WNBA · Finalupdated 14:51 UTC

Dallas Wings vs Indiana Fever

at Indiana Fever

IND expected to win by about 8.5 · both teams together expected to score about 184.5 points · odds to win: DAL 3.92, IND 1.28

Game odds from Pinnacle (the bookmaker we use as the reference), Fri 22:02 UTC

DAL 87 – IND 98

Final · 6 of 11 picks won

11 picks checked: 6 won, 5 lost.

Getting a better price than most bookmakers offer for the same line is the only thing on this page that, measured over many past bets, made money; player rates are context, not tips.

Explore every player and prop

How to read this page

A pick is a player line, for example Under 13.5 points, that we published before the game together with the price we found for it. We do not take bets.
Odds are shown in the decimal format: 1.93 means you get back 1.93 for every 1 staked, so a higher number pays more. The American format (−108 means risk 108 to win 100; +111 means risk 100 to win 111) appears only in the Data log at the bottom of the page.
'Posted at' is the price we found when we published the pick; 'better' is a higher price for the same line at another bookmaker. Taking the better price is the one thing on this page that, measured over many past bets, made money.
'Market puts Under at 48.5%' is the chance implied by all bookmakers' prices together, with their built-in margin removed. Pinnacle is a bookmaker whose prices are widely treated as the most accurate reference, so it is the one we compare against.
A player's rate is how often that player has gone over the line this season, for example over in 41 of 78 games (52.6%), with a likely range such as 32–52%: fewer games means a wider range, and under 10 games we show no rate word at all.
'Past record stronger than the price' means the whole likely range sits above the chance the bookmakers' price implies; 'weaker' means below; 'agrees with the price' means the price sits inside the range, which is the usual case. None of these is a tip.
'Not measurable' is the usual honest answer: too few games to tell a real difference from chance.
'What could go wrong' lists the facts that can change a line: who is out, whether the starting lineup is confirmed, expected playing time (RotoWire's estimate, typically off by about 4 minutes), rest, and how many bookmakers price each line.
After the final, every pick is checked against the official stats and compared with the last price before the game started, the market's most informed price; getting a better price than that is the fairest test of a pick, whether or not it won. A tie means the player landed exactly on the line and the stake is returned; lines ending in .5 cannot tie.
Results are given for every 1 staked: 'would have returned +0.93' means a stake of 1 would have come back with 0.93 in profit. We do not stake anything; the record is what a stake of 1 on each pick would have done. Our record counts a smaller stake when the price advantage was small.
S beside a name marks an expected starter. Times are shown in your device's time zone; our data is recorded in US Eastern Time (ET). Team codes are the league's three-letter abbreviations.
'Your prediction' lets you pick Over or Under on any line before the game starts; we check your predictions the same way and keep your record, and one game of results proves nothing.
Team codes on this page: DAL = Dallas Wings, IND = Indiana Fever.

Picks and prices

Odds of at least 1.70 only · highest odds first · results checked

A line is the number a bookmaker sets, e.g. 13.5 points; Over means more than it, Under fewer. Odds 1.93 pay 1.93 for every 1 staked. 'Posted at' is the price we found when we published the pick; after the game it is compared with the last price before the start.

A. Smith · Under 2.5 assistsWonPosted at 2.23 · last price before start 2.36Won +1.23 per 1 staked

Posted at 2.23 · Our price was 2.5% lower than the last price before the start.

Pinnacle, the reference bookmaker, does not offer this line

First offered at 1.67 by BetOnline.ag (Fri 01:53 UTC); latest 1.68 at DraftKings (Fri 23:03 UTC). The line moved from 2.5 to 3.5.

Re-checked 1 h before the start not re-checked

In our results this pick counts as a stake of 0.30 (standard 1); smaller when the price gap is small.

