WNBA · FINAL · THU, AUG 13, 7:00 PM

ATL @ CON

Atlanta Dream at Connecticut Sun

← All WNBA games on 2026-08-13
+9.5
Spread (home)
174.5
Total
0 / 0
Moneyline

Snapshot market context · game-quote observation time and source book unavailable · snapshot assembled Sep 2, 4:25 AM EDT

GAME BRIEF · START HERE

Start with what happened, then judge the process.

Atlanta Dream at Connecticut Sun is a completed-game review. Any call below is record-only.

REVIEW
Open the 2-minute projection guide
Best next step

Review result, minutes, closing line, and abnormal-exposure notes; then expand the supporting evidence.

DECISION TIMELINE · REVISION FLOW

Loading frozen research checkpoints…

HISTORICAL FORMULA FEED · AUDIT ONLY

Results & Recorded Calls · 3 qualified

Start with the verified result and flat-1u CORE benchmark P&L. Then compare the recorded call with the evidence that can be reconstructed without using this game's outcome.

FINAL RESULT · CORE BENCHMARK

LOSS
Actual
1 vs 9.5
Flat-1u P&L
−1.00u
CLV
+2.4¢
Minutes
10.2

Postgame context: Miller fouled out early (4 PF in just 10 minutes), severely limiting her opportunity to score, and shot just 0-3 from the field while on the court. Combined with minimal usage (17%), she had virtually no chance to reach 9.5 points.

SERVER RECORD · CORE FORMULA · POINTS

Diamond Miller O 9.5 PTS +100

Persisted decision price · 0.8u model stake · bet_clv:300281

RECORD ONLY

Current meaning: This is a settled, record-only decision. It is historical evidence, not a current wager.

PROP BRIEF · START HERE

Review the recorded result—not a current play.

What the evidence saysContext pushes against the OVER

Recent games · Last 5 small sample; Against this opponent pushes back; Similar players vs opponent pushes back. Treat the disagreement as a reason to demand a better price or pass.

Main riskWhat could break the read

Decision time is unavailable; the capture bucket must not be read as decision time.

Next stepReview the process

Compare the result, minutes, closing line, and receipt limits below.

Verified receipt & source timing

Canonical decision receipt · Receipt bet_clv:300281 · formula priced_lineedges v1.0.0 · capture bucket Aug 12, 8:00 PM EDT (not decision time) · decision time unavailable · point-in-time unverified

WHY IT WAS SURFACED · FEED PRICE

51.5% model chance vs 50.0% needed at +100 · +1.5pp probability edge · +2.9% expected profit / 1u
Model stake0.8u

Why “<52%” can still show positive value: that label describes raw hit likelihood. At plus money, a candidate can hit less than half the time and still carry positive expected value because a win pays more than 1u.

PREGAME CHECKS · AUDIT

What the receipt can—and cannot—prove

Decision receiptRecord only

+100 · sportsbook unavailable · quote observation unavailable · bet_clv:300281

Pregame availabilityNot timestamped

No immutable pre-tip player-status receipt is connected.

Pregame roleNot verified

Pick-time minutes, lineup, and role inputs are not verified by the canonical receipt.

SUPPORTING CONTEXT · NOT EXTRA VOTES

Recent, H2H, and similar players

Read each row on its stated basis
Recent games · Last 5Small sample
0 of 1 would have hit

Against today's OVER 9.5 · 9.0 average · 23.6 average minutes

Against this opponentPushes back
0 of 5 would have hit

Vs ATL at today's OVER 9.5 · 5.4 average

Similar players vs opponentPushes back
4 below · 1 above market

5 comparable wings, each judged against that player's own closing line

BOTTOM LINE

Context pushes against the OVER

Recent games · Last 5 small sample; Against this opponent pushes back; Similar players vs opponent pushes back. Treat the disagreement as a reason to demand a better price or pass.

