WNBA · Jun 24 gameAll props Full sheet

Portland Fire at Chicago Sky

FinalPOR 78 – CHI 101Page updated 20:05 UTC

Original picks and recorded results

No saved picks to grade.

Saved picks

0Posted odds · decimal

Check minutes · 2 availability alerts

Out Vandersloot · right knee (knee) · CHI

Out Jackson · left knee (knee) · CHI

No playing-time estimates are available.

Picks for this game are not posted yet. The players below are up to date.

How to read the prices

Over means more than the posted line; Under means fewer. Decimal odds show the total return per unit staked, including the stake. Row order follows lineup status and available prices, not a confidence ranking.

Getting a better price than most bookmakers offer for the same line is the only thing on this page that, measured over many past bets, made money; player rates are context, not tips.

Availability to check

Out Vandersloot · right knee (knee) · CHI

Out Jackson · left knee (knee) · CHI

Players and minutes11 players in the available roster

Minutes are source estimates, not guaranteed playing time. Historical hit rates describe past games; they are not a forecast.

Portland Fire

Bridget Carleton · minutes unknown

points 12.5 → 7 actual

Carla Leite · minutes unknown

points 14.5 → 10 actual

Emily Engstler · minutes unknown

points 8.5 → 10 actual

Megan DiLeo · minutes unknown

points 14.5 → 17 actual

Sarah Ashlee Barker · minutes unknown

points 11.5 → 13 actual

Chicago Sky

Azura Stevens · minutes unknown

points 11.5 → 11 actual

Gabriela Jaquez · minutes unknown

points 9.5 → 10 actual

Kamilla Cardoso · minutes unknown

points 13.5 → 13 actual

Natasha Cloud · minutes unknown

points 8.5 → 9 actual

Skylar Diggins · minutes unknown

points 14.5 → 15 actual

Sydney Taylor · minutes unknown

points 16.5 → 14 actual

Explore every player and prop

Availability and game contextGame odds, lineups, workload and rest

Game odds

CHI expected to win by about 4 · both teams together expected to score about 172 points · odds to win: POR 2.44, CHI 1.59

Game odds from Pinnacle (the bookmaker we use as the reference) · observed Wed 22:41 UTC

What could go wrong

updated 20:05 UTC

Who is out

Westbeld · earlier listed as out, now available (changed Mon 22:00 UTC) · 13, 14 and 9 min in the last 3 games

Out Vandersloot · right knee (knee) · CHI

Out Jackson · left knee (knee) · CHI

Lineups

Expected starting lineup, not yet confirmed

Playing time

No playing-time estimates are available.

Our check: these minute estimates (RotoWire) are typically off by about 4 minutes.

Rest

POR had 10 days off before this game · CHI had 8 days off before this game.

Bookmakers

The reference bookmaker, Pinnacle, offers 14 of the 120 lines; the rest rely on other bookmakers.

Every pick is priced by at least 2 bookmakers.

Looking back

Flagged before the game: Vandersloot out · played

Flagged before the game: Westbeld out (Mon 22:00 UTC) · played

Flagged before the game: Jackson out · played

When a player is out, that player's lines are removed: in our past results this helped. Guessing which teammates benefit was also tested and lost money, so nothing else on this page is adjusted for it.

Your reads and game resultsPredictions closed at game start

What happened

In 6 of 10 cases where a player's past record disagreed with the bookmakers' price, the past record was right in this game. One game proves nothing.

FinalWe had no picks in this game · every posted line is still scored below

11 other players with a posted line

Bridget Carleton · points 12.5 → 7 · 5.5 below the line · played 28.8 min · Pinnacle odds: Over 1.72, Under 2.04

Carla Leite · points 14.5 → 10 · 4.5 below the line · played 28.4 min · Pinnacle odds: Over 1.94, Under 1.80

Emily Engstler · points 8.5 → 10 · 1.5 above the line · played 16.8 min · BetOnline.ag odds: Over 1.74, Under 2.05

Megan DiLeo · points 14.5 → 17 · 2.5 above the line · played 23.1 min · Pinnacle odds: Over 2.04, Under 1.72

Sydney Taylor · points 16.5 → 14 · 2.5 below the line · played 21.1 min · BetOnline.ag odds: Over 2.00, Under 1.77

Sarah Ashlee Barker · points 11.5 → 13 · 1.5 above the line · played 26.5 min · BetOnline.ag odds: Over 2.00, Under 1.77

