← all formulas · WNBA
form_wnba
1626–1244 over 2870 priced bets · +88.2u · ROI +3.1% -0.3% to +6.4% · CLV +1.25¢ +1.1% to +1.4%
Not yet separable from break-even — the ROI interval spans zero, so this record is consistent with a real edge AND with none.
THE PICKS · priced bets only, newest first
Every day, every game, every miss.
Day by day
Latest 22 graded days from the same CORE benchmark shown in the headline, charts and sheet: form_wnba.
529–460 · 53% · −30.74u across the last 22 days · 11 voided, zero benchmark units
09/3016–2440%−11.53u2 games
GSV @ DAL7–18−12.58u
- Jessica Shepard Over 10.5 PTS4 vs 10.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Awak Kuier Over 5.5 REB4 vs 5.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Paige Bueckers Over 20.5 PTS10 vs 20.5no clean explanation
- Jessica Shepard Over 11.5 PTS4 vs 11.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Cecilia Zandalasini Over 7.5 PTS5 vs 7.5no clean explanation
- Paige Bueckers Over 4.5 AST4 vs 4.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held up
ATL @ WAS9–6+1.05u
- Georgia Amoore Over 1.5 3PM0 vs 1.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Angel Reese Over 15.5 PTS15 vs 15.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held up
- Georgia Amoore Over 7.5 PTS2 vs 7.5shots didn't fall — the read held upAmoore's catastrophic 1-5 shooting (20% TS) and 0-4 from three—combined with just 11% usage despite 28 minutes—left her well short of 7.5 points; she scored only 2 and couldn't generate offensive opportunities even with extended floor time.
- Lauren Betts Over 4.5 PTS0 vs 4.5shots didn't fall — the read held upBetts saw limited run (11 minutes) with minimal offensive opportunities (12% usage), going scoreless on her lone field-goal attempt in what appears to have been a blowout situation (-6 +/-). The restricted role and low shot volume made it nearly impossible to reach 4.5 points.
- Georgia Amoore Over 6.5 PTS2 vs 6.5no clean explanationAmoore shot 1-5 from the field and 0-4 from three despite 28 minutes of run, finishing with just 2 points on 20% true shooting—a historically cold performance that fell well short of the 6.5-point line. Her 11% usage rate and inability to convert any perimeter attempts left her 4.5 points short.
- Naz Hillmon Over 3.5 REB3 vs 3.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held upHillmon played 33 minutes with solid efficiency (56% TS) but fell one rebound short despite 16% usage, hampered by a quiet rebounding night in a blowout win (+18) where she recorded just 3 boards.
09/2921–1657%+1.16u2 games
MIN @ NYL14–12−0.83u
- Jonquel Jones Under 9.5 REB13 vs 9.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Sabrina Ionescu Under 2.5 3PM4 vs 2.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Pauline Astier Over 7.5 PTS4 vs 7.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Rebekah Gardner Over 3.5 PTS2 vs 3.5game script — blowout or foul trouble
- Natasha Howard Over 10.5 PTS2 vs 10.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Leonie Fiebich Over 3.5 REB3 vs 3.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held upFiebich fell one rebound short despite playing 29 minutes, held back by a low usage rate (9%) that limited her opportunities to crash the glass and compete for boards.
LVA @ IND7–4+1.98u
- Aliyah Boston Under 16.5 PTS22 vs 16.5no clean explanation
- Jackie Young Over 6.5 AST5 vs 6.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Makayla Timpson Over 6.5 PTS6 vs 6.5 — missed by a hairgame script — blowout or foul trouble
- Aliyah Boston Under 15.5 PTS22 vs 15.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
09/2742–4747%−12.31u4 games
WAS @ ATL8–16−9.76u
- Rhyne Howard Under 19.5 PTS26 vs 19.5paid over the fair number
- Georgia Amoore Over 9.5 PTS8 vs 9.5no clean explanation
- Naz Hillmon Over 7.5 PTS4 vs 7.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Jordin Canada Over 10.5 PTS10 vs 10.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held up
- Angel Reese Over 16.5 PTS13 vs 16.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Allisha Gray Under 18.5 PTS22 vs 18.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
IND @ LVA5–8−4.58u
- Sophie Cunningham Under 6.5 PTS13 vs 6.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Chelsea Gray Under 6.5 AST8 vs 6.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Caitlin Clark Under 9.5 AST10 vs 9.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held up
- Makayla Timpson Over 7.5 PTS2 vs 7.5paid over the fair number
- A'ja Wilson Over 2.5 AST2 vs 2.5shots didn't fall — the read held upWilson's historic scoring efficiency (15-19 FG, 86% TS) made her the focal point of the offense, but her high usage rate (32%) and dominant post presence left little opportunity for playmaking—she recorded just 2 assists despite 35 minutes of elite individual scoring.
- A'ja Wilson Under 9.5 REB16 vs 9.5shots didn't fall — the read held upWilson's elite efficiency (15-19 FG, 86% TS) kept her on the floor for all 35 minutes, and her 32% usage rate generated enough possessions to rack up 16 boards—well above the 9.5 line despite only fouling three times in a blowout win.
DAL @ GSV14–16−3.04u
- Kaila Charles Over 5.5 PTS3 vs 5.5no clean explanation
- Kayla Thornton Under 7.5 PTS10 vs 7.5no clean explanation
- Arike Ogunbowale Over 14.5 PTS10 vs 14.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Awak Kuier Over 7.5 PTS2 vs 7.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Janelle Salaun Over 9.5 PTS3 vs 9.5no clean explanation
- Jessica Shepard Over 11.5 PTS0 vs 11.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
NYL @ MIN15–7+5.07u
- Leonie Fiebich Under 8.5 PTS16 vs 8.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Breanna Stewart Under 21.5 PTS34 vs 21.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Sabrina Ionescu Under 2.5 3PM3 vs 2.5paid over the fair number
- Pauline Astier Over 7.5 PTS7 vs 7.5 — missed by a hairno clean explanation
- Olivia Miles Over 5.5 AST1 vs 5.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Breanna Stewart Under 22.5 PTS34 vs 22.5paid over the fair numberStewart torched the under with elite efficiency, shooting 11-18 from the field and 10-12 from the stripe for a 73% true shooting rate while logging a game-high 38 minutes in a blowout. Her 34% usage rate and near-perfect free-throw shooting (83%) transformed what looked like a modest scoring line into a 34-point performance.
