WNBA · FINAL · WED, AUG 26, 10:00 PM

TOR @ SEA

Toronto Tempo at Seattle Storm

← All WNBA games on 2026-08-26

-4.5

Spread (home)

178

Total

+155 / -190

Moneyline

Snapshot market context · game-quote observation time and source book unavailable · snapshot assembled Sep 1, 6:54 AM EDT

GAME BRIEF · START HERE

Start with what happened, then judge the process.

Toronto Tempo at Seattle Storm is a completed-game review. Any call below is record-only.

REVIEW

Open the 2-minute projection guide

01 · PROP DECISIONS

What the evidence says

2 of 2 prop cards have eligible recent or player-opponent history. Each card explains whether that context supports, opposes, or is too thin.

02 · AVAILABILITY

What could break it

6 hard availability flags returned (Aneesah Morrow, Brittney Sykes, Marina Mabrey, …). Player-level observation times are unavailable, so verify the source report.

03 · MARKET MOVEMENT

What changed

38 unusual market lines: 23 above and 15 below players' typical closes. 5 signals withheld by availability or data-quality checks. Market movement is context, not an Over/Under pick.

MODEL UPDATES

HISTORY TEMPORARILY UNAVAILABLE

We could not load the saved forecast history right now. This does not mean the model never changed or made no call.

DECISION TIMELINE · REVISION FLOW

Loading frozen research checkpoints…

HISTORICAL FORMULA FEED · AUDIT ONLY

Results & Recorded Calls · 2 qualified

Start with the verified result and flat-1u CORE benchmark P&L. Then compare the recorded call with the evidence that can be reconstructed without using this game's outcome.

FINAL RESULT · CORE BENCHMARK

LOSS

Actual: 3 vs 2.5
Flat-1u P&L: −1.00u
CLV: +0.0¢
Minutes: 29.4

Postgame context: Unexplained

SERVER RECORD · CORE FORMULA · ASSISTS

Laura Juskaite U 2.5 AST +102

Persisted decision price · 2.0u model stake · bet_clv:422072

RECORD ONLY

Current meaning: This is a settled, record-only decision. It is historical evidence, not a current wager.

PROP BRIEF · START HERE

Review the recorded result—not a current play.

What the evidence saysContext leans with the UNDER

Recent games · Last 5 supports; Against this opponent small sample; Similar players vs opponent supports. This is supporting context, not extra model votes.

Main riskWhat could break the read

Decision time is unavailable; the capture bucket must not be read as decision time.

Next stepReview the process

Compare the result, minutes, closing line, and receipt limits below.

Verified receipt & source timing

Canonical decision receipt · Receipt bet_clv:422072 · formula consensus_devig v1.0.0 · capture bucket Aug 25, 8:00 PM EDT (not decision time) · decision time unavailable · point-in-time unverified

WHY IT WAS SURFACED · FEED PRICE

54.0% model chance vs 49.5% needed at +102 · +4.5pp probability edge · +0.1% expected profit / 1u

Model stake2.0u

PREGAME CHECKS · AUDIT

What the receipt can—and cannot—prove

Decision receiptRecord only

+102 · sportsbook unavailable · quote observation unavailable · bet_clv:422072

Pregame availabilityNot timestamped

No immutable pre-tip player-status receipt is connected.

Pregame roleNot verified

Pick-time minutes, lineup, and role inputs are not verified by the canonical receipt.

SUPPORTING CONTEXT · NOT EXTRA VOTES

Recent, H2H, and similar players

Read each row on its stated basis

Recent games · Last 5Supports

3 of 5 would have hit

Against today's UNDER 2.5 · 2.0 average · 28.0 average minutes

Against this opponentSmall sample

2 of 2 would have hit

Vs SEA at today's UNDER 2.5 · 0.5 average

Similar players vs opponentSupports

3 below · 2 above market

5 comparable bigs, each judged against that player's own closing line

BOTTOM LINE

Context leans with the UNDER

Recent games · Last 5 supports; Against this opponent small sample; Similar players vs opponent supports. This is supporting context, not extra model votes.