WHAT THE ARCHIVE IS MISSING

  • Decision time is unavailable; the capture bucket must not be read as decision time.
  • The source sportsbook or quote observation timestamp was not preserved.
  • The pre-tip availability observation was not stored immutably.
See game-by-game evidenceL3 / L5 / L10 · opponent games · comparable players
L3
0/1
At today's OVER 9.5 · avg 9.0 · 23.6 avg min
L5
0/1
At today's OVER 9.5 · avg 9.0 · 23.6 avg min
L10
0/1
At today's OVER 9.5 · avg 9.0 · 23.6 avg min

Player vs opponentFinished above 9.5 in 0/5 prior player meetings vs ATL

Position/team matchupNo stat-matched position/team factor is connected; direct defender assignments are unavailable

Reconstructed from a snapshot assembled Sep 2, 4:25 AM EDT. The target game and all same/future dates are excluded. L3 is contained inside L5, which is contained inside L10; they are one sample, not three confirmations.

DEFENSE CHECK · EACH PLAYER'S OWN CLOSE

How comparable wings fared vs ATL
Descriptive · not another model vote
4/5 belowClosest 5 peers · median finish 5.5 below market
All Points props vs ATL
73/145 above
82 players · 145 player-games · median 0.5 above market
Same position family
24 games · mixed
wings only · 15 players · median 0.5 above market

These are market-relative results, not raw points allowed: every peer is judged against the line offered for that peer's own game. The 5 shown are selected by position family and usual line; the opponent result is not used to rank them.

See the 5 comparable players
One latest eligible meeting per peer, strictly before Aug 13. “Usual” is that player's trailing median closing line, not the result against ATL.
PlayerWhy comparableDateOwn closeActualFinishMinutes
Gabriela Jaquez
SF
usual 9.0 over 10 games · Δ 0.5 · 14.3 minJul 197.52.05.5 below market14.7
Emily Engstler
F
usual 9.5 over 10 games · Δ 0.0 · 23.6 minJul 118.514.05.5 above market25.4
Kayla Thornton
SF
usual 8.5 over 10 games · Δ 1.0 · 27.4 minJul 48.52.06.5 below market23.5
Leonie Fiebich
F
usual 9.0 over 10 games · Δ 0.5 · 30.7 minJun 116.56.00.5 below market26.6
Michaela Onyenwere
F
usual 8.5 over 10 games · Δ 1.0 · 28.1 minAug 78.50.08.5 below market21.1
Open evidence game log

HISTORICAL MARKET CHECK

Against each game's own verified close
Normal exposure only

Checking verified pre-tip closing lines…

CURRENT-LINE WHAT-IF

Prior results against this card's 9.5 line
A retrospective comparison with this formula line—not the market line offered in each old game.
DateOpponentActualMinutesOVER 9.5
Aug 7vs PHO9.023.6Miss
Player history vs ATL

Latest 5 of 7 eligible meetings · finished above 9.5 in 0/5 · average 5.4. Context only; roles and schemes change.

DateActualMinutesOVER 9.5
Jun 28.025.9Miss
Aug 296.020.9Miss
Jul 278.015.7Miss
Jul 172.011.4Miss
Sep 13.012.8Miss
See methodology & source audit6 pillars · 49 checks

The six items are pillars, not six yes/no questions. Each check below is evidence—not a gamified score. One hard failure can outweigh many verified inputs.

1 · Price & market value
Caution

What exact side, line, odds, and book are offered?

Diamond Miller OVER 9.5 +100 · sportsbook unavailable

Source · canonical grading decision receipt
Caution

When was the formula price captured?

Capture bucket Aug 12, 8:00 PM EDT (storage bucket, not decision time) · decision time unavailable · quote observation unavailable

Source · bet_clv:300281
Verified

What hit rate does the price require?

50.0%

Source · derived from formula-feed American odds
Verified

What is the calibrated probability at this line?

51.5%

Source · canonical decision model.calibrated_hit_probability
Verified

What is the probability-point edge?