09/247–1237%−6.89u3 games
IND @ MIN0–7−7.00u
- Kelsey Mitchell Over 24.5 PTS10 vs 24.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Kelsey Mitchell Over 2.5 3PM2 vs 2.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Caitlin Clark Over 2.5 3PM0 vs 2.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Caitlin Clark Over 21.5 PTS2 vs 21.5paid over the fair numberClark shot 1-12 from the field and 0-7 from three, combining for just 2 points in 18 minutes despite 30% usage, as historically poor efficiency derailed the over by 19.5 points. The 8% true shooting percentage was the primary culprit—she simply couldn't convert looks that were available within her usage rate.
- Caitlin Clark Over 20.5 PTS2 vs 20.5paid over the fair numberClark shot 1-12 from the field and 0-7 from three despite 30% usage, posting an 8% true shooting percentage—a historically poor offensive night that made the 20.5-point line impossible to reach. Her 18 minutes of playing time compounded the issue, leaving her with insufficient volume to overcome the shooting collapse.
- Kelsey Mitchell Over 23.5 PTS10 vs 23.5no clean explanationMitchell shot just 3-12 from the field (25% FG) in 22 minutes, falling well short of the scoring volume needed to reach 24 points despite solid free-throw shooting (2-2). Her poor efficiency and limited opportunities combined to leave her 13.5 points short of the over.
LVA @ PHO2–3−1.58u
- Kahleah Copper Over 19.5 PTS18 vs 19.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held up
- Jackie Young Over 19.5 PTS5 vs 19.5no clean explanation
- Jackie Young Under 4.5 REB7 vs 4.5shots didn't fall — the read held upYoung grabbed 7 rebounds despite a brutal 2-8 shooting night, as the Las Vegas offense stalled (15% usage) and forced her into extended floor time (34 min) where she accumulated boards on high volume attempts. The under missed because rebounding opportunity, not scoring efficiency, was the key variable—she was on the glass hunting for her own misses and her teammates' bricks.
CHI @ WAS5–2+1.69u
- Sydney Taylor Under 14.5 PTS16 vs 14.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held up
- Shakira Austin Under 3.5 AST5 vs 3.5no clean explanationAustin exceeded the assist line despite shooting 0-for-9 from the field, as her 23 minutes and 25% usage rate kept her involved in ball movement and decision-making even when her shot wasn't falling. She recorded 5 dimes on just 1 turnover, suggesting a facilitation-focused role that compensated for her offensive struggles.
09/2318–1064%+3.67u2 games
ATL @ NYL10–9−0.51u
- Rhyne Howard Over 16.5 PTS8 vs 16.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Angel Reese Over 11.5 REB6 vs 11.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Angel Reese Over 10.5 REB6 vs 10.5no clean explanationReese was limited to just 17 minutes—5-7 below her season average—which capped her rebounding opportunities at 6, well short of the 10.5 line. The limited run was the decisive factor, as her rebounding rate would have easily cleared the over with standard playing time.
- Angel Reese Over 14.5 PTS6 vs 14.5no clean explanationReese was held to just 6 points on 2-7 shooting (29% FG) in only 17 minutes, well short of the 14.5-point line. Limited offensive opportunity and poor efficiency combined to make the over a non-factor.
- Leonie Fiebich Over 2.5 REB2 vs 2.5shots didn't fall — the read held upFiebich fell one rebound short despite playing 16 minutes, collecting just 2 boards on a night when low usage (12%) and a scoreless performance (0-1 FG) limited her opportunities to crash the glass.
- Rhyne Howard Over 15.5 PTS8 vs 15.5no clean explanationHoward shot just 4-of-12 (33% FG) and 0-of-5 from three despite playing 34 minutes, unable to generate scoring efficiency even with the volume to hit over 15.5 points.
DAL @ SEA8–1+4.18u
- Jessica Shepard Under 5.5 AST12 vs 5.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
09/2226–3443%−13.17u5 games
LAS @ LVA1–7−6.42u
- Jackie Young Over 21.5 PTS14 vs 21.5paid over the fair number
- A'ja Wilson Under 9.5 REB10 vs 9.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held up
- Jackie Young Over 20.5 PTS14 vs 20.5paid over the fair number
- Jackie Young Under 4.5 REB5 vs 4.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held upYoung's heavy 34-minute workload and 27% usage rate—playing nearly the full game as the primary ball-handler—gave her enough opportunities to grab 5 boards despite shooting just 6-16 from the field, pushing past the 4.5 rebound line.
- Rae Burrell Over 15.5 PTS11 vs 15.5paid over the fair numberBurrell's inefficient 4-12 shooting (33% FG) and 0-2 from three combined with modest free-throw volume (3 attempts) left her 4.5 points shy despite 29 minutes of play. Her 29% usage rate proved insufficient to generate the scoring volume needed to clear the 15.5-point threshold.
- Chelsea Gray Under 11.5 PTS17 vs 11.5paid over the fair numberGray torched the under on an efficient 7-12 shooting night (58% FG) with extended 33-minute run, nearly doubling the 11.5-point line at 17 points. Her 68% true shooting and zero fouls allowed her to stay on court and capitalize on a high-volume opportunity despite modest 21% usage.
GSV @ POR3–7−4.41u
- Gabby Williams Under 14.5 PTS17 vs 14.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Veronica Burton Under 12.5 PTS13 vs 12.5 — missed by a hairno clean explanation
- Kayla Thornton Under 7.5 PTS11 vs 7.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Kayla Thornton Under 3.5 REB7 vs 3.5no clean explanationThornton nearly doubled the over/under by grabbing 7 boards in 26 minutes, benefiting from elevated opportunity on a night when her team needed rebounding help and she drew only 2 fouls despite heavy box-out work.