WHAT THE ARCHIVE IS MISSING

Decision time is unavailable; the capture bucket must not be read as decision time.
The source sportsbook or quote observation timestamp was not preserved.
The pre-tip availability observation was not stored immutably.

See game-by-game evidenceL3 / L5 / L10 · opponent games · comparable players

L3: 1/3
L5: 3/5
L10: 4/7

Player vs opponentFinished below 2.5 in 2/2 prior player meetings vs SEA · too little to weigh

Position/team matchupNo stat-matched position/team factor is connected; direct defender assignments are unavailable

Reconstructed from a snapshot assembled Sep 1, 6:54 AM EDT. The target game and all same/future dates are excluded. L3 is contained inside L5, which is contained inside L10; they are one sample, not three confirmations.

DEFENSE CHECK · EACH PLAYER'S OWN CLOSE

How comparable bigs fared vs SEA

Descriptive · not another model vote

3/5 belowClosest 5 peers · median finish 0.5 below market

All Assists props vs SEA: 63/109 below
Same position family: 19/31 below

These are market-relative results, not raw points allowed: every peer is judged against the line offered for that peer's own game. The 5 shown are selected by position family and usual line; the opponent result is not used to rank them. 2 abnormal or unverifiable appearances were excluded from the summaries.

See the 5 comparable players

One latest eligible meeting per peer, strictly before Aug 26. “Usual” is that player's trailing median closing line, not the result against SEA.
Player	Why comparable	Date	Own close	Actual	Finish	Minutes
Angel Reese PF	usual 2.5 over 10 games · Δ 0.0 · 32.9 min	Jul 31	2.5	2.0	0.5 below market	37.6
Dearica Hamby PF	usual 2.5 over 10 games · Δ 0.0 · 27.1 min	Jul 6	2.5	2.0	0.5 below market	29.2
Nia Coffey PF	usual 2.5 over 10 games · Δ 0.0 · 28.1 min	Jul 20	2.5	1.0	1.5 below market	28.1
Nneka Ogwumike PF	usual 3.0 over 10 games · Δ 0.5 · 30.3 min	Jul 6	2.5	3.0	0.5 above market	28.1
Azura Stevens F-C	usual 2.5 over 10 games · Δ 0.0 · 27.7 min	Aug 16	2.5	3.0	0.5 above market	27.7

Kept out of the trend

Carla Leite · Aug 8 · 3.8 min · early exit
Tiffany Hayes · May 8 · 4.4 min · early exit

Open evidence game log

HISTORICAL MARKET CHECK

Against each game's own verified close

Normal exposure only

Checking verified pre-tip closing lines…

CURRENT-LINE WHAT-IF

Prior results against this card's 2.5 line

A retrospective comparison with this formula line—not the market line offered in each old game.
Date	Opponent	Actual	Minutes	UNDER 2.5
Aug 23	vs LVA	2.0	28.5	Hit
Aug 21	vs POR	4.0	30.5	Miss
Aug 19	@ WAS	4.0	29.2	Miss
Aug 18	vs IND	0.0	19.7	Hit
Aug 12	@ DAL	0.0	32.0	Hit
Aug 10	@ ATL	0.0	13.5	Hit
Aug 6	@ POR	3.0	26.3	Miss

Player history vs SEA

Latest 2 of 2 eligible meetings · finished below 2.5 in 2/2 · average 0.5. Too little to weigh.

Date	Actual	Minutes	UNDER 2.5
May 30	1.0	25.1	Hit
May 13	0.0	7.4	Hit

See methodology & source audit6 pillars · 49 checks

The six items are pillars, not six yes/no questions. Each check below is evidence—not a gamified score. One hard failure can outweigh many verified inputs.

1 · Price & market value

Caution

What exact side, line, odds, and book are offered?

Laura Juskaite UNDER 2.5 +102 · sportsbook unavailable

Source · canonical grading decision receipt

Caution

When was the formula price captured?

