WNBA · Jun 5 gameAll props Full sheet

Connecticut Sun at Chicago Sky

FinalCON 80 – CHI 85Page updated 11:36 UTC

Original picks and recorded results

No saved picks to grade.

Saved picks

0Posted odds · decimal

Check minutes · 4 availability alerts

Out Coulibaly · earlier listed as may not play

Out Burke · earlier listed as available

Out Vandersloot · right knee (knee) · CHI

Out Jaquez · left knee (knee) · CHI

No playing-time estimates are available.

Picks for this game are not posted yet. The players below are up to date.

How to read the prices

Over means more than the posted line; Under means fewer. Decimal odds show the total return per unit staked, including the stake. Row order follows lineup status and available prices, not a confidence ranking.

Getting a better price than most bookmakers offer for the same line is the only thing on this page that, measured over many past bets, made money; player rates are context, not tips.

Availability to check

Out Coulibaly · earlier listed as may not play · Tue 23:00 UTC · 15, 15 and 13 min in the last 3 games

Out Burke · earlier listed as available · Wed 23:30 UTC · 22, 33 and 31 min in the last 3 games

Out Vandersloot · right knee (knee) · CHI

Out Jaquez · left knee (knee) · CHI

Players and minutes11 players in the available roster

Minutes are source estimates, not guaranteed playing time. Historical hit rates describe past games; they are not a forecast.

Connecticut Sun

Brittney Griner · minutes unknown

points 12.5 → 16 actual

Diamond Miller · minutes unknown

points 7.5 → 16 actual

Leila Lacan · minutes unknown

points 13.5 → 3 actual

Saniya Rivers · minutes unknown

points 8.5 → 14 actual

Chicago Sky

Azura Stevens · minutes unknown

points 8.5 → 13 actual

Jacy Sheldon · minutes unknown

points 7.5 → 5 actual

Kamilla Cardoso · minutes unknown

points 13.5 → 10 actual

Natasha Cloud · minutes unknown

points 9.5 → 13 actual

Rachel Banham · minutes unknown

3-pointers 0.5 → 1 actual

Skylar Diggins · minutes unknown

points 15.5 → 24 actual

Sydney Taylor · minutes unknown

points 9.5 → 4 actual

Explore every player and prop

Availability and game contextGame odds, lineups, workload and rest

Game odds

CHI expected to win by about 6 · both teams together expected to score about 164 points · odds to win: CON 3.17, CHI 1.38

Game odds from Pinnacle (the bookmaker we use as the reference) · observed Fri 23:43 UTC

What could go wrong

updated 11:36 UTC

Who is out

Out Coulibaly · earlier listed as may not play (changed Tue 23:00 UTC) · 15, 15 and 13 min in the last 3 games

Westbeld · earlier listed as out, now available (changed Mon 22:00 UTC) · 13, 14 and 9 min in the last 3 games

Edwards · earlier listed as out, now available (changed Mon 20:15 UTC) · 17, 27 and 31 min in the last 3 games

Out Burke · earlier listed as available (changed Wed 23:30 UTC) · 22, 33 and 31 min in the last 3 games

Out Vandersloot · right knee (knee) · CHI

Out Jaquez · left knee (knee) · CHI

Lineups

Expected starting lineup, not yet confirmed

Playing time

No playing-time estimates are available.

Our check: these minute estimates (RotoWire) are typically off by about 4 minutes.

Rest

CON had 8 days off before this game · CHI had 8 days off before this game.

Bookmakers

The reference bookmaker, Pinnacle, offers 12 of the 119 lines; the rest rely on other bookmakers.

Every pick is priced by at least 2 bookmakers.

Looking back

Flagged before the game: Coulibaly out (Tue 23:00 UTC) · played

Flagged before the game: Vandersloot out · played

Flagged before the game: Jaquez out · played

Flagged before the game: Westbeld out (Mon 22:00 UTC) · played

Flagged before the game: Edwards out (Mon 20:15 UTC) · played

Flagged before the game: Burke out (Wed 23:30 UTC) · played

When a player is out, that player's lines are removed: in our past results this helped. Guessing which teammates benefit was also tested and lost money, so nothing else on this page is adjusted for it.

Your reads and game resultsPredictions closed at game start

What happened

In 4 of 6 cases where a player's past record disagreed with the bookmakers' price, the past record was right in this game. One game proves nothing.