- Kayla Thornton Under 9.5 PTS11 vs 9.5shots didn't fall — the read held upThornton's efficient 62% true shooting on 20% usage was enough to clear the 9.5-point line, converting 4-of-8 from the field and both her three-point attempts in 26 minutes despite modest volume.
- Kayla Thornton Under 8.5 PTS11 vs 8.5shots didn't fall — the read held upThornton exceeded the under despite modest volume, converting 4-of-8 from the field (50%) and 2-of-4 from three (50%) on 26 minutes to reach 11 points, as efficient shooting made up for her low usage rate of just 20%.
CON @ WAS5–8−3.96u
- Aaliyah Edwards Over 12.5 PTS8 vs 12.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Aaliyah Edwards Over 11.5 PTS8 vs 11.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Kiki Iriafen Over 15.5 PTS4 vs 15.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Charlisse Leger-Walker Over 7.5 PTS7 vs 7.5 — missed by a hairpaid over the fair number
- Charlisse Leger-Walker Over 3.5 AST3 vs 3.5 — missed by a hairpaid over the fair numberLeger-Walker came up one assist short despite playing 30 minutes, held back by low offensive involvement at just 14% usage and a 3-8 shooting night that limited her ability to create offense. She finished with exactly 3 dimes, falling one short of the over due to her reduced playmaking opportunities in a blowout loss.
- Kiki Iriafen Over 9.5 REB5 vs 9.5paid over the fair numberIriafen fell well short with just 5 rebounds due to a combination of limited minutes (18) and early foul trouble (5 PF), which restricted her ability to crash the glass and accumulate the volume needed to clear 9.5.
TOR @ CHI5–6−1.84u
- Sydney Taylor Under 14.5 PTS18 vs 14.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Kamilla Cardoso Over 7.5 REB7 vs 7.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held up
- Isabelle Harrison Under 14.5 PTS21 vs 14.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Kiki Rice Over 14.5 PTS9 vs 14.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Sydney Taylor Under 15.5 PTS18 vs 15.5shots didn't fall — the read held upTaylor exceeded the under with efficient shooting, going 5-12 from the field (42%) with a perfect 5-5 from free throw while maintaining 31% usage over 24 minutes. Her 63% true shooting and aggressive free throw attempts (5 attempts) proved the scoring floor was higher than the 15.5-point line anticipated.
- Kiki Rice Over 13.5 PTS9 vs 13.5no clean explanationRice's inefficient 4-11 shooting (36% FG) and lack of free-throw attempts (0-0 FT) left her 4.5 points short despite playing 30 minutes with solid usage; her poor 41% true shooting prevented her from reaching 13.5 even with meaningful playing time.
MIN @ IND12–6+3.47u
- Kelsey Mitchell Over 26.5 PTS20 vs 26.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Natasha Howard Over 6.5 REB5 vs 6.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Kelsey Mitchell Over 25.5 PTS20 vs 25.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Natasha Howard Over 11.5 PTS6 vs 11.5shots didn't fall — the read held upHoward played just 12 minutes and shot 2-for-5 from the field, combining for only 6 points well short of the 11.5 target; limited run and inefficient scoring made the over impossible to hit.
- Natasha Howard Over 10.5 PTS6 vs 10.5shots didn't fall — the read held upHoward played just 12 minutes and shot 2-for-5 from the field, limiting her to 6 points well short of the 10.5 line; the minimal playing time and modest usage rate (27%) prevented her from accumulating scoring opportunities.
- Natasha Howard Over 9.5 PTS6 vs 9.5no clean explanationHoward logged just 12 minutes and converted only 2 of 5 field-goal attempts (40% FG), falling 3.5 points short of the over despite a decent efficiency rate; limited playing time was the primary constraint, as she couldn't generate enough volume to reach double figures.
09/2128–2850%−5.64u2 games
ATL @ NYL19–25−9.93u
- Isobel Borlase Over 4.5 PTS0 vs 4.5game script — blowout or foul trouble
- Leonie Fiebich Over 7.5 PTS1 vs 7.5no clean explanation
- Han Xu Over 5.5 PTS2 vs 5.5game script — blowout or foul trouble
- Sabrina Ionescu Under 14.5 PTS15 vs 14.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held up
- Breanna Stewart Under 20.5 PTS27 vs 20.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Leonie Fiebich Over 6.5 PTS1 vs 6.5no clean explanation
DAL @ PHO9–3+4.29u
- Jessica Shepard Under 9.5 REB19 vs 9.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Alyssa Thomas Under 14.5 PTS15 vs 14.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held up
- Arike Ogunbowale Over 14.5 PTS7 vs 14.5no clean explanation
09/2023–2053%−1.29u2 games
POR @ LAS1–3−2.18u
- Nneka Ogwumike Under 19.5 PTS20 vs 19.5 — missed by a hairpaid over the fair number
- Ariel Atkins Under 6.5 PTS14 vs 6.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Ariel Atkins Under 7.5 PTS14 vs 7.5shots didn't fall — the read held upAtkins was remarkably efficient, converting 5 of 7 from the field (71%) with perfect 3-for-3 free-throw shooting to nearly double the betting line despite playing just 20 minutes. Her elite 84% true shooting and hot hand from the floor—particularly from inside the arc—overcame the limited minutes that would typically support an under bet.
SEA @ LVA22–17+0.89u
- Awa Fam Over 0.5 3PM0 vs 0.5no clean explanation
- Jade Melbourne Over 0.5 3PM0 vs 0.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Chelsea Gray Under 10.5 PTS15 vs 10.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Natisha Hiedeman Over 9.5 PTS4 vs 9.5no clean explanation
- A'ja Wilson Under 26.5 PTS30 vs 26.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held up
- Flau'jae Johnson Under 18.5 PTS29 vs 18.5no clean explanation
09/1927–2453%−0.20u2 games
CHI @ ATL5–10−5.98u
- Allisha Gray Over 3.5 REB3 vs 3.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held up
- Kamilla Cardoso Over 13.5 PTS11 vs 13.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Angel Reese Over 12.5 REB10 vs 12.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Naz Hillmon Over 4.5 REB4 vs 4.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held upHillmon fell one rebound short despite playing 19 minutes, hampered by dismal 0-5 shooting that likely limited her interior activity and offensive rebounding opportunities. Her 13% usage rate suggests limited involvement in the offense, reducing the number of possessions and second-chance situations that typically generate rebound volume.