Capture bucket Aug 25, 8:00 PM EDT (storage bucket, not decision time) · decision time unavailable · quote observation unavailable

Source · bet_clv:422072

Verified

What hit rate does the price require?

49.5%

Source · derived from formula-feed American odds

Verified

What is the calibrated probability at this line?

54.0%

Source · canonical decision model.calibrated_hit_probability

Verified

What is the probability-point edge?

+4.5pp

Source · p_hit minus formula-price break-even

Verified

What is expected profit per unit?

+0.1%

Source · canonical decision model.claimed_ev_pct (when persisted)

N/A

Does the exact line appear in the connected snapshot?

Mutable latest-market rows are intentionally excluded from historical pre-tip proof

Unavailable

What price or line turns this into a pass?

Server-authoritative playable boundaries are not published yet

N/A

Does the broader market agree?

Mutable latest-market rows are not used to reconstruct historical consensus

Unavailable

Is the market liquid enough?

Limits and liquidity are not connected

2 · Projection quality & uncertainty

Unavailable

What is the projected median?

Unavailable

What does the outcome distribution look like?

Distribution unavailable

Unavailable

How sensitive is the pick to minutes, usage, or pace?

Sensitivity model unavailable

Caution

What do L3, L5, and L10 show at this exact line?

L3 1/3 · L5 3/5 · L10 4/7 at the formula UNDER 2.5 line

Source · reconstructed hydrator game history; target/same/future dates excluded

Caution

Is the model calibrated for this league, prop, and bucket?

The pick carries calibrated p_hit; bucket-level proof is not exposed here

Unavailable

Was calibration measured out of sample?

Out-of-sample calibration evidence is not exposed per pick

Caution

How large is the comparable historical sample?

7 eligible prior games in L10 · 0 under 10 minutes · nested descriptive sample, not 7 independent confirmations

Unavailable

When did the model run and were inputs complete?

Research run timestamp unavailable

Source · Gameplay Intelligence

3 · Availability & role

Unavailable

Is the player active, questionable, limited, or returning?

No hard game-report flag; individual status is not fully resolved

Source · player-state service

Caution

When was status last verified?

Snapshot assembled Sep 1, 6:54 AM EDT; injury-source observation time is not mapped

Source · data-hydrator snapshot assembly

Unavailable

What is the expected minutes range?

Minutes projection unavailable

Unavailable

Is the player starting or restricted?

Starter and restriction status unavailable

Unavailable

Has opportunity changed?

Opportunity feed unavailable

Unavailable

Which teammate absences change the role?

No confirmed teammate-absence attribution returned

Unavailable

Were injury-shortened games identified?

The joined outcome does not include a verified abnormal-exposure flag

Unavailable

What rotation change could invalidate the projection?

No material role change returned

4 · Game environment & matchup

Unavailable

How many possessions are expected?

A game-level pace projection is not exposed on this card

Caution

What do spread and total imply?

Spread (home) -4.5 · Total 178 · Moneyline +155 / -190 · archive context only; not an immutable pre-tip market receipt · snapshot assembled Sep 1, 6:54 AM EDT

Source · data-hydrator assembled game-market snapshot

Unavailable

Does opponent scheme affect this stat?

No stat-matched position/team factor is connected; direct defender assignments are unavailable

Caution

What has this player done against this opponent?

Finished below 2.5 in 2/2 prior player meetings vs SEA · too little to weigh

Source · reconstructed player-vs-team game history; target date excluded

Unavailable

Which defender or lineup matters?

Defender attribution is not exposed

Unavailable

Is rest, travel, or schedule a disadvantage?

Rest and travel context are not connected

Caution

What foul, blowout, or game-script path creates downside?

Spread is visible; player-level foul and game-script risk are not quantified

5 · Execution & portfolio risk

N/A

Is the number still inside its playable boundary?

Not applicable after tip; mutable current offers are excluded from historical execution proof

Verified

How was stake size derived?

2.0u model-sized stake

Source · canonical decision model.kelly_stake_units

Unavailable

How much correlated exposure already exists?

