WNBA · FINAL · SAT, JUL 18, 8:00 PM

NYL @ IND

New York Liberty at Indiana Fever

← All WNBA games on 2026-07-18
0
Spread (home)
0
Total
-135 / +120
Moneyline

Snapshot market context · game-quote observation time and source book unavailable · snapshot assembled Aug 31, 6:07 PM EDT

GAME BRIEF · START HERE

Start with what happened, then judge the process.

New York Liberty at Indiana Fever is a completed-game review. Any call below is record-only.

REVIEW
Open the 2-minute projection guide
Best next step

Review result, minutes, closing line, and abnormal-exposure notes; then expand the supporting evidence.

DECISION TIMELINE · REVISION FLOW

Loading frozen research checkpoints…

HISTORICAL FORMULA FEED · AUDIT ONLY

Results & Recorded Calls · 1 qualified

Start with the verified result and flat-1u CORE benchmark P&L. Then compare the recorded call with the evidence that can be reconstructed without using this game's outcome.

FINAL RESULT · CORE BENCHMARK

WIN
Actual
6 vs 5.5
Flat-1u P&L
+0.99u
CLV
+10.4¢
Minutes
17.8

SERVER RECORD · CORE FORMULA · REBOUNDS

Monique Billings O 5.5 REB −101

Persisted decision price · 2.0u model stake · bet_clv:142827

RECORD ONLY

Current meaning: This is a settled, record-only decision. It is historical evidence, not a current wager.

PROP BRIEF · START HERE

Review the recorded result—not a current play.

What the evidence saysThe context is split

Recent games · Last 5 no sample; Against this opponent supports; Similar players vs opponent pushes back. Do not turn correlated or conflicting history into extra confidence.

Main riskWhat could break the read

Decision time is unavailable; the capture bucket must not be read as decision time.

Next stepReview the process

Compare the result, minutes, closing line, and receipt limits below.

Verified receipt & source timing

Canonical decision receipt · Receipt bet_clv:142827 · formula consensus_devig v1.0.0 · capture bucket Jul 17, 8:00 PM EDT (not decision time) · decision time unavailable · point-in-time unverified

WHY IT WAS SURFACED · FEED PRICE

57.3% model chance vs 50.2% needed at −101 · +7.0pp probability edge · +0.1% expected profit / 1u
Model stake2.0u

PREGAME CHECKS · AUDIT

What the receipt can—and cannot—prove

Decision receiptRecord only

−101 · sportsbook unavailable · quote observation unavailable · bet_clv:142827

Pregame availabilityNot timestamped

No immutable pre-tip player-status receipt is connected.

Pregame roleNot verified

Pick-time minutes, lineup, and role inputs are not verified by the canonical receipt.

SUPPORTING CONTEXT · NOT EXTRA VOTES

Recent, H2H, and similar players

Read each row on its stated basis
Recent games · Last 5No sample
No eligible recent sample

The history source was checked, but no eligible recent games were found.

Against this opponentSupports
3 of 5 would have hit

Vs NYL at today's OVER 5.5 · 5.6 average

Similar players vs opponentPushes back
4 below · 1 above market

5 comparable bigs, each judged against that player's own closing line

BOTTOM LINE

The context is split

Recent games · Last 5 no sample; Against this opponent supports; Similar players vs opponent pushes back. Do not turn correlated or conflicting history into extra confidence.

WHAT THE ARCHIVE IS MISSING

  • Decision time is unavailable; the capture bucket must not be read as decision time.
  • The source sportsbook or quote observation timestamp was not preserved.
  • The pre-tip availability observation was not stored immutably.
See game-by-game evidenceL3 / L5 / L10 · opponent games · comparable players
L3
—
At today's OVER 5.5 · avg unavailable · minutes unavailable
L5
—
At today's OVER 5.5 · avg unavailable · minutes unavailable
L10
—
At today's OVER 5.5 · avg unavailable · minutes unavailable

Player vs opponentFinished above 5.5 in 3/5 prior player meetings vs NYL

Position/team matchupNo stat-matched position/team factor is connected; direct defender assignments are unavailable

Reconstructed from a snapshot assembled Aug 31, 6:07 PM EDT. The target game and all same/future dates are excluded. L3 is contained inside L5, which is contained inside L10; they are one sample, not three confirmations.

DEFENSE CHECK · EACH PLAYER'S OWN CLOSE

How comparable bigs fared vs NYL
Descriptive · not another model vote
4/5 belowClosest 5 peers · median finish 0.5 below market
All Rebounds props vs NYL
43/78 below
58 players · 78 player-games · median 0.5 below market
Same position family
18/30 below
bigs only · 23 players · median 0.5 below market

These are market-relative results, not raw points allowed: every peer is judged against the line offered for that peer's own game. The 5 shown are selected by position family and usual line; the opponent result is not used to rank them.

