Monique Billings against the Portland Fire

Averaged 8.0 points, 4.0 rebounds and 0.7 assists in 3 games against the Portland Fire.

01

Every stat, vs baseline

hover a row for the gap against its noise
STAT
VS FIRE
FORM
DIFF
← below baseline · above →
VERDICT
points
8.0
7.2
+0.8
gap is 0.2× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 7.3
NOT MEASURABLE
rebounds
4.0
4.8
−0.8
gap is 0.7× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 2.5
NOT MEASURABLE
assists
0.7
1.3
−0.6
gap is 2.0× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.6
NOT MEASURABLE
threes
0.0
0.3
−0.3
gap is 3.0× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.2
NOT MEASURABLE
steals
1.0
0.9
+0.1
gap is 0.2× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.3
NOT MEASURABLE
blocks
1.0
0.6
+0.4
gap is 3.6× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.2
NOT MEASURABLE
turnovers
1.7
0.7
+0.9
gap is 1.4× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.3
NOT MEASURABLE
pts+reb+ast
12.7
13.3
−0.7
gap is 0.1× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 10.2
NOT MEASURABLE
pts+reb
12.0
12.1
−0.1
gap is 0.0× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 9.8
NOT MEASURABLE
pts+ast
8.7
8.5
+0.2
gap is 0.1× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 7.7
NOT MEASURABLE
reb+ast
4.7
6.1
−1.5
gap is 1.0× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 2.9
NOT MEASURABLE
steals+blocks
2.0
1.5
+0.5
gap is 0.7× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.3
NOT MEASURABLE
field goals made
2.3
2.6
−0.3
gap is 0.2× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 2.4
NOT MEASURABLE
field goal attempts
5.3
5.4
−0.1
gap is 0.0× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 4.9
NOT MEASURABLE
three-point attempts
0.3
0.7
−0.4
gap is 2.0× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.4
NOT MEASURABLE
free throws made
3.3
1.7
+1.6
gap is 1.1× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 3.1
NOT MEASURABLE
free throw attempts
3.7
2.2
+1.5
gap is 0.9× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 3.2
NOT MEASURABLE
offensive rebounds
1.3
1.8
−0.5
gap is 2.4× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.4
NOT MEASURABLE
defensive rebounds
2.7
3.0
−0.4
gap is 0.3× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 2.2
NOT MEASURABLE
fouls
1.0
1.9
−0.9
gap is 1.8× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.0
NOT MEASURABLE
usage 16.2 vs 13.9true shooting 37.8 vs 53.2minutes 19.3 vs 21.1

Baseline: form going into each game (the average of the previous 10), measured on 171 other games since 2022-05-15.

02

The 3 games

points · her form 7.2 · hover a bar
2026-05-20— 5-game mean2026-07-31 · newest
03

Why — minutes or rate

no difference in this split is larger than the sample can resolve, so there is nothing to explain

04

The matchup

Nothing in this split cleared the noise, so there is no difference to attribute to the opponent. The defensive profile is only worth reading beside a finding.

05

Game log

all 3 · click a row for the box score
DATE
OPP
H/A
MIN
POINTS
REB · AST · FG
VS 7.2
2026-07-31
POR
AWAY
29.3MIN
15POINTS
7 · 1 · 5-9
ABOVE
FG
5-9
3PT
0-0
FT
5-6
OREB/DREB
2/5
TS%
64.4
USG%
20.8
STL
2
BLK
1
TOV
3
PF
2
+/−
+17
PRA
23
2026-05-30
POR
AWAY
7.8MIN
0POINTS
1 · 0 · 0-0
BELOW
FG
0-0
3PT
0-0
FT
0-0
OREB/DREB
1/0
TS%
0.0
USG%
5.7
STL
0
BLK
1
TOV
1
PF
1
+/−
-9
PRA
1
2026-05-20
POR
HOME
20.7MIN
9POINTS
4 · 1 · 2-7
ABOVE
FG
2-7
3PT
0-1
FT
5-5
OREB/DREB
1/3
TS%
48.9
USG%
22.2
STL
1
BLK
1
TOV
1
PF
0
+/−
+1
PRA
14
every game on file — nothing hidden