DIME
WNBA 2025–26: 134–82 ATS · +37.4u
Get the picks

← system_lineedges · WNBA

2026-07-22

Day by day

these are the system_lineedges picks — the book grading is currently serving, and the same set listed in the sheet below. The season figure in the header bar is that same book over the whole season; this is a recent window of it.

30–22 · 58% · +1.89u across the last 1 days

07/2230–2258%+1.89u6 games

permalink to 2026-07-22 →

PHO @ LAS3–8−5.34u
  • Nneka Ogwumike Over 17.5 PTS13 vs 17.5shots didn't fall — the read held upOgwumike's 4-10 FG efficiency (40%) fell short despite 30 minutes and solid free-throw shooting (4-4), as her 21% usage rate limited volume opportunities to reach the 17.5-point threshold.
  • Natasha Mack Over 5.5 REB3 vs 5.5no clean explanationMack fell short of 5.5 rebounds despite efficient scoring (5-8 FG), limited by just 15 minutes of playing time and finishing with only 3 boards—a shortfall driven by her reduced opportunity on the court rather than poor rebounding activity.
  • Ariel Atkins Under 3.5 REB4 vs 3.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held upAtkins grabbed 4 rebounds in 33 minutes of play, just one board above the 3.5 line, as solid efficiency and low foul trouble (1 PF) kept her on the floor and in position to contribute on the glass. The modest usage rate (14%) limited her scoring opportunities but didn't prevent her from reaching the rebound threshold.
  • Natasha Mack Over 6.5 REB3 vs 6.5shots didn't fall — the read held upMack grabbed just 3 rebounds in 15 minutes of action, held well below her over line despite efficient scoring (5-8 FG); the limited floor time was the primary culprit in missing the rebound total.
  • Dearica Hamby Under 7.5 REB10 vs 7.5no clean explanationHamby secured 10 rebounds in 31 minutes—well above the 7.5 line—by crashing the glass consistently and avoiding foul trouble (just 1 PF), allowing her to stay on the court and accumulate volume. Her 5 assists also signaled elevated overall playmaking engagement that typically correlates with more rebounding opportunities.
  • Nneka Ogwumike Over 16.5 PTS13 vs 16.5shots didn't fall — the read held upOgwumike's inefficient 4-10 shooting (40% FG) combined with modest 21% usage limited her to 13 points despite playing 30 minutes. She stayed out of foul trouble (3 PF) and grabbed 13 boards, but simply didn't get enough shot attempts to reach the over.
DAL @ POR2–2−0.22u
  • Carla Leite Over 14.5 PTS12 vs 14.5shots didn't fall — the read held upLeite's efficient 56% TS masked a cold shooting night—she connected on just 3-of-8 from the field (37.5% FG) and couldn't generate enough volume at 21% usage to reach 15 points despite 31 minutes played.
  • Arike Ogunbowale Under 17.5 PTS24 vs 17.5no clean explanationOgunbowale was ruthless from the floor, shooting 8-12 (67%) with a scorching 82% true shooting rate, and got to the free-throw line five times to comfortably clear 17.5 on just 35 minutes of work.
CHI @ NYL4–2+0.34u
  • Kamilla Cardoso Over 12.5 PTS10 vs 12.5shots didn't fall — the read held upCardoso fell short despite getting 25 minutes and a healthy 22% usage rate, hampered by poor efficiency—she shot just 5-for-11 from the field and 0-for-0 from three while posting a 46% TS%, leaving her 2.5 points shy of the over. Five personal fouls also limited her effectiveness and may have caused the Bulls to manage her minutes or aggression down the stretch.
  • Azura Stevens Over 11.5 PTS8 vs 11.5shots didn't fall — the read held upStevens shot just 2-5 from the field despite playing 30 minutes, and her 13% usage rate—well below her typical offensive load—limited her scoring opportunities even though she stayed efficient at the line (4-4 FT).
LVA @ WAS4–2+0.64u
  • Shakira Austin Over 9.5 REB6 vs 9.5shots didn't fall — the read held upAustin's efficient 25-point night (10-18 FG) kept her on the floor for 29 minutes, but limited her rebounding opportunities—she grabbed just 6 boards despite a 57% true shooting rate, suggesting the game flow favored her scoring over crashing the glass.
  • Chelsea Gray Over 6.5 AST4 vs 6.5shots didn't fall — the read held upGray's playmaking was bottlenecked by limited offensive touches—she logged just 22% usage despite 37 minutes, finishing with only 4 assists well short of the 6.5 line. The low usage rate, despite efficient scoring (65% TS), left her without enough ball-handling opportunities to generate assists.
CON @ IND6–3+1.67u
  • Olivia Nelson-Ododa Over 5.5 REB1 vs 5.5no clean explanationNelson-Ododa played only 22 minutes and grabbed just 1 rebound despite solid scoring efficiency (5-10 FG), suggesting limited opportunity on the glass in a game where her team was outmatched (-25 +/-). The combination of reduced floor time and low rebounding activity made the over unattainable.
  • Charlisse Leger-Walker Over 2.5 REB2 vs 2.5shots didn't fall — the read held upLeger-Walker fell just short with 2 rebounds despite playing 27 minutes, held back by an inefficient offensive night (0-3 FG) that limited her involvement around the rim and a team blowout (-29 +/-) that reduced second-half rebounding opportunities.
  • Aliyah Boston Over 7.5 REB6 vs 7.5no clean explanationBoston's efficient 22-point night on 10-14 shooting came in just 20 minutes, limiting her board opportunities; she pulled down only 6 rebounds despite high usage, falling one short of the 7.5 line.
MIN @ SEA11–5+4.81u
  • Jade Melbourne Over 7.5 PTS4 vs 7.5no clean explanationMelbourne's 4 points fell short of the 7.5 line despite 28 minutes of floor time due to brutal 2-6 shooting (33% TS) and an 0-4 night from three, leaving her with minimal offensive impact despite high availability.
  • Kayla McBride Over 21.5 PTS20 vs 21.5 — missed by a hairno clean explanation
  • Olivia Miles Over 3.5 REB3 vs 3.5 — missed by a hairno clean explanationMiles fell one rebound short despite playing 31 minutes and logging heavy usage (26%), held back by her role as a primary ball-handler (6 assists) and limited offensive efficiency (5-15 FG) that kept her off the glass.
  • Kayla McBride Over 20.5 PTS20 vs 20.5 — missed by a hairno clean explanation
  • Natasha Howard Over 6.5 REB5 vs 6.5shots didn't fall — the read held upHoward played only 26 minutes and grabbed just 5 rebounds despite solid efficiency, falling one board short of the 6.5 line due to limited floor time and a low-usage role (18% usage). The blowout win (+12 +/-) likely reduced her rebounding opportunities in a game that didn't require extended minutes.

Flat 1 unit per priced bet, settled at the price we posted. Voids are not bets — excluded from the record, the hit rate and the units. Open a day for the per-game split and why each loss lost.