Betnijah Laney-Hamilton against the Chicago Sky

Averaged 10.2 points, 3.0 rebounds and 2.8 assists in 12 games against the Chicago Sky.

Every stat, vs baseline

hover a row for the gap against its noise

STAT

VS SKY

FORM

DIFF

← below baseline · above →

VERDICT

points

10.2

10.3

−0.1

gap is 0.1× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 3.2

NOT MEASURABLE

rebounds

3.0

3.2

−0.2

gap is 0.5× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.9

NOT MEASURABLE

assists

2.8

2.9

−0.1

gap is 0.3× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.9

NOT MEASURABLE

threes

0.8

1.0

−0.3

gap is 1.1× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.5

NOT MEASURABLE

steals

0.8

0.6

+0.1

gap is 0.7× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.4

NOT MEASURABLE

blocks

0.1

0.0

gap is 0.3× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.2

NOT MEASURABLE

turnovers

1.6

2.0

−0.4

gap is 1.2× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.7

NOT MEASURABLE

pts+reb+ast

15.9

16.4

−0.5

gap is 0.2× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 4.2

NOT MEASURABLE

pts+reb

13.2

13.5

−0.3

gap is 0.2× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 3.8

NOT MEASURABLE

pts+ast

12.9

13.1

−0.2

gap is 0.1× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 3.6

NOT MEASURABLE

reb+ast

5.8

6.1

−0.4

gap is 0.5× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.4

NOT MEASURABLE

steals+blocks

0.8

0.7

+0.1

gap is 0.4× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.5

NOT MEASURABLE

field goals made

4.1

3.9

+0.2

gap is 0.3× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.5

NOT MEASURABLE

field goal attempts

9.4

8.7

+0.7

gap is 0.7× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 2.0

NOT MEASURABLE

three-point attempts

1.8

3.1

−1.4

gap is 3.9× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.7

MEASURED

free throws made

1.3

1.5

−0.2

gap is 0.4× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.0

NOT MEASURABLE

free throw attempts

1.6

1.7

−0.1

gap is 0.1× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.2

NOT MEASURABLE

offensive rebounds

0.5

0.6

−0.1

gap is 0.4× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.5

NOT MEASURABLE

defensive rebounds

2.5

2.6

−0.1

gap is 0.3× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.9

NOT MEASURABLE

fouls

2.2

1.7

+0.5

gap is 1.0× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.9

NOT MEASURABLE

usage 20.4 vs 19.4true shooting 49.7 vs 53.4minutes 25.6 vs 26.8

Baseline: form going into each game (the average of the previous 10), measured on 118 other games since 2022-05-17.

The 12 games

points · her form 10.3 · hover a bar

2022-05-11 · CHI · 8 points · −2.3 vs her form

2022-08-17 · CHI · 17 points · +6.7 vs her form

2022-08-20 · CHI · 2 points · −8.3 vs her form

2022-08-23 · CHI · 15 points · +4.7 vs her form

2023-06-02 · CHI · 17 points · +6.7 vs her form

2023-06-04 · CHI · 6 points · −4.3 vs her form

2023-08-11 · CHI · 11 points · +0.7 vs her form

2023-09-03 · CHI · 17 points · +6.7 vs her form

2024-05-23 · CHI · 9 points · −1.3 vs her form

2024-06-04 · CHI · 14 points · +3.7 vs her form

2026-09-17 · CHI · 4 points · −6.3 vs her form

2026-09-24 · CHI · 2 points · −8.3 vs her form

10.3

2022-05-11— 5-game mean2026-09-24 · newest

Why — minutes or rate

no difference in this split is larger than the sample can resolve, so there is nothing to explain

The matchup

Nothing in this split cleared the noise, so there is no difference to attribute to the opponent. The defensive profile is only worth reading beside a finding.

