WNBA · Finalupdated 00:08 UTC

Toronto Tempo vs Dallas Wings

at Dallas Wings

DAL expected to win by about 9.5 · both teams together expected to score about 183.5 points · odds to win: TOR 4.26, DAL 1.23

Game odds from Pinnacle (the bookmaker we use as the reference), Wed 22:34 UTC

TOR 88 – DAL 94

Final · 6 of 10 picks won

10 picks checked: 6 won, 4 lost.

Getting a better price than most bookmakers offer for the same line is the only thing on this page that, measured over many past bets, made money; player rates are context, not tips.

Explore every player and prop

How to read this page

A pick is a player line, for example Under 13.5 points, that we published before the game together with the price we found for it. We do not take bets.
Odds are shown in the decimal format: 1.93 means you get back 1.93 for every 1 staked, so a higher number pays more. The American format (−108 means risk 108 to win 100; +111 means risk 100 to win 111) appears only in the Data log at the bottom of the page.
'Posted at' is the price we found when we published the pick; 'better' is a higher price for the same line at another bookmaker. Taking the better price is the one thing on this page that, measured over many past bets, made money.
'Market puts Under at 48.5%' is the chance implied by all bookmakers' prices together, with their built-in margin removed. Pinnacle is a bookmaker whose prices are widely treated as the most accurate reference, so it is the one we compare against.
A player's rate is how often that player has gone over the line this season, for example over in 41 of 78 games (52.6%), with a likely range such as 32–52%: fewer games means a wider range, and under 10 games we show no rate word at all.
'Past record stronger than the price' means the whole likely range sits above the chance the bookmakers' price implies; 'weaker' means below; 'agrees with the price' means the price sits inside the range, which is the usual case. None of these is a tip.
'Not measurable' is the usual honest answer: too few games to tell a real difference from chance.
'What could go wrong' lists the facts that can change a line: who is out, whether the starting lineup is confirmed, expected playing time (RotoWire's estimate, typically off by about 4 minutes), rest, and how many bookmakers price each line.
After the final, every pick is checked against the official stats and compared with the last price before the game started, the market's most informed price; getting a better price than that is the fairest test of a pick, whether or not it won. A tie means the player landed exactly on the line and the stake is returned; lines ending in .5 cannot tie.
Results are given for every 1 staked: 'would have returned +0.93' means a stake of 1 would have come back with 0.93 in profit. We do not stake anything; the record is what a stake of 1 on each pick would have done. Our record counts a smaller stake when the price advantage was small.
S beside a name marks an expected starter. Times are shown in your device's time zone; our data is recorded in US Eastern Time (ET). Team codes are the league's three-letter abbreviations.
'Your prediction' lets you pick Over or Under on any line before the game starts; we check your predictions the same way and keep your record, and one game of results proves nothing.
Team codes on this page: TOR = Toronto Tempo, DAL = Dallas Wings.

Picks and prices

Odds of at least 1.70 only · highest odds first · results checked

A line is the number a bookmaker sets, e.g. 13.5 points; Over means more than it, Under fewer. Odds 1.93 pay 1.93 for every 1 staked. 'Posted at' is the price we found when we published the pick; after the game it is compared with the last price before the start.

I. Harrison · Under 4.5 reboundsLostPosted at 2.15 · last price before start pendingLost −1.00 per 1 staked

Posted at 2.15

Pinnacle, the reference bookmaker, does not offer this line

First offered at 2.10 by DraftKings (Wed 20:07 UTC); latest 1.78 at BetOnline.ag (Wed 23:49 UTC). The line moved from 4.5 to 5.5.

Re-checked 1 h before the start not re-checked

In our results this pick counts as a stake of 0.00 (standard 1); smaller when the price gap is small.

