DIME
WNBANBAEuroLeagueEuro
points estimatesat home

Jaylyn Sherrod against the Phoenix Mercury

Averaged 1.0 points, 0.6 rebounds and 0.2 assists in 5 games against the Phoenix Mercury.

01

Every stat, vs baseline

hover a row for the gap against its noise
STAT
VS MERCURY
FORM
DIFF
← below baseline · above →
VERDICT
points
1.0
1.4
−0.4
gap is 0.7× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.1
NOT MEASURABLE
rebounds
0.6
0.8
−0.2
gap is 0.5× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.8
NOT MEASURABLE
assists
0.2
0.6
−0.4
gap is 1.9× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.4
NOT MEASURABLE
threes
0.2
0.1
+0.1
gap is 0.4× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.4
NOT MEASURABLE
steals
0.4
0.6
−0.2
gap is 0.4× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.8
NOT MEASURABLE
blocks
0.2
0.0
+0.2
gap is 1.0× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.4
NOT MEASURABLE
turnovers
0.4
0.5
−0.1
gap is 0.3× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.8
NOT MEASURABLE
pts+reb+ast
1.8
2.8
−1.0
gap is 0.9× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 2.1
NOT MEASURABLE
pts+reb
1.6
2.2
−0.6
gap is 0.7× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.8
NOT MEASURABLE
pts+ast
1.2
2.0
−0.8
gap is 1.2× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.4
NOT MEASURABLE
reb+ast
0.8
1.4
−0.6
gap is 1.0× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.1
NOT MEASURABLE
steals+blocks
0.6
0.6
0.0
gap is 0.1× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.8
NOT MEASURABLE
field goals made
0.2
0.4
−0.2
gap is 1.3× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.4
NOT MEASURABLE
field goal attempts
0.6
1.6
−1.0
gap is 2.8× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.7
NOT MEASURABLE
three-point attempts
0.2
0.6
−0.4
gap is 1.2× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.6
NOT MEASURABLE
free throws made
0.4
0.4
0.0
gap is 0.0× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.8
NOT MEASURABLE
free throw attempts
0.4
0.5
−0.1
gap is 0.3× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.8
NOT MEASURABLE
offensive rebounds
0.0
0.2
−0.2
gap is 2.1× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.2
NOT MEASURABLE
defensive rebounds
0.6
0.6
0.0
gap is 0.1× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.8
NOT MEASURABLE
fouls
0.4
1.0
−0.6
gap is 1.4× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.8
NOT MEASURABLE
usage 5.0 vs 16.0true shooting 25.6 vs 21.5minutes 5.0 vs 6.4

Baseline: form going into each game (the average of the previous 10), measured on 45 other games since 2024-08-22.

02

The 5 games

points · her form 1.4 · hover a bar
2025-06-19— 5-game mean2026-08-05 · newest
03

Why — minutes or rate

no difference in this split is larger than the sample can resolve, so there is nothing to explain

04

The matchup

Nothing in this split cleared the noise, so there is no difference to attribute to the opponent. The defensive profile is only worth reading beside a finding.

05

Game log

all 5 · 1 playoff game, marked · click a row for the box score
DATE
OPP
H/A
MIN
POINTS
REB · AST · FG
VS 1.4
2026-08-05
PHO
HOME
10.2MIN
3POINTS
2 · 1 · 1-2
ABOVE
FG
1-2
3PT
1-1
FT
0-0
OREB/DREB
0/2
TS%
75.0
USG%
8.7
STL
0
BLK
1
TOV
0
PF
0
+/−
+4
PRA
6
2025-09-23PLAYOFF R2 G2
PHO
HOME
0.1MIN
0POINTS
0 · 0 · 0-0
BELOW
FG
0-0
3PT
0-0
FT
0-0
OREB/DREB
0/0
TS%
0.0
USG%
0.0
STL
0
BLK
0
TOV
0
PF
0
+/−
0
PRA
0
2025-07-25
PHO
HOME
0.9MIN
0POINTS
0 · 0 · 0-0
BELOW
FG
0-0
3PT
0-0
FT
0-0
OREB/DREB
0/0
TS%
0.0
USG%
0.0
STL
0
BLK
0
TOV
0
PF
0
+/−
0
PRA
0
2025-06-27
PHO
AWAY
10.9MIN
2POINTS
1 · 0 · 0-1
ABOVE
FG
0-1
3PT
0-0
FT
2-2
OREB/DREB
0/1
TS%
53.2
USG%
16.2
STL
2
BLK
0
TOV
2
PF
0
+/−
-4
PRA
3
2025-06-19
PHO
HOME
3.0MIN
0POINTS
0 · 0 · 0-0
BELOW
FG
0-0
3PT
0-0
FT
0-0
OREB/DREB
0/0
TS%
0.0
USG%
0.0
STL
0
BLK
0
TOV
0
PF
2
+/−
-6
PRA
0
every game on file — nothing hidden