← form_wnba · WNBA
2026-07-19
Day by day
these are the form_wnba picks — the book grading is currently serving, and the same set listed in the sheet below. The season figure in the header bar is that same book over the whole season; this is a recent window of it.
20–17 · 54% · −0.80u across the last 1 days
07/1920–1754%−0.80u3 games
LAS @ DAL3–5−2.38u
- Nneka Ogwumike Over 17.5 PTS17 vs 17.5 — missed by a hairno clean explanation
- Arike Ogunbowale Under 13.5 PTS20 vs 13.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Jessica Shepard Under 5.5 AST6 vs 5.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held up
- Jessica Shepard Over 14.5 PTS11 vs 14.5no clean explanation
- Arike Ogunbowale Under 14.5 PTS20 vs 14.5shots didn't fall — the read held upOgunbowale torched the under by going 7-13 from the field (54% FG) and 5-6 from the free-throw line while seeing a healthy 31 minutes of run, generating 20 points on efficient 64% true shooting that far exceeded her typical scoring pace.
CON @ PHO6–6−1.49u
- Charlisse Leger-Walker Over 7.5 PTS5 vs 7.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Natasha Mack Over 6.5 PTS4 vs 6.5paid over the fair number
- Kahleah Copper Over 20.5 PTS18 vs 20.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held up
- Monique Akoa Makani Under 2.5 REB6 vs 2.5shots didn't fall — the read held upMakani stayed on the floor for a full 32 minutes and crashed the glass aggressively, pulling down 6 rebounds despite modest offensive touches—more than double the 2.5-rebound line. Her extended playing time and activity on the boards in a blowout win (+17) meant higher rebounding volume than the projection accounted for.
- Natasha Mack Over 6.5 REB5 vs 6.5shots didn't fall — the read held upMack came up one rebound short despite solid efficiency, held back by just 20 minutes of playing time in a blowout where her team didn't need extended minutes.
- Kahleah Copper Under 2.5 AST4 vs 2.5no clean explanationCopper's elevated 35 minutes and 30% usage rate—well above typical for her—gave her more opportunities to facilitate, and she converted those chances with 4 assists despite a modest 5-14 shooting night. The extended run in a competitive game pushed her over the 2.5 threshold.
CHI @ ATL11–6+3.08u
- Allisha Gray Under 19.5 PTS29 vs 19.5shots didn't fall — the read held upGray's elite efficiency—87% true shooting on 7-11 shooting and 11-13 from the line—propelled her well past 19.5 despite moderate 21% usage, as she converted at an unusually high rate in 35 minutes of action.
- Kamilla Cardoso Over 7.5 REB4 vs 7.5paid over the fair numberCardoso came up well short at just 4 rebounds despite efficient scoring (6-9 FG), limited by only 24 minutes played and a quiet night on the glass that never materialized despite her inside presence. The under-25 minute workload was the primary culprit, preventing her from accumulating the volume needed to reach 7.5 boards.
- Brionna Jones Over 6.5 PTS6 vs 6.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held upJones shot just 1-6 from the field (17%) and played only 15 minutes, limiting her scoring despite converting all four free throws. The poor field-goal efficiency and restricted minutes prevented her from reaching the 7-point threshold needed to cash the over.
- Brionna Jones Over 7.5 PTS6 vs 7.5shots didn't fall — the read held upJones shot just 1-for-6 from the field (17% FG) despite 15 minutes of run, and while she converted all four free throws, the poor field-goal efficiency left her one point short of the over.
- Allisha Gray Under 3.5 REB6 vs 3.5shots didn't fall — the read held upGray's elite shooting night (7-11 FG, 4-6 3PT, 11-13 FT) kept her on the floor for a game-high 35 minutes, allowing her to crash the glass more opportunistically than her modest 21% usage rate might suggest. She secured 6 boards despite modest volume, exceeding the under by one rebound in a high-efficiency performance.
- Sydney Taylor Under 2.5 REB3 vs 2.5no clean explanationTaylor grabbed exactly 3 rebounds in 28 minutes—one more than the 2.5 line required—despite modest usage (28%) and a balanced box score that didn't suggest heavy offensive load or extended possessions. The under missed by the smallest margin; she needed to stay at 2 or fewer boards.
Flat 1 unit per priced bet, settled at the price we posted. Voids are not bets — excluded from the record, the hit rate and the units. Open a day for the per-game split and why each loss lost.