O. Sims · Under 10.5 pointsLostPosted at 1.97 · last price before start 1.91Lost −1.00 per 1 staked

A. Kuier · Under 4.5 reboundsLostPosted at 1.94 · last price before start pendingLost −1.00 per 1 staked

A. Kuier · Under 8.5 pointsWonPosted at 1.93 · last price before start 1.93Won +0.93 per 1 staked

P. Bueckers · Under 21.5 pointsLostPosted at 1.87 · last price before start 1.91Lost −1.00 per 1 staked

K. Mitchell · Over 24.5 pointsLostPosted at 1.79 · last price before start 1.81Lost −1.00 per 1 staked

O. Sims · Under 2.5 reboundsWonPosted at 1.79 · last price before start 1.88Won +0.79 per 1 staked

L. Hull · Under 5.5 pointsWonPosted at 1.77 · last price before start 1.76Won +0.77 per 1 staked

P. Bueckers · Under 6.5 assistsWonPosted at 1.75 · last price before start 1.83Won +0.75 per 1 staked

O. Sims · Under 4.5 assistsWonPosted at 1.72 · last price before start 1.68Won +0.72 per 1 staked

M. Billings · Over 5.5 pointsLostPosted at 1.72 · last price before start pendingLost −1.00 per 1 staked

Why the better price matters

In our past tests, simply taking the highest price offered for a line earned more than any of our own forecasts did.

In that test (25 Aug 2026), taking the best price returned about 2.8 more for every 100 staked than the price we posted did.

The players

12 players checked · 8 whose past record points the other way from the bookmakers' price · 0 out · 0 with too few games · 1 not checked

Rate: the share of this season's games in which the player finished above tonight's line. S beside a name marks an expected starter.

Against this opponent, 1 of 12 players has performed clearly differently and 4 show a slight hint

Context only A player's rate describes the past; it is not a tip and has not been tested as one. Expected minutes come from RotoWire, a lineup news service.

Sign in to see each player's rate The numbers below (for example 15.5 points) are the lines the bookmakers actually posted.

Dallas Wingsplaying IND

SArike Ogunbowale · 33 min expected

points 16.5 → 20 actual

SPaige Bueckers · 33 min expected

points 21.5 → 29 actual

SAlanna Smith · 32 min expected

assists 2.5 → 2 actual

SOdyssey Sims · 30 min expected

assists 4.5 → 2 actual

SAwak Kuier · 25 min expected

points 8.5 → 8 actual

Maddy Siegrist · 15 min expected

points 7.5 → 5 actual

3 players have no line from any bookmaker: Clark (16 expected minutes) · Yueru (8 min) · Sutton (8 min)

Indiana Feverplaying DAL

SCaitlin Clark · 34 min expected

points 21.5 → 29 actual

SKelsey Mitchell · 34 min expected

points 24.5 → 23 actual

SAliyah Boston · 29 min expected

points 16.5 → 16 actual

SMakayla Timpson · 27 min expected

points 6.5 → 6 actual

SLexie Hull · 17 min expected

points 5.5 → 0 actual

Sophie Cunningham · 23 min expected

points 7.5 → 5 actual

Monique Billings · 19 min expected

points 5.5 → 2 actual

4 players have no line from any bookmaker: Harris (10 expected minutes) · Hines-Allen (3 min) · +2 more

What could go wrong

updated 14:51 UTC

Who is out

Hall · earlier listed as out, now available (changed Fri 21:00 UTC) · 14, 2 and 1 min in the last 3 games

Russell · did not play last game

Onyiah · earlier listed as out, now available (changed Fri 21:00 UTC) · 12 and 1 min in the last 2 games

James · earlier listed as out, now available (changed Sat 22:00 UTC) · 13, 8 and 18 min in the last 3 games

Fudd · earlier listed as out, now available (changed Wed 00:00 UTC) · 35, 24 and 33 min in the last 3 games

Williams · earlier listed as out, now available (changed Sat 22:00 UTC) · 1, 6 and 5 min in the last 3 games

Shepard · earlier listed as likely to play, now available (changed Tue 00:45 UTC) · 33, 36 and 27 min in the last 3 games

Lineups

Expected starting lineup, not yet confirmed

Playing time

6 players are expected to play at least 5 minutes more or fewer than in the last 5 games. 1 player with a line is expected to play 15 minutes or less. For 4 players (Yueru, Sutton, Hines-Allen, Johnson) we have no real minutes estimate, only a default.

