WNBA · FINAL · TUE, SEP 29, 8:30 PM

MIN @ NYL

Lynx at Liberty

← All WNBA games on 2026-09-29
+1.5
Spread (home)
175.5
Total
-115 / -115
Moneyline

Snapshot market context · game-quote observation time and source book unavailable · snapshot assembled Sep 29, 10:37 PM EDT

GAME BRIEF · START HERE

Start with what happened, then judge the process.

Lynx at Liberty is a completed-game review. Any call below is record-only.

REVIEW
Open the 2-minute projection guide
Best next step

Review result, minutes, closing line, and abnormal-exposure notes; then expand the supporting evidence.

DECISION TIMELINE · REVISION FLOW

Loading frozen research checkpoints…

HISTORICAL FORMULA FEED · AUDIT ONLY

Results & Recorded Calls · 13 qualified

Start with the verified result and flat-1u CORE benchmark P&L. Then compare the recorded call with the evidence that can be reconstructed without using this game's outcome.

FINAL RESULT · CORE BENCHMARK

WIN
Actual
14 vs 17.5
Flat-1u P&L
+1.56u
CLV
+10.4¢
Minutes
33.2

Postgame context: Collier's 44% true shooting and 6-14 field goal performance kept her grounded at 14 points despite playing all 33 available minutes, with poor efficiency—especially from three (0-5 attempts)—preventing her from reaching the over.

SERVER RECORD · CORE FORMULA · POINTS

Napheesa Collier U 17.5 PTS +156

Persisted decision price · 2.0u model stake · bet_clv:2009421

RECORD ONLY

Current meaning: This is a settled, record-only decision. It is historical evidence, not a current wager.

PROP BRIEF · START HERE

Review the recorded result—not a current play.

What the evidence saysContext leans with the UNDER

Recent games · Last 5 supports; Against this opponent supports; Similar players vs opponent unavailable. This is supporting context, not extra model votes.

Main riskWhat could break the read

Decision time is unavailable; the capture bucket must not be read as decision time.

Next stepReview the process

Compare the result, minutes, closing line, and receipt limits below.

Verified receipt & source timing

Canonical decision receipt · Receipt bet_clv:2009421 · formula consensus_devig v1.0.0 · capture bucket Sep 28, 8:00 PM EDT (not decision time) · decision time unavailable · point-in-time unverified

WHY IT WAS SURFACED · FEED PRICE

47.5% model chance vs 39.1% needed at +156 · +8.4pp probability edge · +0.2% expected profit / 1u
Model stake2.0u

Why “<52%” can still show positive value: that label describes raw hit likelihood. At plus money, a candidate can hit less than half the time and still carry positive expected value because a win pays more than 1u.

PREGAME CHECKS · AUDIT

What the receipt can—and cannot—prove

Decision receiptRecord only

+156 · sportsbook unavailable · quote observation unavailable · bet_clv:2009421

Pregame availabilityNot timestamped

No immutable pre-tip player-status receipt is connected.

Pregame roleNot verified

Pick-time minutes, lineup, and role inputs are not verified by the canonical receipt.

SUPPORTING CONTEXT · NOT EXTRA VOTES

Recent, H2H, and similar players

Read each row on its stated basis
Recent games · Last 5Supports
4 of 5 would have hit

Against today's UNDER 17.5 · 12.8 average · 27.4 average minutes

Against this opponentSupports
3 of 5 would have hit

Vs NYL at today's UNDER 17.5 · 18.4 average

Similar players vs opponentUnavailable
Comparable-player sample unavailable

The matchup comparison service returned 500.

BOTTOM LINE

Context leans with the UNDER

Recent games · Last 5 supports; Against this opponent supports; Similar players vs opponent unavailable. This is supporting context, not extra model votes.

