Carla Leite against the Washington Mystics

Averaged 15.9 points, 1.9 rebounds and 5.1 assists in 7 games against the Washington Mystics.

01

Every stat, vs baseline

hover a row for the gap against its noise
STAT
VS MYSTICS
FORM
DIFF
← below baseline · above →
VERDICT
points
15.9
11.0
+4.9
gap is 1.2× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 8.0
NOT MEASURABLE
rebounds
1.9
2.0
−0.2
gap is 0.2× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.7
NOT MEASURABLE
assists
5.1
4.2
+1.0
gap is 0.9× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 2.2
NOT MEASURABLE
threes
1.3
0.6
+0.6
gap is 1.5× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.8
NOT MEASURABLE
steals
0.9
0.6
+0.3
gap is 0.5× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.1
NOT MEASURABLE
blocks
0.0
0.1
−0.1
gap is 2.9× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.1
NOT MEASURABLE
turnovers
1.6
2.4
−0.9
gap is 0.9× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 2.0
NOT MEASURABLE
pts+reb+ast
22.9
17.2
+5.7
gap is 1.0× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 10.9
NOT MEASURABLE
pts+reb
17.7
13.0
+4.7
gap is 1.0× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 9.2
NOT MEASURABLE
pts+ast
21.0
15.2
+5.8
gap is 1.2× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 9.8
NOT MEASURABLE
reb+ast
7.0
6.2
+0.8
gap is 0.5× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 3.1
NOT MEASURABLE
steals+blocks
0.9
0.7
+0.2
gap is 0.3× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.2
NOT MEASURABLE
field goals made
4.9
3.1
+1.7
gap is 1.1× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 3.0
NOT MEASURABLE
field goal attempts
11.0
8.0
+3.0
gap is 0.9× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 6.6
NOT MEASURABLE
three-point attempts
3.9
2.5
+1.4
gap is 1.7× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.6
NOT MEASURABLE
free throws made
4.9
4.1
+0.7
gap is 0.6× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 2.6
NOT MEASURABLE
free throw attempts
5.4
4.9
+0.5
gap is 0.4× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 2.8
NOT MEASURABLE
offensive rebounds
0.9
0.6
+0.2
gap is 0.5× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.0
NOT MEASURABLE
defensive rebounds
1.0
1.4
−0.4
gap is 0.9× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.9
NOT MEASURABLE
fouls
2.1
2.6
−0.5
gap is 0.7× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.5
NOT MEASURABLE
usage 27.0 vs 24.5true shooting 60.9 vs 53.5minutes 23.8 vs 23.2

Baseline: form going into each game (the average of the previous 10), measured on 69 other games since 2025-05-27.

02

The 7 games

points · her form 11.0 · hover a bar
2025-05-21— 5-game mean2026-08-23 · newest
03

Why — minutes or rate

no difference in this split is larger than the sample can resolve, so there is nothing to explain

04

The matchup

Nothing in this split cleared the noise, so there is no difference to attribute to the opponent. The defensive profile is only worth reading beside a finding.

05

Game log

all 7 · click a row for the box score
DATE
OPP
H/A
MIN
POINTS
REB · AST · FG
VS 11.0
2026-08-23
WAS
HOME
29.9MIN
27POINTS
2 · 11 · 8-20
ABOVE
FG
8-20
3PT
2-5
FT
9-9
OREB/DREB
1/1
TS%
56.3
USG%
36.0
STL
2
BLK
0
TOV
1
PF
2
+/−
+5
PRA
40
2026-07-16
WAS
AWAY
23.0MIN
14POINTS
1 · 5 · 5-12
ABOVE
FG
5-12
3PT
0-4
FT
4-4
OREB/DREB
0/1
TS%
50.9
USG%
29.2
STL
1
BLK
0
TOV
0
PF
1
+/−
+18
PRA
20
2026-06-28
WAS
AWAY
47.8MIN
32POINTS
6 · 9 · 12-26
ABOVE
FG
12-26
3PT
3-6
FT
5-6
OREB/DREB
3/3
TS%
55.9
USG%
32.9
STL
3
BLK
0
TOV
6
PF
5
+/−
-9
PRA
47
2025-08-30
WAS
HOME
19.2MIN
19POINTS
0 · 6 · 5-5
ABOVE
FG
5-5
3PT
1-1
FT
8-9
OREB/DREB
0/0
TS%
106.0
USG%
25.4
STL
0
BLK
0
TOV
1
PF
2
+/−
+29
PRA
25
2025-08-13
WAS
AWAY
12.6MIN
5POINTS
0 · 1 · 1-3
BELOW
FG
1-3
3PT
1-2
FT
2-2
OREB/DREB
0/0
TS%
64.4
USG%
20.0
STL
0
BLK
0
TOV
1
PF
1
+/−
+3
PRA
6
2025-07-31
WAS
AWAY
13.7MIN
4POINTS
2 · 1 · 1-4
BELOW
FG
1-4
3PT
1-3
FT
1-2
OREB/DREB
0/2
TS%
41.0
USG%
25.9
STL
0
BLK
0
TOV
2
PF
0
+/−
+8
PRA
7
2025-05-21
WAS
HOME
20.7MIN
10POINTS
2 · 3 · 2-7
BELOW
FG
2-7
3PT
1-6
FT
5-6
OREB/DREB
2/0
TS%
51.9
USG%
19.6
STL
0
BLK
0
TOV
0
PF
4
+/−
+17
PRA
15
every game on file — nothing hidden