02

Picks and prices

Odds of at least 1.70 only · highest odds first · results checked

A line is the number a bookmaker sets, e.g. 13.5 points; Over means more than it, Under fewer. Odds 1.93 pay 1.93 for every 1 staked. 'Posted at' is the price we found when we published the pick; after the game it is compared with the last price before the start.

We checked 0 lines; none paid at least 1.70, so there are no picks. Normal, not an error.

Why the better price matters

In our past tests, simply taking the highest price offered for a line earned more than any of our own forecasts did.

In that test (25 Aug 2026), taking the best price returned about 2.8 more for every 100 staked than the price we posted did.

03

The players

11 players checked · 3 whose past record points the other way from the bookmakers' price · 0 out · 0 with too few games

Rate: the share of this season's games in which the player finished above tonight's line. S beside a name marks an expected starter.

Against this opponent, 3 of 11 players have performed clearly differently and 2 show a slight hint

Context only A player's rate describes the past; it is not a tip and has not been tested as one. Expected minutes come from RotoWire, a lineup news service.

Sign in to see each player's rate The numbers below (for example 15.5 points) are the lines the bookmakers actually posted.

Chicago Skyplaying NYL

SAzura Stevens · 28 min expected
points 10.5 → 6 actual
SKamilla Cardoso · 27 min expected
points 15.5 → 9 actual
SCourtney Vandersloot · 26 min expected
points 9.5 → 8 actual
SNatasha Cloud · 26 min expected
points 10.5 → 14 actual
SSydney Taylor · 20 min expected
points 12.5 → 13 actual

5 players have no line from any bookmaker: Coulibaly (16 expected minutes) · Jaquez (16 min) · +3 more

New York Libertyplaying CHI

SBreanna Stewart · 32 min expected
points 19.5 → 13 actual
SLeonie Fiebich · 30 min expected
points 10.5 → 11 actual
SSabrina Ionescu · 30 min expected
points 16.5 → 2 actual
SJonquel Jones · 29 min expected
points 14.5 → 11 actual
SPauline Astier · 24 min expected
points 7.5 → 8 actual
Marine Johannes · 15 min expected
points 5.5 → 0 actual

6 players have no line from any bookmaker: Allen (14 expected minutes) · Xu (11 min) · +4 more

04

What could go wrong

updated
Who is out

Balogun · earlier listed as out, now available (changed )

Sabally · earlier listed as out, now available (changed ) · 8, 27 and 17 min in the last 3 games

Out Carrington · earlier listed as available (changed ) · 4, 18 and 19 min in the last 3 games

Out Diggins · right knee · CHI

Lineups

Starting lineup confirmed () · RotoWire, a lineup news service, as of game start

Playing time

2 players are expected to play at least 5 minutes more or fewer than in the last 5 games. For 5 players (Coulibaly, Sheldon, Jaquez, Carrera, Maley) we have no real minutes estimate, only a default.

Stewart: expected to play 32 minutes, averaged 39.5 in the last 5 games, about 7.5 fewer than usual

Johannes: expected to play 15 minutes, averaged 9.3 in the last 5 games, about 5.7 more than usual

Our check: these minute estimates (RotoWire) are typically off by about 4 minutes.

Rest

CHI had 15 days off before this game.

Bookmakers

The reference bookmaker, Pinnacle, offers 20 of the 144 lines; the rest rely on other bookmakers.

Every pick is priced by at least 2 bookmakers.

Looking back

Flagged before the game: Balogun out () · did not play

Flagged before the game: Sabally out () · did not play

Flagged before the game: Carrington out () · did not play

When a player is out, that player's lines are removed: in our past results this helped. Guessing which teammates benefit was also tested and lost money, so nothing else on this page is adjusted for it.

05

What happened

In 2 of 3 cases where a player's past record disagreed with the bookmakers' price, the past record was right in this game. One game proves nothing.
FinalWe had no picks in this game · every posted line is still scored below · checked
11 other players with a posted line
Marine Johannes · points 5.5 → 0 · 5.5 below the line · played 3.5 min (15 expected) · BetRivers odds: Over 1.81, Under —
Sabrina Ionescu · points 16.5 → 2 · 14.5 below the line · played 23.1 min (30 expected) · Pinnacle odds: Over 1.87, Under 1.87
Azura Stevens · points 10.5 → 6 · 4.5 below the line · played 19.7 min (28 expected) · Pinnacle odds: Over 1.77, Under 2.00
Kamilla Cardoso · points 15.5 → 9 · 6.5 below the line · played 20.1 min (27 expected) · Pinnacle odds: Over 1.91, Under 1.83
Natasha Cloud · points 10.5 → 14 · 3.5 above the line · played 20.8 min (26 expected) · Pinnacle odds: Over 1.84, Under 1.90
Breanna Stewart · points 19.5 → 13 · 6.5 below the line · played 26.5 min (32 expected) · Pinnacle odds: Over 1.78, Under 1.96
Jonquel Jones · points 14.5 → 11 · 3.5 below the line · played 19.2 min (29 expected) · Pinnacle odds: Over 1.83, Under 1.92
Courtney Vandersloot · points 9.5 → 8 · 1.5 below the line · played 23.3 min (26 expected) · Pinnacle odds: Over 1.82, Under 1.92
Pauline Astier · points 7.5 → 8 · 0.5 above the line · played 25 min (24 expected) · BetRivers odds: Over 2.02, Under —
Leonie Fiebich · points 10.5 → 11 · 0.5 above the line · played 29.5 min (30 expected) · Pinnacle odds: Over 1.89, Under 1.85
Sydney Taylor · points 12.5 → 13 · 0.5 above the line · played 18.9 min (20 expected) · Pinnacle odds: Over 1.79, Under 1.95