See the 5 comparable players
One latest eligible meeting per peer, strictly before Jul 18. “Usual” is that player's trailing median closing line, not the result against NYL.
PlayerWhy comparableDateOwn closeActualFinishMinutes
Naz Hillmon
PF
usual 5.5 over 10 games · Δ 0.0 · 29.0 minJun 115.51.04.5 below market29.7
Nia Coffey
PF
usual 5.5 over 10 games · Δ 0.0 · 28.4 minJul 114.55.00.5 above market28.1
Awa Fam
C
usual 5.5 over 10 games · Δ 0.0 · 31.1 minJun 256.56.00.5 below market33.0
Maria Conde
PF
usual 4.5 over 10 games · Δ 1.0 · 30.4 minJul 125.52.03.5 below market33.5
NaLyssa Smith
PF
usual 6.5 over 10 games · Δ 1.0 · 23.6 minJun 306.56.00.5 below market20.4
Open evidence game log

HISTORICAL MARKET CHECK

Against each game's own verified close
Normal exposure only

Checking verified pre-tip closing lines…

Player history vs NYL

Latest 5 of 13 eligible meetings · finished above 5.5 in 3/5 · average 5.6. Context only; roles and schemes change.

DateActualMinutesOVER 5.5
Jun 68.035.0Hit
Sep 23.019.6Miss
Jun 257.020.4Hit
May 297.020.3Hit
Aug 263.016.3Miss
See methodology & source audit6 pillars · 49 checks

The six items are pillars, not six yes/no questions. Each check below is evidence—not a gamified score. One hard failure can outweigh many verified inputs.

1 · Price & market value
Caution

What exact side, line, odds, and book are offered?

Monique Billings OVER 5.5 −101 · sportsbook unavailable

Source · canonical grading decision receipt
Caution

When was the formula price captured?

Capture bucket Jul 17, 8:00 PM EDT (storage bucket, not decision time) · decision time unavailable · quote observation unavailable

Source · bet_clv:142827
Verified

What hit rate does the price require?

50.2%

Source · derived from formula-feed American odds
Verified

What is the calibrated probability at this line?

57.3%

Source · canonical decision model.calibrated_hit_probability
Verified

What is the probability-point edge?

+7.0pp

Source · p_hit minus formula-price break-even
Verified

What is expected profit per unit?

+0.1%

Source · canonical decision model.claimed_ev_pct (when persisted)
N/A

Does the exact line appear in the connected snapshot?

Mutable latest-market rows are intentionally excluded from historical pre-tip proof

Unavailable

What price or line turns this into a pass?

Server-authoritative playable boundaries are not published yet

N/A

Does the broader market agree?

Mutable latest-market rows are not used to reconstruct historical consensus

Unavailable

Is the market liquid enough?

Limits and liquidity are not connected

2 · Projection quality & uncertainty
Unavailable

What is the projected median?

Unavailable

Unavailable

What does the outcome distribution look like?

Distribution unavailable

Unavailable

How sensitive is the pick to minutes, usage, or pace?

Sensitivity model unavailable

Caution

What do L3, L5, and L10 show at this exact line?

L3 unavailable · L5 unavailable · L10 unavailable at the formula OVER 5.5 line

Source · reconstructed hydrator game history; target/same/future dates excluded
Caution

Is the model calibrated for this league, prop, and bucket?

The pick carries calibrated p_hit; bucket-level proof is not exposed here

Unavailable

Was calibration measured out of sample?

Out-of-sample calibration evidence is not exposed per pick

Unavailable

How large is the comparable historical sample?

No eligible reconstructed L10 sample

Unavailable

When did the model run and were inputs complete?

Research run timestamp unavailable

Source · Gameplay Intelligence
3 · Availability & role
Unavailable

Is the player active, questionable, limited, or returning?

No hard game-report flag; individual status is not fully resolved

Source · player-state service
Caution

When was status last verified?

Snapshot assembled Aug 31, 6:07 PM EDT; injury-source observation time is not mapped

Source · data-hydrator snapshot assembly
Unavailable

What is the expected minutes range?

Minutes projection unavailable

Unavailable

Is the player starting or restricted?

Starter and restriction status unavailable

Unavailable

Has opportunity changed?

Opportunity feed unavailable

Unavailable

Which teammate absences change the role?

No confirmed teammate-absence attribution returned

Unavailable

Were injury-shortened games identified?

The joined outcome does not include a verified abnormal-exposure flag

Unavailable

What rotation change could invalidate the projection?

