← form_wnba · WNBA
2026-07-31
Day by day
these are the form_wnba picks — the book grading is currently serving, and the same set listed in the sheet below. The season figure in the header bar is that same book over the whole season; this is a recent window of it.
21–21 · 50% · −3.52u across the last 1 days
07/3121–2150%−3.52u3 games
IND @ POR5–8−3.64u
- Emily Engstler Over 5.5 REB2 vs 5.5no clean explanation
- Emily Engstler Over 4.5 REB2 vs 4.5shots didn't fall — the read held upEngstler's rebounding dried up despite 28 minutes played, grabbing only 2 boards—well short of the 4.5 line—as her offensive usage (14%) kept her in a playmaking role rather than crashing the glass. A minus-15 rating suggests the team was outmatched in rebounding margin, limiting her opportunities on the glass.
- Bridget Carleton Over 3.5 REB3 vs 3.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held upCarleton came one rebound short despite playing 34 minutes and shooting efficiently (9-14 FG), as the game's pace and her 20% usage rate limited her opportunities on the glass in a low-possession contest. She picked up 3 fouls without fouling out, which may have caused her to play more cautiously defensively in the second half.
- Caitlin Clark Under 4.5 REB10 vs 4.5shots didn't fall — the read held upClark's aggressive offensive approach—26 points on 79% TS and 34 minutes—naturally created more rebounding opportunities, and she crashed the glass hard enough to pull down 10 boards, more than double the under threshold. Her elite efficiency and high volume usage meant she stayed on the floor and in the action for extended stretches, driving the rebounding output well past expectations.
- Caitlin Clark Under 8.5 AST10 vs 8.5no clean explanationClark's elite efficiency (79% TS, 14-17 FT) and high volume (34 min, 25% usage) created numerous scoring opportunities that also opened passing lanes, allowing her to reach double-digit assists despite moderate turnover rate (4 TO). The +23 rating reflected her dominance in a blowout, where she had more freedom to distribute without defensive pressure.
- Aliyah Boston Under 8.5 REB9 vs 8.5 — missed by a hairno clean explanationBoston grabbed one more board than the line anticipated, finishing with 9 rebounds across 30 minutes of play—her consistent interior presence and 6 assists suggesting strong overall involvement despite modest 20% usage.
DAL @ WAS6–6−1.79u
- Azzi Fudd Over 12.5 PTS8 vs 12.5no clean explanation
- Jessica Shepard Over 13.5 PTS8 vs 13.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Lauren Betts Over 5.5 PTS3 vs 5.5no clean explanation
- Azzi Fudd Over 1.5 AST0 vs 1.5shots didn't fall — the read held upFudd recorded zero assists despite 33 minutes and 18% usage, as she was largely a scorer-only on a poor shooting night (3-11 FG, 36% TS) with no secondary playmaking involvement. The combination of inefficient shot-taking and minimal ball movement—just one turnover in 33 minutes—left her with no dimes in a blowout loss.
- Arike Ogunbowale Over 2.5 REB2 vs 2.5shots didn't fall — the read held upOgunbowale came up one rebound short despite efficient scoring (20 pts on 68% TS%), as her 30 minutes and high usage were concentrated on perimeter scoring rather than offensive glass work in a game that didn't create additional rebounding opportunities for her.
SEA @ ATL10–7+1.91u
- Angel Reese Under 11.5 REB13 vs 11.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held up
- Allisha Gray Over 19.5 PTS16 vs 19.5no clean explanation
- Flau'jae Johnson Over 13.5 PTS9 vs 13.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Brionna Jones Under 11.5 PTS14 vs 11.5no clean explanation
- Flau'jae Johnson Over 12.5 PTS9 vs 12.5no clean explanation
- Allisha Gray Over 18.5 PTS16 vs 18.5 — missed by a hairno clean explanationGray fell just short despite heavy minutes (31) and solid volume (13 FG attempts), as poor overall efficiency—5-13 FG and 1-4 from three—left her two points shy of the line. Her 51% true shooting was below her usual standard and made up the difference on a night she couldn't generate enough makes to reach 18.5.
Flat 1 unit per priced bet, settled at the price we posted. Voids are not bets — excluded from the record, the hit rate and the units. Open a day for the per-game split and why each loss lost.