WNBA · FINAL · THU, AUG 20, 10:00 PM

CON @ LVA

Connecticut Sun at Las Vegas Aces

← All WNBA games on 2026-08-20
-14.5
Spread (home)
0
Total
+600 / -1000
Moneyline

Snapshot market context · game-quote observation time and source book unavailable · snapshot assembled Sep 2, 4:21 AM EDT

GAME BRIEF · START HERE

Start with what happened, then judge the process.

Connecticut Sun at Las Vegas Aces is a completed-game review. Any call below is record-only.

REVIEW
Open the 2-minute projection guide
Best next step

Review result, minutes, closing line, and abnormal-exposure notes; then expand the supporting evidence.

DECISION TIMELINE · REVISION FLOW

Loading frozen research checkpoints…

HISTORICAL FORMULA FEED · AUDIT ONLY

Results & Recorded Calls · 4 qualified

Start with the verified result and flat-1u CORE benchmark P&L. Then compare the recorded call with the evidence that can be reconstructed without using this game's outcome.

FINAL RESULT · CORE BENCHMARK

WIN
Actual
24 vs 19.5
Flat-1u P&L
+1.07u
CLV
+3.6¢
Minutes
27.6

Postgame context: Young's efficient 10-21 shooting night (47.6% FG) combined with her team-high 35% usage rate pushed her comfortably over 19.5, as the Aces' offensive flow ran through her in a blowout win (+16 rating).

SERVER RECORD · CORE FORMULA · POINTS

Jackie Young O 19.5 PTS +107

Persisted decision price · 0.3u model stake · bet_clv:341166

RECORD ONLY

Current meaning: This is a settled, record-only decision. It is historical evidence, not a current wager.

PROP BRIEF · START HERE

Review the recorded result—not a current play.

What the evidence saysThe context is split

Recent games · Last 5 supports; Against this opponent pushes back; Similar players vs opponent supports. Do not turn correlated or conflicting history into extra confidence.

Main riskWhat could break the read

Decision time is unavailable; the capture bucket must not be read as decision time.

Next stepReview the process

Compare the result, minutes, closing line, and receipt limits below.

Verified receipt & source timing

Canonical decision receipt · Receipt bet_clv:341166 · formula priced_lineedges v1.0.0 · capture bucket Aug 19, 8:00 PM EDT (not decision time) · decision time unavailable · point-in-time unverified

WHY IT WAS SURFACED · FEED PRICE

49.0% model chance vs 48.3% needed at +107 · +0.7pp probability edge · +1.5% expected profit / 1u
Model stake0.3u

Why “<52%” can still show positive value: that label describes raw hit likelihood. At plus money, a candidate can hit less than half the time and still carry positive expected value because a win pays more than 1u.

PREGAME CHECKS · AUDIT

What the receipt can—and cannot—prove

Decision receiptRecord only

+107 · sportsbook unavailable · quote observation unavailable · bet_clv:341166

Pregame availabilityNot timestamped

No immutable pre-tip player-status receipt is connected.

Pregame roleNot verified

Pick-time minutes, lineup, and role inputs are not verified by the canonical receipt.

SUPPORTING CONTEXT · NOT EXTRA VOTES

Recent, H2H, and similar players

Read each row on its stated basis
Recent games · Last 5Supports
4 of 5 would have hit

Against today's OVER 19.5 · 22.4 average · 33.7 average minutes

Against this opponentPushes back
2 of 5 would have hit

Vs CON at today's OVER 19.5 · 15.8 average

Similar players vs opponentSupports
2 below · 3 above market

5 comparable wings, each judged against that player's own closing line

BOTTOM LINE

The context is split

Recent games · Last 5 supports; Against this opponent pushes back; Similar players vs opponent supports. Do not turn correlated or conflicting history into extra confidence.

