DIME
Get the picks

← form_wnba · WNBA

2026-07-17

Day by day

these are the form_wnba picks — the book grading is currently serving, and the same set listed in the sheet below. The season figure in the header bar is that same book over the whole season; this is a recent window of it.

34–11 · 76% · +14.82u across the last 1 days

07/1734–1176%+14.82u4 games

permalink to 2026-07-17 →

LAS @ CHI7–5−0.04u
  • Rae Burrell Over 14.5 PTS9 vs 14.5shots didn't fall — the read held upBurrell shot just 3-7 from the field (42.9%) despite playing 31 minutes, and her 16% usage rate—well below her typical offensive load—limited scoring opportunities in what became a blowout loss (-21 +/-). The combination of poor efficiency and reduced volume left her 5.5 points short of the 14.5 line.
  • Natasha Cloud Under 11.5 PTS15 vs 11.5shots didn't fall — the read held upCloud exceeded her L10 average of 9.4 and the 11.5 line by posting 15 points on elite 69% true shooting, including 3-for-6 from three, while playing a full 32 minutes without foul trouble to constrain her opportunities.
  • Erica Wheeler Over 4.5 AST4 vs 4.5 — missed by a hairno clean explanationWheeler played 32 minutes with elevated usage (22%), but generated only 4 assists despite 14 points, suggesting shot-heavy offense rather than playmaking—she took 12 FG attempts compared to her typical distribution. The -13 +/- indicates the team played poorly around her, limiting assist opportunities even with extended run.
  • Natasha Cloud Under 6.5 AST9 vs 6.5shots didn't fall — the read held upCloud's 9 assists crushed the under despite modest 14% usage, as she operated in a high-pace environment (0 turnovers in 32 minutes) that generated plenty of kick-out opportunities from her 69% TS efficiency and ball movement. Her recent 4.5 L10 average proved a poor proxy for a game where she played full minutes in a +11 blowout that created natural assist inflation.
  • Natasha Cloud Under 5.5 AST9 vs 5.5no clean explanationCloud nearly doubled the target with 9 assists on a game-high 32 minutes and zero turnovers, functioning as the primary initiator in a blowout win (+11) where her efficiency (69% TS) kept the offense flowing without forcing shots.
ATL @ TOR6–3+1.17u
  • Isabelle Harrison Over 11.5 PTS10 vs 11.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held upHarrison fell one point shy despite adequate opportunity, going 4-8 from the field but unable to convert at the rim or from three (0-1 3PT, 2-4 FT) in her 21 minutes of work.
  • Maria Conde Over 4.5 REB4 vs 4.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held upConde finished with just 4 rebounds despite 31 minutes and solid free-throw volume (8-9 FT), falling one board short; Atlanta's elite defensive rebounding (rank 1, 30.13 RPG allowed) clamped down on second-chance opportunities and limited her to the exact season-average mark that looked like an outlier against her recent L5 (6.2 RPG) and L10 (5.83 RPG) trends.
  • Isabelle Harrison Over 5.5 REB3 vs 5.5shots didn't fall — the read held upHarrison fell short of the 5.5 rebound line despite a respectable 21 minutes and 50% FG, finishing with just 3 boards—likely a function of limited opportunity in a game where she wasn't the primary rebounder and recorded only 3 fouls, suggesting minimal aggressive interior presence or rebounding activity.
CON @ PHO7–3+2.35u
  • Olivia Nelson-Ododa Over 10.5 PTS6 vs 10.5no clean explanationNelson-Ododa's 2-for-3 FG efficiency masked a dramatic collapse in volume—she took just 3 shots in 21 minutes (10% usage) compared to her pre-game averages, rendering her typical scoring pace irrelevant despite solid shooting splits.
  • Monique Akoa Makani Under 3.5 AST4 vs 3.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held upDespite a season-low 20 minutes and invisible scoring (0-for-6), Akoa Makani still reached 4 assists on modest 19% usage, suggesting she maintained setup duties even in limited action and off-night shooting. Her recent L10 average of 2.3 assists underestimated her floor playmaking role, which proved resilient enough to clear 3.5 despite the offensive drought.
  • Kahleah Copper Over 3.5 REB3 vs 3.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held upCopper fell one rebound short despite 35 minutes and heavy usage (28%), finishing with only 3 boards as Phoenix's spacing and ball movement limited her offensive rebounding opportunities and she didn't crash the glass enough on a night when the team controlled pace.
SEA @ IND14–0+11.34u

Flat 1 unit per priced bet, settled at the price we posted. Voids are not bets — excluded from the record, the hit rate and the units. Open a day for the per-game split and why each loss lost.