+1.5pp

Source · p_hit minus formula-price break-even
Verified

What is expected profit per unit?

+2.9%

Source · canonical decision model.claimed_ev_pct (when persisted)
N/A

Does the exact line appear in the connected snapshot?

Mutable latest-market rows are intentionally excluded from historical pre-tip proof

Unavailable

What price or line turns this into a pass?

Server-authoritative playable boundaries are not published yet

N/A

Does the broader market agree?

Mutable latest-market rows are not used to reconstruct historical consensus

Unavailable

Is the market liquid enough?

Limits and liquidity are not connected

2 · Projection quality & uncertainty
Unavailable

What is the projected median?

Unavailable

Unavailable

What does the outcome distribution look like?

Distribution unavailable

Unavailable

How sensitive is the pick to minutes, usage, or pace?

Sensitivity model unavailable

Caution

What do L3, L5, and L10 show at this exact line?

L3 0/1 · L5 0/1 · L10 0/1 at the formula OVER 9.5 line

Source · reconstructed hydrator game history; target/same/future dates excluded
Caution

Is the model calibrated for this league, prop, and bucket?

The pick carries calibrated p_hit; bucket-level proof is not exposed here

Unavailable

Was calibration measured out of sample?

Out-of-sample calibration evidence is not exposed per pick

Caution

How large is the comparable historical sample?

1 eligible prior games in L10 · 0 under 10 minutes · nested descriptive sample, not 1 independent confirmations

Unavailable

When did the model run and were inputs complete?

Research run timestamp unavailable

Source · Gameplay Intelligence
3 · Availability & role
Unavailable

Is the player active, questionable, limited, or returning?

No hard game-report flag; individual status is not fully resolved

Source · player-state service
Caution

When was status last verified?

Snapshot assembled Sep 2, 4:25 AM EDT; injury-source observation time is not mapped

Source · data-hydrator snapshot assembly
Unavailable

What is the expected minutes range?

Minutes projection unavailable

Unavailable

Is the player starting or restricted?

Starter and restriction status unavailable

Unavailable

Has opportunity changed?

Opportunity feed unavailable

Unavailable

Which teammate absences change the role?

No confirmed teammate-absence attribution returned

Unavailable

Were injury-shortened games identified?

The joined outcome does not include a verified abnormal-exposure flag

Unavailable

What rotation change could invalidate the projection?

No material role change returned

4 · Game environment & matchup
Unavailable

How many possessions are expected?

A game-level pace projection is not exposed on this card

Caution

What do spread and total imply?

Spread (home) +9.5 · Total 174.5 · Moneyline 0 / 0 · archive context only; not an immutable pre-tip market receipt · snapshot assembled Sep 2, 4:25 AM EDT

Source · data-hydrator assembled game-market snapshot
Unavailable

Does opponent scheme affect this stat?

No stat-matched position/team factor is connected; direct defender assignments are unavailable

Caution

What has this player done against this opponent?

Finished above 9.5 in 0/5 prior player meetings vs ATL

Source · reconstructed player-vs-team game history; target date excluded
Unavailable

Which defender or lineup matters?

Defender attribution is not exposed

Unavailable

Is rest, travel, or schedule a disadvantage?

Rest and travel context are not connected

Caution

What foul, blowout, or game-script path creates downside?

Spread is visible; player-level foul and game-script risk are not quantified

5 · Execution & portfolio risk
N/A

Is the number still inside its playable boundary?

Not applicable after tip; mutable current offers are excluded from historical execution proof

Verified

How was stake size derived?

0.8u model-sized stake

Source · canonical decision model.kelly_stake_units
Unavailable

How much correlated exposure already exists?

Player, game, and injury-thesis exposure are not connected

Unavailable

Are exposure limits respected?

Daily, league, player, and prop limits are not exposed

Caution

What event withdraws or expires the pick?

