Isobel Borlase against the Washington Mystics

Averaged 3.0 points, 0.8 rebounds and 0.8 assists in 4 games against the Washington Mystics.

01

Every stat, vs baseline

hover a row for the gap against its noise
STAT
VS MYSTICS
FORM
DIFF
← below baseline · above →
VERDICT
points
3.0
5.5
−2.5
gap is 0.8× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 5.8
NOT MEASURABLE
rebounds
0.8
1.7
−0.9
gap is 1.4× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.3
NOT MEASURABLE
assists
0.8
1.1
−0.4
gap is 0.6× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.2
NOT MEASURABLE
threes
0.5
0.5
0.0
gap is 0.1× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.6
NOT MEASURABLE
steals
0.8
0.4
+0.4
gap is 0.6× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.2
NOT MEASURABLE
blocks
0.0
0.1
−0.1
gap is 1.5× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.1
NOT MEASURABLE
turnovers
1.5
0.6
+0.9
gap is 1.4× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.2
NOT MEASURABLE
pts+reb+ast
4.5
8.3
−3.8
gap is 0.9× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 8.1
NOT MEASURABLE
pts+reb
3.8
7.2
−3.4
gap is 1.0× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 7.0
NOT MEASURABLE
pts+ast
3.8
6.6
−2.9
gap is 0.8× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 6.9
NOT MEASURABLE
reb+ast
1.5
2.8
−1.3
gap is 1.1× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 2.3
NOT MEASURABLE
steals+blocks
0.8
0.5
+0.3
gap is 0.5× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.1
NOT MEASURABLE
field goals made
1.0
2.1
−1.1
gap is 1.1× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 2.0
NOT MEASURABLE
field goal attempts
2.8
4.5
−1.8
gap is 1.2× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 2.9
NOT MEASURABLE
three-point attempts
1.0
1.7
−0.7
gap is 0.9× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.5
NOT MEASURABLE
free throws made
0.5
0.8
−0.3
gap is 0.4× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.5
NOT MEASURABLE
free throw attempts
0.5
0.9
−0.4
gap is 0.5× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.5
NOT MEASURABLE
offensive rebounds
0.3
0.3
−0.1
gap is 0.3× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.4
NOT MEASURABLE
defensive rebounds
0.5
1.3
−0.8
gap is 1.2× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.4
NOT MEASURABLE
fouls
1.3
1.2
0.0
gap is 0.1× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.7
NOT MEASURABLE
usage 16.6 vs 17.1true shooting 31.6 vs 55.1minutes 11.6 vs 13.8

Baseline: form going into each game (the average of the previous 10), measured on 38 other games since 2026-05-22.

02

The 4 games

points · her form 5.5 · hover a bar
2026-06-06— 5-game mean2026-09-27 · newest
03

Why — minutes or rate

no difference in this split is larger than the sample can resolve, so there is nothing to explain

04

The matchup

Nothing in this split cleared the noise, so there is no difference to attribute to the opponent. The defensive profile is only worth reading beside a finding.

05

Game log

all 4 · 1 playoff game, marked · click a row for the box score
DATE
OPP
H/A
MIN
POINTS
REB · AST · FG
VS 5.5
2026-09-27PLAYOFF R1 G1
WAS
HOME
6.2MIN
0POINTS
0 · 0 · 0-1
BELOW
FG
0-1
3PT
0-0
FT
0-0
OREB/DREB
0/0
TS%
0.0
USG%
6.9
STL
0
BLK
0
TOV
0
PF
1
+/−
+5
PRA
0
2026-08-07
WAS
AWAY
9.4MIN
0POINTS
1 · 0 · 0-2
BELOW
FG
0-2
3PT
0-0
FT
0-0
OREB/DREB
1/0
TS%
0.0
USG%
16.3
STL
0
BLK
0
TOV
2
PF
1
+/−
-6
PRA
1
2026-07-02
WAS
AWAY
7.7MIN
3POINTS
0 · 1 · 1-3
BELOW
FG
1-3
3PT
1-2
FT
0-0
OREB/DREB
0/0
TS%
50.0
USG%
30.6
STL
1
BLK
0
TOV
3
PF
2
+/−
-3
PRA
4
2026-06-06
WAS
HOME
23.0MIN
9POINTS
2 · 2 · 3-5
ABOVE
FG
3-5
3PT
1-2
FT
2-2
OREB/DREB
0/2
TS%
76.5
USG%
12.6
STL
2
BLK
0
TOV
1
PF
1
+/−
+27
PRA
13
every game on file — nothing hidden