WHAT THE ARCHIVE IS MISSING

  • Decision time is unavailable; the capture bucket must not be read as decision time.
  • The source sportsbook or quote observation timestamp was not preserved.
  • The pre-tip availability observation was not stored immutably.
See game-by-game evidenceL3 / L5 / L10 · opponent games · comparable players
L3
2/3
At today's OVER 19.5 · avg 21.3 · 34.5 avg min
L5
4/5
At today's OVER 19.5 · avg 22.4 · 33.7 avg min
L10
6/7
At today's OVER 19.5 · avg 23.1 · 34.0 avg min

Player vs opponentFinished above 19.5 in 2/5 prior player meetings vs CON

Position/team matchupNo stat-matched position/team factor is connected; direct defender assignments are unavailable

Reconstructed from a snapshot assembled Sep 2, 4:21 AM EDT. The target game and all same/future dates are excluded. L3 is contained inside L5, which is contained inside L10; they are one sample, not three confirmations.

DEFENSE CHECK · EACH PLAYER'S OWN CLOSE

How comparable wings fared vs CON
Descriptive · not another model vote
3/5 aboveClosest 5 peers · median finish 1.5 above market
All Points props vs CON
78/144 below
87 players · 144 player-games · median 0.5 below market
Same position family
17/27 below
wings only · 17 players · median 2.5 below market

These are market-relative results, not raw points allowed: every peer is judged against the line offered for that peer's own game. The 5 shown are selected by position family and usual line; the opponent result is not used to rank them.

See the 5 comparable players
One latest eligible meeting per peer, strictly before Aug 20. “Usual” is that player's trailing median closing line, not the result against CON.
PlayerWhy comparableDateOwn closeActualFinishMinutes
Kahleah Copper
SF
usual 21.5 over 10 games · Δ 2.0 · 34.6 minAug 720.516.04.5 below market34.0
Sonia Citron
SF
usual 16.5 over 10 games · Δ 3.0 · 33.5 minJul 2816.522.05.5 above market33.9
Rae Burrell
SF
usual 15.5 over 10 games · Δ 4.0 · 32.6 minAug 1817.519.01.5 above market29.8
Bridget Carleton
F
usual 15.0 over 10 games · Δ 4.5 · 30.8 minJul 1413.512.01.5 below market31.7
Isabelle Harrison
F
usual 12.5 over 10 games · Δ 7.0 · 21.3 minJun 1912.515.02.5 above market30.4
Open evidence game log

HISTORICAL MARKET CHECK

Against each game's own verified close
Normal exposure only

Checking verified pre-tip closing lines…

CURRENT-LINE WHAT-IF

Prior results against this card's 19.5 line
A retrospective comparison with this formula line—not the market line offered in each old game.
DateOpponentActualMinutesOVER 19.5
Aug 18vs ATL24.034.7Hit
Aug 15vs MIN8.033.4Miss
Aug 13vs WAS32.035.3Hit
Aug 11vs WAS25.032.3Hit
Aug 8@ MIN23.033.0Hit
Aug 6@ IND22.035.0Hit
Aug 3@ ATL28.034.4Hit
Player history vs CON

Latest 5 of 19 eligible meetings · finished above 19.5 in 2/5 · average 15.8. Context only; roles and schemes change.

DateActualMinutesOVER 19.5
May 1513.031.4Miss
May 1311.026.6Miss
Aug 1021.032.2Hit
Jul 614.021.2Miss
Jun 2520.025.5Hit
See methodology & source audit6 pillars · 49 checks

The six items are pillars, not six yes/no questions. Each check below is evidence—not a gamified score. One hard failure can outweigh many verified inputs.

1 · Price & market value
Caution

What exact side, line, odds, and book are offered?

Jackie Young OVER 19.5 +107 · sportsbook unavailable

Source · canonical grading decision receipt
Caution

When was the formula price captured?

Capture bucket Aug 19, 8:00 PM EDT (storage bucket, not decision time) · decision time unavailable · quote observation unavailable

Source · bet_clv:341166
Verified

What hit rate does the price require?

48.3%

Source · derived from formula-feed American odds
Verified

What is the calibrated probability at this line?

49.0%

Source · canonical decision model.calibrated_hit_probability
Verified

What is the probability-point edge?

