02

Picks and prices

Odds of at least 1.70 only · highest odds first · results checked

A line is the number a bookmaker sets, e.g. 13.5 points; Over means more than it, Under fewer. Odds 1.93 pay 1.93 for every 1 staked. 'Posted at' is the price we found when we published the pick; after the game it is compared with the last price before the start.

A. Ogunbowale · Over 14.5 pointsLostPosted at 1.83 · last price before start 1.75Lost −1.00 per 1 staked

Posted at 1.83 · Our price was 2.7% higher than the last price before the start (good: a higher price pays more per 1 staked).

Pinnacle 1.75, 199 min ago

First offered at 1.88 by Pinnacle (); latest 2.05 at Pinnacle (). The line moved from 14.5 to 15.5.

Re-checked 1 h before the start not re-checked

In our results this pick counts as a stake of 0.00 (standard 1); smaller when the price gap is small.

J. Salaun · Over 11.5 pointsLostPosted at 1.83 · last price before start 1.83Lost −1.00 per 1 staked
A. Smith · Under 5.5 reboundsLostPosted at 1.79 · last price before start 1.86Lost −1.00 per 1 staked
J. Shepard · Over 11.5 pointsLostPosted at 1.73 · last price before start 1.73Lost −1.00 per 1 staked

Sign in to open every pick

Why the better price matters

In our past tests, simply taking the highest price offered for a line earned more than any of our own forecasts did.

In that test (25 Aug 2026), taking the best price returned about 2.8 more for every 100 staked than the price we posted did.

03

The players

11 players checked · 7 whose past record points the other way from the bookmakers' price · 1 out · 0 with too few games

Rate: the share of this season's games in which the player finished above tonight's line. S beside a name marks an expected starter.

Against this opponent, 1 of 11 players has performed clearly differently and 2 show a slight hint

Context only A player's rate describes the past; it is not a tip and has not been tested as one. Expected minutes come from RotoWire, a lineup news service.

Sign in to see each player's rate The numbers below (for example 15.5 points) are the lines the bookmakers actually posted.

Golden State Valkyriesplaying DAL

Veronica Burton · 30 min expected
points 11.5 → 22 actual
Kayla Thornton · 25 min expected
points 8.5 → 11 actual
Kiah Stokes · 24 min expected
rebounds 5.5 → 7 actual
Janelle Salaun · 23 min expected
points 11.5 → 9 actual
Gabby Williams · 22 min expected
points 13.5 → 19 actual
Cecilia Zandalasini · 19 min expected
points 6.5 → 5 actual
Kaitlyn Chen · 10 min expected
points 6.5 → 2 actual

3 players have no line from any bookmaker: Hayes (22 expected minutes) · Charles (18 min) · Amihere (7 min)

Dallas Wingsplaying GSV

Jessica Shepard · 33 min expected
points 11.5 → 6 actual
Paige Bueckers · 33 min expected
points 19.5 → 17 actual
Arike Ogunbowale · 32 min expected
points 14.5 → 5 actual
Alanna Smith · 25 min expected
rebounds 5.5 → 6 actual
Azzi Fudd · 32 min expected · Out · right knee
points 12.5 → did not play, so no result

8 players have no line from any bookmaker: Sims (21 expected minutes) · Siegrist (20 min) · +6 more

04

What could go wrong

updated
Who is out

Clark · earlier listed as out, now available (changed ) · 3, 19 and 10 min in the last 3 games

Fudd · earlier listed as out, now available (changed ) · 35, 24 and 33 min in the last 3 games

Verona · earlier listed as out, now available (changed ) · 6 min in the last game

Jones · earlier listed as out, now available (changed ) · 7, 5 and 7 min in the last 3 games

Prechtel · earlier listed as out, now available (changed ) · 4, 5 and 2 min in the last 3 games

Jocyte · did not play last game

Sowah · earlier listed as out, now available (changed ) · 4, 4 and 2 min in the last 3 games

Fingall · did not play last game

Lineups

Expected starting lineup, not yet confirmed

Playing time

1 player is expected to play at least 5 minutes more or fewer than in the last 5 games. For 4 players (Williams, Hayes, Kuier, Sutton) we have no real minutes estimate, only a default.

Chen: expected to play 10 minutes, averaged 22.1 in the last 5 games, about 12.1 fewer than usual

Our check: these minute estimates (RotoWire) are typically off by about 4 minutes.

Rest

Both teams had at least two days between their last game and this one.