WHAT THE ARCHIVE IS MISSING

  • Decision time is unavailable; the capture bucket must not be read as decision time.
  • The source sportsbook or quote observation timestamp was not preserved.
  • The pre-tip availability observation was not stored immutably.
See game-by-game evidenceL3 / L5 / L10 · opponent games · comparable players
L3
3/3
At today's UNDER 17.5 · avg 9.0 · 23.6 avg min
L5
4/5
At today's UNDER 17.5 · avg 12.8 · 27.4 avg min
L10
6/9
At today's UNDER 17.5 · avg 14.1 · 29.5 avg min

Player vs opponentFinished below 17.5 in 3/5 prior player meetings vs NYL

Position/team matchupNo stat-matched position/team factor is connected; direct defender assignments are unavailable

Reconstructed from a snapshot assembled Sep 29, 10:37 PM EDT. The target game and all same/future dates are excluded. L3 is contained inside L5, which is contained inside L10; they are one sample, not three confirmations.

DEFENSE CHECK · EACH PLAYER'S OWN CLOSE

How comparable players fared vs NYL
Descriptive · not another model vote

The matchup comparison service returned 500.

Open evidence game log

HISTORICAL MARKET CHECK

Against each game's own verified close
Normal exposure only

Checking verified pre-tip closing lines…

CURRENT-LINE WHAT-IF

Prior results against this card's 17.5 line
A retrospective comparison with this formula line—not the market line offered in each old game.
DateOpponentActualMinutesUNDER 17.5
Sep 27vs NYL12.032.9Hit
Sep 24vs IND6.024.9Hit
Sep 22@ IND9.013.0Hit
Sep 20@ CON23.034.0Miss
Sep 18vs NYL14.032.3Hit
Aug 30@ ATL17.035.0Hit
Aug 24vs GSV9.031.7Hit
Aug 19@ GSV18.036.7Miss
Aug 15@ LVA19.025.1Miss
Player history vs NYL

Latest 5 of 13 eligible meetings · finished below 17.5 in 3/5 · average 18.4. Context only; roles and schemes change.

DateActualMinutesUNDER 17.5
Sep 2712.032.9Hit
Sep 1814.032.3Hit
Jul 3030.034.5Miss
Oct 2022.044.4Miss
Oct 1814.040.0Hit
See methodology & source audit6 pillars · 49 checks

The six items are pillars, not six yes/no questions. Each check below is evidence—not a gamified score. One hard failure can outweigh many verified inputs.

1 · Price & market value
Caution

What exact side, line, odds, and book are offered?

Napheesa Collier UNDER 17.5 +156 · sportsbook unavailable

Source · canonical grading decision receipt
Caution

When was the formula price captured?

Capture bucket Sep 28, 8:00 PM EDT (storage bucket, not decision time) · decision time unavailable · quote observation unavailable

Source · bet_clv:2009421
Verified

What hit rate does the price require?

39.1%

Source · derived from formula-feed American odds
Verified

What is the calibrated probability at this line?

47.5%

Source · canonical decision model.calibrated_hit_probability
Verified

What is the probability-point edge?

+8.4pp

Source · p_hit minus formula-price break-even
Verified

What is expected profit per unit?

+0.2%

Source · canonical decision model.claimed_ev_pct (when persisted)
N/A

Does the exact line appear in the connected snapshot?

Mutable latest-market rows are intentionally excluded from historical pre-tip proof

Unavailable

What price or line turns this into a pass?

Server-authoritative playable boundaries are not published yet

N/A

Does the broader market agree?

Mutable latest-market rows are not used to reconstruct historical consensus

Unavailable

Is the market liquid enough?

Limits and liquidity are not connected

2 · Projection quality & uncertainty
Unavailable

What is the projected median?

Unavailable

Unavailable

What does the outcome distribution look like?

Distribution unavailable

Unavailable

How sensitive is the pick to minutes, usage, or pace?

Sensitivity model unavailable

Caution

What do L3, L5, and L10 show at this exact line?