Smith: expected to play 32 minutes, averaged 20.5 in the last 5 games, about 11.5 more than usual

Sims: expected to play 30 minutes, averaged 10.3 in the last 5 games, about 19.7 more than usual

Siegrist: expected to play only 15 minutes, yet bookmakers post a line

Timpson: expected to play 27 minutes, averaged 19.9 in the last 5 games, about 7.1 more than usual

Boston: expected to play 29 minutes, averaged 23.0 in the last 5 games, about 6.0 more than usual

Billings: expected to play 19 minutes, averaged 9.5 in the last 5 games, about 9.5 more than usual

Cunningham: expected to play 23 minutes, averaged 17.2 in the last 5 games, about 5.8 more than usual

Our check: these minute estimates (RotoWire) are typically off by about 4 minutes.

Rest

Both teams had at least two days between their last game and this one.

Bookmakers

The reference bookmaker, Pinnacle, offers 14 of the 134 lines; the rest rely on other bookmakers.

Every pick is priced by at least 2 bookmakers.

Looking back

Flagged before the game: Hall out (Fri 21:00 UTC) · did not play

Flagged before the game: Russell out · did not play

Flagged before the game: Onyiah out (Fri 21:00 UTC) · did not play

Flagged before the game: James out (Sat 22:00 UTC) · did not play

Flagged before the game: Fudd out (Wed 00:00 UTC) · did not play

Flagged before the game: Williams out (Sat 22:00 UTC) · did not play

Flagged before the game: Shepard out (Tue 00:45 UTC) · did not play

1 expected player did not play

When a player is out, that player's lines are removed: in our past results this helped. Guessing which teammates benefit was also tested and lost money, so nothing else on this page is adjusted for it.

What happened

In 6 of 8 cases where a player's past record disagreed with the bookmakers' price, the past record was right in this game. One game proves nothing.

Final · 6 of 11 picks won6 won, 5 lost · +0.19 if you had staked 1 on each · our prices on average 0.7% lower than the last before the start · 20 lines checked, 9 scored but not picked · checked Sun 23:52 UTC

Lexie Hull · points 5.5 → 0 · 5.5 below the line · played 12.4 min (17 expected)

Pick: Under 5.5 at 1.77 → Won +0.77 per 1 staked

Monique Billings · points 5.5 → 2 · 3.5 below the line · played 14.4 min (19 expected)

Pick: Over 5.5 at 1.72 → Lost −1.00 per 1 staked · our note: no single cause

Odyssey Sims · assists 4.5 → 2 · 2.5 below the line · played 23.3 min (30 expected)

Pick: Under 4.5 at 1.72 → Won +0.72 per 1 staked

Paige Bueckers · points 21.5 → 29 · 7.5 above the line · played 36.5 min (33 expected)

Pick: Under 21.5 at 1.87 → Lost −1.00 per 1 staked · our note: worse price than the market

Alanna Smith · assists 2.5 → 2 · 0.5 below the line · played 35.1 min (32 expected)

Pick: Under 2.5 at 2.23 → Won +1.23 per 1 staked

Kelsey Mitchell · points 24.5 → 23 · 1.5 below the line · played 35.9 min (34 expected)

Pick: Over 24.5 at 1.79 → Lost −1.00 per 1 staked · our note: worse price than the market

Awak Kuier · points 8.5 → 8 · 0.5 below the line · played 27.9 min (25 expected)

Pick: Under 8.5 at 1.93 → Won +0.93 per 1 staked

6 other players with a posted line

Caitlin Clark · points 21.5 → 29 · 7.5 above the line · played 34.1 min (34 expected) · Pinnacle odds: Over 1.75, Under 1.99

Maddy Siegrist · points 7.5 → 5 · 2.5 below the line · played 12.8 min (15 expected) · no final price

Sophie Cunningham · points 7.5 → 5 · 2.5 below the line · played 20.4 min (23 expected) · BetOnline.ag odds: Over 1.93, Under 1.83

Arike Ogunbowale · points 16.5 → 20 · 3.5 above the line · played 29.8 min (33 expected) · Pinnacle odds: Over 1.69, Under 2.07

Makayla Timpson · points 6.5 → 6 · 0.5 below the line · played 23.7 min (27 expected) · BetRivers odds: Over 1.76, Under —

Aliyah Boston · points 16.5 → 16 · 0.5 below the line · played 29.2 min (29 expected) · Pinnacle odds: Over 1.85, Under 1.88

Each prediction is recorded as if you had staked 1 at the line you saw, and your record is shown here. One game tells you nothing yet.

