Alanna Smith against the Connecticut Sun

Averaged 8.4 points, 4.1 rebounds and 1.7 assists in 20 games against the Connecticut Sun.

01

Every stat, vs baseline

hover a row for the gap against its noise
STAT
VS SUN
FORM
DIFF
← below baseline · above →
VERDICT
points
8.4
8.4
0.0
gap is 0.0× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 2.1
NOT MEASURABLE
rebounds
4.1
5.8
−1.8
gap is 3.2× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.1
MEASURED
assists
1.7
2.3
−0.6
gap is 2.1× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.6
DIRECTIONAL
threes
1.1
0.9
+0.2
gap is 0.7× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.6
NOT MEASURABLE
steals
1.0
1.1
−0.2
gap is 0.6× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.6
NOT MEASURABLE
blocks
1.4
1.2
+0.2
gap is 0.5× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.6
NOT MEASURABLE
turnovers
1.6
1.7
−0.1
gap is 0.4× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.5
NOT MEASURABLE
pts+reb+ast
14.1
16.5
−2.4
gap is 1.8× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 2.7
DIRECTIONAL
pts+reb
12.5
14.2
−1.8
gap is 1.4× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 2.5
DIRECTIONAL
pts+ast
10.1
10.6
−0.6
gap is 0.6× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 2.1
NOT MEASURABLE
reb+ast
5.7
8.1
−2.4
gap is 3.3× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.4
MEASURED
steals+blocks
2.4
2.4
0.0
gap is 0.0× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.9
NOT MEASURABLE
field goals made
3.1
3.3
−0.2
gap is 0.5× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.8
NOT MEASURABLE
field goal attempts
6.2
6.8
−0.7
gap is 0.9× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.4
NOT MEASURABLE
three-point attempts
2.7
2.9
−0.3
gap is 0.7× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.8
NOT MEASURABLE
free throws made
1.2
1.0
+0.2
gap is 0.7× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.6
NOT MEASURABLE
free throw attempts
2.2
1.4
+0.8
gap is 2.1× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.7
MEASURED
offensive rebounds
1.2
1.6
−0.4
gap is 1.6× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.6
DIRECTIONAL
defensive rebounds
2.9
4.3
−1.4
gap is 2.5× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.1
MEASURED
fouls
3.0
2.6
+0.4
gap is 0.8× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.9
NOT MEASURABLE
usage 18.7 vs 17.0true shooting 60.3 vs 55.2minutes 22.6 vs 24.3

Baseline: form going into each game (the average of the previous 10), measured on 157 other games since 2022-05-13.

02

The 20 games

rebounds · her form 5.8 · hover a bar
2022-05-20— 5-game mean2026-08-30 · newest
03

Why — minutes or rate

−0.40 minutes−1.40 rate  =  −1.80 total

Production, not playing time: similar minutes, 0.06 fewer rebounds per minute.

Usage 18.7 vs 17.0 (+1.7) · True shooting 60.3% vs 55.2% (+5.1)

04

The matchup

concedes −20suppresses +2

The opponent is league-average at rebounds (-0.17 SD), so the matchup does not account for this.