L3 3/3 · L5 4/5 · L10 6/9 at the formula UNDER 17.5 line

Source · reconstructed hydrator game history; target/same/future dates excluded
Caution

Is the model calibrated for this league, prop, and bucket?

The pick carries calibrated p_hit; bucket-level proof is not exposed here

Unavailable

Was calibration measured out of sample?

Out-of-sample calibration evidence is not exposed per pick

Caution

How large is the comparable historical sample?

9 eligible prior games in L10 · 0 under 10 minutes · nested descriptive sample, not 9 independent confirmations

Unavailable

When did the model run and were inputs complete?

Research run timestamp unavailable

Source · Gameplay Intelligence
3 · Availability & role
Unavailable

Is the player active, questionable, limited, or returning?

No hard game-report flag; individual status is not fully resolved

Source · player-state service
Caution

When was status last verified?

Snapshot assembled Sep 29, 10:37 PM EDT; injury-source observation time is not mapped

Source · data-hydrator snapshot assembly
Unavailable

What is the expected minutes range?

Minutes projection unavailable

Unavailable

Is the player starting or restricted?

Starter and restriction status unavailable

Unavailable

Has opportunity changed?

Opportunity feed unavailable

Unavailable

Which teammate absences change the role?

No confirmed teammate-absence attribution returned

Unavailable

Were injury-shortened games identified?

The joined outcome does not include a verified abnormal-exposure flag

Unavailable

What rotation change could invalidate the projection?

No material role change returned

4 · Game environment & matchup
Unavailable

How many possessions are expected?

A game-level pace projection is not exposed on this card

Caution

What do spread and total imply?

Spread (home) +1.5 · Total 175.5 · Moneyline -115 / -115 · archive context only; not an immutable pre-tip market receipt · snapshot assembled Sep 29, 10:37 PM EDT

Source · data-hydrator assembled game-market snapshot
Unavailable

Does opponent scheme affect this stat?

No stat-matched position/team factor is connected; direct defender assignments are unavailable

Caution

What has this player done against this opponent?

Finished below 17.5 in 3/5 prior player meetings vs NYL

Source · reconstructed player-vs-team game history; target date excluded
Unavailable

Which defender or lineup matters?

Defender attribution is not exposed

Unavailable

Is rest, travel, or schedule a disadvantage?

Rest and travel context are not connected

Caution

What foul, blowout, or game-script path creates downside?

Spread is visible; player-level foul and game-script risk are not quantified

5 · Execution & portfolio risk
N/A

Is the number still inside its playable boundary?

Not applicable after tip; mutable current offers are excluded from historical execution proof

Verified

How was stake size derived?

2.0u model-sized stake

Source · canonical decision model.kelly_stake_units
Unavailable

How much correlated exposure already exists?

Player, game, and injury-thesis exposure are not connected

Unavailable

Are exposure limits respected?

Daily, league, player, and prop limits are not exposed

Caution

What event withdraws or expires the pick?

Game start and hard availability conflicts are enforced; price boundaries remain a backend gap

Caution

Is this pregame, live, or halftime analysis?

Schedule status: final · formula-feed archive context

Caution

Is there a no-chase rule?

The UI expires the card after tip and requires exact-line verification; explicit price-bound enforcement is pending

6 · Outcome evidence & accountability
Verified

Did the pick beat the comparable close?

+10.4¢ closing-line value (price CLV)

Source · joined grading settlement
Verified

Was the formula line stored immutably?

UNDER 17.5 · decision key pd_5cc272053b6e7f662693344d · receipt bet_clv:2009421 · formula consensus_devig v1.0.0

Source · prop-decision-envelope.v1
Verified

Was a miss variance, injury, foul trouble, or blowout?

Collier's 44% true shooting and 6-14 field goal performance kept her grounded at 14 points despite playing all 33 available minutes, with poor efficiency—especially from three (0-5 attempts)—preventing her from reaching the over.

Source · joined outcome receipt
Verified

What are flat-1u and actual-staked ROI?