More context

Head to head

IND vs DAL · last 16 games · DAL leads · IND record 7–9 · average score 92.0–92.0 · IND has won by 0 on average

Team results are background only; they say nothing about any single player's line.

20 Aug · IND 85 at DAL 91IND lost

14 Aug · DAL 87 at IND 98IND won

9 May · DAL 107 at IND 104IND lost

What each defense gives up per game

DAL gives up85.3 points · 33.3 rebounds · 19.9 assists · 8.1 three-pointers scored against them · opponents make 44.8% of shots · 33.1% from three-point range · 11.9 opponent turnovers

IND gives up90.4 points · 31.9 rebounds · 20.9 assists · 8.0 three-pointers scored against them · opponents make 46.0% of shots · 33.7% from three-point range · 12.7 opponent turnovers

Defense by position

How much this is worth

Defense-by-position numbers are mostly random from season to season; shown for context only. We tested it: a team's defense-by-position numbers from one half of the season do not predict the other half, so treat them as noise.

DAL gives up 85.3 points a game · 5th of 15 · league average 87.0−1.8 vs average

IND gives up 90.4 points a game · 11th of 15 · league average 87.0+3.4 vs average

How the game odds moved

Pinnacle first had IND expected to win by 7, expected total 187 (Fri 03:25 UTC) and later IND expected to win by 8.5, expected total 184.5 (Fri 22:02 UTC).

The odds at the top of the page are the latest we have, from every bookmaker on file; this is one bookmaker's own history.

Data log (technical)

Technical detail for auditing; the plain version is above. Internal ids and formula names print here only.

Line-shopping measurement: project_conditional_minutes_refuted

Defense-by-position measurement: split-half reliability r = -0.033 across 12 cells (7 of 12 negative) against a shuffle null of 0.000; a placebo using the wrong position family reproduced the effect to within 0.12pp · project_dvp_blowout_gate_refuted · 2026-08-26

Our picks, raw · 15

Alanna Smith · U 2.5 assists+123value_edge_pct +1.38 · kelly 0.30u · price_check unchecked · rank 1

Odyssey Sims · U 10.5 points−103value_edge_pct −1.68 · kelly 0.00u · price_check unchecked · rank 2

Kelsey Mitchell · O 24.5 points−127value_edge_pct −2.16 · kelly 0.00u · price_check unchecked · rank 3

Paige Bueckers · U 21.5 points−115value_edge_pct −2.50 · kelly 0.00u · price_check unchecked · rank 4

Odyssey Sims · U 11.5 points+104value_edge_pct −2.63 · kelly 0.00u · price_check unchecked · rank 5

Awak Kuier · U 8.5 points−107value_edge_pct −3.08 · kelly 0.00u · price_check unchecked · rank 6

Paige Bueckers · U 6.5 assists−133value_edge_pct −3.15 · kelly 0.00u · price_check unchecked · rank 7

Lexie Hull · U 5.5 points−130value_edge_pct −3.44 · kelly 0.00u · price_check unchecked · rank 8

Kelsey Mitchell · O 25.5 points−110value_edge_pct −3.80 · kelly 0.00u · price_check unchecked · rank 9

Odyssey Sims · U 4.5 assists−139value_edge_pct −4.04 · kelly 0.00u · price_check unchecked · rank 12

Odyssey Sims · U 3.5 assists+115value_edge_pct −4.13 · kelly 0.00u · price_check unchecked · rank 15

Awak Kuier · U 4.5 rebounds−106value_edge_pct −4.17 · kelly 0.00u · price_check unchecked · rank 17

Odyssey Sims · U 2.5 rebounds−127value_edge_pct −4.36 · kelly 0.00u · price_check unchecked · rank 19

Odyssey Sims · U 12.5 points−122value_edge_pct −4.41 · kelly 0.00u · price_check unchecked · rank 20

Monique Billings · O 5.5 points−139value_edge_pct −4.45 · kelly 0.00u · price_check unchecked · rank 21

Checked results, raw (basketball-stats shorthand) · 20

Odyssey Sims Under 11.5 PTSWIN +1.04ubet +104 → close −104 · CLV +2.0¢ · bet_clv:307554 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-14T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 PASS · p_hit 47.7% · actual 11 · 23.3 min · startedSims stayed just under the number despite solid efficiency (70% TS), limited by 23 minutes and a modest 19% usage rate that kept her scoring opportunities in check. Her 3-7 shooting from the field simply didn't generate enough volume to push past 11.5 points.