- Naz Hillmon Over 7.5 PTS2 vs 7.5shots didn't fall — the read held upHillmon shot 0-for-5 from the field and generated only 13% usage in 19 minutes, leaving her entirely dependent on free throws for scoring and unable to reach 8 points. Her 17% true shooting percentage reflects a near-complete offensive drought that rendered the over unplayable.
- Kamilla Cardoso Over 11.5 PTS11 vs 11.5 — missed by a hairno clean explanationCardoso's efficient 74% TS on 24% usage fell just short as she scored exactly 11 points in 19 minutes, missing the mark by a single point despite a strong 5-7 shooting night. Limited run and conservative offensive touches in a game that didn't require high volume from her prevented the slight scoring bump needed to clear 11.5.
SEA @ GSV22–14+5.78u
- Kaila Charles Under 6.5 REB12 vs 6.5paid over the fair number
- Kaila Charles Under 5.5 REB12 vs 5.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Veronica Burton Over 9.5 PTS9 vs 9.5 — missed by a hairno clean explanation
- Kaila Charles Under 8.5 PTS16 vs 8.5no clean explanation
- Tiffany Hayes Under 4.5 AST6 vs 4.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Kaila Charles Under 10.5 PTS16 vs 10.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
09/1821–24 ·4 void47%−8.22u3 games
POR @ GSV9–11−4.05u
- Kaila Charles Under 5.5 REB6 vs 5.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held up
- Nyadiew Puoch Under 7.5 PTS11 vs 7.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Carla Leite Over 14.5 PTS12 vs 14.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Megan DiLeo Over 13.5 PTS8 vs 13.5no clean explanation
- Megan DiLeo Over 12.5 PTS8 vs 12.5no clean explanation
- Kayla Thornton Under 10.5 PTS13 vs 10.5paid over the fair numberThornton exceeded the under despite modest efficiency (4-10 FG), hitting 3-of-8 from three to reach 13 points in 25 minutes with elevated usage at 23%, relying on volume rather than shooting accuracy to push past the 10.5 line.
NYL @ MIN5–6−2.16u
- Kayla McBride Over 2.5 3PM2 vs 2.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Natasha Howard Over 11.5 PTS11 vs 11.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held up
- Leonie Fiebich Over 9.5 PTS3 vs 9.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Olivia Miles Over 1.5 3PM0 vs 1.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Courtney Williams Over 3.5 AST2 vs 3.5shots didn't fall — the read held upWilliams played 29 minutes with low usage (19%) in a blowout loss, recording only 2 assists despite 5 rebounds, suggesting limited offensive flow and playmaking opportunities in a game that didn't require sustained ball movement. Five fouls also may have constrained her aggression late, limiting her ability to generate additional assists.
- Breanna Stewart Under 8.5 REB10 vs 8.5shots didn't fall — the read held upStewart grabbed two boards beyond the line in 38 full minutes of action, capitalizing on her team's offensive rebounding opportunities in a blowout win (+13). Her elite efficiency (58% TS) and high usage kept her on the floor throughout, providing extra chances to clean the glass.
IND @ TOR7–7 ·4 void−2.01u
- Laura Juskaite Over 4.5 REB3 vs 4.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Isabelle Harrison Under 14.5 PTS16 vs 14.5 — missed by a hairpaid over the fair number
- Makayla Timpson Over 7.5 PTS4 vs 7.5no clean explanation
- Caitlin Clark Over 2.5 3PM2 vs 2.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Laura Juskaite Under 12.5 PTS22 vs 12.5shots didn't fall — the read held upJuskaite nearly doubled the 12.5 projection by shooting an efficient 8-15 from the field (53%) with strong free-throw conversion (4-5), combining volume and accuracy to reach 22 points in 30 minutes of heavy usage (28%).
- Kiki Rice Under 3.5 REB6 vs 3.5no clean explanationRice doubled her rebounding projection with 6 boards in 29 minutes, benefiting from elevated usage (34%) and activity that extended beyond her typical scoring role in a competitive game.
09/1737–3154%−2.35u5 games
CON @ ATL6–14−8.08u
- Angel Reese Over 12.5 REB10 vs 12.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- DeWanna Bonner Over 0.5 3PM0 vs 0.5no clean explanation
- Jordin Canada Over 11.5 PTS5 vs 11.5no clean explanation
- Allisha Gray Over 1.5 3PM0 vs 1.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Allisha Gray Over 18.5 PTS10 vs 18.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Jordin Canada Over 0.5 3PM0 vs 0.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
WAS @ CHI8–5+0.11u
- Kiki Iriafen Under 17.5 PTS18 vs 17.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held up
- Michaela Onyenwere Under 9.5 PTS12 vs 9.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Kamilla Cardoso Over 14.5 PTS10 vs 14.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Kamilla Cardoso Over 13.5 PTS10 vs 13.5no clean explanationCardoso's 10 points fell short of 13.5 despite solid volume (11 FG attempts), as she converted just 5 shots (45% FG) and took zero free throws in 23 minutes—a below-average efficiency night that couldn't overcome her limited offensive output. Four fouls in limited minutes also likely restricted her aggressive play late in the game.
- Kamilla Cardoso Over 12.5 PTS10 vs 12.5paid over the fair numberCardoso fell short of 12.5 despite solid volume (11 FG attempts), hampered by poor efficiency at 45.5% TS and zero free-throw attempts that limited her scoring upside. Foul trouble (6 PF in 23 minutes) likely curtailed her aggression and playing time in a blowout loss.
