing 29 minutes, her 17% usage rate—indicating limited offensive touches—capped her at just 10 points, 7.5 short of the over.
- Kayla McBride Over 16.5 PTS10 vs 16.5shots didn't fall — the read held upMcBride's 40% field-goal percentage (4-10) and limited offensive opportunities at 17% usage rate kept her well short of the 16.5-point threshold despite playing 29 minutes.
- Kayla McBride Over 15.5 PTS10 vs 15.5shots didn't fall — the read held upMcBride's 40% shooting night (4-10 FG) fell well short of her scoring line despite getting 29 minutes of run, as inefficient shooting and low free-throw activity (0 attempts) left her 5.5 points short of the over.
LAS @ POR6–4 ·3 void+0.96u
- Dearica Hamby Under 7.5 REB10 vs 7.5shots didn't fall — the read held upHamby exceeded the 7.5 rebound line with 10 boards despite playing only 29 minutes, capitalizing on elite 73% true shooting and high volume touches (26% usage) that kept her heavily involved in the offensive glass. The under missed because she secured 0.34 rebounds per minute—well above her typical rate—in a game where she stayed out of foul trouble with just 4 fouls.
- Dearica Hamby Under 3.5 AST4 vs 3.5 — missed by a hairno clean explanationHamby's high usage rate (26%) and extended minutes (29) in a game where she was efficient (11-15 FG) created enough ball-handling opportunities to push her to exactly 4 assists, just one over the line. She stayed out of foul trouble (4 PF) and maintained possession, allowing her to facilitate slightly more than the under projection despite playing within her typical role.
- Nneka Ogwumike Over 2.5 AST2 vs 2.5shots didn't fall — the read held upOgwumike's ball-handling was minimal despite 30 minutes and high usage (31%), as she recorded just 2 assists while turning it over twice, suggesting the offense ran through her scoring rather than playmaking in this game.
- Emily Engstler Over 4.5 REB3 vs 4.5no clean explanationEngstler managed only 3 rebounds in 22 minutes of play, falling one board short of the 4.5 target; her limited floor time and 4 fouls (one shy of fouling out) restricted her rebounding opportunities despite a team that may have needed boards.
Flat 1 unit per priced bet, settled at the price we posted. Voids are not bets — excluded from the record, the hit rate and the units. Open a day for the per-game split and why each loss lost.