WNBA · Jun 14 gameFull sheet

Chicago Sky at Washington Mystics

FinalCHI 81 – WAS 83Page updated 16:53 UTC

Original picks and recorded results

No saved picks to grade.

Saved picks

0Posted odds · decimal

Check minutes

No playing-time estimates are available.

Picks for this game are not posted yet. The players below are up to date.

How to read the prices

Over means more than the posted line; Under means fewer. Decimal odds show the total return per unit staked, including the stake. Row order follows lineup status and available prices, not a confidence ranking.

Getting a better price than most bookmakers offer for the same line is the only thing on this page that, measured over many past bets, made money; player rates are context, not tips.

Players and minutes1 players in the available roster

Minutes are source estimates, not guaranteed playing time. Historical hit rates describe past games; they are not a forecast.

Chicago Sky

Kamilla Cardoso · minutes unknown

rebounds 7.5 → 4 actual

Washington Mystics

Explore every player and prop

Availability and game contextGame odds, lineups, workload and rest

Game odds

CHI expected to win by about 3 · both teams together expected to score about 158.5 points · odds to win: CHI 1.65, WAS 2.33

Game odds from Pinnacle (the bookmaker we use as the reference) · observed Fri 23:25 UTC

What could go wrong

updated 16:53 UTC

Who is out

Nobody is listed as injured on either team.

Lineups

Expected starting lineup, not yet confirmed

Playing time

No playing-time estimates are available.

Our check: these minute estimates (RotoWire) are typically off by about 4 minutes.

Rest

CHI had 7 days off before this game · WAS also played the day before this game.

Bookmakers

The reference bookmaker, Pinnacle, offers 0 of the 44 lines; the rest rely on other bookmakers.

Every pick is priced by at least 2 bookmakers.

When a player is out, that player's lines are removed: in our past results this helped. Guessing which teammates benefit was also tested and lost money, so nothing else on this page is adjusted for it.

Your reads and game resultsPredictions closed at game start

What happened

One game proves nothing.

FinalWe had no picks in this game · every posted line is still scored below

1 other player with a posted line

Kamilla Cardoso · rebounds 7.5 → 4 · 3.5 below the line · played 24 min · no final price

Each prediction is recorded as if you had staked 1 at the line you saw, and your record is shown here. One game tells you nothing yet.

Open My reads

More context

Head to head

WAS vs CHI · last 19 games · WAS leads · WAS record 14–5 · average score 83.1–77.3 · WAS has won by 5.7 on average

Team results are background only; they say nothing about any single player's line.

24 Sep · CHI 93 at WAS 101WAS won

17 Sep · WAS 110 at CHI 80WAS won

2 Jun · CHI 72 at WAS 90WAS won

What each defense gives up per game

CHI gives up90.7 points · 37.1 rebounds · 20.7 assists · 8.2 three-pointers scored against them · opponents make 44.9% of shots · 33.8% from three-point range · 12.9 opponent turnovers

WAS gives up83.2 points · 30.0 rebounds · 19.8 assists · 8.4 three-pointers scored against them · opponents make 43.1% of shots · 32.9% from three-point range · 11.9 opponent turnovers

Defense by position

How much this is worth

Defense-by-position numbers are mostly random from season to season; shown for context only. We tested it: a team's defense-by-position numbers from one half of the season do not predict the other half, so treat them as noise.

CHI gives up 90.7 points a game · 12th of 15 · league average 87.2+3.5 vs average

WAS gives up 83.2 points a game · 2nd of 15 · league average 87.2−4.0 vs average

How the game odds moved

No history of the game odds on file.

Data log (technical)

Technical detail for auditing; the plain version is above. Internal ids and formula names print here only.

Line-shopping measurement: project_conditional_minutes_refuted

Defense-by-position measurement: split-half reliability r = -0.033 across 12 cells (7 of 12 negative) against a shuffle null of 0.000; a placebo using the wrong position family reproduced the effect to within 0.12pp · project_dvp_blowout_gate_refuted · 2026-08-26

Our picks, raw · 0

No raw pick rows for this game.

Checked results, raw (basketball-stats shorthand) · 0

No graded rows for this game.

Data fetches · 22

sds rest/team (away)ok 200 · 8 ms

sds injuries/date/{date}ok 200 · 10 ms

grading picks/nightlyok 200 · 11 ms

sds schedule/team (meetings)ok · 12 ms

sds defense/team (home)ok 200 · 12 ms

sds defense/team (away)ok 200 · 13 ms

sds rest/team (home)ok 200 · 14 ms

sds analytics opponent_defense (home)ok 200 · 14 ms

grading verdict/boardok 200 · 17 ms

sds analytics opponent_defense (away)ok 200 · 16 ms

sds games/{id}ok 200 · 91 ms

sds lineups/{id}ok 200 · 103 ms

sds players/team (away)ok 200 · 4 ms

sds players/team (home)ok 200 · 5 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (rebounds)ok 200 · 6 ms

dh lineups/{id}/deltaok 200 · 131 ms

sds games/{id}/boxscoreok 200 · 141 ms

sds history (h2h)ok · 158 ms

grading clv/picksok 200 · 154 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 91 ms

odds game timelinefailed · 6001 ms

odds player timeline (rebounds)failed · 6000 ms

Classic view →

The older, longer version of this page is still available as the classic view. Nothing there is tracked in our results; this page is.