Player, game, and injury-thesis exposure are not connected

Unavailable

Are exposure limits respected?

Daily, league, player, and prop limits are not exposed

Caution

What event withdraws or expires the pick?

Game start and hard availability conflicts are enforced; price boundaries remain a backend gap

Caution

Is this pregame, live, or halftime analysis?

Schedule status: final · formula-feed archive context

Caution

Is there a no-chase rule?

The UI expires the card after tip and requires exact-line verification; explicit price-bound enforcement is pending

6 · Outcome evidence & accountability

Caution

Did the pick beat the comparable close?

+0.0¢ closing-line value (price CLV)

Source · joined grading settlement

Verified

Was the formula line stored immutably?

UNDER 2.5 · decision key pd_7f256300243b0240e9377d24 · receipt bet_clv:422072 · formula consensus_devig v1.0.0

Source · prop-decision-envelope.v1

Verified

Was a miss variance, injury, foul trouble, or blowout?

Unexplained

Source · joined outcome receipt

Verified

What are flat-1u and actual-staked ROI?

This pick's flat-1u CORE result is −1.00u. Personal staking remains separate.

Source · joined grading ledger

Unavailable

What are sample size and uncertainty interval?

Per-cohort confidence interval is not exposed on the card

Unavailable

Are probabilities calibrated by Brier or log loss?

Per-cohort calibration metrics are not exposed

Unavailable

Where is performance weakening?

League/prop/price/book/time-to-tip drift is not joined here

Unavailable

What are drawdown and losing-streak behavior?

Portfolio drawdown belongs to the ledger and is not connected to this pick

Unavailable

Is the edge persisting in new data?

Model-versioned out-of-sample persistence is not exposed per pick

CORE FORMULA CARD · ACCOUNT ACCESS

Additional qualified candidate

RECORD ONLY

This hidden formula-feed row is archive context, not a current wager or proof of a pre-tip publication.

Create account to view

DECISION LAB · MODEL RECORD + YOUR READ

Challenge what the system knew.

The original records stay frozen. Your thesis is checked against the captured evidence, then any explicit numerical assumption is tested separately—never silently fed into CORE or Gameplay.

HISTORICAL

SELECTED PROP

Laura Juskaite

UNDER 2.5 · Assists

NO GAMEPLAY CAPTUREThe exact CORE record has no matching immutable Gameplay player capture to compare.

RECORDED CORE LANE

What the formula record actually says

DECISION RECEIPT

FORMULA FEATURE INPUTSNOT STORED IN THIS RECEIPTThe receipt preserves pricing outputs and the action—not the lineup, minutes, usage, or matchup contribution path.

Stored pricing outputs

CAPTURED PRICE+102book not stored · time not stored

CALIBRATED SIDE54.0%break-even 49.5% · EV +0.1%

STORED ACTIONrecord onlyUNDER 2.5 · stake 2.00u

Formula: consensus_devig
Version: v1.0.0
Decision time: time not stored
Input status: unverified
Point-in-time: unverified
Receipt quality: partial

Receipt integrity flagssource sportsbook unavailable · quote observed at unavailable · decision at unavailable · capture receipt unavailable

game settled

NO GAMEPLAY CAPTUREEvidence beside the call is not automatically evidence inside the call.

IMMUTABLE GAMEPLAY CAPTURE

What the research system captured

CAPTURE BUILDING

Gameplay evidence is capture building.

The CORE row remains visible, but there is no immutable research projection from which to build a numeric human scenario.

REPLAY LAB · HINDSIGHT CHALLENGE

Tell us what the model may have missed

Write your basketball thesis normally. We'll turn it into checkable claims, compare each one with the frozen Gameplay capture, and show whether a quantified counterfactual changes the make.

UNSAVED REPLAY

HINDSIGHT MODEYou can test assumptions, but this page cannot save or alter a pregame read after the authoritative tip time. Browser timestamps are a convenience, not independent proof of publication.

PRIMARY WORKFLOW

Challenge the call

FROZEN CAPTURE · DETERMINISTIC CHECK

What is your basketball read?