Game log

all 12 · 3 playoff games, marked · click a row for the box score

DATE

OPP

H/A

MIN

POINTS

REB · AST · FG

VS 10.3

2026-09-24

CHI

HOME

9.6MIN

2POINTS

0 · 1 · 1-3

BELOW

FG: 1-3
3PT: 0-0
FT: 0-0
OREB/DREB: 0/0
TS%: 33.3
USG%: 13.0
STL: 1
BLK: 0
TOV: 0
PF: 1
+/−: +8
PRA: 3

2026-09-17

CHI

AWAY

17.7MIN

4POINTS

2 · 2 · 1-2

BELOW

FG: 1-2
3PT: 0-0
FT: 2-2
OREB/DREB: 0/2
TS%: 69.4
USG%: 9.3
STL: 1
BLK: 0
TOV: 1
PF: 1
+/−: -1
PRA: 8

2024-06-04

CHI

AWAY

31.4MIN

14POINTS

3 · 5 · 4-12

ABOVE

FG: 4-12
3PT: 2-3
FT: 4-5
OREB/DREB: 1/2
TS%: 49.3
USG%: 19.4
STL: 2
BLK: 0
TOV: 0
PF: 4
+/−: +17
PRA: 22

2024-05-23

CHI

HOME

32.7MIN

9POINTS

3 · 1 · 3-10

BELOW

FG: 3-10
3PT: 2-3
FT: 1-2
OREB/DREB: 2/1
TS%: 41.4
USG%: 17.2
STL: 0
BLK: 0
TOV: 2
PF: 5
+/−: -4
PRA: 13

2023-09-03

CHI

AWAY

33.0MIN

17POINTS

5 · 2 · 8-12

ABOVE

FG: 8-12
3PT: 1-2
FT: 0-0
OREB/DREB: 1/4
TS%: 70.8
USG%: 20.0
STL: 1
BLK: 0
TOV: 3
PF: 3
+/−: +18
PRA: 24

2023-08-11

CHI

HOME

28.1MIN

11POINTS

1 · 3 · 4-6

ABOVE

FG: 4-6
3PT: 2-3
FT: 1-2
OREB/DREB: 0/1
TS%: 79.9
USG%: 16.5
STL: 1
BLK: 0
TOV: 3
PF: 2
+/−: +7
PRA: 15

2023-06-04

CHI

HOME

19.3MIN

6POINTS

3 · 1 · 3-11

BELOW

FG: 3-11
3PT: 0-3
FT: 0-0
OREB/DREB: 0/3
TS%: 27.3
USG%: 23.7
STL: 0
BLK: 0
TOV: 0
PF: 2
+/−: -5
PRA: 10

2023-06-02

CHI

AWAY

30.9MIN

17POINTS

3 · 2 · 8-14

ABOVE

FG: 8-14
3PT: 1-1
FT: 0-0
OREB/DREB: 0/3
TS%: 60.7
USG%: 22.4
STL: 1
BLK: 0
TOV: 0
PF: 2
+/−: -5
PRA: 22

2022-08-23PLAYOFF R1 G3

CHI

HOME

29.9MIN

15POINTS

5 · 2 · 6-11

ABOVE

FG: 6-11
3PT: 0-0
FT: 3-3
OREB/DREB: 0/5
TS%: 60.9
USG%: 22.4
STL: 0
BLK: 0
TOV: 2
PF: 4
+/−: -7
PRA: 22

2022-08-20PLAYOFF R1 G2

CHI

AWAY

16.2MIN

2POINTS

2 · 3 · 1-7

BELOW

FG: 1-7
3PT: 0-2
FT: 0-0
OREB/DREB: 1/1
TS%: 14.3
USG%: 28.0
STL: 1
BLK: 0
TOV: 3
PF: 1
+/−: -23
PRA: 7

2022-08-17PLAYOFF R1 G1

CHI

AWAY

26.8MIN

17POINTS

5 · 5 · 6-13

ABOVE

FG: 6-13
3PT: 1-2
FT: 4-5
OREB/DREB: 1/4
TS%: 55.9
USG%: 28.8
STL: 1
BLK: 1
TOV: 2
PF: 1
+/−: +12
PRA: 27

2022-05-11

CHI

AWAY

31.2MIN

8POINTS

4 · 6 · 4-12

BELOW

FG: 4-12
3PT: 0-2
FT: 0-0
OREB/DREB: 0/4
TS%: 33.3
USG%: 24.7
STL: 0
BLK: 0
TOV: 3
PF: 0
+/−: -24
PRA: 18

every game on file — nothing hidden