WNBA · May 9 gameAll props Full sheet

Chicago Sky at Portland Fire

FinalCHI 98 – POR 83Page updated 10:41 UTC

Original picks and recorded results

No saved picks to grade.

Saved picks

0Posted odds · decimal

Check minutes

No playing-time estimates are available.

Picks for this game are not posted yet. The players below are up to date.

How to read the prices

Over means more than the posted line; Under means fewer. Decimal odds show the total return per unit staked, including the stake. Row order follows lineup status and available prices, not a confidence ranking.

Getting a better price than most bookmakers offer for the same line is the only thing on this page that, measured over many past bets, made money; player rates are context, not tips.

Players and minutes6 players in the available roster

Minutes are source estimates, not guaranteed playing time. Historical hit rates describe past games; they are not a forecast.

Chicago Sky

Kamilla Cardoso · minutes unknown

points 13.5 → 22 actual

Rickea Jackson · minutes unknown

points 16.5 → 19 actual

Skylar Diggins · minutes unknown

points 15.5 → 21 actual

Portland Fire

Bridget Carleton · minutes unknown

points 12.5 → 13 actual

Carla Leite · minutes unknown

points 14.5 → 18 actual

Luisa Geiselsoder · minutes unknown

points 11.5 → 8 actual

Explore every player and prop

Availability and game contextGame odds, lineups, workload and rest

Game odds

CHI expected to win by about 5.5 · both teams together expected to score about 163 points · odds to win: CHI 1.43, POR 2.93

Game odds from Pinnacle (the bookmaker we use as the reference) · observed Sun 00:55 UTC

What could go wrong

updated 10:41 UTC

Who is out

Nobody is listed as injured on either team.

Lineups

Expected starting lineup, not yet confirmed

Playing time

No playing-time estimates are available.

Our check: these minute estimates (RotoWire) are typically off by about 4 minutes.

Rest

CHI had 8 days off before this game · POR had 10 days off before this game.

Bookmakers

The reference bookmaker, Pinnacle, offers 0 of the 70 lines; the rest rely on other bookmakers.

Every pick is priced by at least 2 bookmakers.

When a player is out, that player's lines are removed: in our past results this helped. Guessing which teammates benefit was also tested and lost money, so nothing else on this page is adjusted for it.

Your reads and game resultsPredictions closed at game start

What happened

In 1 of 5 cases where a player's past record disagreed with the bookmakers' price, the past record was right in this game. One game proves nothing.

FinalWe had no picks in this game · every posted line is still scored below

6 other players with a posted line

Kamilla Cardoso · points 13.5 → 22 · 8.5 above the line · played 24.7 min · BetOnline.ag odds: Over 2.00, Under 1.77

Skylar Diggins · points 15.5 → 21 · 5.5 above the line · played 32.8 min · BetRivers odds: Over 1.63, Under —

Luisa Geiselsoder · points 11.5 → 8 · 3.5 below the line · played 25.1 min · BetOnline.ag odds: Over 1.90, Under 1.86

Carla Leite · points 14.5 → 18 · 3.5 above the line · played 28.5 min · BetOnline.ag odds: Over 1.84, Under 1.92

Rickea Jackson · points 16.5 → 19 · 2.5 above the line · played 35.7 min · BetRivers odds: Over 1.78, Under —

Bridget Carleton · points 12.5 → 13 · 0.5 above the line · played 30.4 min · BetRivers odds: Over 1.78, Under —

Each prediction is recorded as if you had staked 1 at the line you saw, and your record is shown here. One game tells you nothing yet.

Open My reads

More context

Head to head

POR vs CHI · last 3 games · CHI leads · POR record 0–3 · average score 85.0–107.7 · POR has lost by 22.7 on average

Team results are background only; they say nothing about any single player's line.

26 Jun · POR 94 at CHI 124POR lost

24 Jun · POR 78 at CHI 101POR lost

9 May · CHI 98 at POR 83POR lost

What each defense gives up per game

CHI gives up90.7 points · 37.1 rebounds · 20.7 assists · 8.2 three-pointers scored against them · opponents make 44.9% of shots · 33.8% from three-point range · 12.9 opponent turnovers

POR gives up91.0 points · 34.0 rebounds · 22.9 assists · 9.3 three-pointers scored against them · opponents make 46.4% of shots · 35.0% from three-point range · 13.6 opponent turnovers

Defense by position

How much this is worth

Defense-by-position numbers are mostly random from season to season; shown for context only. We tested it: a team's defense-by-position numbers from one half of the season do not predict the other half, so treat them as noise.

CHI gives up 90.7 points a game · 11th of 15 · league average 87.2+3.5 vs average

POR gives up 91.0 points a game · 13th of 15 · league average 87.2+3.8 vs average

How the game odds moved

Pinnacle first had CHI expected to win by 5.5, expected total 163 (Sun 00:55 UTC) and had not changed it by Sun 00:55 UTC.

The odds at the top of the page are the latest we have, from every bookmaker on file; this is one bookmaker's own history.

Data log (technical)

Technical detail for auditing; the plain version is above. Internal ids and formula names print here only.

Line-shopping measurement: project_conditional_minutes_refuted

Defense-by-position measurement: split-half reliability r = -0.033 across 12 cells (7 of 12 negative) against a shuffle null of 0.000; a placebo using the wrong position family reproduced the effect to within 0.12pp · project_dvp_blowout_gate_refuted · 2026-08-26

Our picks, raw · 0

No raw pick rows for this game.

Checked results, raw (basketball-stats shorthand) · 0

No graded rows for this game.

Data fetches · 37

sds injuries/date/{date}ok 200 · 430 ms

sds rest/team (away)ok 200 · 433 ms

grading picks/nightlyok 200 · 436 ms

sds rest/team (home)ok 200 · 439 ms

sds defense/team (away)ok 200 · 439 ms

sds defense/team (home)ok 200 · 443 ms

sds schedule/team (meetings)ok · 444 ms

sds analytics opponent_defense (home)ok 200 · 446 ms

sds analytics opponent_defense (away)ok 200 · 447 ms

grading verdict/boardok 200 · 486 ms

sds games/{id}ok 200 · 499 ms

sds lineups/{id}ok 200 · 500 ms

sds players/team (home)ok 200 · 145 ms

sds players/team (away)ok 200 · 146 ms

sds history (h2h)ok · 660 ms

sds games/{id}/boxscoreok 200 · 663 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 65 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 67 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 69 ms

grading clv/picksok 200 · 310 ms

dh lineups/{id}/deltaok 200 · 753 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 155 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 159 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 176 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 184 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 187 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 189 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 192 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 201 ms

odds game timelineok 200 · 1574 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 1572 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 1574 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 1575 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 1577 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 1581 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 1645 ms

Classic view →

The older, longer version of this page is still available as the classic view. Nothing there is tracked in our results; this page is.