← form_wnba · WNBA
2026-08-02
Day by day
these are the form_wnba picks — the book grading is currently serving, and the same set listed in the sheet below. The season figure in the header bar is that same book over the whole season; this is a recent window of it.
21–17 · 55% · +0.07u across the last 1 days · 4 voided, nothing staked
08/0221–17 ·4 void55%+0.07u4 games
IND @ MIN7–8−2.58u
- Natasha Howard Under 12.5 PTS13 vs 12.5 — missed by a hairno clean explanation
- Kayla McBride Over 2.5 3PM2 vs 2.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Aliyah Boston Under 3.5 AST7 vs 3.5no clean explanation
- Natasha Howard Over 5.5 REB4 vs 5.5shots didn't fall — the read held upHoward fell one rebound short despite efficient scoring (6-9 FG), limited by 23 minutes of playing time and picking up 4 fouls that likely restricted her availability on the glass in the final quarter.
- Napheesa Collier Under 7.5 REB8 vs 7.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held upCollier cleared the under by one rebound despite modest usage (21%), grabbing 8 boards in 32 minutes as Minnesota's primary floor-spacer and secondary playmaker; the extra rebound came via heavy involvement in transition and offensive glass work that wasn't fully priced into the 7.5 line.
- Caitlin Clark Under 8.5 AST10 vs 8.5no clean explanationClark exceeded the assist line by distributing the ball at a high rate despite modest scoring efficiency (8-18 FG); her 30% usage and full 34 minutes gave her sufficient opportunities to reach double-digit dimes even in a low-efficiency shooting night.
TOR @ GSV3–3−0.54u
- Isabelle Harrison Over 12.5 PTS4 vs 12.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Isabelle Harrison Over 5.5 REB2 vs 5.5shots didn't fall — the read held upHarrison was held to just 2 rebounds in 17 minutes despite 27% usage, falling well short of the 5.5 line; her poor offensive efficiency (2-9 FG, 22% TS) likely limited second-chance opportunities and kept her off the glass.
- Isabelle Harrison Over 11.5 PTS4 vs 11.5no clean explanationHarrison's ice-cold 2-9 shooting (22% TS) left her far short at just 4 points, compounded by a blowout loss that limited her to 17 minutes and 27% usage. A combination of poor efficiency and reduced playing time in a lopsided game made the over an easy miss.
CON @ DAL2–2−0.44u
- Arike Ogunbowale Over 15.5 PTS15 vs 15.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held up
- Paige Bueckers Over 3.5 REB3 vs 3.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held upBueckers fell one rebound short despite playing 25 minutes, finishing with 3 boards as her offensive struggles (3-9 FG, 18% usage) limited her ability to generate extra possessions and offensive rebounding opportunities.
LAS @ POR9–4 ·4 void+3.63u
- Emily Engstler Over 8.5 PTS7 vs 8.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Dearica Hamby Under 7.5 REB10 vs 7.5shots didn't fall — the read held upHamby exceeded the 7.5 rebound line with 10 boards despite playing only 29 minutes, capitalizing on elite 73% true shooting and high volume touches (26% usage) that kept her heavily involved in the offensive glass. The under missed because she secured 0.34 rebounds per minute—well above her typical rate—in a game where she stayed out of foul trouble with just 4 fouls.
- Nneka Ogwumike Over 2.5 AST2 vs 2.5shots didn't fall — the read held upOgwumike's ball-handling was minimal despite 30 minutes and high usage (31%), as she recorded just 2 assists while turning it over twice, suggesting the offense ran through her scoring rather than playmaking in this game.
- Emily Engstler Over 4.5 REB3 vs 4.5no clean explanationEngstler managed only 3 rebounds in 22 minutes of play, falling one board short of the 4.5 target; her limited floor time and 4 fouls (one shy of fouling out) restricted her rebounding opportunities despite a team that may have needed boards.
Flat 1 unit per priced bet, settled at the price we posted. Voids are not bets — excluded from the record, the hit rate and the units. Open a day for the per-game split and why each loss lost.