← system_lineedges · WNBA
2026-08-05
Day by day
these are the system_lineedges picks — the book grading is currently serving, and the same set listed in the sheet below. The season figure in the header bar is that same book over the whole season; this is a recent window of it.
22–17 · 56% · +0.75u across the last 1 days
08/0522–1756%+0.75u4 games
PHO @ ATL7–8−2.22u
- Rhyne Howard Under 16.5 PTS23 vs 16.5shots didn't fall — the read held upHoward's elite efficiency—74% TS on 22% usage with a 6-13 FG line anchored by 5-9 from three—carried her well past 16.5 despite modest volume, as she made 6 of 6 free throws to reach 23 points in 34 minutes.
- Rhyne Howard Under 17.5 PTS23 vs 17.5shots didn't fall — the read held upHoward's elite efficiency—74% true shooting on 22% usage—combined with perfect free-throw shooting (6-6) to push her 5 points over the line despite moderate volume from the field (13 FG attempts).
- Rhyne Howard Under 18.5 PTS23 vs 18.5no clean explanationHoward's elite 74% true shooting—fueled by a 5-for-9 night from three and perfect 6-for-6 free-throw shooting—carried her 4.5 points past the line despite modest 22% usage, as she made the most of her 34 minutes on efficient volume.
- Jordin Canada Over 7.5 AST4 vs 7.5no clean explanationCanada's assist total was dragged down by five turnovers and limited playmaking opportunities despite 30 minutes of work; she recorded only 4 dimes against an opponent that forced her into a shoot-first role (32% usage, 4-13 FG).
- Brionna Jones Over 5.5 REB4 vs 5.5no clean explanationJones played only 21 minutes and grabbed just 4 rebounds despite efficient shooting, falling one short of the 5.5 line due to limited court time and a lower-than-needed rebound rate in that restricted sample.
- Brionna Jones Under 2.5 AST6 vs 2.5no clean explanation
SEA @ NYL4–3+0.27u
- Sabrina Ionescu Over 18.5 PTS15 vs 18.5no clean explanationIonescu's inefficient 4-14 shooting (28.6% FG) despite 31 minutes of work left her 3.5 points short, as she couldn't compensate for her poor field-goal accuracy with her free-throw prowess (6-6). Her 23% usage rate also indicated the offense didn't lean heavily on her scoring in this matchup.
- Awa Fam Over 5.5 REB5 vs 5.5 — missed by a hairpaid over the fair numberFam finished exactly at the line with 5 rebounds in 23 minutes of play, unable to secure the extra board needed to cash the over despite solid shooting efficiency (59% TS). Limited minutes and moderate usage (23%) kept her rebound opportunities constrained.
- Flau'jae Johnson Over 14.5 PTS11 vs 14.5no clean explanationJohnson's 11 points fell short despite 27 minutes of action, as poor shooting efficiency—5-of-12 FG (42%) and just 1-of-3 from three—combined with a low-volume 20% usage rate to keep her well below the 14.5-point threshold.
LAS @ CHI5–3+1.05u
- Erica Wheeler Over 5.5 AST5 vs 5.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held upWheeler came up one assist short despite efficient scoring (6-9 FG), limited by 24 minutes and modest usage (20%) that restricted her playmaking opportunities.
- Natasha Cloud Under 13.5 PTS15 vs 13.5 — missed by a hairpaid over the fair numberCloud shot 60% from the field (6-10) and stayed out of foul trouble with zero personal fouls across 32 minutes, allowing her to maintain high efficiency and push past the 13.5-point line despite modest 17% usage.
- Cameron Brink Under 10.5 PTS11 vs 10.5 — missed by a hairpaid over the fair numberBrink's perfect 5-5 free-throw shooting compensated for modest 3-6 field goal efficiency, pushing her to 11 points in just 14 minutes on 34% usage; the under missed by a single point despite below-average shooting because of her elite conversion at the stripe.
DAL @ WAS6–3+1.64u
- Alanna Smith Under 3.5 REB11 vs 3.5shots didn't fall — the read held upSmith's 11 rebounds—triple the over/under line—came from 32 minutes of heavy usage (32%) and her ability to crash the glass on both ends, collecting boards on 9 made field goals and generating extra possessions despite shooting just 5-for-7 from the free-throw line.
- Arike Ogunbowale Over 15.5 PTS15 vs 15.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held upOgunbowale fell one point shy despite solid efficiency (59% TS), as a modest 20% usage rate limited her volume—she needed just one more made field goal to cash the over, but finished 4-10 from the floor in 33 minutes.
- Michaela Onyenwere Over 1.5 AST1 vs 1.5no clean explanationOnyenwere logged only 19 minutes and recorded just 1 assist despite solid efficiency (62% TS), unable to generate enough ball movement in limited run to clear the 1.5 threshold.
Flat 1 unit per priced bet, settled at the price we posted. Voids are not bets — excluded from the record, the hit rate and the units. Open a day for the per-game split and why each loss lost.