DIME
Get the picks

← form_wnba · WNBA

2026-07-22

Day by day

these are the form_wnba picks — the book grading is currently serving, and the same set listed in the sheet below. The season figure in the header bar is that same book over the whole season; this is a recent window of it.

52–39 · 57% · +3.42u across the last 1 days

07/2252–3957%+3.42u6 games

permalink to 2026-07-22 →

DAL @ POR3–9−6.43u
  • Arike Ogunbowale Under 15.5 PTS24 vs 15.5no clean explanation
  • Emily Engstler Over 5.5 REB1 vs 5.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
  • Emily Engstler Over 8.5 PTS6 vs 8.5no clean explanation
  • Carla Leite Over 15.5 PTS12 vs 15.5no clean explanation
  • Sarah Ashlee Barker Over 9.5 PTS2 vs 9.5game script — blowout or foul trouble
  • Arike Ogunbowale Under 16.5 PTS24 vs 16.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
CHI @ NYL4–7−3.90u
  • Kamilla Cardoso Over 13.5 PTS10 vs 13.5no clean explanation
  • Azura Stevens Over 12.5 PTS8 vs 12.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
  • Breanna Stewart Over 21.5 PTS20 vs 21.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held up
  • Kamilla Cardoso Over 7.5 REB5 vs 7.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
  • Kamilla Cardoso Over 12.5 PTS10 vs 12.5shots didn't fall — the read held upCardoso fell short despite getting 25 minutes and a healthy 22% usage rate, hampered by poor efficiency—she shot just 5-for-11 from the field and 0-for-0 from three while posting a 46% TS%, leaving her 2.5 points shy of the over. Five personal fouls also limited her effectiveness and may have caused the Bulls to manage her minutes or aggression down the stretch.
  • Azura Stevens Over 11.5 PTS8 vs 11.5shots didn't fall — the read held upStevens shot just 2-5 from the field despite playing 30 minutes, and her 13% usage rate—well below her typical offensive load—limited her scoring opportunities even though she stayed efficient at the line (4-4 FT).
PHO @ LAS9–9−1.44u
  • Monique Akoa Makani Under 10.5 PTS14 vs 10.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
  • Ariel Atkins Under 11.5 PTS15 vs 11.5no clean explanation
  • Nneka Ogwumike Over 17.5 PTS13 vs 17.5shots didn't fall — the read held upOgwumike's 4-10 FG efficiency (40%) fell short despite 30 minutes and solid free-throw shooting (4-4), as her 21% usage rate limited volume opportunities to reach the 17.5-point threshold.
  • Natasha Mack Over 5.5 REB3 vs 5.5no clean explanationMack fell short of 5.5 rebounds despite efficient scoring (5-8 FG), limited by just 15 minutes of playing time and finishing with only 3 boards—a shortfall driven by her reduced opportunity on the court rather than poor rebounding activity.
  • Natasha Mack Over 6.5 REB3 vs 6.5shots didn't fall — the read held upMack grabbed just 3 rebounds in 15 minutes of action, held well below her over line despite efficient scoring (5-8 FG); the limited floor time was the primary culprit in missing the rebound total.
  • Nneka Ogwumike Over 16.5 PTS13 vs 16.5no clean explanationOgwumike's inefficient 4-10 shooting (40% FG) combined with modest 21% usage limited her to 13 points despite playing 30 minutes. She stayed out of foul trouble (3 PF) and grabbed 13 boards, but simply didn't get enough shot attempts to reach the over.
LVA @ WAS7–3+2.40u
  • NaLyssa Smith Over 9.5 PTS4 vs 9.5no clean explanation
  • Shakira Austin Over 9.5 REB6 vs 9.5shots didn't fall — the read held upAustin's efficient 25-point night (10-18 FG) kept her on the floor for 29 minutes, but limited her rebounding opportunities—she grabbed just 6 boards despite a 57% true shooting rate, suggesting the game flow favored her scoring over crashing the glass.
  • Chelsea Gray Over 6.5 AST4 vs 6.5shots didn't fall — the read held upGray's playmaking was bottlenecked by limited offensive touches—she logged just 22% usage despite 37 minutes, finishing with only 4 assists well short of the 6.5 line. The low usage rate, despite efficient scoring (65% TS), left her without enough ball-handling opportunities to generate assists.
MIN @ SEA15–7+5.65u
  • Nia Coffey Under 6.5 PTS7 vs 6.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held up
  • Jade Melbourne Over 8.5 PTS4 vs 8.5no clean explanation
  • Olivia Miles Over 17.5 PTS13 vs 17.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
  • Natasha Howard Over 11.5 PTS11 vs 11.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held up
  • Natasha Howard Over 7.5 REB5 vs 7.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
  • Jade Melbourne Over 7.5 PTS4 vs 7.5no clean explanationMelbourne's 4 points fell short of the 7.5 line despite 28 minutes of floor time due to brutal 2-6 shooting (33% TS) and an 0-4 night from three, leaving her with minimal offensive impact despite high availability.
CON @ IND14–4+7.15u
  • Diamond Miller Under 9.5 PTS15 vs 9.5no clean explanation
  • Olivia Nelson-Ododa Over 6.5 REB1 vs 6.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
  • Aliyah Boston Over 0.5 3PM0 vs 0.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
  • Aliyah Boston Over 7.5 REB6 vs 7.5no clean explanationBoston's efficient 22-point night on 10-14 shooting came in just 20 minutes, limiting her board opportunities; she pulled down only 6 rebounds despite high usage, falling one short of the 7.5 line.

Flat 1 unit per priced bet, settled at the price we posted. Voids are not bets — excluded from the record, the hit rate and the units. Open a day for the per-game split and why each loss lost.