I. Harrison · Under 11.5 pointsWonPosted at 1.98 · last price before start pendingWon +0.98 per 1 staked

P. Bueckers · Under 22.5 pointsWonPosted at 1.96 · last price before start pendingWon +0.96 per 1 staked

L. Juskaite · Over 7.5 pointsWonPosted at 1.96 · last price before start pendingWon +0.96 per 1 staked

K. Rice · Under 4.5 assistsLostPosted at 1.95 · last price before start pendingLost −1.00 per 1 staked

N. Sabally · Over 13.5 pointsLostPosted at 1.88 · last price before start pendingLost −1.00 per 1 staked

K. Rice · Under 14.5 pointsWonPosted at 1.77 · last price before start pendingWon +0.77 per 1 staked

P. Bueckers · Under 7.5 assistsLostPosted at 1.73 · last price before start pendingLost −1.00 per 1 staked

P. Bueckers · Under 4.5 reboundsWonPosted at 1.72 · last price before start pendingWon +0.72 per 1 staked

N. Sabally · Over 5.5 reboundsWonPosted at 1.72 · last price before start pendingWon +0.72 per 1 staked

Why the better price matters

In our past tests, simply taking the highest price offered for a line earned more than any of our own forecasts did.

In that test (25 Aug 2026), taking the best price returned about 2.8 more for every 100 staked than the price we posted did.

The players

10 players checked · 9 whose past record points the other way from the bookmakers' price · 3 out · 0 with too few games

Rate: the share of this season's games in which the player finished above tonight's line. S beside a name marks an expected starter.

Against this opponent, 2 of 11 players have performed clearly differently and 0 show a slight hint

Context only A player's rate describes the past; it is not a tip and has not been tested as one. Expected minutes come from RotoWire, a lineup news service.

Sign in to see each player's rate The numbers below (for example 15.5 points) are the lines the bookmakers actually posted.

Toronto Tempoplaying DAL

SLaura Juskaite · 32 min expected

points 7.5 → 18 actual

SMarina Mabrey · 32 min expected

points 18.5 → 23 actual

SNyara Sabally · 30 min expected

rebounds 5.5 → 7 actual

SKiki Rice · 25 min expected

assists 4.5 → 5 actual

SIsabelle Harrison · 23 min expected

points 11.5 → 4 actual

Aneesah Morrow · 26 min expected

points 9.5 → 8 actual

Julie Allemand · Out · left thigh

points 6.5 → did not play, so no result

Maria Conde · Out · left calf

points 8.5 → did not play, so no result

3 players have no line from any bookmaker: Fagbenle (18 expected minutes) · Nurse (14 min) · Key

Dallas Wingsplaying TOR

SPaige Bueckers · 32 min expected

points 22.5 → 22 actual

SArike Ogunbowale · 30 min expected

points 15.5 → 21 actual

SAlanna Smith · 27 min expected

points 12.5 → 13 actual

SAwak Kuier · 15 min expected

points 6.5 → 14 actual

Azzi Fudd · Out · right knee

points 11.5 → did not play, so no result

6 players have no line from any bookmaker: Yueru (25 expected minutes) · Sims (22 min) · +4 more

What could go wrong

updated 00:08 UTC

Who is out

James · earlier listed as out, now available (changed Sat 22:00 UTC) · 13, 12 and 15 min in the last 3 games

Fudd · earlier listed as out, now available (changed Wed 00:00 UTC) · 35, 24 and 33 min in the last 3 games

Jones · earlier listed as out, now available (changed Sat 22:00 UTC) · 7, 5 and 7 min in the last 3 games

Shepard · earlier listed as likely to play, now available (changed Tue 00:45 UTC) · 33, 36 and 27 min in the last 3 games

Yueru · did not play last game

Sutton · did not play last game

Out Sykes · earlier listed as available (changed Sat 23:45 UTC) · 2, 22 and 19 min in the last 3 games

Allemand · earlier listed as likely to play, now available (changed Wed 21:15 UTC) · 25, 23 and 26 min in the last 3 games

Out Conde · earlier listed as may not play (changed Thu 18:15 UTC) · 14, 22 and 20 min in the last 3 games

Key · did not play last game

Green · earlier listed as out, now available (changed Fri 00:00 UTC) · 21, 10 and 4 min in the last 3 games

Lineups

Expected starting lineup, not yet confirmed

Playing time

4 players are expected to play at least 5 minutes more or fewer than in the last 5 games. For 2 players (Juskaite, Mabrey) we have no real minutes estimate, only a default.