Sign in to see your predictions checked

Each prediction is recorded as if you had staked 1 at the line you saw, and your record is shown here. One game tells you nothing yet.

More context
Head to head

NYL vs CHI · last 23 games · NYL leads · NYL record 14–9 · average score 83.9–82.5 · NYL has won by 1.3 on average

Team results are background only; they say nothing about any single player's line.

29 Aug · CHI 66 at NYL 85NYL won
18 Aug · NYL 86 at CHI 93NYL lost
22 Jul · CHI 94 at NYL 95NYL won
17 Jun · NYL 96 at CHI 95NYL won
What each defense gives up per game
CHI gives up90.7 points · 37.1 rebounds · 20.7 assists · 8.2 three-pointers scored against them · opponents make 44.9% of shots · 33.8% from three-point range · 12.9 opponent turnovers
NYL gives up86.5 points · 31.4 rebounds · 21.3 assists · 9.1 three-pointers scored against them · opponents make 44.6% of shots · 34.6% from three-point range · 10.8 opponent turnovers
Defense by position
How much this is worth

Defense-by-position numbers are mostly random from season to season; shown for context only. We tested it: a team's defense-by-position numbers from one half of the season do not predict the other half, so treat them as noise.

CHI gives up 90.7 points a game · 11th of 15 · league average 87.2+3.5 vs average
NYL gives up 86.5 points a game · 7th of 15 · league average 87.2about league average
How the game odds moved

Pinnacle first had NYL expected to win by 9, expected total 179.5 () and later NYL expected to win by 9, expected total 183 ().

The odds at the top of the page are the latest we have, from every bookmaker on file; this is one bookmaker's own history.

Data log (technical)

Technical detail for auditing; the plain version is above. Internal ids and formula names print here only.

Line-shopping measurement: project_conditional_minutes_refuted

Defense-by-position measurement: split-half reliability r = -0.033 across 12 cells (7 of 12 negative) against a shuffle null of 0.000; a placebo using the wrong position family reproduced the effect to within 0.12pp · project_dvp_blowout_gate_refuted · 2026-08-26

Our picks, raw · 0

No raw pick rows for this game.

Checked results, raw (basketball-stats shorthand) · 0

No graded rows for this game.

Data fetches · 50
sds games/{id}ok 200 · 28 ms
sds lineups/{id}ok 200 · 29 ms
sds injuries/date/{date}ok 200 · 31 ms
sds history (h2h)ok · 46 ms
sds defense/team (away)ok 200 · 47 ms
sds rest/team (away)ok 200 · 49 ms
sds rest/team (home)ok 200 · 50 ms
sds schedule/team (meetings)ok · 60 ms
dh lineups/{id}/deltaok 200 · 63 ms
sds defense/team (home)ok 200 · 63 ms
sds analytics opponent_defense (away)ok 200 · 63 ms
sds analytics opponent_defense (home)ok 200 · 64 ms
sds games/{id}/boxscoreok 200 · 66 ms
grading picks/nightlyok 200 · 69 ms
odds game timelineok 200 · 75 ms
grading clv/picksok 200 · 8 ms
grading verdict/boardok 200 · 489 ms
sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 77 ms
sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 78 ms
sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 78 ms
sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 111 ms
sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 117 ms
sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 118 ms
sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 181 ms
sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 248 ms
sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 261 ms
sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 284 ms
sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 318 ms
sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 320 ms
sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 321 ms
sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 322 ms
sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 327 ms
sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 338 ms
sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 339 ms
sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 347 ms
sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 356 ms
sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 355 ms
sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 356 ms
sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 359 ms
odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 885 ms
odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 885 ms
odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 891 ms
odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 897 ms
odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 1069 ms
odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 1081 ms
odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 1088 ms
odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 1098 ms
odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 1101 ms
odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 1150 ms
odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 1173 ms
Classic view →

The older, longer version of this page is still available as the classic view. Nothing there is tracked in our results; this page is.