This pick's flat-1u CORE result is +1.56u. Personal staking remains separate.

Source · joined grading ledger
Unavailable

What are sample size and uncertainty interval?

Per-cohort confidence interval is not exposed on the card

Unavailable

Are probabilities calibrated by Brier or log loss?

Per-cohort calibration metrics are not exposed

Unavailable

Where is performance weakening?

League/prop/price/book/time-to-tip drift is not joined here

Unavailable

What are drawdown and losing-streak behavior?

Portfolio drawdown belongs to the ledger and is not connected to this pick

Unavailable

Is the edge persisting in new data?

Model-versioned out-of-sample persistence is not exposed per pick

Formula · consensus_devigReceipt · bet_clv:2009421Serving price floor · 1.70Research assembled · Timestamp unavailable

CORE FORMULA CARD · ACCOUNT ACCESS

Additional qualified candidate

RECORD ONLY

This hidden formula-feed row is archive context, not a current wager or proof of a pre-tip publication.

Create account to view

CORE FORMULA CARD · ACCOUNT ACCESS

Additional qualified candidate

RECORD ONLY

This hidden formula-feed row is archive context, not a current wager or proof of a pre-tip publication.

Create account to view

CORE FORMULA CARD · ACCOUNT ACCESS

Additional qualified candidate

RECORD ONLY

This hidden formula-feed row is archive context, not a current wager or proof of a pre-tip publication.

Create account to view

CORE FORMULA CARD · ACCOUNT ACCESS

Additional qualified candidate

RECORD ONLY

This hidden formula-feed row is archive context, not a current wager or proof of a pre-tip publication.

Create account to view

CORE FORMULA CARD · ACCOUNT ACCESS

Additional qualified candidate

RECORD ONLY

This hidden formula-feed row is archive context, not a current wager or proof of a pre-tip publication.

Create account to view

CORE FORMULA CARD · ACCOUNT ACCESS

Additional qualified candidate

RECORD ONLY

This hidden formula-feed row is archive context, not a current wager or proof of a pre-tip publication.

Create account to view

CORE FORMULA CARD · ACCOUNT ACCESS

Additional qualified candidate

RECORD ONLY

This hidden formula-feed row is archive context, not a current wager or proof of a pre-tip publication.

Create account to view

CORE FORMULA CARD · ACCOUNT ACCESS

Additional qualified candidate

RECORD ONLY

This hidden formula-feed row is archive context, not a current wager or proof of a pre-tip publication.

Create account to view

CORE FORMULA CARD · ACCOUNT ACCESS

Additional qualified candidate

RECORD ONLY

This hidden formula-feed row is archive context, not a current wager or proof of a pre-tip publication.

Create account to view

CORE FORMULA CARD · ACCOUNT ACCESS

Additional qualified candidate

RECORD ONLY

This hidden formula-feed row is archive context, not a current wager or proof of a pre-tip publication.

Create account to view

CORE FORMULA CARD · ACCOUNT ACCESS

Additional qualified candidate

RECORD ONLY

This hidden formula-feed row is archive context, not a current wager or proof of a pre-tip publication.

Create account to view

CORE FORMULA CARD · ACCOUNT ACCESS

Additional qualified candidate

RECORD ONLY

This hidden formula-feed row is archive context, not a current wager or proof of a pre-tip publication.

Create account to view

DECISION LAB

Loading the immutable evidence map…

AVAILABILITY SNAPSHOT · AUDIT CONTEXT

Availability & Injuries

1 hard availability snapshot flag appears. Player-level observation time is unavailable, so this does not prove the status existed before tip; formula rows remain record-only.

MINAnastasiia Olairi Kosu · Injury/Illness-RightFoot;Rightfoot (Foot)OUT

GAMEPLAY INTELLIGENCE · IMMUTABLE PRE-TIP CAPTURE

Model Outlook

Checking the latest captured lineup, rotation, matchup and market state…

MARKET CONTEXT · NOT A PICK · THIS GAME · T−1H

Prop Watchlist

A shortlist of unusual market lines. Compare this game's checkpoint with a player's typical close, then see whether recent results against their own lines agree. Only the Formula-Qualified Recommendations section contains CORE candidate wagers.