+0.7pp

Source · p_hit minus formula-price break-even
Verified

What is expected profit per unit?

+1.5%

Source · canonical decision model.claimed_ev_pct (when persisted)
N/A

Does the exact line appear in the connected snapshot?

Mutable latest-market rows are intentionally excluded from historical pre-tip proof

Unavailable

What price or line turns this into a pass?

Server-authoritative playable boundaries are not published yet

N/A

Does the broader market agree?

Mutable latest-market rows are not used to reconstruct historical consensus

Unavailable

Is the market liquid enough?

Limits and liquidity are not connected

2 · Projection quality & uncertainty
Unavailable

What is the projected median?

Unavailable

Unavailable

What does the outcome distribution look like?

Distribution unavailable

Unavailable

How sensitive is the pick to minutes, usage, or pace?

Sensitivity model unavailable

Caution

What do L3, L5, and L10 show at this exact line?

L3 2/3 · L5 4/5 · L10 6/7 at the formula OVER 19.5 line

Source · reconstructed hydrator game history; target/same/future dates excluded
Caution

Is the model calibrated for this league, prop, and bucket?

The pick carries calibrated p_hit; bucket-level proof is not exposed here

Unavailable

Was calibration measured out of sample?

Out-of-sample calibration evidence is not exposed per pick

Caution

How large is the comparable historical sample?

7 eligible prior games in L10 · 0 under 10 minutes · nested descriptive sample, not 7 independent confirmations

Unavailable

When did the model run and were inputs complete?

Research run timestamp unavailable

Source · Gameplay Intelligence
3 · Availability & role
Unavailable

Is the player active, questionable, limited, or returning?

No hard game-report flag; individual status is not fully resolved

Source · player-state service
Caution

When was status last verified?

Snapshot assembled Sep 2, 4:21 AM EDT; injury-source observation time is not mapped

Source · data-hydrator snapshot assembly
Unavailable

What is the expected minutes range?

Minutes projection unavailable

Unavailable

Is the player starting or restricted?

Starter and restriction status unavailable

Unavailable

Has opportunity changed?

Opportunity feed unavailable

Unavailable

Which teammate absences change the role?

No confirmed teammate-absence attribution returned

Unavailable

Were injury-shortened games identified?

The joined outcome does not include a verified abnormal-exposure flag

Unavailable

What rotation change could invalidate the projection?

No material role change returned

4 · Game environment & matchup
Unavailable

How many possessions are expected?

A game-level pace projection is not exposed on this card

Caution

What do spread and total imply?

Spread (home) -14.5 · Total 0 · Moneyline +600 / -1000 · archive context only; not an immutable pre-tip market receipt · snapshot assembled Sep 2, 4:21 AM EDT

Source · data-hydrator assembled game-market snapshot
Unavailable

Does opponent scheme affect this stat?

No stat-matched position/team factor is connected; direct defender assignments are unavailable

Caution

What has this player done against this opponent?

Finished above 19.5 in 2/5 prior player meetings vs CON

Source · reconstructed player-vs-team game history; target date excluded
Unavailable

Which defender or lineup matters?

Defender attribution is not exposed

Unavailable

Is rest, travel, or schedule a disadvantage?

Rest and travel context are not connected

Caution

What foul, blowout, or game-script path creates downside?

Spread is visible; player-level foul and game-script risk are not quantified

5 · Execution & portfolio risk
N/A

Is the number still inside its playable boundary?

Not applicable after tip; mutable current offers are excluded from historical execution proof

Verified

How was stake size derived?

0.3u model-sized stake

Source · canonical decision model.kelly_stake_units
Unavailable

How much correlated exposure already exists?

Player, game, and injury-thesis exposure are not connected

Unavailable

Are exposure limits respected?

Daily, league, player, and prop limits are not exposed

Caution

What event withdraws or expires the pick?

Game start and hard availability conflicts are enforced; price boundaries remain a backend gap

Caution

Is this pregame, live, or halftime analysis?

Schedule status: final · formula-feed archive context

Caution

Is there a no-chase rule?

