WNBA · Finalupdated 18:01 UTC

Portland Fire vs Washington Mystics

at Washington Mystics

WAS expected to win by about 6.5 · both teams together expected to score about 162.5 points · odds to win: POR 3.22, WAS 1.37

Game odds from Pinnacle (the bookmaker we use as the reference), Thu 21:40 UTC

POR 75 – WAS 56

Final

We had no picks in this game; every posted line is still scored below.

Getting a better price than most bookmakers offer for the same line is the only thing on this page that, measured over many past bets, made money; player rates are context, not tips.

Explore every player and prop

How to read this page

A pick is a player line, for example Under 13.5 points, that we published before the game together with the price we found for it. We do not take bets.
Odds are shown in the decimal format: 1.93 means you get back 1.93 for every 1 staked, so a higher number pays more. The American format (−108 means risk 108 to win 100; +111 means risk 100 to win 111) appears only in the Data log at the bottom of the page.
'Posted at' is the price we found when we published the pick; 'better' is a higher price for the same line at another bookmaker. Taking the better price is the one thing on this page that, measured over many past bets, made money.
'Market puts Under at 48.5%' is the chance implied by all bookmakers' prices together, with their built-in margin removed. Pinnacle is a bookmaker whose prices are widely treated as the most accurate reference, so it is the one we compare against.
A player's rate is how often that player has gone over the line this season, for example over in 41 of 78 games (52.6%), with a likely range such as 32–52%: fewer games means a wider range, and under 10 games we show no rate word at all.
'Past record stronger than the price' means the whole likely range sits above the chance the bookmakers' price implies; 'weaker' means below; 'agrees with the price' means the price sits inside the range, which is the usual case. None of these is a tip.
'Not measurable' is the usual honest answer: too few games to tell a real difference from chance.
'What could go wrong' lists the facts that can change a line: who is out, whether the starting lineup is confirmed, expected playing time (RotoWire's estimate, typically off by about 4 minutes), rest, and how many bookmakers price each line.
After the final, every pick is checked against the official stats and compared with the last price before the game started, the market's most informed price; getting a better price than that is the fairest test of a pick, whether or not it won. A tie means the player landed exactly on the line and the stake is returned; lines ending in .5 cannot tie.
Results are given for every 1 staked: 'would have returned +0.93' means a stake of 1 would have come back with 0.93 in profit. We do not stake anything; the record is what a stake of 1 on each pick would have done. Our record counts a smaller stake when the price advantage was small.
S beside a name marks an expected starter. Times are shown in your device's time zone; our data is recorded in US Eastern Time (ET). Team codes are the league's three-letter abbreviations.
'Your prediction' lets you pick Over or Under on any line before the game starts; we check your predictions the same way and keep your record, and one game of results proves nothing.
Team codes on this page: POR = Portland Fire, WAS = Washington Mystics.

Picks and prices

Odds of at least 1.70 only · highest odds first · results checked

A line is the number a bookmaker sets, e.g. 13.5 points; Over means more than it, Under fewer. Odds 1.93 pay 1.93 for every 1 staked. 'Posted at' is the price we found when we published the pick; after the game it is compared with the last price before the start.

We checked 0 lines; none paid at least 1.70, so there are no picks. Normal, not an error.

Why the better price matters

In our past tests, simply taking the highest price offered for a line earned more than any of our own forecasts did.

In that test (25 Aug 2026), taking the best price returned about 2.8 more for every 100 staked than the price we posted did.

The players

10 players checked · 9 whose past record points the other way from the bookmakers' price · 0 out · 0 with too few games

Rate: the share of this season's games in which the player finished above tonight's line. S beside a name marks an expected starter.

Against this opponent, 0 of 10 players have performed clearly differently and 1 shows a slight hint · No starting lineup yet; showing every player with a line

Context only A player's rate describes the past; it is not a tip and has not been tested as one. Expected minutes come from RotoWire, a lineup news service.

Sign in to see each player's rate The numbers below (for example 15.5 points) are the lines the bookmakers actually posted.

Portland Fireplaying WAS

Bridget Carleton · minutes unknown

points 12.5 → 6 actual

Carla Leite · minutes unknown

points 15.5 → 14 actual

Emily Engstler · minutes unknown

points 10.5 → 8 actual

Megan DiLeo · minutes unknown

points 12.5 → no final stat available

Sarah Ashlee Barker · minutes unknown

points 9.5 → 10 actual

Washington Mysticsplaying POR

Georgia Amoore · minutes unknown

points 6.5 → 3 actual

Kiki Iriafen · minutes unknown

points 15.5 → 2 actual

Michaela Onyenwere · minutes unknown

points 9.5 → 5 actual

Shakira Austin · minutes unknown

points 15.5 → 19 actual

Sonia Citron · minutes unknown

points 16.5 → 8 actual

What could go wrong

updated 18:01 UTC

Who is out

Harrison · earlier listed as likely to play, now available (changed Wed 01:15 UTC) · 16, 23 and 6 min in the last 3 games

Out Feagin · earlier listed as available (changed Mon 23:30 UTC) · 6, 1 and 3 min in the last 3 games

Lineups

Expected starting lineup, not yet confirmed

Playing time

No playing-time estimates yet.

Our check: these minute estimates (RotoWire) are typically off by about 4 minutes.

Rest

POR had 11 days off before this game.

Bookmakers

The reference bookmaker, Pinnacle, offers 15 of the 109 lines; the rest rely on other bookmakers.

Every pick is priced by at least 2 bookmakers.