Game start and hard availability conflicts are enforced; price boundaries remain a backend gap

Caution

Is this pregame, live, or halftime analysis?

Schedule status: final · formula-feed archive context

Caution

Is there a no-chase rule?

The UI expires the card after tip and requires exact-line verification; explicit price-bound enforcement is pending

6 · Outcome evidence & accountability
Verified

Did the pick beat the comparable close?

+2.4¢ closing-line value (price CLV)

Source · joined grading settlement
Verified

Was the formula line stored immutably?

OVER 9.5 · decision key pd_69faff5c63db0cfd9719d769 · receipt bet_clv:300281 · formula priced_lineedges v1.0.0

Source · prop-decision-envelope.v1
Verified

Was a miss variance, injury, foul trouble, or blowout?

Miller fouled out early (4 PF in just 10 minutes), severely limiting her opportunity to score, and shot just 0-3 from the field while on the court. Combined with minimal usage (17%), she had virtually no chance to reach 9.5 points.

Source · joined outcome receipt
Verified

What are flat-1u and actual-staked ROI?

This pick's flat-1u CORE result is −1.00u. Personal staking remains separate.

Source · joined grading ledger
Unavailable

What are sample size and uncertainty interval?

Per-cohort confidence interval is not exposed on the card

Unavailable

Are probabilities calibrated by Brier or log loss?

Per-cohort calibration metrics are not exposed

Unavailable

Where is performance weakening?

League/prop/price/book/time-to-tip drift is not joined here

Unavailable

What are drawdown and losing-streak behavior?

Portfolio drawdown belongs to the ledger and is not connected to this pick

Unavailable

Is the edge persisting in new data?

Model-versioned out-of-sample persistence is not exposed per pick

Formula · priced_lineedgesReceipt · bet_clv:300281Serving price floor · 1.70Research assembled · Timestamp unavailable

CORE FORMULA CARD · ACCOUNT ACCESS

Additional qualified candidate

RECORD ONLY

This hidden formula-feed row is archive context, not a current wager or proof of a pre-tip publication.

Create account to view

CORE FORMULA CARD · ACCOUNT ACCESS

Additional qualified candidate

RECORD ONLY

This hidden formula-feed row is archive context, not a current wager or proof of a pre-tip publication.

Create account to view

DECISION LAB

Loading the immutable evidence map…

AVAILABILITY SNAPSHOT · AUDIT CONTEXT

Availability & Injuries

3 hard availability snapshot flags appear. Player-level observation time is unavailable, so this does not prove the status existed before tip; formula rows remain record-only.

ATLIndya Nivar · PersonalReasonsOUT
ATLTe-Hina Paopao · Injury/Illness-RightLeg;N/AOUT
CONAshlon Jackson · Coach'sDecisionOUT

GAMEPLAY INTELLIGENCE · IMMUTABLE PRE-TIP CAPTURE

Model Outlook

Checking the latest captured lineup, rotation, matchup and market state…

MARKET CONTEXT · NOT A PICK · THIS GAME · T−1H

Prop Watchlist

A shortlist of unusual market lines. Compare this game's checkpoint with a player's typical close, then see whether recent results against their own lines agree. Only the Formula-Qualified Recommendations section contains CORE candidate wagers.

Choose prop
Showing 2 of 36 all props market observations
51props checked
2top observations shown now
0Out / Doubtful / Inactive watches hidden
T−1Hlatest locked check
How these market observations are calculated

Typical market close is the median closing line across all earlier verified games this season—not a scoring average or a fixed 30-game window. Recent results use up to five actual-backed games that were final at least six hours before this checkpoint, so a just-finished game may be intentionally excluded. These are descriptive observations, not win probabilities or automatic picks.