No material role change returned

4 · Game environment & matchup
Unavailable

How many possessions are expected?

A game-level pace projection is not exposed on this card

Caution

What do spread and total imply?

Spread (home) 0 · Total 0 · Moneyline -135 / +120 · archive context only; not an immutable pre-tip market receipt · snapshot assembled Aug 31, 6:07 PM EDT

Source · data-hydrator assembled game-market snapshot
Unavailable

Does opponent scheme affect this stat?

No stat-matched position/team factor is connected; direct defender assignments are unavailable

Caution

What has this player done against this opponent?

Finished above 5.5 in 3/5 prior player meetings vs NYL

Source · reconstructed player-vs-team game history; target date excluded
Unavailable

Which defender or lineup matters?

Defender attribution is not exposed

Unavailable

Is rest, travel, or schedule a disadvantage?

Rest and travel context are not connected

Caution

What foul, blowout, or game-script path creates downside?

Spread is visible; player-level foul and game-script risk are not quantified

5 · Execution & portfolio risk
N/A

Is the number still inside its playable boundary?

Not applicable after tip; mutable current offers are excluded from historical execution proof

Verified

How was stake size derived?

2.0u model-sized stake

Source · canonical decision model.kelly_stake_units
Unavailable

How much correlated exposure already exists?

Player, game, and injury-thesis exposure are not connected

Unavailable

Are exposure limits respected?

Daily, league, player, and prop limits are not exposed

Caution

What event withdraws or expires the pick?

Game start and hard availability conflicts are enforced; price boundaries remain a backend gap

Caution

Is this pregame, live, or halftime analysis?

Schedule status: final · formula-feed archive context

Caution

Is there a no-chase rule?

The UI expires the card after tip and requires exact-line verification; explicit price-bound enforcement is pending

6 · Outcome evidence & accountability
Verified

Did the pick beat the comparable close?

+10.4¢ closing-line value (price CLV)

Source · joined grading settlement
Verified

Was the formula line stored immutably?

OVER 5.5 · decision key pd_0a867f102931a4a82bb08bef · receipt bet_clv:142827 · formula consensus_devig v1.0.0

Source · prop-decision-envelope.v1
N/A

Was a miss variance, injury, foul trouble, or blowout?

Winning settlement; miss-cause attribution is not applicable.

Verified

What are flat-1u and actual-staked ROI?

This pick's flat-1u CORE result is +0.99u. Personal staking remains separate.

Source · joined grading ledger
Unavailable

What are sample size and uncertainty interval?

Per-cohort confidence interval is not exposed on the card

Unavailable

Are probabilities calibrated by Brier or log loss?

Per-cohort calibration metrics are not exposed

Unavailable

Where is performance weakening?

League/prop/price/book/time-to-tip drift is not joined here

Unavailable

What are drawdown and losing-streak behavior?

Portfolio drawdown belongs to the ledger and is not connected to this pick

Unavailable

Is the edge persisting in new data?

Model-versioned out-of-sample persistence is not exposed per pick

Formula · consensus_devigReceipt · bet_clv:142827Serving price floor · 1.70Research assembled · Timestamp unavailable

DECISION LAB

Loading the immutable evidence map…

AVAILABILITY SNAPSHOT · AUDIT CONTEXT

Availability & Injuries

1 hard availability snapshot flag appears. Player-level observation time is unavailable, so this does not prove the status existed before tip; formula rows remain record-only.

NYLLeonie Fiebich · Injury/Illness-LeftFoot (Foot)OUT

GAMEPLAY INTELLIGENCE · IMMUTABLE PRE-TIP CAPTURE

Model Outlook

Checking the latest captured lineup, rotation, matchup and market state…

MARKET CONTEXT · NOT A PICK · THIS GAME · T−1H

Prop Watchlist

A shortlist of unusual market lines. Compare this game's checkpoint with a player's typical close, then see whether recent results against their own lines agree. Only the Formula-Qualified Recommendations section contains CORE candidate wagers.

Choose prop
Showing 2 of 29 all props market observations
38props checked
2top observations shown now
0Out / Doubtful / Inactive watches hidden
T−1Hlatest locked check
How these market observations are calculated

Typical market close is the median closing line across all earlier verified games this season—not a scoring average or a fixed 30-game window. Recent results use up to five actual-backed games that were final at least six hours before this checkpoint, so a just-finished game may be intentionally excluded. These are descriptive observations, not win probabilities or automatic picks.

