← form_wnba · WNBA
2026-07-20
Day by day
these are the form_wnba picks — the book grading is currently serving, and the same set listed in the sheet below. The season figure in the header bar is that same book over the whole season; this is a recent window of it.
48–22 · 69% · +16.49u across the last 1 days
07/2048–2269%+16.49u4 games
NYL @ DAL16–11+1.08u
- Arike Ogunbowale Under 2.5 3PM3 vs 2.5no clean explanation
- Awak Kuier Under 6.5 PTS10 vs 6.5no clean explanation
- Pauline Astier Over 2.5 AST1 vs 2.5no clean explanationAstier's playmaking dried up despite 25 minutes of run, recording just 1 assist while turning the ball over once and posting a team-worst -7 rating. Her 20% usage rate and poor offensive efficiency (35% TS%) limited her ability to create for teammates in a game where the team struggled overall.
- Arike Ogunbowale Under 13.5 PTS29 vs 13.5no clean explanation
- Arike Ogunbowale Under 16.5 PTS29 vs 16.5no clean explanationOgunbowale's elite free-throw shooting (8-8) and high usage rate (37%) powered her well past the under, as she compensated for below-average field-goal efficiency (9-24 FG) by drawing fouls and staying on the court for 38 minutes in a competitive game. The combination of volume opportunities and perfect shooting from the line nearly doubled the betting line.
- Arike Ogunbowale Under 15.5 PTS29 vs 15.5no clean explanationOgunbowale nearly doubled the 15.5 line by dominating usage at 37% while staying efficient from three (3-5) and perfect from the free-throw line (8-8), combining volume with precision to reach 29 points across 38 minutes.
WAS @ GSV8–4+2.62u
- Sonia Citron Over 3.5 REB2 vs 3.5no clean explanation
- Veronica Burton Under 11.5 PTS12 vs 11.5 — missed by a hairno clean explanation
- Tiffany Hayes Over 5.5 PTS0 vs 5.5game script — blowout or foul trouble
- Sonia Citron Over 2.5 REB2 vs 2.5no clean explanationCitron fell one rebound short despite heavy usage (26%) and 32 minutes, limited by her role as a primary ball-handler (6 assists) in a game where the team controlled pace and she didn't crash the glass enough to reach 3 boards.
MIN @ SEA12–4+5.97u
- Jade Melbourne Over 7.5 PTS5 vs 7.5no clean explanation
- Natisha Hiedeman Over 14.5 PTS12 vs 14.5no clean explanation
- Courtney Williams Under 15.5 PTS21 vs 15.5no clean explanation
- Courtney Williams Under 16.5 PTS21 vs 16.5no clean explanationWilliams torched the under with efficient scoring, shooting 8-of-13 from the field (62%) and converting all four free throws to reach 21 points in 33 minutes. Her 71% true shooting and high-volume scoring night—despite a modest 21% usage rate—indicates she capitalized on premium looks and shot selection rather than heavy ball handling.
LVA @ TOR12–3+6.83u
- Marina Mabrey Over 21.5 PTS14 vs 21.5no clean explanation
- Marina Mabrey Over 2.5 3PM1 vs 2.5no clean explanation
- Laura Juskaite Over 3.5 REB3 vs 3.5 — missed by a hairno clean explanation
Flat 1 unit per priced bet, settled at the price we posted. Voids are not bets — excluded from the record, the hit rate and the units. Open a day for the per-game split and why each loss lost.