Sydney Taylor against the Connecticut Sun

Averaged 8.0 points, 1.0 rebounds and 3.0 assists in 4 games against the Connecticut Sun.

01

Every stat, vs baseline

hover a row for the gap against its noise
STAT
VS SUN
FORM
DIFF
← below baseline · above →
VERDICT
points
8.0
16.7
−8.7
gap is 3.2× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 5.4
NOT MEASURABLE
rebounds
1.0
2.1
−1.1
gap is 2.0× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.1
NOT MEASURABLE
assists
3.0
1.9
+1.1
gap is 0.9× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 2.4
NOT MEASURABLE
threes
0.8
2.4
−1.6
gap is 2.9× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.1
NOT MEASURABLE
steals
0.3
1.0
−0.7
gap is 1.7× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.8
NOT MEASURABLE
blocks
0.3
0.2
+0.1
gap is 0.2× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.6
NOT MEASURABLE
turnovers
2.0
1.6
+0.4
gap is 0.4× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.8
NOT MEASURABLE
pts+reb+ast
12.0
20.8
−8.8
gap is 2.5× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 6.8
NOT MEASURABLE
pts+reb
9.0
18.9
−9.9
gap is 3.1× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 6.2
NOT MEASURABLE
pts+ast
11.0
18.6
−7.6
gap is 2.5× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 6.0
NOT MEASURABLE
reb+ast
4.0
4.0
0.0
gap is 0.0× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 2.6
NOT MEASURABLE
steals+blocks
0.5
1.2
−0.7
gap is 1.0× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.4
NOT MEASURABLE
field goals made
3.0
5.9
−2.9
gap is 2.9× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 2.0
NOT MEASURABLE
field goal attempts
10.0
13.2
−3.2
gap is 2.0× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 3.2
NOT MEASURABLE
three-point attempts
5.5
6.9
−1.4
gap is 0.9× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 3.0
NOT MEASURABLE
free throws made
1.3
2.5
−1.3
gap is 0.9× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 2.8
NOT MEASURABLE
free throw attempts
1.5
3.3
−1.8
gap is 1.1× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 3.3
NOT MEASURABLE
offensive rebounds
0.3
0.4
−0.1
gap is 0.5× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.5
NOT MEASURABLE
defensive rebounds
0.8
1.8
−1.0
gap is 1.8× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.1
NOT MEASURABLE
fouls
1.8
2.9
−1.1
gap is 1.4× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.6
NOT MEASURABLE
usage 26.5 vs 30.6true shooting 37.7 vs 53.5minutes 21.5 vs 22.6

Baseline: form going into each game (the average of the previous 10), measured on 30 other games since 2026-05-23.

02

The 4 games

points · her form 16.7 · hover a bar
2026-06-05— 5-game mean2026-08-25 · newest
03

Why — minutes or rate

no difference in this split is larger than the sample can resolve, so there is nothing to explain

04

The matchup

Nothing in this split cleared the noise, so there is no difference to attribute to the opponent. The defensive profile is only worth reading beside a finding.

05

Game log

all 4 · click a row for the box score
DATE
OPP
H/A
MIN
POINTS
REB · AST · FG
VS 16.7
2026-08-25
CON
AWAY
20.1MIN
4POINTS
0 · 4 · 2-11
BELOW
FG
2-11
3PT
0-6
FT
0-0
OREB/DREB
0/0
TS%
18.2
USG%
24.7
STL
0
BLK
0
TOV
0
PF
2
+/−
0
PRA
8
2026-07-30
CON
HOME
30.8MIN
14POINTS
2 · 6 · 6-12
BELOW
FG
6-12
3PT
2-7
FT
0-0
OREB/DREB
0/2
TS%
58.3
USG%
19.9
STL
1
BLK
1
TOV
2
PF
1
+/−
+5
PRA
22
2026-06-22
CON
AWAY
22.1MIN
10POINTS
1 · 2 · 2-12
BELOW
FG
2-12
3PT
1-8
FT
5-6
OREB/DREB
1/0
TS%
34.2
USG%
30.2
STL
0
BLK
0
TOV
2
PF
1
+/−
-18
PRA
13
2026-06-05
CON
HOME
13.0MIN
4POINTS
1 · 0 · 2-5
BELOW
FG
2-5
3PT
0-1
FT
0-0
OREB/DREB
0/1
TS%
40.0
USG%
31.2
STL
0
BLK
0
TOV
4
PF
3
+/−
-17
PRA
5
every game on file — nothing hidden