PROP FEED UNAVAILABLE

The market observation feed could not be checked

The player-prop signal feed could not be checked. The matchup page still uses the independently available schedule, injury, and recommendation data.

The Read

The Minnesota Lynx visit the New York Liberty in a matchup between two teams that play at essentially the same tempo but arrive with meaningfully different efficiency profiles. Minnesota's team profile shows an offensive rating of 110.72 on a pace of 81.73, paired with a defensive rating of 102.56, while New York checks in at an offensive rating of 109.24 and a defensive rating of 105.65 on a pace of 81.76 (net +3.59). On paper that shapes up as a small but real edge for the road side in a game the market has priced with a 2.5-point spread and a 172.5 total.

The clearest quantifiable storylines sit on the defensive end. Minnesota is a top-tier defense per the available splits — 83.82 points allowed (rank 3 league-wide), and notably a league-low 14.0 points allowed to centers (position_rank 1) with 9.76 rebounds allowed to centers (rank 9). New York's counterweight is rebounding prevention: 31.31 rebounds allowed, rank 2 in the league, alongside 86.38 opponent points per game (rank 7). New York also holds opponents to 9.02 made threes (rank 11) and 21.38 assists (rank 11). Both teams' efficiency markers (NYL eFG% 0.5357, TOV% 0.1525, ORB% 0.2278, FT rate 0.3062; MIN eFG% 0.5406, TOV% 0.1391, ORB% 0.2687, FT rate 0.2443) point to two competent, relatively careful offenses.

The game context supplied with the data is a 172.5 market total, a 2.5-point spread, an 'above_avg' pace context and 'low' blowout risk — all of which argue for a competitive, moderately-paced game rather than a track meet or a rout. The near-identical pace figures (81.73 vs 81.76) support treating this as a possession-neutral game where the difference is made on efficiency and rebounding rather than tempo.

This preview is deliberately thin on specifics because the underlying dataset is severely incomplete. The matchup agent returned an empty object, the Minnesota team agent JSON failed to parse, and 12 of the 13 player agents returned null headlines with empty prop_picks arrays. There is no injury or absence block for either team, no confirmed lineup (the only lineup data present is a projected 'roster-fallback' list at confidence_level 0), and no rest-days or back-to-back information. Opponent FG%, blocks, steals, three-point attempt rate, paint points and fastbreak points are null for New York. Because of those gaps, no player prop clears the grading bar tonight — the one analyzed player (Han Xu) self-flagged his only supplied line (points 5.5) as 'no_edge'. Pick volume is therefore zero by design rather than by omission.

What to watch for: whether Minnesota's league-best points-allowed-to-centers defense (14.0) suppresses New York's interior scoring, and whether New York's rank-2 rebound prevention (31.31 allowed) can limit Minnesota's second-chance opportunities given the Lynx's 0.2687 offensive rebound rate. If either team wins the possession battle decisively on the glass, that is the likeliest path to covering the short number.

SUPPORTING RESEARCH · NOT A BETTING RECOMMENDATION

Matchup Outlook

MIN
Projected winner
-2.5
Model spread
U 172.5
Model total
40%
Outlook confidence · MODERATE

Team Series History

NYL vs MIN · last 23 meetings · NYL leads

Team results are game-environment context—not validation for an individual player prop. Player-specific opponent history lives inside each recommendation card.

12–11
NYL record
83.4–79.8
Avg score (home)
+3.7
Avg margin
36.5
Avg reb

RECENT MEETINGS

09/27NYL 91 @ MIN 75WNYL
09/18NYL 93 @ MIN 81WNYL
07/11NYL 85 @ MIN 90LNYL
07/03MIN 86 @ NYL 99WNYL