Looking back

Flagged before the game: Harrison out (Wed 01:15 UTC) · played

Flagged before the game: Feagin out (Mon 23:30 UTC) · played

When a player is out, that player's lines are removed: in our past results this helped. Guessing which teammates benefit was also tested and lost money, so nothing else on this page is adjusted for it.

What happened

In 6 of 8 cases where a player's past record disagreed with the bookmakers' price, the past record was right in this game. One game proves nothing.

FinalWe had no picks in this game · every posted line is still scored below

10 other players with a posted line

Kiki Iriafen · points 15.5 → 2 · 13.5 below the line · played 24 min · Pinnacle odds: Over 1.79, Under 1.95

Georgia Amoore · points 6.5 → 3 · 3.5 below the line · played 15.7 min · Pinnacle odds: Over 1.87, Under 1.87

Bridget Carleton · points 12.5 → 6 · 6.5 below the line · played 26 min · Pinnacle odds: Over 1.76, Under 2.00

Sonia Citron · points 16.5 → 8 · 8.5 below the line · played 29.3 min · Pinnacle odds: Over 1.78, Under 1.95

Michaela Onyenwere · points 9.5 → 5 · 4.5 below the line · played 26.1 min · BetRivers odds: Over 2.25, Under —

Emily Engstler · points 10.5 → 8 · 2.5 below the line · played 21.8 min · Pinnacle odds: Over 1.99, Under 1.76

Shakira Austin · points 15.5 → 19 · 3.5 above the line · played 33.5 min · Pinnacle odds: Over 1.96, Under 1.78

Carla Leite · points 15.5 → 14 · 1.5 below the line · played 23 min · Pinnacle odds: Over 2.00, Under 1.75

Sarah Ashlee Barker · points 9.5 → 10 · 0.5 above the line · played 24 min · Pinnacle odds: Over 1.93, Under 1.81

Megan DiLeo · points 12.5 → no final stat available · Pinnacle odds: Over 1.81, Under 1.93

Each prediction is recorded as if you had staked 1 at the line you saw, and your record is shown here. One game tells you nothing yet.

More context

Head to head

WAS vs POR · last 3 games · WAS leads · WAS record 2–1 · average score 95.0–99.3 · WAS has lost by 4.3 on average

Team results are background only; they say nothing about any single player's line.

23 Aug · WAS 105 at POR 100WAS won

16 Jul · POR 75 at WAS 56WAS lost

28 Jun · POR 123 at WAS 124WAS won

What each defense gives up per game

POR gives up91.0 points · 34.0 rebounds · 22.9 assists · 9.3 three-pointers scored against them · opponents make 46.4% of shots · 35.0% from three-point range · 13.6 opponent turnovers

WAS gives up83.2 points · 30.0 rebounds · 19.8 assists · 8.4 three-pointers scored against them · opponents make 43.1% of shots · 32.9% from three-point range · 11.9 opponent turnovers

Defense by position

How much this is worth

Defense-by-position numbers are mostly random from season to season; shown for context only. We tested it: a team's defense-by-position numbers from one half of the season do not predict the other half, so treat them as noise.

POR gives up 91.0 points a game · 13th of 15 · league average 87.2+3.9 vs average

WAS gives up 83.2 points a game · 2nd of 15 · league average 87.2−4.0 vs average

How the game odds moved

Pinnacle first had WAS expected to win by 6, expected total 163.5 (Thu 00:45 UTC) and later WAS expected to win by 6.5, expected total 162.5 (Thu 21:40 UTC).

The odds at the top of the page are the latest we have, from every bookmaker on file; this is one bookmaker's own history.

Data log (technical)

Technical detail for auditing; the plain version is above. Internal ids and formula names print here only.

Line-shopping measurement: project_conditional_minutes_refuted

Defense-by-position measurement: split-half reliability r = -0.033 across 12 cells (7 of 12 negative) against a shuffle null of 0.000; a placebo using the wrong position family reproduced the effect to within 0.12pp · project_dvp_blowout_gate_refuted · 2026-08-26

Our picks, raw · 0

No raw pick rows for this game.

Checked results, raw (basketball-stats shorthand) · 0

No graded rows for this game.

Data fetches · 49

sds rest/team (home)ok 200 · 8 ms

sds rest/team (away)ok 200 · 15 ms

sds lineups/{id}ok 200 · 16 ms

sds history (h2h)ok · 16 ms

sds games/{id}/boxscoreok 200 · 18 ms

sds defense/team (away)ok 200 · 18 ms

sds analytics opponent_defense (away)ok 200 · 18 ms

sds injuries/date/{date}ok 200 · 21 ms

sds defense/team (home)ok 200 · 21 ms

grading picks/nightlyok 200 · 23 ms

grading verdict/boardok 200 · 26 ms

sds analytics opponent_defense (home)ok 200 · 27 ms

sds schedule/team (meetings)ok · 28 ms

sds players/team (home)ok 200 · 15 ms

sds players/team (away)ok 200 · 16 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 40 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 47 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 48 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 51 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 52 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 54 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 59 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 61 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 64 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 64 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 66 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 66 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 67 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 69 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 71 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 72 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 74 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 75 ms

sds games/{id}ok 200 · 121 ms

grading clv/picksok 200 · 181 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 194 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 199 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 214 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 217 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 229 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 236 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 250 ms

dh lineups/{id}/deltaok 200 · 365 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 546 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 613 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 617 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 629 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 651 ms

odds game timelineok 200 · 718 ms

Classic view →

The older, longer version of this page is still available as the classic view. Nothing there is tracked in our results; this page is.