Bookmakers

The reference bookmaker, Pinnacle, offers 19 of the 119 lines; the rest rely on other bookmakers.

Every pick is priced by at least 2 bookmakers.

Looking back

Flagged before the game: Clark out () · did not play

Flagged before the game: Fudd out () · did not play

Flagged before the game: Verona out () · did not play

Flagged before the game: Jones out () · did not play

Flagged before the game: Prechtel out () · did not play

Flagged before the game: Jocyte out · did not play

Flagged before the game: Sowah out () · did not play

Flagged before the game: Fingall out · did not play

3 expected players did not play

When a player is out, that player's lines are removed: in our past results this helped. Guessing which teammates benefit was also tested and lost money, so nothing else on this page is adjusted for it.

05

What happened

In 2 of 7 cases where a player's past record disagreed with the bookmakers' price, the past record was right in this game. One game proves nothing.
Final · 0 of 4 picks won0 won, 4 lost · −4.00 if you had staked 1 on each · our prices on average 0.1% higher than the last before the start · 12 lines checked, 8 scored but not picked · checked
Arike Ogunbowale · points 14.5 → 5 · 9.5 below the line · played 26.7 min (32 expected)
Pick: Over 14.5 at 1.83 → Lost −1.00 per 1 staked · our note: the shots did not fall
Jessica Shepard · points 11.5 → 6 · 5.5 below the line · played 25.8 min (33 expected)
Pick: Over 11.5 at 1.73 → Lost −1.00 per 1 staked · our note: no single cause
Janelle Salaun · points 11.5 → 9 · 2.5 below the line · played 16.6 min (23 expected)
Pick: Over 11.5 at 1.83 → Lost −1.00 per 1 staked · our note: worse price than the market
Alanna Smith · rebounds 5.5 → 6 · 0.5 above the line · played 27.4 min (25 expected)
Pick: Under 5.5 at 1.79 → Lost −1.00 per 1 staked · our note: worse price than the market
8 other players with a posted line
Veronica Burton · points 11.5 → 22 · 10.5 above the line · played 30.1 min (30 expected) · Pinnacle odds: Over 2.14, Under 1.71
Kaitlyn Chen · points 6.5 → 2 · 4.5 below the line · played 11.6 min (10 expected) · FanDuel odds: Over 2.04, Under 1.74
Gabby Williams · points 13.5 → 19 · 5.5 above the line · played 21.9 min (22 expected) · Pinnacle odds: Over 2.06, Under 1.77
Kayla Thornton · points 8.5 → 11 · 2.5 above the line · played 27.4 min (25 expected) · Pinnacle odds: Over 2.05, Under 1.78
Kiah Stokes · rebounds 5.5 → 7 · 1.5 above the line · played 26 min (24 expected) · BetOnline.ag odds: Over 1.82, Under 1.94
Cecilia Zandalasini · points 6.5 → 5 · 1.5 below the line · played 17.5 min (19 expected) · Pinnacle odds: Over 1.68, Under 2.19
Paige Bueckers · points 19.5 → 17 · 2.5 below the line · played 28.9 min (33 expected) · Pinnacle odds: Over 2.04, Under 1.79
Azzi Fudd · points 12.5 → did not play, so no result · Pinnacle odds: Over 1.82, Under 2.00

Sign in to see your predictions checked

Each prediction is recorded as if you had staked 1 at the line you saw, and your record is shown here. One game tells you nothing yet.

More context
Head to head

DAL vs GSV · last 7 games · GSV leads · DAL record 1–6 · average score 77.6–84.9 · DAL has lost by 7.3 on average

Team results are background only; they say nothing about any single player's line.

17 Aug · DAL 70 at GSV 78DAL lost
7 Aug · GSV 94 at DAL 76DAL lost
17 Jun · DAL 80 at GSV 91DAL lost
4 Sep · DAL 80 at GSV 84DAL lost
What each defense gives up per game
GSV gives up75.1 points · 32.7 rebounds · 18.2 assists · 8.0 three-pointers scored against them · opponents make 41.4% of shots · 32.6% from three-point range · 13.7 opponent turnovers
DAL gives up85.3 points · 33.3 rebounds · 19.9 assists · 8.1 three-pointers scored against them · opponents make 44.8% of shots · 33.1% from three-point range · 11.9 opponent turnovers
Defense by position
How much this is worth

Defense-by-position numbers are mostly random from season to season; shown for context only. We tested it: a team's defense-by-position numbers from one half of the season do not predict the other half, so treat them as noise.

