WNBA · Jun 22 gameAll props Full sheet

Chicago Sky at Connecticut Sun

FinalCHI 63 – CON 92Page updated 18:19 UTC

Original picks and recorded results

No saved picks to grade.

Saved picks

0Posted odds · decimal

Check minutes · 2 availability alerts

Out Coulibaly · earlier listed as may not play

Out Vandersloot · right knee · CHI

No playing-time estimates are available.

Picks for this game are not posted yet. The players below are up to date.

How to read the prices

Over means more than the posted line; Under means fewer. Decimal odds show the total return per unit staked, including the stake. Row order follows lineup status and available prices, not a confidence ranking.

Getting a better price than most bookmakers offer for the same line is the only thing on this page that, measured over many past bets, made money; player rates are context, not tips.

Availability to check

Out Coulibaly · earlier listed as may not play · Tue 23:00 UTC · 15, 15 and 13 min in the last 3 games

Out Vandersloot · right knee · CHI

Players and minutes12 players in the available roster

Minutes are source estimates, not guaranteed playing time. Historical hit rates describe past games; they are not a forecast.

Chicago Sky

Azura Stevens · minutes unknown

points 10.5 → 11 actual

Gabriela Jaquez · minutes unknown

points 9.5 → 5 actual

Kamilla Cardoso · minutes unknown

points 12.5 → 16 actual

Natasha Cloud · minutes unknown

points 9.5 → 4 actual

Skylar Diggins · minutes unknown

points 16.5 → 3 actual

Sydney Taylor · minutes unknown

points 14.5 → 10 actual

Connecticut Sun

Aaliyah Edwards · minutes unknown

points 8.5 → 11 actual

Brittney Griner · minutes unknown

points 11.5 → 14 actual

Diamond Miller · minutes unknown

points 5.5 → 9 actual

Kennedy Burke · minutes unknown

points 8.5 → 8 actual

Leila Lacan · minutes unknown

points 12.5 → 12 actual

Olivia Nelson-Ododa · minutes unknown

rebounds 4.5 → 15 actual

Explore every player and prop

Availability and game contextGame odds, lineups, workload and rest

Game odds

CHI expected to win by about 3 · both teams together expected to score about 157 points · odds to win: CHI 1.60, CON 2.25

Game odds from Pinnacle (the bookmaker we use as the reference) · observed Mon 23:25 UTC

What could go wrong

updated 18:19 UTC

Who is out

Out Coulibaly · earlier listed as may not play (changed Tue 23:00 UTC) · 15, 15 and 13 min in the last 3 games

Out Vandersloot · right knee · CHI

Lineups

Expected starting lineup, not yet confirmed

Playing time

No playing-time estimates are available.

Our check: these minute estimates (RotoWire) are typically off by about 4 minutes.

Rest

CHI had 8 days off before this game · CON had 8 days off before this game.

Bookmakers

The reference bookmaker, Pinnacle, offers 18 of the 149 lines; the rest rely on other bookmakers.

Every pick is priced by at least 2 bookmakers.

Looking back

Flagged before the game: Coulibaly out (Tue 23:00 UTC) · played

Flagged before the game: Vandersloot out · played

When a player is out, that player's lines are removed: in our past results this helped. Guessing which teammates benefit was also tested and lost money, so nothing else on this page is adjusted for it.

Your reads and game resultsPredictions closed at game start

What happened

In 3 of 5 cases where a player's past record disagreed with the bookmakers' price, the past record was right in this game. One game proves nothing.

FinalWe had no picks in this game · every posted line is still scored below

12 other players with a posted line

Olivia Nelson-Ododa · rebounds 4.5 → 15 · 10.5 above the line · played 26.9 min · DraftKings odds: Over 2.05, Under 1.69

Skylar Diggins · points 16.5 → 3 · 13.5 below the line · played 20.1 min · Pinnacle odds: Over 2.01, Under 1.75

Diamond Miller · points 5.5 → 9 · 3.5 above the line · played 23.7 min · FanDuel odds: Over 1.87, Under 1.88

Natasha Cloud · points 9.5 → 4 · 5.5 below the line · played 21.3 min · Pinnacle odds: Over 1.81, Under 1.93

Gabriela Jaquez · points 9.5 → 5 · 4.5 below the line · played 21.3 min · Pinnacle odds: Over 1.85, Under 1.89

Sydney Taylor · points 14.5 → 10 · 4.5 below the line · played 22.1 min · DraftKings odds: Over 1.77, Under 1.95

Aaliyah Edwards · points 8.5 → 11 · 2.5 above the line · played 14.3 min · Pinnacle odds: Over 1.96, Under 1.78

