Natasha Cloud against the Minnesota Lynx

Averaged 12.7 points, 4.2 rebounds and 6.6 assists in 19 games against the Minnesota Lynx.

01

Every stat, vs baseline

hover a row for the gap against its noise
STAT
VS LYNX
FORM
DIFF
← below baseline · above →
VERDICT
points
12.7
11.8
+0.9
gap is 0.5× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 3.3
NOT MEASURABLE
rebounds
4.2
3.9
+0.3
gap is 0.6× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.9
NOT MEASURABLE
assists
6.6
5.6
+1.0
gap is 1.9× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.1
DIRECTIONAL
threes
1.6
1.4
+0.3
gap is 0.9× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.5
NOT MEASURABLE
steals
0.9
1.3
−0.3
gap is 1.2× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.5
DIRECTIONAL
blocks
0.4
0.4
0.0
gap is 0.2× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.3
NOT MEASURABLE
turnovers
2.3
2.7
−0.4
gap is 1.2× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.6
NOT MEASURABLE
pts+reb+ast
23.5
21.3
+2.2
gap is 1.1× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 4.0
DIRECTIONAL
pts+reb
16.9
15.7
+1.2
gap is 0.7× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 3.5
NOT MEASURABLE
pts+ast
19.3
17.4
+2.0
gap is 1.0× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 3.7
DIRECTIONAL
reb+ast
10.8
9.5
+1.3
gap is 1.6× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.6
DIRECTIONAL
steals+blocks
1.4
1.7
−0.3
gap is 1.1× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.6
NOT MEASURABLE
field goals made
4.7
4.2
+0.5
gap is 0.7× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.5
NOT MEASURABLE
field goal attempts
11.4
9.5
+1.9
gap is 1.7× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 2.1
DIRECTIONAL
three-point attempts
4.8
3.7
+1.1
gap is 2.0× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.1
MEASURED
free throws made
1.7
2.0
−0.4
gap is 0.9× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.8
NOT MEASURABLE
free throw attempts
2.4
2.4
0.0
gap is 0.1× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.0
NOT MEASURABLE
offensive rebounds
0.3
0.4
−0.1
gap is 0.4× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.3
NOT MEASURABLE
defensive rebounds
3.9
3.6
+0.3
gap is 0.7× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.0
NOT MEASURABLE
fouls
2.8
2.7
+0.2
gap is 0.4× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.7
NOT MEASURABLE
usage 20.3 vs 19.3true shooting 49.6 vs 53.6minutes 32.3 vs 31.2

Baseline: form going into each game (the average of the previous 10), measured on 178 other games since 2022-05-20.

02

The 19 games

points · her form 11.8 · hover a bar
2022-05-08— 5-game mean2026-05-29 · newest
03

Why — minutes or rate

no difference in this split is larger than the sample can resolve, so there is nothing to explain

04

The matchup

Nothing in this split cleared the noise, so there is no difference to attribute to the opponent. The defensive profile is only worth reading beside a finding.