FinalWe had no picks in this game · every posted line is still scored below

11 other players with a posted line

Diamond Miller · points 7.5 → 16 · 8.5 above the line · played 28 min · FanDuel odds: Over 1.76, Under 2.02

Rachel Banham · 3-pointers 0.5 → 1 · 0.5 above the line · played 21.9 min · FanDuel odds: Over 1.41, Under 2.78

Leila Lacan · points 13.5 → 3 · 10.5 below the line · played 33.5 min · Pinnacle odds: Over 1.92, Under 1.83

Saniya Rivers · points 8.5 → 14 · 5.5 above the line · played 23.3 min · Pinnacle odds: Over 1.87, Under 1.87

Sydney Taylor · points 9.5 → 4 · 5.5 below the line · played 13 min · BetRivers odds: Over 1.60, Under —

Skylar Diggins · points 15.5 → 24 · 8.5 above the line · played 32.3 min · Pinnacle odds: Over 1.81, Under 1.93

Azura Stevens · points 8.5 → 13 · 4.5 above the line · played 20.4 min · BetRivers odds: Over 1.87, Under —

Natasha Cloud · points 9.5 → 13 · 3.5 above the line · played 26 min · Pinnacle odds: Over 2.08, Under 1.70

Jacy Sheldon · points 7.5 → 5 · 2.5 below the line · played 26.9 min · DraftKings odds: Over 1.91, Under 1.83

Brittney Griner · points 12.5 → 16 · 3.5 above the line · played 29 min · Pinnacle odds: Over 1.79, Under 1.95

Kamilla Cardoso · points 13.5 → 10 · 3.5 below the line · played 32.6 min · Pinnacle odds: Over 1.86, Under 1.88

Each prediction is recorded as if you had staked 1 at the line you saw, and your record is shown here. One game tells you nothing yet.

Open My reads

More context

Head to head

CHI vs CON · last 25 games · CON leads · CHI record 11–14 · average score 79.0–82.7 · CHI has lost by 3.7 on average

Team results are background only; they say nothing about any single player's line.

25 Aug · CHI 81 at CON 87CHI lost

30 Jul · CON 88 at CHI 94CHI won

22 Jun · CHI 63 at CON 92CHI lost

5 Jun · CON 80 at CHI 85CHI won

3 Sep · CON 64 at CHI 88CHI won

What each defense gives up per game

CON gives up87.7 points · 33.9 rebounds · 19.9 assists · 8.0 three-pointers scored against them · opponents make 46.3% of shots · 34.9% from three-point range · 13.5 opponent turnovers

CHI gives up90.7 points · 37.1 rebounds · 20.7 assists · 8.2 three-pointers scored against them · opponents make 44.9% of shots · 33.8% from three-point range · 12.9 opponent turnovers

Defense by position

How much this is worth

Defense-by-position numbers are mostly random from season to season; shown for context only. We tested it: a team's defense-by-position numbers from one half of the season do not predict the other half, so treat them as noise.

CON gives up 87.7 points a game · 9th of 15 · league average 87.2about league average

CHI gives up 90.7 points a game · 11th of 15 · league average 87.2+3.5 vs average

How the game odds moved

Pinnacle first had CHI expected to win by 7.5, expected total 163.5 (Fri 01:05 UTC) and later CHI expected to win by 6, expected total 164 (Fri 23:43 UTC).

The odds at the top of the page are the latest we have, from every bookmaker on file; this is one bookmaker's own history.

Data log (technical)

Technical detail for auditing; the plain version is above. Internal ids and formula names print here only.

Line-shopping measurement: project_conditional_minutes_refuted

Defense-by-position measurement: split-half reliability r = -0.033 across 12 cells (7 of 12 negative) against a shuffle null of 0.000; a placebo using the wrong position family reproduced the effect to within 0.12pp · project_dvp_blowout_gate_refuted · 2026-08-26

Our picks, raw · 0

No raw pick rows for this game.

Checked results, raw (basketball-stats shorthand) · 0

No graded rows for this game.

Data fetches · 52

sds rest/team (away)ok 200 · 210 ms

sds rest/team (home)ok 200 · 206 ms

grading picks/nightlyok 200 · 211 ms

sds schedule/team (meetings)ok · 226 ms

sds defense/team (away)ok 200 · 228 ms

sds defense/team (home)ok 200 · 229 ms

sds analytics opponent_defense (away)ok 200 · 231 ms

sds analytics opponent_defense (home)ok 200 · 232 ms

sds injuries/date/{date}ok 200 · 428 ms

sds games/{id}ok 200 · 436 ms

sds history (h2h)ok · 436 ms

sds lineups/{id}ok 200 · 451 ms

sds players/team (home)ok 200 · 9 ms

sds players/team (away)ok 200 · 11 ms

sds games/{id}/boxscoreok 200 · 464 ms

grading clv/picksok 200 · 290 ms

dh lineups/{id}/deltaok 200 · 637 ms

grading verdict/boardok 200 · 788 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 48 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 63 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 71 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 77 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 169 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 171 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 181 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 221 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (three_pointers_made)ok 200 · 235 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 254 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 256 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 259 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 261 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 265 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 269 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 273 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 274 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 277 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 276 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 279 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 290 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 306 ms

odds game timelineok 200 · 1839 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 1088 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 1138 ms

odds player timeline (threes)ok 200 · 1272 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 1272 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 1275 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 1282 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 1285 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 1286 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 1443 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 1445 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 1513 ms

Classic view →

The older, longer version of this page is still available as the classic view. Nothing there is tracked in our results; this page is.