Brionna Jones against the Connecticut Sun

Averaged 7.7 points, 5.7 rebounds and 0.8 assists in 6 games against the Connecticut Sun.

01

Every stat, vs baseline

hover a row for the gap against its noise
STAT
VS SUN
FORM
DIFF
← below baseline · above →
VERDICT
points
7.7
12.3
−4.6
gap is 3.1× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 2.9
NOT MEASURABLE
rebounds
5.7
7.2
−1.5
gap is 0.9× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 3.1
NOT MEASURABLE
assists
0.8
2.0
−1.2
gap is 3.8× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.6
NOT MEASURABLE
threes
0.0
0.1
−0.1
gap is 2.9× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.1
NOT MEASURABLE
steals
0.7
0.8
−0.2
gap is 0.7× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.5
NOT MEASURABLE
blocks
0.3
0.9
−0.5
gap is 2.2× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.5
NOT MEASURABLE
turnovers
1.2
1.3
−0.1
gap is 0.2× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.1
NOT MEASURABLE
pts+reb+ast
14.2
21.4
−7.3
gap is 3.0× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 4.8
NOT MEASURABLE
pts+reb
13.3
19.4
−6.1
gap is 2.6× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 4.6
NOT MEASURABLE
pts+ast
8.5
14.3
−5.8
gap is 3.5× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 3.2
NOT MEASURABLE
reb+ast
6.5
9.2
−2.7
gap is 1.7× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 3.1
NOT MEASURABLE
steals+blocks
1.0
1.7
−0.7
gap is 2.0× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.7
NOT MEASURABLE
field goals made
3.2
4.9
−1.7
gap is 3.3× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.0
NOT MEASURABLE
field goal attempts
7.8
9.1
−1.3
gap is 0.8× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 3.3
NOT MEASURABLE
three-point attempts
0.7
0.9
−0.2
gap is 0.6× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.6
NOT MEASURABLE
free throws made
1.3
2.4
−1.1
gap is 1.9× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.1
NOT MEASURABLE
free throw attempts
1.7
3.0
−1.4
gap is 2.0× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.4
NOT MEASURABLE
offensive rebounds
2.8
3.2
−0.4
gap is 0.4× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 2.2
NOT MEASURABLE
defensive rebounds
2.8
3.9
−1.1
gap is 1.1× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.9
NOT MEASURABLE
fouls
1.5
2.5
−1.0
gap is 1.9× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.0
NOT MEASURABLE
usage 21.2 vs 22.0true shooting 41.4 vs 59.2minutes 20.2 vs 24.1

Baseline: form going into each game (the average of the previous 10), measured on 156 other games since 2022-05-17.

02

The 6 games

points · her form 12.3 · hover a bar
2025-05-25— 5-game mean2026-08-13 · newest
03

Why — minutes or rate

no difference in this split is larger than the sample can resolve, so there is nothing to explain

04

The matchup

Nothing in this split cleared the noise, so there is no difference to attribute to the opponent. The defensive profile is only worth reading beside a finding.

05

Game log

all 6 · click a row for the box score
DATE
OPP
H/A
MIN
POINTS
REB · AST · FG
VS 12.3
2026-08-13
CON
AWAY
4.7MIN
0POINTS
1 · 1 · 0-1
BELOW
FG
0-1
3PT
0-0
FT
0-0
OREB/DREB
1/0
TS%
0.0
USG%
9.2
STL
0
BLK
1
TOV
0
PF
0
+/−
+12
PRA
2
2025-09-10
CON
AWAY
16.3MIN
13POINTS
2 · 1 · 5-7
ABOVE
FG
5-7
3PT
0-0
FT
3-4
OREB/DREB
1/1
TS%
74.2
USG%
29.9
STL
1
BLK
0
TOV
1
PF
2
+/−
+4
PRA
16
2025-09-08
CON
HOME
19.6MIN
8POINTS
5 · 1 · 4-12
BELOW
FG
4-12
3PT
0-0
FT
0-0
OREB/DREB
2/3
TS%
33.3
USG%
28.0
STL
1
BLK
0
TOV
0
PF
1
+/−
+11
PRA
14
2025-09-01
CON
AWAY
30.3MIN
10POINTS
11 · 1 · 4-14
BELOW
FG
4-14
3PT
0-2
FT
2-2
OREB/DREB
8/3
TS%
33.6
USG%
24.5
STL
2
BLK
1
TOV
1
PF
2
+/−
+25
PRA
22
2025-06-06
CON
AWAY
23.6MIN
7POINTS
6 · 0 · 3-8
BELOW
FG
3-8
3PT
0-1
FT
1-2
OREB/DREB
3/3
TS%
39.4
USG%
19.1
STL
0
BLK
0
TOV
1
PF
1
+/−
-12
PRA
13
2025-05-25
CON
HOME
26.8MIN
8POINTS
9 · 1 · 3-5
BELOW
FG
3-5
3PT
0-1
FT
2-2
OREB/DREB
2/7
TS%
68.0
USG%
16.2
STL
0
BLK
0
TOV
4
PF
3
+/−
+17
PRA
18
every game on file — nothing hidden