05

Game log

all 19 · 2 playoff games, marked · click a row for the box score
DATE
OPP
H/A
MIN
POINTS
REB · AST · FG
VS 11.8
2026-05-29
MIN
HOME
30.8MIN
6POINTS
4 · 2 · 1-7
BELOW
FG
1-7
3PT
1-5
FT
3-4
OREB/DREB
0/4
TS%
34.2
USG%
14.7
STL
2
BLK
1
TOV
2
PF
3
+/−
-22
PRA
12
2026-05-23
MIN
HOME
32.4MIN
6POINTS
2 · 1 · 2-6
BELOW
FG
2-6
3PT
0-2
FT
2-3
OREB/DREB
0/2
TS%
41.0
USG%
13.1
STL
1
BLK
1
TOV
3
PF
3
+/−
-7
PRA
9
2026-05-17
MIN
AWAY
31.7MIN
11POINTS
6 · 7 · 5-9
BELOW
FG
5-9
3PT
1-3
FT
0-2
OREB/DREB
0/6
TS%
55.7
USG%
19.1
STL
0
BLK
0
TOV
4
PF
4
+/−
+13
PRA
24
2025-08-19
MIN
HOME
26.9MIN
10POINTS
5 · 2 · 4-9
BELOW
FG
4-9
3PT
2-5
FT
0-2
OREB/DREB
0/5
TS%
50.6
USG%
20.6
STL
2
BLK
0
TOV
2
PF
2
+/−
+8
PRA
17
2025-08-16
MIN
AWAY
27.9MIN
10POINTS
4 · 6 · 4-8
BELOW
FG
4-8
3PT
0-2
FT
2-2
OREB/DREB
0/4
TS%
56.3
USG%
16.2
STL
1
BLK
0
TOV
1
PF
5
+/−
-4
PRA
20
2025-08-10
MIN
HOME
30.5MIN
14POINTS
6 · 5 · 6-11
ABOVE
FG
6-11
3PT
2-6
FT
0-0
OREB/DREB
0/6
TS%
63.6
USG%
19.4
STL
0
BLK
0
TOV
2
PF
1
+/−
+2
PRA
25
2025-07-30
MIN
AWAY
32.1MIN
12POINTS
4 · 7 · 4-10
ABOVE
FG
4-10
3PT
1-2
FT
3-4
OREB/DREB
1/3
TS%
51.0
USG%
16.5
STL
2
BLK
0
TOV
0
PF
2
+/−
-1
PRA
23
2024-09-25PLAYOFF R1 G2
MIN
AWAY
34.6MIN
16POINTS
5 · 10 · 5-12
ABOVE
FG
5-12
3PT
2-5
FT
4-4
OREB/DREB
0/5
TS%
58.1
USG%
19.4
STL
1
BLK
0
TOV
1
PF
4
+/−
-6
PRA
31
2024-09-22PLAYOFF R1 G1
MIN
AWAY
38.2MIN
33POINTS
6 · 10 · 14-23
ABOVE
FG
14-23
3PT
4-8
FT
1-2
OREB/DREB
0/6
TS%
69.1
USG%
33.7
STL
1
BLK
1
TOV
5
PF
4
+/−
-1
PRA
49
2024-08-28
MIN
HOME
36.4MIN
12POINTS
3 · 8 · 5-16
ABOVE
FG
5-16
3PT
2-5
FT
0-0
OREB/DREB
1/2
TS%
37.5
USG%
21.5
STL
0
BLK
2
TOV
3
PF
1
+/−
-13
PRA
23
2024-06-22
MIN
AWAY
33.6MIN
14POINTS
2 · 5 · 6-15
ABOVE
FG
6-15
3PT
1-6
FT
1-1
OREB/DREB
0/2
TS%
45.3
USG%
22.5
STL
1
BLK
2
TOV
2
PF
1
+/−
-12
PRA
21
2024-06-07
MIN
HOME
33.5MIN
8POINTS
6 · 10 · 2-6
BELOW
FG
2-6
3PT
1-2
FT
3-4
OREB/DREB
0/6
TS%
51.5
USG%
14.0
STL
0
BLK
1
TOV
3
PF
4
+/−
+3
PRA
24
2024-05-31
MIN
AWAY
29.4MIN
5POINTS
6 · 7 · 2-7
BELOW
FG
2-7
3PT
0-2
FT
1-2
OREB/DREB
1/5
TS%
31.7
USG%
18.8
STL
0
BLK
0
TOV
4
PF
3
+/−
-13
PRA
18
2023-08-29
MIN
HOME
29.8MIN
12POINTS
5 · 9 · 2-13
ABOVE
FG
2-13
3PT
2-7
FT
6-8
OREB/DREB
2/3
TS%
36.3
USG%
31.0
STL
0
BLK
0
TOV
3
PF
5
+/−
+18
PRA
26
2023-07-26
MIN
AWAY
35.6MIN
24POINTS
0 · 6 · 10-21
ABOVE
FG
10-21
3PT
3-7
FT
1-1
OREB/DREB
0/0
TS%
56.0
USG%
28.4
STL
1
BLK
0
TOV
2
PF
3
+/−
-5
PRA
30
2023-06-03
MIN
HOME
35.1MIN
14POINTS
2 · 9 · 5-12
ABOVE
FG
5-12
3PT
2-7
FT
2-3
OREB/DREB
0/2
TS%
52.6
USG%
17.8
STL
2
BLK
0
TOV
0
PF
1
+/−
-4
PRA
25
2022-07-17
MIN
HOME
32.8MIN
7POINTS
6 · 8 · 2-7
BELOW
FG
2-7
3PT
1-3
FT
2-2
OREB/DREB
1/5
TS%
44.4
USG%
14.7
STL
2
BLK
0
TOV
2
PF
2
+/−
+8
PRA
21
2022-06-10
MIN
AWAY
32.9MIN
8POINTS
2 · 8 · 3-11
BELOW
FG
3-11
3PT
2-8
FT
0-0
OREB/DREB
0/2
TS%
36.4
USG%
19.3
STL
0
BLK
0
TOV
2
PF
2
+/−
+18
PRA
18
2022-05-08
MIN
AWAY
29.3MIN
19POINTS
6 · 6 · 7-13
ABOVE
FG
7-13
3PT
4-7
FT
1-1
OREB/DREB
0/6
TS%
70.7
USG%
25.0
STL
2
BLK
0
TOV
3
PF
4
+/−
+12
PRA
31
every game on file — nothing hidden