02

Picks and prices

Odds of at least 1.70 only · highest odds first · results checked

A line is the number a bookmaker sets, e.g. 13.5 points; Over means more than it, Under fewer. Odds 1.93 pay 1.93 for every 1 staked. 'Posted at' is the price we found when we published the pick; after the game it is compared with the last price before the start.

We checked 0 lines; none paid at least 1.70, so there are no picks. Normal, not an error.

Why the better price matters

In our past tests, simply taking the highest price offered for a line earned more than any of our own forecasts did.

In that test (25 Aug 2026), taking the best price returned about 2.8 more for every 100 staked than the price we posted did.

03

The players

11 players checked · 8 whose past record points the other way from the bookmakers' price · 1 out · 0 with too few games

Rate: the share of this season's games in which the player finished above tonight's line. S beside a name marks an expected starter.

Against this opponent, 1 of 12 players has performed clearly differently and 5 show a slight hint

Context only A player's rate describes the past; it is not a tip and has not been tested as one. Expected minutes come from RotoWire, a lineup news service.

Sign in to see each player's rate The numbers below (for example 15.5 points) are the lines the bookmakers actually posted.

Connecticut Sunplaying IND

SCharlisse Leger-Walker · 29 min expected
points 8.5 → 8 actual
SAaliyah Edwards · 28 min expected
points 12.5 → 12 actual
SSaniya Rivers · 28 min expected
points 8.5 → 9 actual
SDiamond Miller · 27 min expected
points 10.5 → 19 actual
Olivia Nelson-Ododa · Out · right knee
rebounds 6.5 → did not play, so no result

6 players have no line from any bookmaker: Angloma (23 expected minutes) · Beers (23 min) · +4 more

Indiana Feverplaying CON

SCaitlin Clark · 34 min expected
points 22.5 → 34 actual
SKelsey Mitchell · 33 min expected
points 25.5 → 34 actual
SAliyah Boston · 29 min expected
points 16.5 → 14 actual
SMakayla Timpson · 28 min expected
points 8.5 → 10 actual
SLexie Hull · 18 min expected
points 4.5 → 7 actual
Monique Billings · 18 min expected
points 6.5 → 0 actual
Sophie Cunningham · 18 min expected
points 7.5 → 1 actual

4 players have no line from any bookmaker: Hines-Allen (10 expected minutes) · Harris (10 min) · +2 more

04

What could go wrong

updated
Who is out

Onyiah · did not play last game

Out Marshall · earlier listed as available (changed ) · 0, 8 and 10 min in the last 3 games

Beers · new starter

Out Griner · left knee · CON

Out Nelson-Ododa · right knee · CON

Lineups

Starting lineup confirmed () · RotoWire, a lineup news service, as of game start

Playing time

2 players are expected to play at least 5 minutes more or fewer than in the last 5 games. For 6 players (Lith, Kneepkens, Jackson, Hull, Billings, Cunningham) we have no real minutes estimate, only a default.

Rivers: expected to play 28 minutes, averaged 23.0 in the last 5 games, about 5.0 more than usual

Timpson: expected to play 28 minutes, averaged 15.7 in the last 5 games, about 12.3 more than usual

Our check: these minute estimates (RotoWire) are typically off by about 4 minutes.

Rest

CON had 11 days off before this game.

Bookmakers

The reference bookmaker, Pinnacle, offers 13 of the 140 lines; the rest rely on other bookmakers.

One team is expected to win by 10 or more. In past games like this, players went over their lines 65.9% of the time; this does not mean the opposite is a good bet.

Looking back

Flagged before the game: Onyiah out · did not play

Flagged before the game: Marshall out () · did not play

Beers new starter · started, 22.1 min

When a player is out, that player's lines are removed: in our past results this helped. Guessing which teammates benefit was also tested and lost money, so nothing else on this page is adjusted for it.

05

What happened

In 4 of 8 cases where a player's past record disagreed with the bookmakers' price, the past record was right in this game. One game proves nothing.
FinalWe had no picks in this game · every posted line is still scored below · checked
12 other players with a posted line
Monique Billings · points 6.5 → 0 · 6.5 below the line · played 7.6 min (18 expected) · no final price
Sophie Cunningham · points 7.5 → 1 · 6.5 below the line · played 14.1 min (18 expected) · no final price
Diamond Miller · points 10.5 → 19 · 8.5 above the line · played 20.3 min (27 expected) · no final price
Lexie Hull · points 4.5 → 7 · 2.5 above the line · played 24.3 min (18 expected) · no final price
Caitlin Clark · points 22.5 → 34 · 11.5 above the line · played 33.8 min (34 expected) · Pinnacle odds: Over 1.95, Under 1.79
Kelsey Mitchell · points 25.5 → 34 · 8.5 above the line · played 31.2 min (33 expected) · Pinnacle odds: Over 1.98, Under 1.77
Makayla Timpson · points 8.5 → 10 · 1.5 above the line · played 29.5 min (28 expected) · no final price
Aliyah Boston · points 16.5 → 14 · 2.5 below the line · played 25 min (29 expected) · no final price
Charlisse Leger-Walker · points 8.5 → 8 · 0.5 below the line · played 24.4 min (29 expected) · no final price
Saniya Rivers · points 8.5 → 9 · 0.5 above the line · played 31.4 min (28 expected) · no final price
Aaliyah Edwards · points 12.5 → 12 · 0.5 below the line · played 29.7 min (28 expected) · no final price
Olivia Nelson-Ododa · rebounds 6.5 → did not play, so no result · no final price