05

Game log

all 20 · 5 playoff games, marked · click a row for the box score
DATE
OPP
H/A
MIN
REBOUNDS
REB · AST · FG
VS 5.8
2026-08-30
CON
HOME
16.8MIN
2REBOUNDS
2 · 0 · 2-4
BELOW
FG
2-4
3PT
0-1
FT
3-4
OREB/DREB
1/1
TS%
60.8
USG%
15.9
STL
0
BLK
0
TOV
0
PF
4
+/−
+8
PRA
9
2026-08-02
CON
HOME
13.8MIN
3REBOUNDS
3 · 1 · 1-6
BELOW
FG
1-6
3PT
1-2
FT
0-0
OREB/DREB
0/3
TS%
25.0
USG%
26.4
STL
0
BLK
2
TOV
2
PF
3
+/−
+3
PRA
7
2026-07-02
CON
AWAY
13.7MIN
3REBOUNDS
3 · 0 · 4-6
BELOW
FG
4-6
3PT
2-3
FT
1-3
OREB/DREB
1/2
TS%
75.1
USG%
24.1
STL
0
BLK
0
TOV
0
PF
2
+/−
+1
PRA
14
2025-08-30
CON
AWAY
24.9MIN
1REBOUNDS
1 · 1 · 7-10
BELOW
FG
7-10
3PT
4-6
FT
0-2
OREB/DREB
0/1
TS%
82.7
USG%
21.9
STL
1
BLK
1
TOV
0
PF
0
+/−
+23
PRA
20
2025-06-29
CON
HOME
21.2MIN
7REBOUNDS
7 · 2 · 3-8
ABOVE
FG
3-8
3PT
0-3
FT
3-4
OREB/DREB
2/5
TS%
46.1
USG%
21.5
STL
0
BLK
2
TOV
1
PF
2
+/−
+20
PRA
18
2025-05-23
CON
HOME
14.6MIN
0REBOUNDS
0 · 2 · 1-2
BELOW
FG
1-2
3PT
0-0
FT
0-2
OREB/DREB
0/0
TS%
34.7
USG%
11.8
STL
4
BLK
2
TOV
1
PF
5
+/−
-11
PRA
4
2024-10-08PLAYOFF R2 G5
CON
HOME
30.5MIN
3REBOUNDS
3 · 3 · 2-3
BELOW
FG
2-3
3PT
2-3
FT
1-2
OREB/DREB
1/2
TS%
90.2
USG%
7.3
STL
1
BLK
2
TOV
1
PF
2
+/−
+10
PRA
13
2024-10-06PLAYOFF R2 G4
CON
AWAY
27.9MIN
3REBOUNDS
3 · 4 · 3-4
BELOW
FG
3-4
3PT
2-3
FT
1-2
OREB/DREB
0/3
TS%
92.2
USG%
13.9
STL
0
BLK
2
TOV
3
PF
2
+/−
-5
PRA
16
2024-10-04PLAYOFF R2 G3
CON
AWAY
25.9MIN
3REBOUNDS
3 · 1 · 2-2
BELOW
FG
2-2
3PT
1-1
FT
2-4
OREB/DREB
0/3
TS%
93.1
USG%
13.2
STL
0
BLK
3
TOV
3
PF
6
+/−
+7
PRA
11
2024-10-01PLAYOFF R2 G2
CON
HOME
25.4MIN
6REBOUNDS
6 · 2 · 6-8
ABOVE
FG
6-8
3PT
3-4
FT
0-0
OREB/DREB
3/3
TS%
93.8
USG%
17.0
STL
1
BLK
1
TOV
1
PF
3
+/−
-4
PRA
23
2024-09-29PLAYOFF R2 G1
CON
HOME
33.0MIN
8REBOUNDS
8 · 4 · 2-9
ABOVE
FG
2-9
3PT
0-4
FT
2-3
OREB/DREB
1/7
TS%
29.1
USG%
18.3
STL
2
BLK
5
TOV
2
PF
2
+/−
-8
PRA
18
2024-09-17
CON
AWAY
28.2MIN
6REBOUNDS
6 · 3 · 4-6
ABOVE
FG
4-6
3PT
0-1
FT
1-1
OREB/DREB
1/5
TS%
69.9
USG%
16.2
STL
2
BLK
2
TOV
3
PF
2
+/−
0
PRA
18
2024-07-04
CON
HOME
30.4MIN
4REBOUNDS
4 · 2 · 5-6
BELOW
FG
5-6
3PT
4-5
FT
0-2
OREB/DREB
1/3
TS%
101.7
USG%
13.9
STL
1
BLK
2
TOV
2
PF
5
+/−
+1
PRA
20
2024-05-23
CON
AWAY
23.4MIN
7REBOUNDS
7 · 2 · 4-7
ABOVE
FG
4-7
3PT
0-1
FT
2-3
OREB/DREB
1/6
TS%
60.1
USG%
23.2
STL
2
BLK
1
TOV
3
PF
6
+/−
+9
PRA
19
2023-09-10
CON
AWAY
9.8MIN
5REBOUNDS
5 · 0 · 1-3
BELOW
FG
1-3
3PT
0-1
FT
0-0
OREB/DREB
0/5
TS%
33.3
USG%
19.3
STL
0
BLK
0
TOV
1
PF
2
+/−
+3
PRA
7
2023-08-20
CON
HOME
29.2MIN
8REBOUNDS
8 · 4 · 3-9
ABOVE
FG
3-9
3PT
1-5
FT
2-4
OREB/DREB
3/5
TS%
41.8
USG%
19.2
STL
0
BLK
1
TOV
1
PF
1
+/−
+8
PRA
21
2023-07-12
CON
HOME
23.1MIN
4REBOUNDS
4 · 0 · 2-6
BELOW
FG
2-6
3PT
0-1
FT
2-2
OREB/DREB
2/2
TS%
43.6
USG%
19.9
STL
0
BLK
1
TOV
3
PF
3
+/−
-12
PRA
10
2023-06-25
CON
AWAY
27.5MIN
5REBOUNDS
5 · 2 · 5-11
BELOW
FG
5-11
3PT
0-2
FT
1-2
OREB/DREB
5/0
TS%
46.3
USG%
22.1
STL
2
BLK
1
TOV
2
PF
1
+/−
-17
PRA
18
2022-05-22
CON
HOME
20.5MIN
1REBOUNDS
1 · 0 · 2-7
BELOW
FG
2-7
3PT
0-4
FT
0-0
OREB/DREB
1/0
TS%
28.6
USG%
20.0
STL
1
BLK
0
TOV
2
PF
5
+/−
-12
PRA
5
2022-05-20
CON
AWAY
12.0MIN
2REBOUNDS
2 · 0 · 2-6
BELOW
FG
2-6
3PT
2-3
FT
3-4
OREB/DREB
0/2
TS%
58.0
USG%
29.5
STL
2
BLK
0
TOV
0
PF
4
+/−
+5
PRA
11
every game on file — nothing hidden