GSV gives up 75.1 points a game · 1st of 15 · league average 87.0−11.9 vs average
DAL gives up 85.3 points a game · 5th of 15 · league average 87.0−1.8 vs average
How the game odds moved

Pinnacle first had DAL expected to win by 1.5, expected total 163.5 () and later DAL expected to win by 1.5, expected total 160.5 ().

The odds at the top of the page are the latest we have, from every bookmaker on file; this is one bookmaker's own history.

Data log (technical)

Technical detail for auditing; the plain version is above. Internal ids and formula names print here only.

Line-shopping measurement: project_conditional_minutes_refuted

Defense-by-position measurement: split-half reliability r = -0.033 across 12 cells (7 of 12 negative) against a shuffle null of 0.000; a placebo using the wrong position family reproduced the effect to within 0.12pp · project_dvp_blowout_gate_refuted · 2026-08-26

Our picks, raw · 5
Alanna Smith · U 5.5 rebounds−127value_edge_pct −2.74 · kelly 0.00u · price_check unchecked · rank 5
Arike Ogunbowale · O 14.5 points−120value_edge_pct −3.58 · kelly 0.00u · price_check unchecked · rank 9
Janelle Salaun · O 11.5 points−121value_edge_pct −3.60 · kelly 0.00u · price_check unchecked · rank 10
Jessica Shepard · O 11.5 points−137value_edge_pct −4.97 · kelly 0.00u · price_check unchecked · rank 14
Arike Ogunbowale · O 15.5 points+110value_edge_pct −5.58 · kelly 0.00u · price_check unchecked · rank 15
Checked results, raw (basketball-stats shorthand) · 12
Arike Ogunbowale Over 2.5 ASTLOSS −1.00ubet −167 → close −178 · CLV +1.5¢ · bet_clv:256394 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-07T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 A · p_hit 60.1% · conversion_unlucky · actual 1 · 26.7 min · startedOgunbowale's assist total collapsed due to severe offensive inefficiency—she shot just 20% from the field (2-10) with a 25% true shooting percentage, forcing the offense to stall around her and limiting playmaking opportunities despite 27 minutes of run.
Arike Ogunbowale Over 15.5 PTSLOSS −1.00ubet +110 → close +109 · CLV +0.2¢ · bet_clv:256396 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-07T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 PASS · p_hit 45.0% · conversion_unlucky · actual 5 · 26.7 min · startedOgunbowale was ice-cold from the field, shooting just 2-10 (20%) despite playing 27 minutes, and couldn't generate her typical scoring volume with only 21% usage as the team controlled pace in a blowout. Her 5 points fell well short of the 15.5 line due to inefficiency and limited offensive opportunities.
Jessica Shepard Over 11.5 PTSLOSS −1.00ubet −137 → close −137 · CLV +0.0¢ · bet_clv:256400 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-07T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 C · p_hit 54.9% · unexplained · actual 6 · 25.8 min · started
Janelle Salaun Over 11.5 PTSLOSS −1.00ubet −121 → close −120 · CLV −0.2¢ · bet_clv:256399 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-07T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 C · p_hit 52.8% · bad_price · actual 9 · 16.6 min · benchSalaun struggled from the field, converting just 2 of 7 attempts (28.6%) while playing only 17 minutes, limiting her scoring opportunities well short of the 11.5-point threshold. Her low usage rate (27%) and modest volume of shot attempts undercut her scoring potential despite efficient free-throw shooting (4-4).
Arike Ogunbowale Over 2.5 REBWIN +0.60ubet −167 → close −180 · CLV +1.7¢ · bet_clv:256398 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-07T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 A · p_hit 61.2% · actual 4 · 26.7 min · startedOgunbowale cleared the 2.5 rebound line with 4 boards despite a brutal 2-10 shooting night, as her 27 minutes of run time and active defensive presence—2 steals—kept her on the glass even when her offensive efficiency completely dried up at 25% TS%.
Azzi Fudd Over 1.5 ASTVOID +0.00ubet −175 → close −159 · CLV −2.2¢ · bet_clv:256403 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-07T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 A · p_hit 61.1% · actual 0Azzi Fudd did not play (DNP), resulting in a void of the OVER 1.5 assists bet.
Alanna Smith Under 5.5 REBLOSS −1.00ubet −127 → close −116 · CLV −2.2¢ · bet_clv:256401 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-07T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 C · p_hit 54.4% · bad_price · actual 6 · 27.4 min · startedSmith grabbed one more rebound than the line despite modest 27 minutes and 15% usage, as her 6 boards came from active positioning on the glass rather than volume; the under missed by just a single rebound in a game where she stayed out of foul trouble (1 PF).
Arike Ogunbowale Over 13.5 PTSLOSS −1.00ubet −148 → close −130 · CLV −3.2¢ · bet_clv:256397 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-07T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 B · p_hit 57.1% · bad_price · actual 5 · 26.7 min · startedOgunbowale's shot completely deserted her, going just 2-10 from the field (20%) with a 25% true shooting percentage despite playing 27 minutes, leaving her well short at 5 points. The combination of poor scoring efficiency and relatively low usage (21%) made it impossible to reach the 13.5-point threshold.