The UI expires the card after tip and requires exact-line verification; explicit price-bound enforcement is pending

6 · Outcome evidence & accountability
Verified

Did the pick beat the comparable close?

+3.6¢ closing-line value (price CLV)

Source · joined grading settlement
Verified

Was the formula line stored immutably?

OVER 19.5 · decision key pd_b6d161399126dd3bceb8c527 · receipt bet_clv:341166 · formula priced_lineedges v1.0.0

Source · prop-decision-envelope.v1
Verified

Was a miss variance, injury, foul trouble, or blowout?

Young's efficient 10-21 shooting night (47.6% FG) combined with her team-high 35% usage rate pushed her comfortably over 19.5, as the Aces' offensive flow ran through her in a blowout win (+16 rating).

Source · joined outcome receipt
Verified

What are flat-1u and actual-staked ROI?

This pick's flat-1u CORE result is +1.07u. Personal staking remains separate.

Source · joined grading ledger
Unavailable

What are sample size and uncertainty interval?

Per-cohort confidence interval is not exposed on the card

Unavailable

Are probabilities calibrated by Brier or log loss?

Per-cohort calibration metrics are not exposed

Unavailable

Where is performance weakening?

League/prop/price/book/time-to-tip drift is not joined here

Unavailable

What are drawdown and losing-streak behavior?

Portfolio drawdown belongs to the ledger and is not connected to this pick

Unavailable

Is the edge persisting in new data?

Model-versioned out-of-sample persistence is not exposed per pick

Formula · priced_lineedgesReceipt · bet_clv:341166Serving price floor · 1.70Research assembled · Timestamp unavailable

CORE FORMULA CARD · ACCOUNT ACCESS

Additional qualified candidate

RECORD ONLY

This hidden formula-feed row is archive context, not a current wager or proof of a pre-tip publication.

Create account to view

CORE FORMULA CARD · ACCOUNT ACCESS

Additional qualified candidate

RECORD ONLY

This hidden formula-feed row is archive context, not a current wager or proof of a pre-tip publication.

Create account to view

CORE FORMULA CARD · ACCOUNT ACCESS

Additional qualified candidate

RECORD ONLY

This hidden formula-feed row is archive context, not a current wager or proof of a pre-tip publication.

Create account to view

DECISION LAB

Loading the immutable evidence map…

AVAILABILITY SNAPSHOT · AUDIT CONTEXT

Availability & Injuries

5 hard availability snapshot flags appear. Player-level observation time is unavailable, so this does not prove the status existed before tip; formula rows remain record-only.

CONAaliyah Edwards · Injury/Illness-LeftAnkle;- (Ankle)OUT
CONBrittney Griner · Injury/Illness-LeftKnee;- (Knee)OUT
CONHailey Van Lith · Coach'sDecisionOUT
LVADana Evans · Injury/Illness-LeftLeg;leftletOUT
LVATa'Niya Latson · Coach'sDecision-NotactivatingOUT

GAMEPLAY INTELLIGENCE · IMMUTABLE PRE-TIP CAPTURE

Model Outlook

Checking the latest captured lineup, rotation, matchup and market state…

MARKET CONTEXT · NOT A PICK · THIS GAME · T−1H

Prop Watchlist

A shortlist of unusual market lines. Compare this game's checkpoint with a player's typical close, then see whether recent results against their own lines agree. Only the Formula-Qualified Recommendations section contains CORE candidate wagers.

Choose prop
Showing 2 of 37 all props market observations
44props checked
2top observations shown now
0Out / Doubtful / Inactive watches hidden
T−1Hlatest locked check
How these market observations are calculated

Typical market close is the median closing line across all earlier verified games this season—not a scoring average or a fixed 30-game window. Recent results use up to five actual-backed games that were final at least six hours before this checkpoint, so a just-finished game may be intentionally excluded. These are descriptive observations, not win probabilities or automatic picks.

