DIME
Get the picksJoin
points estimatesat home

Sarah Ashlee Barker against the Chicago Sky

Averaged 8.5 points, 3.2 rebounds and 0.7 assists in 6 games against the Chicago Sky.

01

Every stat, vs baseline

hover a row for the gap against its noise
STAT
VS SKY
FORM
DIFF
← below baseline · above →
VERDICT
points
8.5
7.1
+1.4
gap is 0.6× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 4.4
NOT MEASURABLE
rebounds
3.2
3.4
−0.2
gap is 0.3× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.4
NOT MEASURABLE
assists
0.7
1.9
−1.2
gap is 4.7× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.5
NOT MEASURABLE
threes
1.2
1.2
0.0
gap is 0.1× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.9
NOT MEASURABLE
steals
1.2
0.5
+0.7
gap is 1.5× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.9
NOT MEASURABLE
blocks
0.7
0.2
+0.5
gap is 1.4× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.7
NOT MEASURABLE
turnovers
1.5
1.9
−0.4
gap is 0.7× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.1
NOT MEASURABLE
pts+reb+ast
12.3
12.4
0.0
gap is 0.0× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 5.7
NOT MEASURABLE
pts+reb
11.7
10.4
+1.2
gap is 0.4× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 5.6
NOT MEASURABLE
pts+ast
9.2
9.0
+0.2
gap is 0.1× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 4.5
NOT MEASURABLE
reb+ast
3.8
5.3
−1.5
gap is 1.9× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.5
NOT MEASURABLE
steals+blocks
1.8
0.7
+1.2
gap is 1.5× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.5
NOT MEASURABLE
field goals made
3.3
2.5
+0.8
gap is 0.8× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.9
NOT MEASURABLE
field goal attempts
7.5
5.8
+1.7
gap is 1.2× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 2.8
NOT MEASURABLE
three-point attempts
3.3
3.2
+0.1
gap is 0.3× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.1
NOT MEASURABLE
free throws made
0.7
0.8
−0.2
gap is 0.4× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.7
NOT MEASURABLE
free throw attempts
1.2
1.0
+0.1
gap is 0.2× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.1
NOT MEASURABLE
offensive rebounds
0.5
0.5
0.0
gap is 0.0× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.7
NOT MEASURABLE
defensive rebounds
2.7
2.9
−0.2
gap is 0.3× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.7
NOT MEASURABLE
fouls
2.5
2.0
+0.5
gap is 0.4× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 2.1
NOT MEASURABLE
usage 18.5 vs 17.3true shooting 60.2 vs 55.6minutes 22.3 vs 21.0

Baseline: form going into each game (the average of the previous 10), measured on 51 other games since 2025-05-23.

02

The 6 games

points · her form 7.1 · hover a bar
2025-05-25— 5-game mean2026-06-26 · newest
03

Why — minutes or rate

no difference in this split is larger than the sample can resolve, so there is nothing to explain

04

The matchup

Nothing in this split cleared the noise, so there is no difference to attribute to the opponent. The defensive profile is only worth reading beside a finding.

05

Game log

all 6 · click a row for the box score
DATE
OPP
H/A
MIN
POINTS
REB · AST · FG
VS 7.1
2026-06-26
CHI
AWAY
29.1MIN
11POINTS
3 · 1 · 5-11
ABOVE
FG
5-11
3PT
1-4
FT
0-0
OREB/DREB
2/1
TS%
50.0
USG%
16.5
STL
3
BLK
2
TOV
1
PF
1
+/−
-24
PRA
15
2026-06-24
CHI
AWAY
26.5MIN
13POINTS
5 · 2 · 5-12
ABOVE
FG
5-12
3PT
2-5
FT
1-3
OREB/DREB
0/5
TS%
48.8
USG%
24.4
STL
1
BLK
0
TOV
1
PF
1
+/−
-10
PRA
20
2026-05-09
CHI
HOME
23.6MIN
13POINTS
4 · 0 · 6-9
ABOVE
FG
6-9
3PT
1-2
FT
0-0
OREB/DREB
0/4
TS%
72.2
USG%
19.3
STL
1
BLK
1
TOV
1
PF
4
+/−
-15
PRA
17
2025-06-29
CHI
HOME
17.0MIN
0POINTS
2 · 0 · 0-5
BELOW
FG
0-5
3PT
0-4
FT
0-0
OREB/DREB
1/1
TS%
0.0
USG%
17.4
STL
1
BLK
1
TOV
2
PF
0
+/−
+3
PRA
2
2025-06-24
CHI
AWAY
12.3MIN
5POINTS
2 · 0 · 1-1
BELOW
FG
1-1
3PT
1-1
FT
2-2
OREB/DREB
0/2
TS%
133.0
USG%
17.4
STL
1
BLK
0
TOV
3
PF
5
+/−
-2
PRA
7
2025-05-25
CHI
HOME
25.6MIN
9POINTS
3 · 1 · 3-7
ABOVE
FG
3-7
3PT
2-4
FT
1-2
OREB/DREB
0/3
TS%
57.1
USG%
15.9
STL
0
BLK
0
TOV
1
PF
4
+/−
+7
PRA
13
every game on file — nothing hidden