Raegan Beers against the Chicago Sky
Averaged 3.3 points, 3.0 rebounds and 0.8 assists in 4 games against the Chicago Sky.
01
Every stat, vs baseline
hover a row for the gap against its noiseSTAT
VS SKY
FORM
DIFF
← below baseline · above →
VERDICT
points
3.3
4.6
−1.3
gap is 1.2× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 2.1
NOT MEASURABLE
rebounds
3.0
3.7
−0.7
gap is 0.7× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.8
NOT MEASURABLE
assists
0.8
0.9
−0.2
gap is 0.4× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.9
NOT MEASURABLE
threes
0.0
0.1
−0.1
gap is 2.1× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.1
NOT MEASURABLE
steals
0.3
0.6
−0.3
gap is 0.9× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.7
NOT MEASURABLE
blocks
0.8
0.2
+0.6
gap is 1.1× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.0
NOT MEASURABLE
turnovers
1.3
1.0
+0.3
gap is 0.5× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.0
NOT MEASURABLE
pts+reb+ast
7.0
9.2
−2.2
gap is 1.5× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 2.8
NOT MEASURABLE
pts+reb
6.3
8.2
−2.0
gap is 1.6× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 2.5
NOT MEASURABLE
pts+ast
4.0
5.5
−1.5
gap is 1.4× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 2.1
NOT MEASURABLE
reb+ast
3.8
4.6
−0.9
gap is 0.7× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 2.3
NOT MEASURABLE
steals+blocks
1.0
0.8
+0.2
gap is 0.7× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.7
NOT MEASURABLE
field goals made
1.3
1.6
−0.4
gap is 0.8× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.0
NOT MEASURABLE
field goal attempts
2.5
3.3
−0.8
gap is 1.1× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.4
NOT MEASURABLE
three-point attempts
0.0
0.3
−0.3
gap is 3.2× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.2
NOT MEASURABLE
free throws made
0.8
1.2
−0.4
gap is 1.2× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.7
NOT MEASURABLE
free throw attempts
1.5
1.5
0.0
gap is 0.1× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.7
NOT MEASURABLE
offensive rebounds
1.0
1.4
−0.4
gap is 1.0× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.8
NOT MEASURABLE
defensive rebounds
2.0
2.3
−0.3
gap is 0.3× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 2.1
NOT MEASURABLE
fouls
2.8
2.9
−0.2
gap is 0.1× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 2.7
NOT MEASURABLE
usage 24.9 vs 15.8true shooting 57.4 vs 55.2minutes 9.1 vs 13.2
Baseline: form going into each game (the average of the previous 10), measured on 30 other games since 2026-05-20.
02
The 4 games
points · her form 4.6 · hover a bar2026-06-05 · CHI · 5 points · +0.4 vs her form
2026-06-22 · CHI · 4 points · −0.6 vs her form
2026-07-30 · CHI · 3 points · −1.6 vs her form
2026-08-25 · CHI · 1 points · −3.6 vs her form
4.6
2026-06-05— 5-game mean2026-08-25 · newest
03
Why — minutes or rate
no difference in this split is larger than the sample can resolve, so there is nothing to explain
04
The matchup
Nothing in this split cleared the noise, so there is no difference to attribute to the opponent. The defensive profile is only worth reading beside a finding.
05
Game log
all 4 · click a row for the box scoreDATE
OPP
H/A
MIN
POINTS
REB · AST · FG
VS 4.6
2026-08-25CHIHOME12.5MIN1POINTS4 · 1 · 0-2BELOW
- FG
- 0-2
- 3PT
- 0-0
- FT
- 1-4
- OREB/DREB
- 1/3
- TS%
- 13.3
- USG%
- 13.7
- STL
- 0
- BLK
- 2
- TOV
- 0
- PF
- 4
- +/−
- +2
- PRA
- 6
2026-07-30CHIAWAY12.8MIN3POINTS3 · 0 · 1-3BELOW
- FG
- 1-3
- 3PT
- 0-0
- FT
- 1-1
- OREB/DREB
- 0/3
- TS%
- 43.6
- USG%
- 14.4
- STL
- 1
- BLK
- 0
- TOV
- 1
- PF
- 5
- +/−
- -1
- PRA
- 6
2026-06-22CHIHOME5.1MIN4POINTS1 · 0 · 2-2BELOW
- FG
- 2-2
- 3PT
- 0-0
- FT
- 0-0
- OREB/DREB
- 1/0
- TS%
- 100.0
- USG%
- 33.4
- STL
- 0
- BLK
- 0
- TOV
- 2
- PF
- 2
- +/−
- -2
- PRA
- 5
2026-06-05CHIAWAY6.0MIN5POINTS4 · 2 · 2-3ABOVE
- FG
- 2-3
- 3PT
- 0-0
- FT
- 1-1
- OREB/DREB
- 2/2
- TS%
- 72.7
- USG%
- 38.1
- STL
- 0
- BLK
- 1
- TOV
- 2
- PF
- 0
- +/−
- +3
- PRA
- 11
every game on file — nothing hidden