Sabally: expected to play 30 minutes, averaged 24.6 in the last 5 games, about 5.4 more than usual

Morrow: expected to play 26 minutes, averaged 19.7 in the last 5 games, about 6.3 more than usual

Smith: expected to play 27 minutes, averaged 20.5 in the last 5 games, about 6.5 more than usual

Kuier: expected to play 15 minutes, averaged 25.7 in the last 5 games, about 10.7 fewer than usual

Our check: these minute estimates (RotoWire) are typically off by about 4 minutes.

Rest

Both teams had at least two days between their last game and this one.

Bookmakers

The reference bookmaker, Pinnacle, offers 18 of the 146 lines; the rest rely on other bookmakers.

Every pick is priced by at least 2 bookmakers.

Looking back

Flagged before the game: James out (Sat 22:00 UTC) · played

Flagged before the game: Fudd out (Wed 00:00 UTC) · did not play

Flagged before the game: Jones out (Sat 22:00 UTC) · did not play

Flagged before the game: Shepard out (Tue 00:45 UTC) · did not play

Flagged before the game: Yueru out · did not play

Flagged before the game: Sutton out · did not play

Flagged before the game: Sykes out (Sat 23:45 UTC) · did not play

Flagged before the game: Allemand out (Wed 21:15 UTC) · did not play

Flagged before the game: Conde out (Thu 18:15 UTC) · did not play

Flagged before the game: Key out · did not play

Flagged before the game: Green out (Fri 00:00 UTC) · did not play

2 expected players did not play

When a player is out, that player's lines are removed: in our past results this helped. Guessing which teammates benefit was also tested and lost money, so nothing else on this page is adjusted for it.

What happened

In 5 of 9 cases where a player's past record disagreed with the bookmakers' price, the past record was right in this game. One game proves nothing.

Final · 6 of 10 picks won6 won, 4 lost · +1.12 if you had staked 1 on each · 15 lines checked, 5 scored but not picked · checked Sat 00:52 UTC

Laura Juskaite · points 7.5 → 18 · 10.5 above the line · played 32 min (32 expected)

Pick: Over 7.5 at 1.96 → Won +0.96 per 1 staked

Isabelle Harrison · points 11.5 → 4 · 7.5 below the line · played 30.3 min (23 expected)

Pick: Under 11.5 at 1.98 → Won +0.98 per 1 staked

Nyara Sabally · rebounds 5.5 → 7 · 1.5 above the line · played 16.8 min (30 expected)

Pick: Over 5.5 at 1.72 → Won +0.72 per 1 staked

Kiki Rice · assists 4.5 → 5 · 0.5 above the line · played 31.5 min (25 expected)

Pick: Under 4.5 at 1.95 → Lost −1.00 per 1 staked · our note: no single cause

Paige Bueckers · points 22.5 → 22 · 0.5 below the line · played 34.5 min (32 expected)

Pick: Under 22.5 at 1.96 → Won +0.96 per 1 staked

8 other players with a posted line

Awak Kuier · points 6.5 → 14 · 7.5 above the line · played 25.3 min (15 expected) · BetRivers odds: Over 1.83, Under —

Arike Ogunbowale · points 15.5 → 21 · 5.5 above the line · played 34.6 min (30 expected) · Pinnacle odds: Over 1.85, Under 1.89

Marina Mabrey · points 18.5 → 23 · 4.5 above the line · played 31 min (32 expected) · Pinnacle odds: Over 1.87, Under 1.87

Aneesah Morrow · points 9.5 → 8 · 1.5 below the line · played 21.6 min (26 expected) · DraftKings odds: Over 1.97, Under 1.78

Alanna Smith · points 12.5 → 13 · 0.5 above the line · played 33.5 min (27 expected) · Pinnacle odds: Over 2.11, Under 1.74

Julie Allemand · points 6.5 → did not play, so no result · Pinnacle odds: Over 1.97, Under 1.78

Maria Conde · points 8.5 → did not play, so no result · Pinnacle odds: Over 1.78, Under 1.98

Azzi Fudd · points 11.5 → did not play, so no result · no final price

Each prediction is recorded as if you had staked 1 at the line you saw, and your record is shown here. One game tells you nothing yet.

