02

Picks and prices

Odds of at least 1.70 only · highest odds first · results checked

A line is the number a bookmaker sets, e.g. 13.5 points; Over means more than it, Under fewer. Odds 1.93 pay 1.93 for every 1 staked. 'Posted at' is the price we found when we published the pick; after the game it is compared with the last price before the start.

Publication timing not verified

Saved legacy CORE rows, if available, have not been verified as pre-tip publications. They are not backfilled into the published record, and a missing row is not a pass.

No new predictions are being generated here after tip. Saved calls and captured research are not current offers or injury confirmations.

This game’s current price coverage could not be verified. An empty price panel does not mean bookmakers have no lines.

Price comparison only: live snapshot enrichment and model inference were not requested by this game view. Source injuries, lineups and historical statistics are separate reads.

Evaluation coverage and timestamps

Status is slate-wide, observed only since the service started. It does not identify this game’s individual evaluation result.

Slate games processed
0 / 0
Latest publication attempt
unknown
Status observed since

No verified attempt timestamp was returned. This is unknown—not a successful empty evaluation.

K. Plum · Over 24.5 points + rebounds + assistsWonPosted at 2.00 · last price before start 1.78Won +1.00 per 1 staked

Posted at 2.00 · Our price was 6.1% higher than the last price before the start (good: a higher price pays more per 1 staked).

Pinnacle, the reference bookmaker, does not offer this line

No price history for this line.

Re-checked 1 h before the start not re-checked

Legacy CORE signal · publication timing not verified. Recorded model stake: 1.45 units. The broader CORE flat-1u benchmark is separate; it is not a recommended1u wager or the exact published cohort’s ROI.

Investigate this prop →
Why the better price matters

In our past tests, simply taking the highest price offered for a line earned more than any of our own forecasts did.

In that test (25 Aug 2026), taking the best price returned about 2.8 more for every 100 staked than the price we posted did.

03

The players

7 players checked · 5 whose past record points the other way from the bookmakers' price · 0 out · 0 with too few games

Rate: the share of this season's games in which the player finished above tonight's line. S beside a name marks an expected starter.

Against this opponent, 0 of 7 players have performed clearly differently and 2 show a slight hint

Context only A player's rate describes the past; it is not a tip and has not been tested as one. Expected minutes come from RotoWire, a lineup news service.

Sign in to see each player's rate The numbers below (for example 15.5 points) are the lines the bookmakers actually posted.

Phoenix Mercuryplaying CON

Alyssa Thomas · 36 min expected
points 15.5 → 10 actual
Kahleah Copper · 34 min expected
points 20.5 → 16 actual
DeWanna Bonner · 31 min expected
points 10.5 → 6 actual
Kelsey Plum · 28 min expected
points + rebounds + assists 24.5 → 28 actual

4 players have no line from any bookmaker: Brochant (23 expected minutes) · Ayayi (16 min) · +2 more

Connecticut Sunplaying PHO

Leila Lacan · 29 min expected
points 12.5 → 9 actual
Olivia Nelson-Ododa · 27 min expected
points 12.5 → 7 actual
Diamond Miller · 26 min expected
points 11.5 → 9 actual

8 players have no line from any bookmaker: Leger-Walker (26 expected minutes) · Burke (26 min) · +6 more

Saved gameplay research · not CORE picks

What did the models record?

Read frozen projections, minutes and lineup assumptions for this exact game. These are uncalibrated research—not official recommendations or evidence that the CORE selector ran.

Only original pre-tip captures are read. Nothing is newly forecast after tip; old availability assumptions are not current injury news.

Sign in to view saved research →Coverage has not been checked in this session. Missing access is not missing data.

Saved reads only · no new captures, current snapshots, odds requests or paid AI runs.