LVA @ SEA7–5+0.82u
- Awa Fam Under 6.5 REB9 vs 6.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- A'ja Wilson Under 25.5 PTS29 vs 25.5 — missed by a hairno clean explanation
- Dominique Malonga Over 8.5 REB6 vs 8.5no clean explanation
- A'ja Wilson Under 26.5 PTS29 vs 26.5 — missed by a hairpaid over the fair numberWilson's perfect 10-10 free-throw shooting and elite 69% two-point conversion (8-of-11) powered her to 29 points despite modest usage, as her 83% true shooting easily cleared the 26.5 line. She stayed out of foul trouble with just 3 PF in 29 minutes, allowing her to maintain high-efficiency offense throughout the game.
- Chelsea Gray Under 3.5 REB9 vs 3.5shots didn't fall — the read held upGray crashed the glass hard despite minimal offensive involvement, pulling down 9 rebounds in 26 minutes—more than double the projected total—as a primary rebounder in a game where Las Vegas controlled pace and rebounding opportunities.
PHO @ POR4–2+1.07u
- Alyssa Thomas Under 14.5 PTS18 vs 14.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Alyssa Thomas Under 15.5 PTS18 vs 15.5shots didn't fall — the read held upThomas torched the under with efficient inside scoring, converting 6 of 8 from the field (75%) while getting to the free-throw line 10 times in 31 minutes, offsetting her zero three-pointers with dominant paint production.
LAS @ DAL12–5+3.74u
- Maddy Siegrist Under 7.5 PTS12 vs 7.5paid over the fair number
- Jessica Shepard Under 10.5 REB11 vs 10.5 — missed by a hairno clean explanationShepard grabbed 11 boards in 28 minutes, just clearing the number despite modest 22% usage, as her team's +18 margin and defensive rebounding opportunities kept her in high-volume rebound situations.
- Rae Burrell Over 14.5 PTS12 vs 14.5paid over the fair numberBurrell shot just 5-14 from the field (36%) and 1-4 from three despite 24 minutes and 27% usage, falling two points short of the 14.5 line. Her inefficient shooting night, combined with limited free-throw attempts (1-1), prevented her from reaching the scoring threshold.
- Jessica Shepard Under 5.5 AST12 vs 5.5shots didn't fall — the read held upShepard's playmaking was the engine of her impact despite modest scoring, dishing 12 assists on 28 minutes of floor time while maintaining efficiency (55% TS%) and recording a team-leading +18, nearly doubling the 5.5 assist line. Her ball movement and high-volume involvement in the offense—facilitated by low foul trouble (2 PF)—drove her well above the projection.
- Maddy Siegrist Under 8.5 PTS12 vs 8.5paid over the fair numberSiegrist converted 5 of 10 from the field (50% FG) and 2 of 5 from three for 12 points in 23 minutes, exceeding the 8.5-point line through efficient shooting rather than elevated usage (17%). She stayed out of foul trouble with only 3 personal fouls, allowing her to play her typical role without restriction.
08/309–1341%−5.46u2 games
GSV @ POR7–10−3.93u
- Kayla Thornton Under 1.5 3PM3 vs 1.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Kaila Charles Under 8.5 PTS11 vs 8.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Kayla Thornton Under 7.5 PTS17 vs 7.5shots didn't fall — the read held upThornton torched the under with elite efficiency, shooting 5-8 from the field and 3-5 from three while posting a 87% true shooting percentage in 25 minutes—nearly double the scoring needed to clear 7.5 points on just 19% usage.
- Megan DiLeo Over 13.5 PTS12 vs 13.5 — missed by a hairpaid over the fair numberDiLeo fell just short despite efficient shooting (60% FG), limited by 24 minutes of run and a 23% usage rate in a game where the team's offensive load was distributed elsewhere. One made three-pointer instead of going 0-for-3 from deep would have cleared the line.
- Kayla Thornton Under 8.5 PTS17 vs 8.5shots didn't fall — the read held upThornton's efficient 5-8 shooting night (62.5% FG, 60% from three) easily doubled the expected output, and her 25 minutes of run time at 19% usage provided the volume to cash in on her hot shooting from the field and foul line (4-4 FT).
- Kiah Stokes Over 5.5 REB1 vs 5.5shots didn't fall — the read held upStokes was limited to just 12 minutes and recorded only 1 rebound, as her minimal playing time and 0% usage rate prevented her from approaching the 5.5 rebound threshold.
CON @ DAL2–3−1.53u
- Awak Kuier Over 9.5 PTS4 vs 9.5no clean explanation
- Jessica Shepard Under 15.5 PTS17 vs 15.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held up
- Awak Kuier Over 8.5 PTS4 vs 8.5no clean explanationKuier's 4 points fell well short of the 8.5-point line due to minimal offensive involvement—she posted just 7% usage and took only 2 field-goal attempts despite playing 20 minutes. Though she was efficient when she did shoot (50% FG, 100% FT), the volume simply wasn't there to reach the over.
08/2923–6 ·4 void79%+10.66u1 game
TOR @ PHO23–6 ·4 void+10.66u
- Isabelle Harrison Under 15.5 PTS16 vs 15.5 — missed by a hairno clean explanation
- Natasha Mack Under 7.5 REB8 vs 7.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held up
- Isabelle Harrison Under 14.5 PTS16 vs 14.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held up
- Laura Juskaite Over 4.5 REB4 vs 4.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held up
- Alyssa Thomas Over 7.5 REB6 vs 7.5shots didn't fall — the read held upThomas fell one rebound short despite solid floor time (22 min), held back by low volume—her 14% usage and pass-first role (12 assists) limited her opportunities on the glass in a blowout win (+38).
- Kiki Rice Under 3.5 REB4 vs 3.5 — missed by a hairno clean explanationRice grabbed 4 rebounds in 28 minutes, one more than the 3.5 line, benefiting from elevated usage (32%) and shot volume (11 FG attempts) that kept her active on the glass despite a blowout loss.