Kamilla Cardoso · points 12.5 → 16 · 3.5 above the line · played 23.3 min · Pinnacle odds: Over 1.83, Under 1.91

Brittney Griner · points 11.5 → 14 · 2.5 above the line · played 22 min · Pinnacle odds: Over 1.83, Under 1.91

Kennedy Burke · points 8.5 → 8 · 0.5 below the line · played 23.8 min · DraftKings odds: Over 1.91, Under 1.80

Azura Stevens · points 10.5 → 11 · 0.5 above the line · played 25.9 min · Pinnacle odds: Over 1.73, Under 2.04

Leila Lacan · points 12.5 → 12 · 0.5 below the line · played 20.1 min · Pinnacle odds: Over 2.00, Under 1.75

Each prediction is recorded as if you had staked 1 at the line you saw, and your record is shown here. One game tells you nothing yet.

Open My reads

More context

Head to head

CON vs CHI · last 25 games · CON leads · CON record 14–11 · average score 82.7–79.0 · CON has won by 3.7 on average

Team results are background only; they say nothing about any single player's line.

25 Aug · CHI 81 at CON 87CON won

30 Jul · CON 88 at CHI 94CON lost

22 Jun · CHI 63 at CON 92CON won

5 Jun · CON 80 at CHI 85CON lost

3 Sep · CON 64 at CHI 88CON lost

What each defense gives up per game

CHI gives up90.7 points · 37.1 rebounds · 20.7 assists · 8.2 three-pointers scored against them · opponents make 44.9% of shots · 33.8% from three-point range · 12.9 opponent turnovers

CON gives up87.7 points · 33.9 rebounds · 19.9 assists · 8.0 three-pointers scored against them · opponents make 46.3% of shots · 34.9% from three-point range · 13.5 opponent turnovers

Defense by position

How much this is worth

Defense-by-position numbers are mostly random from season to season; shown for context only. We tested it: a team's defense-by-position numbers from one half of the season do not predict the other half, so treat them as noise.

CHI gives up 90.7 points a game · 11th of 15 · league average 87.2+3.5 vs average

CON gives up 87.7 points a game · 9th of 15 · league average 87.2about league average

How the game odds moved

Pinnacle first had CHI expected to win by 4, expected total 167 (Mon 02:36 UTC) and later CHI expected to win by 3, expected total 157 (Mon 23:25 UTC).

The odds at the top of the page are the latest we have, from every bookmaker on file; this is one bookmaker's own history.

Data log (technical)

Technical detail for auditing; the plain version is above. Internal ids and formula names print here only.

Line-shopping measurement: project_conditional_minutes_refuted

Defense-by-position measurement: split-half reliability r = -0.033 across 12 cells (7 of 12 negative) against a shuffle null of 0.000; a placebo using the wrong position family reproduced the effect to within 0.12pp · project_dvp_blowout_gate_refuted · 2026-08-26

Our picks, raw · 0

No raw pick rows for this game.

Checked results, raw (basketball-stats shorthand) · 0

No graded rows for this game.

Data fetches · 55

sds rest/team (home)ok 200 · 131 ms

sds rest/team (away)ok 200 · 139 ms

sds defense/team (away)ok 200 · 141 ms

sds schedule/team (meetings)ok · 146 ms

sds defense/team (home)ok 200 · 148 ms

sds analytics opponent_defense (away)ok 200 · 150 ms

sds analytics opponent_defense (home)ok 200 · 153 ms

sds games/{id}ok 200 · 161 ms

grading picks/nightlyok 200 · 261 ms

sds lineups/{id}ok 200 · 272 ms

sds games/{id}/boxscoreok 200 · 284 ms

sds injuries/date/{date}ok 200 · 287 ms

sds players/team (away)ok 200 · 21 ms

sds players/team (home)ok 200 · 23 ms

sds history (h2h)ok · 297 ms

grading verdict/boardok 200 · 380 ms

grading clv/picksok 200 · 191 ms

dh lineups/{id}/deltaok 200 · 513 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 182 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 245 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 261 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 273 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 282 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 356 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (rebounds)ok 200 · 363 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 372 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 400 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 411 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 425 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 449 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 452 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 454 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 456 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 458 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 461 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 463 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 469 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 476 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 478 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 480 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 484 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 487 ms

odds game timelineok 200 · 1273 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 1402 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 1410 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 1489 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 1503 ms

odds player timeline (rebounds)ok 200 · 1558 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 1566 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 1567 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 1597 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 1607 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 1606 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 1689 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 1699 ms

Classic view →

The older, longer version of this page is still available as the classic view. Nothing there is tracked in our results; this page is.