More context

Head to head

DAL vs TOR · last 3 games · DAL leads · DAL record 3–0 · average score 97.0–86.3 · DAL has won by 10.7 on average

Team results are background only; they say nothing about any single player's line.

12 Aug · TOR 88 at DAL 94DAL won

10 Jul · DAL 108 at TOR 95DAL won

5 Jul · DAL 89 at TOR 76DAL won

What each defense gives up per game

TOR gives up94.4 points · 34.5 rebounds · 22.6 assists · 9.8 three-pointers scored against them · opponents make 47.8% of shots · 35.4% from three-point range · 12.1 opponent turnovers

DAL gives up85.3 points · 33.3 rebounds · 19.9 assists · 8.1 three-pointers scored against them · opponents make 44.8% of shots · 33.1% from three-point range · 11.9 opponent turnovers

Defense by position

How much this is worth

Defense-by-position numbers are mostly random from season to season; shown for context only. We tested it: a team's defense-by-position numbers from one half of the season do not predict the other half, so treat them as noise.

TOR gives up 94.4 points a game · 15th of 15 · league average 87.0+7.3 vs average

DAL gives up 85.3 points a game · 5th of 15 · league average 87.0−1.8 vs average

How the game odds moved

Pinnacle first had DAL expected to win by 9, expected total 185 (Wed 01:11 UTC) and later DAL expected to win by 9.5, expected total 183.5 (Wed 22:34 UTC).

The odds at the top of the page are the latest we have, from every bookmaker on file; this is one bookmaker's own history.

Data log (technical)

Technical detail for auditing; the plain version is above. Internal ids and formula names print here only.

Line-shopping measurement: project_conditional_minutes_refuted

Defense-by-position measurement: split-half reliability r = -0.033 across 12 cells (7 of 12 negative) against a shuffle null of 0.000; a placebo using the wrong position family reproduced the effect to within 0.12pp · project_dvp_blowout_gate_refuted · 2026-08-26

Our picks, raw · 12

Kiki Rice · U 4.5 assists−105value_edge_pct +3.90 · kelly 1.00u · price_check unchecked · rank 1

Isabelle Harrison · U 4.5 rebounds+115value_edge_pct +0.96 · kelly 0.00u · price_check unchecked · rank 4

Nyara Sabally · O 13.5 points−114value_edge_pct −0.64 · kelly 0.00u · price_check unchecked · rank 6

Paige Bueckers · U 22.5 points−104value_edge_pct −1.83 · kelly 0.00u · price_check unchecked · rank 7

Nyara Sabally · O 14.5 points+103value_edge_pct −2.54 · kelly 0.00u · price_check unchecked · rank 12

Isabelle Harrison · U 11.5 points−102value_edge_pct −2.62 · kelly 0.00u · price_check unchecked · rank 13

Laura Juskaite · O 7.5 points−104value_edge_pct −3.11 · kelly 0.00u · price_check unchecked · rank 14

Paige Bueckers · U 4.5 rebounds−138value_edge_pct −3.34 · kelly 0.00u · price_check unchecked · rank 15

Nyara Sabally · O 5.5 rebounds−138value_edge_pct −3.34 · kelly 0.00u · price_check unchecked · rank 16

Paige Bueckers · U 7.5 assists−137value_edge_pct −3.62 · kelly 0.00u · price_check unchecked · rank 17

Paige Bueckers · U 21.5 points−106value_edge_pct −4.17 · kelly 0.00u · price_check unchecked · rank 18

Kiki Rice · U 14.5 points−130value_edge_pct −4.30 · kelly 0.00u · price_check unchecked · rank 19

Checked results, raw (basketball-stats shorthand) · 15

Kiki Rice Under 14.5 PTSWIN +0.77ubet −130 · bet_clv:297490 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-12T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 C · p_hit 54.1% · actual 13 · 31.5 min · startedWithout the box-score details (FG%, attempts, minutes, etc.), I can't write a grounded explanation. Please provide her shooting splits, minutes played, or other relevant stats so I can explain specifically why she stayed under 14.5 points.