04

What could go wrong

updated
Who is out

Jackson · earlier listed as out, now available (changed ) · 26, 15 and 17 min in the last 3 games

Kneepkens · did not play last game

Beers · earlier listed as out, now available (changed ) · 29, 24 and 12 min in the last 3 games

Out Marshall · earlier listed as available (changed ) · 0, 8 and 10 min in the last 3 games

Dunn · earlier listed as likely to play, now available (changed ) · 17, 11 and 13 min in the last 3 games

Held · did not play last game

Suarez · earlier listed as may not play, now available (changed ) · 15, 10 and 4 min in the last 3 games

Ciezki · earlier listed as out, now available (changed ) · 19, 15 and 21 min in the last 3 games

Lineups

Expected starting lineup, not yet confirmed

Playing time

4 players are expected to play at least 5 minutes more or fewer than in the last 5 games. For 3 players (Leger-Walker, Miller, Burke) we have no real minutes estimate, only a default.

Thomas: expected to play 36 minutes, averaged 28.3 in the last 5 games, about 7.7 more than usual

Bonner: expected to play 31 minutes, averaged 15.1 in the last 5 games, about 15.9 more than usual

Plum: expected to play 28 minutes, averaged 22.7 in the last 5 games, about 5.3 more than usual

Nelson-Ododa: expected to play 27 minutes, averaged 21.6 in the last 5 games, about 5.4 more than usual

Our check: these minute estimates (RotoWire) are typically off by about 4 minutes.

Rest

PHO had 38 days off before this game · CON had 38 days off before this game.

Bookmakers

The reference bookmaker, Pinnacle, offers 14 of the 72 lines; the rest rely on other bookmakers.

Every pick is priced by at least 2 bookmakers.

Looking back

Flagged before the game: Jackson out () · did not play

Flagged before the game: Kneepkens out · did not play

Flagged before the game: Beers out () · did not play

Flagged before the game: Marshall out () · did not play

Flagged before the game: Dunn out () · did not play

Flagged before the game: Held out · did not play

Flagged before the game: Suarez out () · did not play

Flagged before the game: Ciezki out () · did not play

2 expected players did not play

When a player is out, that player's lines are removed: in our past results this helped. Guessing which teammates benefit was also tested and lost money, so nothing else on this page is adjusted for it.

05

What happened

In 5 of 5 cases where a player's past record disagreed with the bookmakers' price, the past record was right in this game. One game proves nothing.
Final · 1 of 1 pick won1 won, 0 lost · +1.00 if you had staked 1 on each · our prices on average 6.1% higher than the last before the start · checked
Kelsey Plum · points + rebounds + assists 24.5 → 28 · 3.5 above the line · played 27.8 min (28 expected)
Pick: Over 24.5 at 2.00 → Won +1.00 per 1 staked
6 other players with a posted line
Olivia Nelson-Ododa · points 12.5 → 7 · 5.5 below the line · played 16.1 min (27 expected) · no final price
DeWanna Bonner · points 10.5 → 6 · 4.5 below the line · played 34.5 min (31 expected) · no final price
Alyssa Thomas · points 15.5 → 10 · 5.5 below the line · played 35.3 min (36 expected) · Pinnacle odds: Over 1.96, Under 1.79
Leila Lacan · points 12.5 → 9 · 3.5 below the line · played 31.1 min (29 expected) · no final price
Kahleah Copper · points 20.5 → 16 · 4.5 below the line · played 34 min (34 expected) · Pinnacle odds: Over 1.72, Under 2.12
Diamond Miller · points 11.5 → 9 · 2.5 below the line · played 23.6 min (26 expected) · no final price

Sign in to see your predictions checked

Each prediction is recorded as if you had staked 1 at the line you saw, and your record is shown here. One game tells you nothing yet.

More context
Head to head

CON vs PHO · last 16 games · CON leads · CON record 11–5 · average score 80.6–74.0 · CON has won by 6.6 on average

Team results are background only; they say nothing about any single player's line.