Natasha Cloud · points 8.5 → 9 · 0.5 above the line · played 20.7 min · Pinnacle odds: Over 1.84, Under 1.89

Gabriela Jaquez · points 9.5 → 10 · 0.5 above the line · played 23.2 min · Pinnacle odds: Over 1.77, Under 1.98

Azura Stevens · points 11.5 → 11 · 0.5 below the line · played 26.9 min · Pinnacle odds: Over 1.91, Under 1.83

Kamilla Cardoso · points 13.5 → 13 · 0.5 below the line · played 27 min · Pinnacle odds: Over 1.85, Under 1.88

Skylar Diggins · points 14.5 → 15 · 0.5 above the line · played 24.9 min · Pinnacle odds: Over 1.76, Under 1.99

Each prediction is recorded as if you had staked 1 at the line you saw, and your record is shown here. One game tells you nothing yet.

Open My reads

More context

Head to head

CHI vs POR · last 3 games · CHI leads · CHI record 3–0 · average score 107.7–85.0 · CHI has won by 22.7 on average

Team results are background only; they say nothing about any single player's line.

26 Jun · POR 94 at CHI 124CHI won

24 Jun · POR 78 at CHI 101CHI won

9 May · CHI 98 at POR 83CHI won

What each defense gives up per game

POR gives up91.0 points · 34.0 rebounds · 22.9 assists · 9.3 three-pointers scored against them · opponents make 46.4% of shots · 35.0% from three-point range · 13.6 opponent turnovers

CHI gives up90.7 points · 37.1 rebounds · 20.7 assists · 8.2 three-pointers scored against them · opponents make 44.9% of shots · 33.8% from three-point range · 12.9 opponent turnovers

Defense by position

How much this is worth

Defense-by-position numbers are mostly random from season to season; shown for context only. We tested it: a team's defense-by-position numbers from one half of the season do not predict the other half, so treat them as noise.

POR gives up 91.0 points a game · 13th of 15 · league average 87.2+3.8 vs average

CHI gives up 90.7 points a game · 11th of 15 · league average 87.2+3.5 vs average

How the game odds moved

Pinnacle first had CHI expected to win by 3, expected total 169.5 (Wed 01:56 UTC) and later CHI expected to win by 4, expected total 172 (Wed 22:41 UTC).

The odds at the top of the page are the latest we have, from every bookmaker on file; this is one bookmaker's own history.

Data log (technical)

Technical detail for auditing; the plain version is above. Internal ids and formula names print here only.

Line-shopping measurement: project_conditional_minutes_refuted

Defense-by-position measurement: split-half reliability r = -0.033 across 12 cells (7 of 12 negative) against a shuffle null of 0.000; a placebo using the wrong position family reproduced the effect to within 0.12pp · project_dvp_blowout_gate_refuted · 2026-08-26

Our picks, raw · 0

No raw pick rows for this game.

Checked results, raw (basketball-stats shorthand) · 0

No graded rows for this game.

Data fetches · 52

grading picks/nightlyok 200 · 41 ms

sds rest/team (home)ok 200 · 44 ms

sds defense/team (home)ok 200 · 45 ms

sds analytics opponent_defense (home)ok 200 · 45 ms

sds injuries/date/{date}ok 200 · 47 ms

sds rest/team (away)ok 200 · 48 ms

sds games/{id}ok 200 · 95 ms

sds lineups/{id}ok 200 · 111 ms

sds history (h2h)ok · 115 ms

sds schedule/team (meetings)ok · 139 ms

sds games/{id}/boxscoreok 200 · 141 ms

sds defense/team (away)ok 200 · 142 ms

sds analytics opponent_defense (away)ok 200 · 143 ms

grading clv/picksok 200 · 105 ms

sds players/team (home)ok 200 · 47 ms

dh lineups/{id}/deltaok 200 · 174 ms

sds players/team (away)ok 200 · 130 ms

odds game timelineok 200 · 946 ms

grading verdict/boardok 200 · 5265 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 169 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 179 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 194 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 202 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 240 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 246 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 248 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 252 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 254 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 269 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 310 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 323 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 325 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 329 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 331 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 333 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 337 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 340 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 382 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 385 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 389 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 392 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 573 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 635 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 642 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 708 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 920 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 1010 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 1017 ms

Classic view →

The older, longer version of this page is still available as the classic view. Nothing there is tracked in our results; this page is.