08/2852–19 ·3 void73%+25.12u4 games
TOR @ LVA7–5 ·3 void+0.82u
- Kiki Rice Over 14.5 PTS10 vs 14.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Temi Fagbenle Under 4.5 REB6 vs 4.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Kia Nurse Under 9.5 PTS12 vs 9.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Isabelle Harrison Under 14.5 PTS15 vs 14.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held up
- Isabelle Harrison Over 7.5 REB7 vs 7.5 — missed by a hairno clean explanationHarrison came up one rebound short despite solid 24 minutes and high usage (36%), held back by limited opportunities on the glass—she grabbed only 7 boards while shooting just 5-for-14 from the field in a game where her team was outrebounded.
CON @ IND7–2+3.77u
- Saniya Rivers Under 8.5 PTS9 vs 8.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held up
- Caitlin Clark Under 4.5 REB5 vs 4.5 — missed by a hairno clean explanationClark grabbed one more rebound than the line allowed, finishing with 5 boards in 34 minutes of heavy usage (34%) while playing efficiently and staying out of foul trouble (4 PF), which kept her on the floor and in position to crash the glass.
POR @ ATL10–3+5.89u
- Bridget Carleton Over 15.5 PTS4 vs 15.5no clean explanation
- Bridget Carleton Over 14.5 PTS4 vs 14.5shots didn't fall — the read held upCarleton was ice-cold from the field, shooting just 1-6 (17%) with 0-3 from three despite playing 33 minutes, and her 10% usage rate left her with minimal scoring opportunities in the game. Even with free throws, she could only muster 4 points—well short of 14.5—on a historically poor 29% true shooting night.
- Carla Leite Under 2.5 REB3 vs 2.5no clean explanationLeite grabbed 3 rebounds in 29 minutes, just one more than the under's threshold, as her elite scoring efficiency (9-13 FG, 88% TS) kept her heavily involved on offense rather than crashing the glass.
WAS @ LAS28–9+14.63u
- Betnijah Laney-Hamilton Under 5.5 PTS6 vs 5.5 — missed by a hairno clean explanation
- Dearica Hamby Over 12.5 PTS9 vs 12.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Nneka Ogwumike Over 7.5 REB4 vs 7.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Lauren Betts Over 4.5 REB4 vs 4.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held up
- Kiki Iriafen Over 14.5 PTS12 vs 14.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Kiki Iriafen Over 12.5 PTS12 vs 12.5 — missed by a hairno clean explanation
08/2713–2237%−12.38u2 games
GSV @ NYL5–14−10.23u
- Pauline Astier Over 7.5 PTS4 vs 7.5paid over the fair number
- Gabby Williams Under 14.5 PTS16 vs 14.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held up
- Sabrina Ionescu Over 15.5 PTS7 vs 15.5paid over the fair number
- Janelle Salaun Over 12.5 PTS7 vs 12.5no clean explanation
- Veronica Burton Over 12.5 PTS8 vs 12.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Leonie Fiebich Over 9.5 PTS3 vs 9.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
WAS @ PHO8–8−2.15u
- Natasha Mack Under 7.5 REB9 vs 7.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Georgia Amoore Under 7.5 PTS25 vs 7.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Natasha Mack Under 9.5 PTS10 vs 9.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held up
- Natasha Mack Under 8.5 REB9 vs 8.5 — missed by a hairno clean explanation
- Alyssa Thomas Over 13.5 PTS4 vs 13.5no clean explanationThomas was held to just 1-5 from the field (20% FG) despite playing 32 minutes, rendering her 11% usage rate irrelevant; the offensive inefficiency—compounded by zero 3-pointers—left her stranded well short of 13.5 points.
- Betnijah Laney-Hamilton Under 5.5 PTS6 vs 5.5 — missed by a hairno clean explanation
08/2627–1860%+4.27u2 games
TOR @ SEA8–7−0.38u
- Temi Fagbenle Under 4.5 REB5 vs 4.5 — missed by a hairno clean explanation
- Temi Fagbenle Under 7.5 PTS8 vs 7.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held up
- Kiki Rice Under 16.5 PTS24 vs 16.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Isabelle Harrison Under 15.5 PTS17 vs 15.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held upHarrison exceeded the under on volume rather than efficiency, taking 16 shots across 32 minutes (27% usage) and converting 7-of-10 free throws to reach 17 points despite shooting just 31% from the field and 0-for-4 from three. Her elevated free-throw attempts (10 FT) and heavy workload proved enough to clear 15.5 despite poor overall shooting splits.
- Isabelle Harrison Under 14.5 PTS17 vs 14.5shots didn't fall — the read held upHarrison converted 7 of 10 free throws (70%) to reach 17 points despite shooting just 31% from the field, leaning heavily on free-throw volume to exceed the 14.5-point line. Her 32 minutes and 27% usage rate provided enough offensive opportunities for her to push over despite poor overall efficiency.
- Jade Melbourne Under 6.5 AST7 vs 6.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held upMelbourne pushed one assist over the line despite modest usage (19%), as she operated efficiently in 33 minutes and found cutters consistently in a game flow that favored ball movement with her low turnover rate (2 TOs).
GSV @ CON19–11+4.65u
- Veronica Burton Over 12.5 PTS12 vs 12.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held up
- Charlisse Leger-Walker Under 8.5 PTS17 vs 8.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Gabby Williams Over 11.5 PTS9 vs 11.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Tiffany Hayes Over 11.5 PTS5 vs 11.5game script — blowout or foul trouble
- Gabby Williams Over 2.5 REB2 vs 2.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Kennedy Burke Over 0.5 3PM0 vs 0.5no clean explanation
08/2515–3033%−18.31u3 games
WAS @ PHO7–15−9.33u
- Natasha Mack Under 7.5 PTS19 vs 7.5paid over the fair number
- Kelsey Plum Over 15.5 PTS10 vs 15.5no clean explanation
- Georgia Amoore Under 6.5 PTS7 vs 6.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held up
- Michaela Onyenwere Under 9.5 PTS10 vs 9.5 — missed by a hairno clean explanation
- Alyssa Thomas Over 8.5 REB6 vs 8.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Kelsey Plum Over 13.5 PTS10 vs 13.5shots didn't fall — the read held upPlum's 10 points fell short of 13.5 as she shot just 4-12 FG (33%) in limited 17-minute action, and a five-foul performance (matching her minutes) likely kept her off the floor down the stretch in what became a blowout (-18 +/-).