7 Aug · PHO 72 at CON 75CON won
19 Jul · CON 63 at PHO 72CON lost
17 Jul · CON 96 at PHO 83CON won
6 Sep · PHO 84 at CON 87CON won
What each defense gives up per game
PHO gives up87.6 points · 34.0 rebounds · 21.5 assists · 9.7 three-pointers scored against them · opponents make 46.4% of shots · 36.1% from three-point range · 12.9 opponent turnovers
CON gives up87.7 points · 33.9 rebounds · 19.9 assists · 8.0 three-pointers scored against them · opponents make 46.3% of shots · 34.9% from three-point range · 13.5 opponent turnovers
Defense by position
How much this is worth

Defense-by-position numbers are mostly random from season to season; shown for context only. We tested it: a team's defense-by-position numbers from one half of the season do not predict the other half, so treat them as noise.

PHO gives up 87.6 points a game · 8th of 15 · league average 87.0about league average
CON gives up 87.7 points a game · 9th of 15 · league average 87.0about league average
How the game odds moved

Pinnacle first had PHO expected to win by 6, expected total 172.5 () and later PHO expected to win by 5, expected total 173 ().

The odds at the top of the page are the latest we have, from every bookmaker on file; this is one bookmaker's own history.

Data log (technical)

Technical detail for auditing; the plain version is above. Internal ids and formula names print here only.

Line-shopping measurement: project_conditional_minutes_refuted

Defense-by-position measurement: split-half reliability r = -0.033 across 12 cells (7 of 12 negative) against a shuffle null of 0.000; a placebo using the wrong position family reproduced the effect to within 0.12pp · project_dvp_blowout_gate_refuted · 2026-08-26

Our picks, raw · 1
Kelsey Plum · O 24.5 pra+100value_edge_pct +5.85 · kelly 1.45u · price_check unchecked · rank 1
Checked results, raw (basketball-stats shorthand) · 1
Kelsey Plum Over 24.5 PRAWIN +1.00ubet +100 → close −128 · CLV +6.1¢ · bet_clv:256639 · consensus_devig · captured 2026-08-07T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 C · p_hit 52.9% · actual 28 · 27.8 min · started
Data fetches · 39
sds rest/team (away)ok 200 · 10 ms
sds history (h2h)ok · 11 ms
sds defense/team (home)ok 200 · 12 ms
sds defense/team (away)ok 200 · 13 ms
sds analytics opponent_defense (away)ok 200 · 14 ms
sds analytics opponent_defense (home)ok 200 · 15 ms
grading picks/nightlyok 200 · 17 ms
sds schedule/team (meetings)ok · 16 ms
sds games/{id}ok 200 · 91 ms
sds rest/team (home)ok 200 · 92 ms
grading picks/published (saved-only)ok · 95 ms
sds lineups/{id}ok 200 · 105 ms
sds games/{id}/boxscoreok 200 · 109 ms
sds injuries/date/{date}ok 200 · 111 ms
odds player timeline (pra)failed 503 · 85 ms
grading clv/picksok 200 · 97 ms
dh lineups/{id}/deltaok 200 · 449 ms
odds game timelineok 200 · 803 ms
grading verdict/board (price-only)ok 200 · 1032 ms
odds player timeline (points)failed 503 · 97 ms
odds player timeline (points)failed 503 · 99 ms
odds player timeline (points)failed 503 · 99 ms
odds player timeline (points)failed 503 · 100 ms
sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 103 ms
sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 108 ms
sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 110 ms
sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 117 ms
sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 123 ms
sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 127 ms
sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 130 ms
sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 130 ms
sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 137 ms
sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 147 ms
sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 151 ms
sds analytics player_vs_line (pra)ok 200 · 163 ms
sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 167 ms
sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 169 ms
odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 581 ms
odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 648 ms
Classic view →

The older, longer version of this page is still available as the classic view. Nothing there is tracked in our results; this page is.