Market expectation up

Upward descriptive pattern—not an Over pick
Expectation upPRA · market observation—not a pick

Sabrina Ionescu

NYL · G · vs IND

26.5Line at T−1H
Typical market close
23.5
across 14 earlier verified games
Market vs typical
+3.0
checkpoint line minus typical close
Last 5 vs own closing lines
+13.5
median actual minus each game's line
Checkpoint move
+1.0
since the 6-hour check

Market + recent results align

This game's PRA line is 26.5 at T−1H. The typical market close was 23.5 across 14 earlier verified games. Recent results finished a median 13.5 above their own closing lines across 5 included games.

Use this to investigate this game's number—not as an automatic Over/Under.

LATEST INCLUDED · Jul 12 · 40.0 actual vs 25.5 line (+14.5)

Market expectation down

Downward descriptive pattern—not an Under pick
Expectation downPTS · market observation—not a pick

Caitlin Clark

IND · G · vs NYL

17.5Line at T−1H
Typical market close
19.5
across 20 earlier verified games
Market vs typical
−2.0
checkpoint line minus typical close
Last 5 vs own closing lines
−2.5
median actual minus each game's line
Checkpoint move
0.0
since the 6-hour check

Market + recent results align

This game's PTS line is 17.5 at T−1H. The typical market close was 19.5 across 20 earlier verified games. Recent results finished a median 2.5 below their own closing lines across 5 included games.

Use this to investigate this game's number—not as an automatic Over/Under.

LATEST INCLUDED · Jul 17 · 45.0 actual vs 18.5 line (+26.5)

Showing the clearest market observations for available players—not additional bets.Open the season tape →

The Read

Liberty @ Fever presents a low-scoring, grind-style matchup driven by pace dynamics. Indiana operates at 84.8 possessions per game (below-league-average) with a solid +4.9 net rating (ORTG 110.7, DRTG 105.8), while New York Liberty runs even slower at 80.9 pace with a +2.99 net rating (ORTG 107.94, DRTG 104.95). The combined pace of ~165.7 possessions translates to approximately 95 total possessions and a projected total around 190–197 points—well below the market total of 174.5, suggesting value on the UNDER. Indiana's elite three-point defense (6.87 3PM allowed, rank 1) and strong rebound defense (30.56 RPG allowed, rank 2) will suppress New York's efficiency. However, New York exploits a vulnerability in Indiana's forward defense (37.96 PPG allowed, rank 15, middle-of-pack), and both teams' guard scoring units face a neutral-to-slightly-favorable environment. The 20% blowout probability indicates both teams will play deep benches, keeping star minutes in the 31–36 range unless the game tightens unexpectedly late.

Kelsey Mitchell emerges as Indiana's most actionable prop target. Operating at 27.2% usage with 32–33 projected minutes, Mitchell is averaging 27.0 PPG over her last five games—well above her season mean of 22.9. New York's guard defense ranks 3rd-worst, allowing 35.46 PPG to opposing guards, creating a soft matchup despite the slower tempo. The 23.5 line sits 2.3 points below her season average and 1.7 below her L5 mark, offering modest value. The slower pace compresses her ceiling by 5–7%, but her recent form and the defensive mismatch justify a MEDIUM-confidence lean on the OVER.

Monique Billings' rebounding prop provides secondary value. Billings is a reserve forward operating at 22–23 minutes per game with elevated recent form (L5: 5.8 RPG vs. season 5.3). Against New York's neutral rebounding defense (13.75 RPG allowed to forwards, rank 5), the 5.5 line sits 0.3 points below her L5 average. The grind-style game reduces blowout risk and rebounding noise, stabilizing her baseline. Her assists prop (1.5 line) carries marginal edge at only 58% confidence and is included at the lower confidence threshold.

The broader game environment is shaped by Indiana's defensive excellence and New York's ball security concerns (16.1% turnover rate). The Fever's elite three-point defense should suppress New York's perimeter scoring and force the Liberty to lean on interior playmaking—an area where Indiana's elite guard defense (9.72 APG allowed, rank 3) provides secondary support. The game's likely grind nature and lower total favor under-type props and reduced volume for most role players, necessitating selective prop targeting around primary scorers and high-volume rebounders with recent form edges.

SUPPORTING RESEARCH · NOT A BETTING RECOMMENDATION

Matchup Outlook

IND
Projected winner
-1.5
Model spread
U 197.5
Model total
60%
Outlook confidence · MODERATE

Team Series History

IND vs NYL · last 19 meetings · NYL leads

Team results are game-environment context—not validation for an individual player prop. Player-specific opponent history lives inside each recommendation card.

5–14
IND record
85.3–93.5
Avg score (home)
-8.3
Avg margin
34
Avg reb

RECENT MEETINGS

06/06IND 75 @ NYL 83LIND