DIME
Get the picksJoin
points estimatesat home

Sarah Ashlee Barker against the Minnesota Lynx

Averaged 7.3 points, 2.3 rebounds and 1.7 assists in 6 games against the Minnesota Lynx.

01

Every stat, vs baseline

hover a row for the gap against its noise
STAT
VS LYNX
FORM
DIFF
← below baseline · above →
VERDICT
points
7.3
7.6
−0.3
gap is 0.1× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 5.0
NOT MEASURABLE
rebounds
2.3
4.3
−2.0
gap is 2.3× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.7
NOT MEASURABLE
assists
1.7
1.6
+0.1
gap is 0.3× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.7
NOT MEASURABLE
threes
1.2
1.2
0.0
gap is 0.1× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.0
NOT MEASURABLE
steals
0.7
0.9
−0.2
gap is 0.4× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.9
NOT MEASURABLE
blocks
0.3
0.4
0.0
gap is 0.1× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.5
NOT MEASURABLE
turnovers
2.7
1.6
+1.1
gap is 0.8× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 2.7
NOT MEASURABLE
pts+reb+ast
11.3
13.5
−2.2
gap is 0.7× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 6.1
NOT MEASURABLE
pts+reb
9.7
12.0
−2.3
gap is 0.8× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 5.6
NOT MEASURABLE
pts+ast
9.0
9.2
−0.2
gap is 0.1× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 5.5
NOT MEASURABLE
reb+ast
4.0
5.9
−1.9
gap is 1.7× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 2.1
NOT MEASURABLE
steals+blocks
1.0
1.2
−0.2
gap is 0.3× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.3
NOT MEASURABLE
field goals made
2.7
2.5
+0.1
gap is 0.1× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 2.3
NOT MEASURABLE
field goal attempts
5.3
5.8
−0.4
gap is 0.2× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 3.6
NOT MEASURABLE
three-point attempts
3.2
2.9
+0.3
gap is 0.2× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 2.4
NOT MEASURABLE
free throws made
0.8
1.4
−0.5
gap is 1.2× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.8
NOT MEASURABLE
free throw attempts
1.3
1.7
−0.4
gap is 0.5× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.6
NOT MEASURABLE
offensive rebounds
0.3
0.6
−0.2
gap is 0.9× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.6
NOT MEASURABLE
defensive rebounds
2.0
3.7
−1.7
gap is 2.8× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.2
NOT MEASURABLE
fouls
2.8
2.7
+0.1
gap is 0.2× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.5
NOT MEASURABLE
usage 14.6 vs 16.2true shooting 50.4 vs 64.5minutes 23.1 vs 23.0

Baseline: form going into each game (the average of the previous 10), measured on 52 other games since 2025-05-23.

02

The 6 games

points · her form 7.6 · hover a bar
2025-05-18— 5-game mean2026-07-18 · newest
03

Why — minutes or rate

no difference in this split is larger than the sample can resolve, so there is nothing to explain

04

The matchup

Nothing in this split cleared the noise, so there is no difference to attribute to the opponent. The defensive profile is only worth reading beside a finding.

05

Game log

all 6 · click a row for the box score
DATE
OPP
H/A
MIN
POINTS
REB · AST · FG
VS 7.6
2026-07-18
MIN
AWAY
30.2MIN
21POINTS
4 · 3 · 9-14
ABOVE
FG
9-14
3PT
3-6
FT
0-0
OREB/DREB
1/3
TS%
75.0
USG%
22.1
STL
0
BLK
0
TOV
1
PF
5
+/−
-1
PRA
28
2026-06-15
MIN
AWAY
25.1MIN
8POINTS
2 · 2 · 3-5
ABOVE
FG
3-5
3PT
2-4
FT
0-0
OREB/DREB
0/2
TS%
80.0
USG%
20.1
STL
2
BLK
1
TOV
7
PF
3
+/−
-16
PRA
12
2025-07-10
MIN
HOME
8.1MIN
0POINTS
1 · 1 · 0-0
BELOW
FG
0-0
3PT
0-0
FT
0-0
OREB/DREB
0/1
TS%
0.0
USG%
0.0
STL
0
BLK
0
TOV
0
PF
1
+/−
-6
PRA
2
2025-06-21
MIN
AWAY
22.7MIN
5POINTS
0 · 1 · 2-8
BELOW
FG
2-8
3PT
1-6
FT
0-0
OREB/DREB
0/0
TS%
31.3
USG%
18.2
STL
0
BLK
0
TOV
1
PF
2
+/−
-4
PRA
6
2025-06-14
MIN
AWAY
28.0MIN
4POINTS
4 · 2 · 1-2
BELOW
FG
1-2
3PT
0-0
FT
2-4
OREB/DREB
1/3
TS%
53.2
USG%
13.9
STL
1
BLK
0
TOV
5
PF
1
+/−
-24
PRA
10
2025-05-18
MIN
HOME
24.5MIN
6POINTS
3 · 1 · 1-3
BELOW
FG
1-3
3PT
1-3
FT
3-4
OREB/DREB
0/3
TS%
63.0
USG%
13.5
STL
1
BLK
1
TOV
2
PF
5
+/−
-6
PRA
10
every game on file — nothing hidden