Your prose supplies hypotheses, never evidence. This check only recognizes explicit starter, minutes, availability, usage, matchup, pace, and rotation claims.

CORE RECORDUNDER 2.554.0% side probability

GAMEPLAY MAKE—— model minutes

GAMEPLAY LEANNO SAME-LINE CAPTUREno capture at 2.5

MY MAKE—scenario unavailable

Advanced manual scenarioDirectly edit minutes, opportunity, matchup, and pace

ISOLATED-PLAYER SENSITIVITYMoving one player's minutes here does not conserve the team's 200 regulation minutes. Name whose minutes or role you think changes so the assumption stays basketball-real.

Starting-role beliefRecorded label: unknown. This label does not secretly add minutes.Expected minutes —Model: — · regulation maximum 40Opportunity / usage change +0%Use for role, touches, shot volume, rebound chances, or potential assists.Matchup adjustment +0.0Direct assists added to or removed from the make.Pace / game-script adjustment +0.0Direct assists added to or removed from the make for pace, blowout, overtime tail, or foul-risk beliefs.

My decision

Confidence in my readLineup / availability beliefWhose minutes / role moves?This note is required for a rotation-aware interpretation; the calculator itself remains player-only.

TRANSPARENT SCENARIO MATH

Gameplay baseline—
After your minutes—
After opportunity—
After matchup + pace—

WHAT FLIPS THE LINE?Unavailable

Under your current opportunity, matchup, and pace assumptions, this is the minutes threshold where the personal make equals 2.5.

A numeric personal make needs both a stored Gameplay projection and model minutes. You can still record a stance and thesis.

How this personal make is calculated

Gameplay mean × (your minutes ÷ model minutes) × (1 + your opportunity change) + your matchup adjustment + your pace/game-script adjustment. It is a sensitivity tool, not a retrained probability, and it does not claim the CORE formula uses these inputs.

DECISION LAB

Loading the immutable evidence map…

AVAILABILITY SNAPSHOT · AUDIT CONTEXT

Availability & Injuries

6 hard availability snapshot flags appear. Player-level observation time is unavailable, so this does not prove the status existed before tip; formula rows remain record-only.

TORAneesah Morrow · Injury/Illness-LeftKnee;Injury (Knee)OUT

TORBrittney Sykes · Injury/Illness-LeftFoot;Injury (Foot)OUT

TORMarina Mabrey · Injury/Illness-RightAdductor;InjuryOUT

TORNyara Sabally · Injury/Illness-LeftCalf;NotWithTeam (Calf)OUT

TORZaay Green · Coach'sDecisionOUT

SEANatisha Hiedeman · Injury/Illness-LeftShoulder;Injury (Shoulder)OUT

GAMEPLAY INTELLIGENCE · IMMUTABLE PRE-TIP CAPTURE

Model Outlook

BUILDING

The first frozen read has not posted for this game yet. We publish a checkpointed snapshot before tip instead of inventing a live answer from incomplete inputs.

GAMEPLAY INTELLIGENCE · IMMUTABLE PRE-TIP CAPTURE

Model Outlook

Checking the latest captured lineup, rotation, matchup and market state…

MARKET CONTEXT · NOT A PICK · THIS GAME · T−1H

Prop Watchlist

A shortlist of unusual market lines. Compare this game's checkpoint with a player's typical close, then see whether recent results against their own lines agree. Only the Formula-Qualified Recommendations section contains CORE candidate wagers.

Showing 2 of 37 all props market observations

47props checked

2top observations shown now

0Out / Doubtful / Inactive watches hidden

T−1Hlatest locked check

How these market observations are calculated

Typical market close is the median closing line across all earlier verified games this season—not a scoring average or a fixed 30-game window. Recent results use up to five actual-backed games that were final at least six hours before this checkpoint, so a just-finished game may be intentionally excluded. These are descriptive observations, not win probabilities or automatic picks.