POR @ DAL2–8−6.33u
- Bridget Carleton Over 15.5 PTS14 vs 15.5 — missed by a hairpaid over the fair number
- Jessica Shepard Under 14.5 PTS21 vs 14.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Bridget Carleton Over 2.5 3PM2 vs 2.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Bridget Carleton Over 14.5 PTS14 vs 14.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held up
- Bridget Carleton Over 4.5 REB2 vs 4.5shots didn't fall — the read held upCarleton played 30 minutes with heavy offensive usage (22%) but failed to crash the glass, grabbing just 2 rebounds despite taking 13 shots—a clear departure from her rebounding role that left the over well short.
- Paige Bueckers Under 6.5 AST11 vs 6.5shots didn't fall — the read held upBueckers nearly doubled the assist line with 11 dimes, thriving in a game where UConn dominated (+26) and she played all 33 available minutes without foul trouble, creating easy looks for teammates in a blowout environment.
CHI @ CON6–7−2.66u
- Kamilla Cardoso Under 16.5 PTS24 vs 16.5paid over the fair number
- Natasha Cloud Over 3.5 REB0 vs 3.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Sydney Taylor Over 13.5 PTS4 vs 13.5no clean explanation
- Natasha Cloud Over 12.5 PTS3 vs 12.5paid over the fair number
- Sydney Taylor Over 1.5 3PM0 vs 1.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Saniya Rivers Under 4.5 AST5 vs 4.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held upRivers pushed over the line with exactly 5 assists despite shooting just 3-10 and posting poor efficiency (35% TS), relying on playmaking volume rather than scoring to stay productive in 29 minutes.
08/2417–1849%−4.33u2 games
GSV @ MIN10–11−2.89u
- Kayla McBride Over 2.5 3PM2 vs 2.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Olivia Miles Over 1.5 3PM1 vs 1.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Kayla McBride Over 15.5 PTS12 vs 15.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Cecilia Zandalasini Over 1.5 AST1 vs 1.5no clean explanationZandalasini's playmaking dried up despite heavy usage (30%) and 30 minutes; she generated just 1 assist while shouldering a scoring load (18 pts on 7-17 FG), suggesting she operated primarily as a scorer rather than a facilitator in this game. Four personal fouls also may have limited her ability to push tempo and create in transition.
- Maya Caldwell Under 5.5 PTS9 vs 5.5paid over the fair numberCaldwell's 3-for-5 three-point shooting (60%) and near-perfect 90% true shooting overcame modest 25 minutes and 11% usage, as efficient scoring made the under vulnerable to even modest volume. She needed just 9 points to bust a 5.5 line, and elite efficiency made that threshold easier to clear than expected.
- Kayla McBride Under 2.5 REB4 vs 2.5no clean explanationMcBride grabbed 4 boards despite a poor 2-11 shooting night, staying on the floor for all 33 minutes and maintaining active rebounding work even as her offensive touches dried up. The volume was there to hit the over, and she delivered on the glass despite shooting just 18% from the field.
ATL @ LAS7–7−1.44u
- Dearica Hamby Over 5.5 REB3 vs 5.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Rhyne Howard Over 3.5 AST3 vs 3.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held up
- Rhyne Howard Over 18.5 PTS18 vs 18.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held up
- Erica Wheeler Over 3.5 AST3 vs 3.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held upWheeler came up one assist short despite playing 25 minutes, finishing with just 3 dimes as her offensive inefficiency (1-6 FG, 15% usage) limited her ability to generate ball movement and create scoring opportunities off the bench.
- Erica Wheeler Over 8.5 PTS2 vs 8.5shots didn't fall — the read held upWheeler's ice-cold 1-6 shooting (17% TS) left her well short despite 25 minutes of run, as she managed just 2 points on 15% usage in a game where she couldn't find her rhythm from the field.
- Erica Wheeler Over 7.5 PTS2 vs 7.5no clean explanationWheeler's abysmal 1-6 shooting (17% TS%) left her with just 2 points despite playing 25 minutes, as she couldn't convert opportunities in an efficient offensive system. The combination of poor shot selection and execution—missing all six attempts—made the 7.5-point line unreachable.
08/2340–1770%+16.94u3 games
WAS @ POR9–4+2.28u
- Bridget Carleton Over 2.5 3PM2 vs 2.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Georgia Amoore Under 6.5 PTS13 vs 6.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Bridget Carleton Over 4.5 REB4 vs 4.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held upCarleton fell one rebound short despite heavy volume (36 min, 18% usage), as her elite offensive efficiency (64% TS%, 8-14 FG) kept her ball-dominant in a way that limited rebounding opportunities relative to her playing time.
- Georgia Amoore Under 7.5 PTS13 vs 7.5no clean explanation
LVA @ TOR12–4+6.68u
- Jackie Young Over 3.5 REB3 vs 3.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held up
- NaLyssa Smith Over 10.5 PTS8 vs 10.5no clean explanation
- Julie Allemand Over 4.5 AST2 vs 4.5no clean explanationAllemand's limited 15-minute run and 16% usage rate left her well short of assist opportunities, while 2 turnovers in that brief window further dampened her playmaking impact.
- NaLyssa Smith Over 9.5 PTS8 vs 9.5no clean explanation
IND @ CHI19–9+7.98u
- Sydney Taylor Over 15.5 PTS4 vs 15.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Lexie Hull Under 4.5 PTS14 vs 4.5paid over the fair number
- Sydney Taylor Over 16.5 PTS4 vs 16.5no clean explanation
- Caitlin Clark Under 24.5 PTS37 vs 24.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Lexie Hull Under 5.5 PTS14 vs 5.5paid over the fair number
- Monique Billings Under 4.5 REB5 vs 4.5 — missed by a hairno clean explanationBillings grabbed exactly 5 rebounds in 19 minutes, just clearing the 4.5 bar despite modest offensive involvement (16% usage); she was efficient on the glass relative to her limited shot diet and playing time.