Market expectation up

Upward descriptive pattern—not an Over pick
Expectation upPTS · market observation—not a pick

Diamond Miller

CON · SF · vs ATL

9.5Line at T−1H
Typical market close
8.5
across 22 earlier verified games
Market vs typical
+1.0
checkpoint line minus typical close
Last 5 vs own closing lines
+5.0
median actual minus each game's line
Checkpoint move
0.0
since the 6-hour check

Formula-qualified card: Over 9.5 PTS. The research pattern points the same way, but it is not an additional recommendation or confidence boost.

Market + recent results align

This game's PTS line is 9.5 at T−1H. The typical market close was 8.5 across 22 earlier verified games. Recent results finished a median 5.0 above their own closing lines across 5 included games.

Use this to investigate this game's number—not as an automatic Over/Under.

LATEST INCLUDED · Aug 7 · 9.0 actual vs 10.5 line (−1.5)

Possible context: Brittney Griner — Questionable (reported Aug 12, 5:00 PM EDT); Ashlon Jackson — Available (reported Aug 12, 5:00 PM EDT). Timestamped association only; not proof it caused the move.

Market expectation down

Downward descriptive pattern—not an Under pick
Expectation downREB · market observation—not a pick

Allisha Gray

ATL · SG · vs CON

2.5Line at T−1H
Typical market close
3.5
across 27 earlier verified games
Market vs typical
−1.0
checkpoint line minus typical close
Last 5 vs own closing lines
−0.5
median actual minus each game's line
Checkpoint move
0.0
since the 6-hour check

Market + recent results align

This game's REB line is 2.5 at T−1H. The typical market close was 3.5 across 27 earlier verified games. Recent results finished a median 0.5 below their own closing lines across 5 included games.

Use this to investigate this game's number—not as an automatic Over/Under.

LATEST INCLUDED · Aug 10 · 3.0 actual vs 3.5 line (−0.5)

Possible context: Indya Nivar — Out (reported Aug 10, 7:00 PM EDT). Timestamped association only; not proof it caused the move.

Showing the clearest market observations for available players—not additional bets.Open the season tape →

The Read

Connecticut hosts Atlanta in a slow-paced, defensive grind that heavily favors the visitors. Both teams operate below league-average tempo (CON 81.94, ATL 83.8 possessions/game), projecting ~99 total possessions and a game total around 220.5. The critical mismatch: Connecticut's guard defense is among the league's worst, allowing 36.9 PPG and 10.1 APG to guards (4th and 2nd worst, respectively), while Atlanta deploys an elite overall defense (102.67 DRTG, 4th in league) and methodical offensive system (106.96 ORTG). Connecticut's below-average offensive rating (97.43) and turnover rate (15.4%) will struggle against Atlanta's rim protection and perimeter intensity. Brittney Griner's Questionable status (left knee injury) adds uncertainty to Connecticut's interior depth; if she sits, Aaliyah Edwards would absorb limited minutes and Connecticut's already-weak offensive efficiency drops further. Atlanta's +4.29 net rating and guard-attack advantage should control the game flow, with the elite rebounding defense (1st in league at 30.09 RPG allowed) limiting Connecticut's second-chance opportunities. Look for Atlanta guards (Rhyne Howard, Jordin Canada) to exploit Connecticut's weak perimeter defense, while Atlanta's interior players (Angel Reese, Naz Hillmon) attack a Connecticut forward/center group weakened by Griner's potential absence.

SUPPORTING RESEARCH · NOT A BETTING RECOMMENDATION

Matchup Outlook

ATL
Projected winner
-4.5
Model spread
U 220.5
Model total
60%
Outlook confidence · MODERATE

Team Series History

CON vs ATL · last 19 meetings · ATL leads

Team results are game-environment context—not validation for an individual player prop. Player-specific opponent history lives inside each recommendation card.

9–10
CON record
76.8–80.9
Avg score (home)
-4.1
Avg margin
33.8
Avg reb

RECENT MEETINGS

06/02CON 75 @ ATL 91LCON
09/10ATL 88 @ CON 72LCON
09/08CON 62 @ ATL 87LCON
09/01ATL 93 @ CON 76LCON