Arike Ogunbowale Over 14.5 PTSLOSS −1.00ubet −120 → close −134 · CLV +2.7¢ · bet_clv:256395 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-07T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 C · p_hit 52.6% · conversion_unlucky · actual 5 · 26.7 min · startedOgunbowale's 5 points fell well short of the 14.5 line due to historically poor shooting efficiency—she went 2-10 from the field (20%) and 1-6 from three while managing just 21% true shooting despite 27 minutes and 21% usage. The combination of ice-cold shooting and low-volume output from her typical scoring role made the over an easy miss.
Jessica Shepard Over 4.5 ASTLOSS −1.00ubet −180 → close −180 · CLV +0.0¢ · bet_clv:259124 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-07T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 A · p_hit 61.8% · unexplained · actual 1 · 25.8 min · startedShepard's assist total cratered despite 26 minutes played, finishing with just 1 dime as her 17% usage rate left her out of the offense's playmaking flow. Her poor shooting (2-7 FG, 34% TS%) likely forced the ball away from her and limited her ability to facilitate in the low post.
Azzi Fudd Under 2.5 ASTVOID +0.00ubet −192 · bet_clv:256404 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-07T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 A · p_hit 62.7% · actual 0Fudd did not play (DNP), so the bet voided per standard sportsbook rules rather than hitting the under.
Kiah Stokes Under 5.5 PTSLOSS −1.00ubet −169 · bet_clv:256402 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-07T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 A · p_hit 60.0% · unexplained · actual 7 · 26.0 min · startedStokes exceeded the Under on efficient shooting, going 3-4 from the field (75% FG) in 26 minutes despite her typically low usage rate of 7%, and her two three-pointers proved decisive in a blowout where she finished +21.
Data fetches · 53
sds rest/team (away)ok 200 · 40 ms
sds analytics opponent_defense (away)ok 200 · 64 ms
sds analytics opponent_defense (home)ok 200 · 65 ms
sds defense/team (away)ok 200 · 65 ms
sds defense/team (home)ok 200 · 68 ms
sds rest/team (home)ok 200 · 70 ms
sds schedule/team (meetings)ok · 82 ms
sds games/{id}ok 200 · 166 ms
sds lineups/{id}ok 200 · 195 ms
sds injuries/date/{date}ok 200 · 199 ms
sds games/{id}/boxscoreok 200 · 204 ms
sds history (h2h)ok · 221 ms
grading picks/nightlyok 200 · 298 ms
grading clv/picksok 200 · 130 ms
odds player timeline (rebounds)ok 200 · 480 ms
dh lineups/{id}/deltaok 200 · 846 ms
odds game timelineok 200 · 893 ms
odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 626 ms
grading verdict/boardok 200 · 930 ms
sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 54 ms
sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 113 ms
sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 177 ms
sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 178 ms
sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 179 ms
sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 182 ms
sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 194 ms
odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 897 ms
sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 291 ms
sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 294 ms
odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 931 ms
sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 302 ms
sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 308 ms
sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 318 ms
sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 319 ms
sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 331 ms
sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 338 ms
sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 338 ms
sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 340 ms
sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 343 ms
sds analytics player_vs_line (rebounds)ok 200 · 352 ms
sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 355 ms
sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 356 ms
sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 364 ms
sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 366 ms
odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 499 ms
odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 504 ms
odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 504 ms
sds analytics player_vs_line (rebounds)ok 200 · 537 ms
odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 772 ms
odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 997 ms
odds player timeline (rebounds)ok 200 · 999 ms
odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 1000 ms
odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 1002 ms
Classic view →

The older, longer version of this page is still available as the classic view. Nothing there is tracked in our results; this page is.