Kiki Rice Under 4.5 ASTLOSS −1.00ubet −105 · bet_clv:297491 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-12T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 C · p_hit 53.2% · unexplained · actual 5 · 31.5 min · startedShe exceeded the assist line by just one, finishing with 5 assists—likely driven by elevated ball-handling and playmaking opportunities that pushed her over the modest 4.5 threshold.

Nyara Sabally Over 5.5 REBWIN +0.72ubet −138 · bet_clv:297489 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-12T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 B · p_hit 56.0% · actual 7 · 16.8 min · benchWithout the full box line provided, I can't ground the explanation in specific context like her minutes played, the team's rebounding rate, or whether she faced backup defenders. To write an accurate post-game note, I'd need details such as: - Minutes played - Field goal attempts (indicating usage) - Whether the game was competitive or a blowout - Foul trouble or early exits Could you share her complete box line (points, FG%, minutes, etc.) so I can explain *why* she hit 7 boards and cleared the 5.5 line?

Nyara Sabally Over 13.5 PTSLOSS −1.00ubet −114 · bet_clv:297488 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-12T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 C · p_hit 52.9% · unexplained · actual 6 · 16.8 min · benchI can't write the note without the box-score data. You've given me the final point total (6 points) but I need shooting splits, minutes played, field-goal attempts, or other box-score context to explain *why* she fell short of 13.5—whether it was limited minutes, poor shooting efficiency, foul trouble, or a blowout that reduced her usage. Please provide the box line or key stats (FG%, FGA, minutes, etc.) and I'll write a sharp explanation.

Nyara Sabally Over 14.5 PTSLOSS −1.00ubet +103 · bet_clv:297487 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-12T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 PASS · p_hit 48.0% · unexplained · actual 6 · 16.8 min · benchWithout box-score details (minutes played, shot attempts, free throw attempts), I can't ground a specific explanation in the data as required by the rules. I'd need her FGA, FT attempts, shooting percentages, or minutes to explain whether this was due to limited run, poor efficiency, foul trouble, or bench role. Please provide the box-score line so I can write an accurate note.

Isabelle Harrison Under 5.5 REBLOSS −1.00ubet −147 · bet_clv:297494 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-12T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 B · p_hit 57.2% · unexplained · actual 10 · 30.3 min · startedPlayer nearly doubled the rebounding projection with 10 boards, likely driven by extended playing time and strong activity on both glass—a significant gap from the 5.5-rebound threshold.

Isabelle Harrison Under 4.5 REBLOSS −1.00ubet +115 · bet_clv:297493 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-12T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 PASS · p_hit 47.0% · unexplained · actual 10 · 30.3 min · startedPlayer hauled in 10 rebounds, more than double the 4.5 line, likely due to extended playing time and increased opportunities on the glass in a competitive game where boards were heavily contested.

Isabelle Harrison Under 11.5 PTSWIN +0.98ubet −102 · bet_clv:297492 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-12T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 PASS · p_hit 49.2% · actual 4 · 30.3 min · startedPlayer was held well below the line due to limited offensive opportunities and shot selection, finishing 2-for-8 from the field for just 4 points despite playing a full game. The under hit decisively as she failed to get into rhythm and couldn't generate enough scoring looks to approach double figures.

Laura Juskaite Over 2.5 REBWIN +0.70ubet −143 · bet_clv:297486 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-12T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 B · p_hit 57.5% · actual 7 · 32.0 min · startedShe grabbed 7 rebounds, well above the 2.5 line, by staying on the floor for extended minutes and consistently crashing the glass on both ends.