Market expectation up

Upward descriptive pattern—not an Over pick
Expectation upPTS · market observation—not a pick

Diamond Miller

CON · SF · vs LVA

11.5Line at T−1H
Typical market close
9.0
across 25 earlier verified games
Market vs typical
+2.5
checkpoint line minus typical close
Last 5 vs own closing lines
+0.5
median actual minus each game's line
Checkpoint move
+1.0
since the 6-hour check

Market + recent results align

This game's PTS line is 11.5 at T−1H. The typical market close was 9.0 across 25 earlier verified games. Recent results finished a median 0.5 above their own closing lines across 5 included games.

Use this to investigate this game's number—not as an automatic Over/Under.

LATEST INCLUDED · Aug 18 · 13.0 actual vs 12.5 line (+0.5)

Possible context: Aaliyah Edwards — Out (reported Aug 20, 3:45 PM EDT); Brittney Griner — Out (reported Aug 20, 3:45 PM EDT). Timestamped association only; not proof it caused the move.

Market expectation down

Downward descriptive pattern—not an Under pick
Expectation downPRA · market observation—not a pick

Leïla Lacan

CON · G · vs LVA

18.0Line at T−1H
Typical market close
19.5
across 18 earlier verified games
Market vs typical
−1.5
checkpoint line minus typical close
Last 5 vs own closing lines
−4.5
median actual minus each game's line
Checkpoint move
−1.5
since the 6-hour check

Market + recent results align

This game's PRA line is 18.0 at T−1H. The typical market close was 19.5 across 18 earlier verified games. Recent results finished a median 4.5 below their own closing lines across 5 included games.

Use this to investigate this game's number—not as an automatic Over/Under.

LATEST INCLUDED · Aug 18 · 17.0 actual vs 21.5 line (−4.5)

Possible context: Aaliyah Edwards — Out (reported Aug 20, 3:45 PM EDT); Brittney Griner — Out (reported Aug 20, 3:45 PM EDT). Timestamped association only; not proof it caused the move.

Showing the clearest market observations for available players—not additional bets.Open the season tape →

The Read

Las Vegas enters as a modest favorite against a Connecticut team severely compromised by injuries to key contributors Brittney Griner (C, left knee) and Aaliyah Edwards (F, left ankle). The Aces operate a deliberate, efficient offense (ORTG 110.64, pace 81.51) anchored by strong ball movement and perimeter discipline, while Connecticut brings elite perimeter defense (5th in three-pointers allowed at 8.1/game, 5th in assists allowed at 19.6/game) but a crippled offense (ORTG 97.3, 15.2% turnover rate). Both teams favor slow-paced, defensive-heavy basketball—neither is a tempo-up force—setting the stage for a grinding, low-scoring affair. LVA's backcourt (notably without Dana Evans, a guard dealing with left leg injury) will test CON's elite perimeter discipline, while LVA's 9th-ranked overall defense (87.5 PPG allowed, 2nd in assists allowed at 18.89/game) suffocates an already-struggling Connecticut offense. The critical edge: LVA's offensive rebounding rate (22.9%) and CON's soft rebound defense (32.73 allowed, 7th-worst) create second-chance opportunities for the Aces, while CON's two absence-depleted frontcourt will struggle to generate efficient scoring against LVA's disciplined perimeter D. Game flow projects toward controlled LVA dominance with blowout risk at 28%—if the Aces build an early lead, bench rotations enter and star minutes compress. This is a defensive grind with a total lean UNDER, driven by CON's offensive dysfunction and LVA's elite perimeter discipline suppressing ball movement and three-point volume.

SUPPORTING RESEARCH · NOT A BETTING RECOMMENDATION

Matchup Outlook

LVA
Projected winner
-13.5
Model spread
U 167.5
Model total
60%
Outlook confidence · MODERATE

Team Series History

LVA vs CON · last 20 meetings · LVA leads

Team results are game-environment context—not validation for an individual player prop. Player-specific opponent history lives inside each recommendation card.

17–3
LVA record
86.9–78.1
Avg score (home)
+8.8
Avg margin
35.2
Avg reb

RECENT MEETINGS

05/15LVA 101 @ CON 94WLVA
05/13LVA 98 @ CON 69WLVA