08/2229–1467%+9.88u3 games
IND @ NYL10–6+2.25u
- Kelsey Mitchell Over 26.5 PTS25 vs 26.5 — missed by a hairno clean explanation
- Sabrina Ionescu Over 4.5 AST4 vs 4.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held up
- Caitlin Clark Over 21.5 PTS21 vs 21.5 — missed by a hairpaid over the fair number
- Kelsey Mitchell Over 25.5 PTS25 vs 25.5 — missed by a hairpaid over the fair numberMitchell fell one point short despite efficient shooting (71% TS on 30% usage), unable to generate enough volume or free-throw attempts (only 6 FTA) to push past 25.5 in her 33 minutes. Her 9-15 FG pace would have required significantly more shot attempts or trips to the line to clear the number.
- Marine Johannes Over 8.5 PTS6 vs 8.5no clean explanation
- Marine Johannes Over 7.5 PTS6 vs 7.5no clean explanation
CON @ LAS11–6+3.16u
- Saniya Rivers Under 8.5 PTS14 vs 8.5no clean explanation
- Nneka Ogwumike Over 2.5 AST1 vs 2.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Leila Lacan Under 11.5 PTS13 vs 11.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held upLacan's 13 points came despite poor efficiency (6-14 FG, 45% TS), as her 29 minutes and 21% usage rate gave her enough volume to clear the 11.5 threshold in a game where she stayed out of foul trouble with just one personal.
- Rae Burrell Over 2.5 AST2 vs 2.5shots didn't fall — the read held upBurrell was a scorer, not a facilitator tonight—she shot efficiently (8-13 FG) and took 28% usage but distributed just 2 assists in 30 minutes, staying in attack mode rather than playmaking. Three turnovers and a ball-dominant role left little room for the helper column despite her scoring efficiency.
- Cameron Brink Over 4.5 REB1 vs 4.5shots didn't fall — the read held upBrink played just 12 minutes and fouled out with 6 PF, severely limiting her opportunity to crash the boards despite efficient scoring; she grabbed only 1 rebound in that shortened run.
- Leila Lacan Under 12.5 PTS13 vs 12.5 — missed by a hairno clean explanationLacan's 29 minutes of court time and 21% usage rate gave her enough opportunities to edge past the line, converting 6 of 14 field-goal attempts despite a 45% true shooting percentage that was below her season average.
ATL @ PHO8–2+4.47u
- Alyssa Thomas Over 13.5 PTS11 vs 13.5no clean explanation
- Angel Reese Over 2.5 AST2 vs 2.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
08/2135–2459%+6.55u3 games
POR @ TOR5–8−4.04u
- Brittney Sykes Over 15.5 PTS0 vs 15.5game script — blowout or foul trouble
- Brittney Sykes Over 14.5 PTS0 vs 14.5game script — blowout or foul trouble
- Bridget Carleton Over 5.5 REB4 vs 5.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Julie Allemand Over 5.5 PTS5 vs 5.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held up
- Brittney Sykes Over 12.5 PTS0 vs 12.5game script — blowout or foul trouble
- Brittney Sykes Over 13.5 PTS0 vs 13.5game script — blowout or foul troubleSykes played just 2 minutes with 1 personal foul, effectively sidelined early and unable to contribute on the scoresheet. With minimal court time and zero shot attempts, she couldn't approach the 13.5-point threshold despite the 30% usage rate context.
GSV @ CHI11–8+2.16u
- Veronica Burton Over 12.5 PTS11 vs 12.5 — missed by a hairno clean explanation
- Kamilla Cardoso Over 14.5 PTS14 vs 14.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held up
- Azura Stevens Over 9.5 PTS4 vs 9.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Kayla Thornton Over 7.5 PTS0 vs 7.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Sydney Taylor Over 14.5 PTS14 vs 14.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held up
- Courtney Vandersloot Over 2.5 REB1 vs 2.5shots didn't fall — the read held upVandersloot grabbed just 1 rebound despite playing 29 minutes, well below the 2.5 line—a stark departure from her usual rebounding activity and likely attributable to limited offensive rebounding opportunities and her primary role as a floor-running guard rather than a glass-cleaner.
MIN @ WAS19–8+8.43u
- Natasha Howard Under 12.5 PTS21 vs 12.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Nia Coffey Under 7.5 PTS8 vs 7.5 — missed by a hairno clean explanation
- Shakira Austin Over 18.5 PTS17 vs 18.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held up
- Nia Coffey Under 6.5 PTS8 vs 6.5no clean explanation
- Lauren Betts Over 4.5 REB1 vs 4.5shots didn't fall — the read held upBetts played only 13 minutes and grabbed just 1 rebound, falling 4 short of the over; limited run and low usage (10%) kept her well below the 4.5 threshold despite the playing time she did receive.
- Olivia Miles Over 3.5 REB3 vs 3.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held upMiles fell one board short despite heavy offensive involvement (42% usage, 29 min), as her scoring creation (24 pts, 7 ast) came primarily through perimeter shooting rather than interior activity, and five personal fouls limited her ability to crash the glass aggressively.
08/203–925%−6.91u1 game
ATL @ LAS3–9−6.91u
- Naz Hillmon Under 9.5 PTS14 vs 9.5no clean explanation
- Monique Akoa Makani Over 6.5 PTS3 vs 6.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Erica Wheeler Over 8.5 PTS8 vs 8.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held up
- Dearica Hamby Over 14.5 PTS8 vs 14.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Rae Burrell Over 15.5 PTS12 vs 15.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Allisha Gray Over 18.5 PTS13 vs 18.5paid over the fair number
Each eligible priced formula signal is normalized to a flat 1-unit outcome at its recorded price. Voids are excluded from the record, hit rate, and units. Open a day for the per-game split and loss review.