Leila Lacan against the Chicago Sky

Averaged 9.7 points, 2.3 rebounds and 3.3 assists in 6 games against the Chicago Sky.

01

Every stat, vs baseline

hover a row for the gap against its noise
STAT
VS SKY
FORM
DIFF
← below baseline · above →
VERDICT
points
9.7
11.7
−2.0
gap is 0.8× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 4.7
NOT MEASURABLE
rebounds
2.3
1.9
+0.5
gap is 0.6× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.6
NOT MEASURABLE
assists
3.3
4.6
−1.2
gap is 1.2× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 2.0
NOT MEASURABLE
threes
0.3
1.0
−0.6
gap is 2.3× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.5
NOT MEASURABLE
steals
1.7
2.4
−0.7
gap is 1.4× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.1
NOT MEASURABLE
blocks
0.2
0.2
−0.1
gap is 0.3× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.4
NOT MEASURABLE
turnovers
1.5
2.1
−0.6
gap is 1.7× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.7
NOT MEASURABLE
pts+reb+ast
15.3
18.1
−2.8
gap is 0.8× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 6.9
NOT MEASURABLE
pts+reb
12.0
13.6
−1.6
gap is 0.5× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 5.8
NOT MEASURABLE
pts+ast
13.0
16.3
−3.3
gap is 1.1× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 5.9
NOT MEASURABLE
reb+ast
5.7
6.5
−0.8
gap is 0.5× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 3.0
NOT MEASURABLE
steals+blocks
1.8
2.6
−0.8
gap is 1.6× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.0
NOT MEASURABLE
field goals made
3.8
4.6
−0.8
gap is 0.9× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.7
NOT MEASURABLE
field goal attempts
8.0
10.5
−2.5
gap is 1.6× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 3.1
NOT MEASURABLE
three-point attempts
2.0
3.3
−1.3
gap is 2.0× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.2
NOT MEASURABLE
free throws made
1.7
1.4
+0.2
gap is 0.3× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.3
NOT MEASURABLE
free throw attempts
2.7
1.9
+0.8
gap is 0.8× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.8
NOT MEASURABLE
offensive rebounds
1.0
0.4
+0.6
gap is 1.1× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.0
NOT MEASURABLE
defensive rebounds
1.3
1.4
−0.1
gap is 0.2× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.9
NOT MEASURABLE
fouls
3.5
2.9
+0.6
gap is 1.0× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.1
NOT MEASURABLE
usage 18.4 vs 21.6true shooting 54.0 vs 50.0minutes 25.8 vs 28.3

Baseline: form going into each game (the average of the previous 10), measured on 46 other games since 2025-07-13.

02

The 6 games

points · her form 11.7 · hover a bar
2025-08-13— 5-game mean2026-07-30 · newest
03

Why — minutes or rate

no difference in this split is larger than the sample can resolve, so there is nothing to explain

04

The matchup

Nothing in this split cleared the noise, so there is no difference to attribute to the opponent. The defensive profile is only worth reading beside a finding.

05

Game log

all 6 · click a row for the box score
DATE
OPP
H/A
MIN
POINTS
REB · AST · FG
VS 11.7
2026-07-30
CHI
AWAY
28.8MIN
12POINTS
5 · 6 · 4-7
ABOVE
FG
4-7
3PT
1-2
FT
3-4
OREB/DREB
2/3
TS%
68.5
USG%
15.5
STL
2
BLK
0
TOV
2
PF
3
+/−
-6
PRA
23
2026-06-22
CHI
HOME
20.1MIN
12POINTS
1 · 2 · 5-6
ABOVE
FG
5-6
3PT
0-1
FT
2-3
OREB/DREB
0/1
TS%
82.0
USG%
17.6
STL
3
BLK
0
TOV
1
PF
4
+/−
+10
PRA
15
2026-06-05
CHI
AWAY
33.5MIN
3POINTS
1 · 2 · 1-8
BELOW
FG
1-8
3PT
0-3
FT
1-2
OREB/DREB
0/1
TS%
16.9
USG%
14.9
STL
1
BLK
0
TOV
3
PF
6
+/−
-5
PRA
6
2025-09-03
CHI
AWAY
22.1MIN
8POINTS
3 · 1 · 4-9
BELOW
FG
4-9
3PT
0-2
FT
0-1
OREB/DREB
1/2
TS%
42.4
USG%
24.0
STL
1
BLK
1
TOV
2
PF
2
+/−
-16
PRA
12
2025-08-23
CHI
AWAY
19.6MIN
6POINTS
0 · 4 · 3-5
BELOW
FG
3-5
3PT
0-1
FT
0-0
OREB/DREB
0/0
TS%
60.0
USG%
12.2
STL
1
BLK
0
TOV
0
PF
4
+/−
+12
PRA
10
2025-08-13
CHI
HOME
30.6MIN
17POINTS
4 · 5 · 6-13
ABOVE
FG
6-13
3PT
1-3
FT
4-6
OREB/DREB
3/1
TS%
54.3
USG%
26.3
STL
2
BLK
0
TOV
1
PF
2
+/−
+2
PRA
26
every game on file — nothing hidden