Laura Juskaite Over 7.5 PTSWIN +0.96ubet −104 · bet_clv:297485 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-12T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 PASS · p_hit 49.4% · actual 18 · 32.0 min · startedShe erupted for 18 points, well above the 7.5-point line, by staying aggressive throughout and capitalizing on efficient scoring opportunities.

Paige Bueckers Under 7.5 ASTLOSS −1.00ubet −137 · bet_clv:297480 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-12T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 B · p_hit 55.7% · unexplained · actual 8 · 34.5 min · startedShe exceeded the line by just one assist, finishing with 8—likely driven by high usage and ball-handling volume in a game that required her to run the offense consistently.

Paige Bueckers Under 4.5 REBWIN +0.72ubet −138 · bet_clv:297483 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-12T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 B · p_hit 56.0% · actual 3 · 34.5 min · startedPlayer finished with just 3 rebounds, well short of the 4.5 line, likely due to limited court time or a game script that didn't generate enough rebounding opportunities.

Paige Bueckers Under 22.5 PTSWIN +0.96ubet −104 · bet_clv:297482 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-12T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 PASS · p_hit 50.0% · actual 22 · 34.5 min · startedThe under cashed as she stayed just under the mark with 22 points on the night. Without her typical shot volume or efficiency, she couldn't climb over the 22.5 threshold.

Paige Bueckers Under 21.5 PTSLOSS −1.00ubet −106 · bet_clv:297481 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-12T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 PASS · p_hit 49.3% · unexplained · actual 22 · 34.5 min · startedUnable to write an accurate note without box-score details. To explain why the UNDER 21.5 missed at 22 points, I need shooting splits, minutes, or usage data to identify the specific driver (hot shooting, extended minutes, high volume, etc.). Please provide the box-line stats.

Alanna Smith Under 2.5 ASTLOSS −1.00ubet −175 · bet_clv:297484 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-12T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 A · p_hit 60.8% · unexplained · actual 4 · 33.5 min · startedShe exceeded the assist line by recording 4 assists, benefiting from elevated ball-handling duties and likely more offensive possessions than the line anticipated.

Data fetches · 58

sds rest/team (away)ok 200 · 62 ms

sds rest/team (home)ok 200 · 63 ms

sds defense/team (away)ok 200 · 70 ms

sds defense/team (home)ok 200 · 71 ms

sds schedule/team (meetings)ok · 77 ms

sds analytics opponent_defense (home)ok 200 · 79 ms

sds analytics opponent_defense (away)ok 200 · 81 ms

sds games/{id}ok 200 · 186 ms

sds lineups/{id}ok 200 · 201 ms

sds injuries/date/{date}ok 200 · 213 ms

sds history (h2h)ok · 217 ms

grading picks/nightlyok 200 · 221 ms

sds games/{id}/boxscoreok 200 · 241 ms

grading clv/picksok 200 · 106 ms

dh lineups/{id}/deltaok 200 · 494 ms

odds player timeline (assists)ok 200 · 486 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 556 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 558 ms

odds player timeline (rebounds)ok 200 · 560 ms

odds player timeline (rebounds)ok 200 · 561 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 572 ms

odds player timeline (assists)ok 200 · 572 ms

odds player timeline (rebounds)ok 200 · 736 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 866 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 867 ms

odds game timelineok 200 · 1107 ms

grading verdict/boardok 200 · 2700 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 73 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 202 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 204 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 208 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 209 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 211 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 217 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 220 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 256 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 263 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 265 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 270 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 278 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 291 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (rebounds)ok 200 · 294 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 296 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 314 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 318 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 323 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (assists)ok 200 · 326 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 328 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 330 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 331 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 350 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 524 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 566 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 570 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 572 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 613 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 615 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 633 ms

Classic view →

The older, longer version of this page is still available as the classic view. Nothing there is tracked in our results; this page is.