Market expectation up

Upward descriptive pattern—not an Over pick

Expectation upPTS · market observation—not a pick

Jade Melbourne

SEA · G · vs TOR

11.5Line at T−1H

Typical market close: 7.5
Market vs typical: +4.0
Last 5 vs own closing lines: +2.5
Checkpoint move: 0.0

Market + recent results align

This game's PTS line is 11.5 at T−1H. The typical market close was 7.5 across 27 earlier verified games. Recent results finished a median 2.5 above their own closing lines across 5 included games.

Use this to investigate this game's number—not as an automatic Over/Under.

LATEST INCLUDED · Aug 23 · 15.0 actual vs 10.5 line (+4.5)

Possible context: Flau'jae Johnson — Probable (reported Aug 25, 8:00 PM EDT). Timestamped association only; not proof it caused the move.

Market expectation down

Downward descriptive pattern—not an Under pick

Expectation downAST · market observation—not a pick

Isabelle Harrison

TOR · F · vs SEA

1.5Line at T−1H

Typical market close: 2.5
Market vs typical: −1.0
Last 5 vs own closing lines: −1.5
Checkpoint move: 0.0

Market + recent results align

This game's AST line is 1.5 at T−1H. The typical market close was 2.5 across 9 earlier verified games. Recent results finished a median 1.5 below their own closing lines across 5 included games.

Use this to investigate this game's number—not as an automatic Over/Under.

LATEST INCLUDED · Aug 23 · 1.0 actual vs 2.5 line (−1.5)

Possible context: Maria Conde — Available (reported Aug 26, 3:30 PM EDT); Zaay Green — Available (reported Aug 25, 8:00 PM EDT). Timestamped association only; not proof it caused the move.

Showing the clearest market observations for available players—not additional bets.Open the season tape →

The Read

Toronto Tempo visits Seattle Storm in a game where the provided analysis is unusually thin: there is no away-team profile, no matchup agent projection, and no spread or total in the data. What is known centers on Seattle’s season profile — 99.7 offensive rating, 106.3 defensive rating, 88.4 points allowed per game, 20.8 assists allowed per game, 36.1 rebounds allowed, and 8.7 threes allowed — plus a modest pace edge for Seattle (83.15 vs Toronto’s 82.5). Seattle will also be without Natisha Hiedeman, though the data does not quantify her minutes/usage loss or who absorbs those minutes.

The most testable individual angle is Laura Juskaite’s passing. She is a floor-spacing, glass-cleaning forward averaging 1.7 assists in 24.7 minutes this season and 1.9 in 26.9 minutes over her last 10 games. Despite a hot three-game assist patch (3.33), she has cleared 2.5 assists in only 4 of her last 10 games. Seattle’s opponent assist allowance is not especially stingy — 20.8 per game, including 5.5 to forwards — but Juskaite’s head-to-head numbers versus Seattle (0.5 assists per game in two games) and her general role as a non-primary creator point firmly under the 2.5 line.

The key watch is whether Juskaite’s recent usage and minutes growth (projected 29 minutes) can create a new assist role. The data says no: her minute-matched baseline and pace-adjusted projection both sit around 1.5, and recent high-turnover starts have ended possessions in giveaways rather than assists. The pace environment is mildly helpful, but not enough to bridge a one-assist gap.

Because the matchup and away-team data are missing, no spread or total prediction is supportable, and no additional player props can be validated from the provided information. The disciplined call is to isolate the one qualifying prop and avoid inventing projections where the data is silent.

SUPPORTING RESEARCH · NOT A BETTING RECOMMENDATION

Matchup Outlook

N/A

Projected winner

(no spread data provided)

Model spread

—

Model total

40%

Outlook confidence · MODERATE

Team Series History

SEA vs TOR · last 3 meetings · TOR leads

Team results are game-environment context—not validation for an individual player prop. Player-specific opponent history lives inside each recommendation card.

1–2

SEA record

78.3–85.7

Avg score (home)

-7.3

Avg margin

32.3

Avg reb

RECENT MEETINGS

05/30SEA 72 @ TOR 93LSEA

05/13SEA 73 @ TOR 86LSEA