Sign in to see your predictions checked

Each prediction is recorded as if you had staked 1 at the line you saw, and your record is shown here. One game tells you nothing yet.

More context
Head to head

IND vs CON · last 22 games · CON leads · IND record 7–15 · average score 81.4–85.1 · IND has lost by 3.8 on average

Team results are background only; they say nothing about any single player's line.

28 Aug · CON 91 at IND 111IND won
22 Jul · CON 88 at IND 123IND won
13 Jun · IND 85 at CON 75IND won
What each defense gives up per game
CON gives up87.7 points · 33.9 rebounds · 19.9 assists · 8.0 three-pointers scored against them · opponents make 46.3% of shots · 34.9% from three-point range · 13.5 opponent turnovers
IND gives up90.7 points · 31.9 rebounds · 20.8 assists · 8.1 three-pointers scored against them · opponents make 46.2% of shots · 34.0% from three-point range · 12.6 opponent turnovers
Defense by position
How much this is worth

Defense-by-position numbers are mostly random from season to season; shown for context only. We tested it: a team's defense-by-position numbers from one half of the season do not predict the other half, so treat them as noise.

CON gives up 87.7 points a game · 9th of 15 · league average 87.1about league average
IND gives up 90.7 points a game · 12th of 15 · league average 87.1+3.6 vs average
How the game odds moved

Pinnacle first had IND expected to win by 16.5, expected total 179.5 () and later IND expected to win by 17, expected total 179.5 ().

The odds at the top of the page are the latest we have, from every bookmaker on file; this is one bookmaker's own history.

Data log (technical)

Technical detail for auditing; the plain version is above. Internal ids and formula names print here only.

Line-shopping measurement: project_conditional_minutes_refuted

Defense-by-position measurement: split-half reliability r = -0.033 across 12 cells (7 of 12 negative) against a shuffle null of 0.000; a placebo using the wrong position family reproduced the effect to within 0.12pp · project_dvp_blowout_gate_refuted · 2026-08-26

Our picks, raw · 0

No raw pick rows for this game.

Checked results, raw (basketball-stats shorthand) · 0

No graded rows for this game.

Data fetches · 53
sds rest/team (away)ok 200 · 26 ms
sds rest/team (home)ok 200 · 28 ms
sds history (h2h)ok · 28 ms
grading picks/nightlyok 200 · 30 ms
sds defense/team (home)ok 200 · 32 ms
sds schedule/team (meetings)ok · 37 ms
sds defense/team (away)ok 200 · 38 ms
sds analytics opponent_defense (home)ok 200 · 40 ms
sds analytics opponent_defense (away)ok 200 · 42 ms
sds games/{id}ok 200 · 102 ms
sds lineups/{id}ok 200 · 110 ms
sds injuries/date/{date}ok 200 · 130 ms
grading clv/picksok 200 · 101 ms
sds games/{id}/boxscoreok 200 · 140 ms
dh lineups/{id}/deltaok 200 · 384 ms
grading verdict/boardok 200 · 636 ms
sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 45 ms
sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 51 ms
sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 135 ms
sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 143 ms
sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 152 ms
sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 155 ms
sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 163 ms
sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 170 ms
sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 172 ms
sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 178 ms
sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 341 ms
sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 343 ms
sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 352 ms
sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 352 ms
sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 364 ms
sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 365 ms
odds game timelineok 200 · 1008 ms
sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 385 ms
sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 394 ms
sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 397 ms
sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 406 ms
sds analytics player_vs_line (rebounds)ok 200 · 419 ms
sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 423 ms
sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 424 ms
sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 590 ms
odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 680 ms
odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 682 ms
odds player timeline (points)failed · 6003 ms
odds player timeline (points)failed · 6004 ms
odds player timeline (points)failed · 6010 ms
odds player timeline (points)failed · 6010 ms
odds player timeline (points)failed · 6011 ms
odds player timeline (points)failed · 6011 ms
odds player timeline (points)failed · 6012 ms
odds player timeline (points)failed · 6013 ms
odds player timeline (points)failed · 6014 ms
odds player timeline (rebounds)failed · 6015 ms
Classic view →

The older, longer version of this page is still available as the classic view. Nothing there is tracked in our results; this page is.