Odyssey Sims Under 2.5 REBWIN +0.79ubet −127 → close −114 · CLV −2.7¢ · bet_clv:307551 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-14T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 C · p_hit 53.5% · actual 2 · 23.3 min · startedSims stayed well under the board despite efficient scoring (70% TS), grabbing just 2 rebounds in 23 minutes—limited opportunity and usage (19%) kept her off the glass even though she stayed out of foul trouble (2 PF).

Odyssey Sims Under 12.5 PTSWIN +0.82ubet −122 → close −132 · CLV +1.9¢ · bet_clv:309593 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-14T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 C · p_hit 52.5% · actual 11 · 23.3 min · startedSims stayed under 12.5 despite solid efficiency (70% TS) because her 19% usage rate and 23 minutes limited her volume—she attempted just 7 field goals total. The under cashed on a quiet night in terms of shot volume, not poor shooting.

Odyssey Sims Under 4.5 ASTWIN +0.72ubet −139 → close −146 · CLV +1.2¢ · bet_clv:307553 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-14T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 B · p_hit 55.8% · actual 2 · 23.3 min · startedSims' playmaking dried up despite solid scoring efficiency; she logged only 23 minutes and recorded just 2 assists on low usage (19%), well below the 4.5 line.

Alanna Smith Under 2.5 ASTWIN +1.23ubet +123 → close +136 · CLV −2.5¢ · bet_clv:307556 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-14T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 PASS · p_hit 45.5% · actual 2 · 35.1 min · startedSmith's playmaking was limited despite 35 minutes on the floor, finishing with exactly 2 assists as her 16% usage rate and ball-heavy offensive role (4-11 FG attempts) left little opportunity for secondary contributions.

Paige Bueckers Under 6.5 ASTWIN +0.75ubet −133 → close −120 · CLV −2.5¢ · bet_clv:307562 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-14T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 B · p_hit 55.3% · actual 6 · 36.5 min · startedBueckers stayed under the 6.5 assist line despite 36 minutes and high usage (30%), as she prioritized scoring with 29 points on efficient 11-21 shooting rather than facilitating—she recorded just 6 dimes with only 2 turnovers, indicating a score-first approach. The low assist total was compounded by limited ball movement in a game where UConn struggled overall (-7 +/-), reducing opportunities for playmaking.

Lexie Hull Under 5.5 PTSWIN +0.77ubet −130 → close −132 · CLV +0.4¢ · bet_clv:307566 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-14T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 C · p_hit 54.6% · actual 0 · 12.4 min · benchHull managed just 12 minutes off the bench and went scoreless on 2 shot attempts (0-2 FG), with minimal usage at 7%, keeping her well below the 5.5-point line. Limited opportunity and cold shooting combined to make this a comfortable under.

Odyssey Sims Under 3.5 ASTWIN +1.15ubet +115 → close +114 · CLV +0.2¢ · bet_clv:307552 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-14T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 PASS · p_hit 44.6% · actual 2 · 23.3 min · startedSims stayed under the assists line despite solid scoring (11 pts on 70% TS) because her playmaking was limited to just 2 dimes in 23 minutes, a direct result of 19% usage and 2 turnovers that constrained her ball-handling opportunities.

Alanna Smith Under 3.5 ASTWIN +0.59ubet −169 → close −146 · CLV −3.5¢ · bet_clv:309584 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-14T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 A · p_hit 60.9% · actual 2 · 35.1 min · startedSmith's playmaking was limited despite heavy minutes (35), as her 16% usage rate and 2 turnovers left little opportunity for assists. She was primarily a rebounder and scorer (7 boards, 8 points on poor shooting), not a facilitator in this game's offensive flow.

Paige Bueckers Under 21.5 PTSLOSS −1.00ubet −115 → close −110 · CLV −1.1¢ · bet_clv:307560 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-14T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 C · p_hit 52.2% · bad_price · actual 29 · 36.5 min · startedBueckers exceeded the under by 8 points on an efficient 11-21 shooting night (52 FG%), converting all five free throws and logging 36 minutes with 30% usage to carry the offensive load. Her 62% true shooting marked a hot performance that overwhelmed the betting line.

Kelsey Mitchell Over 25.5 PTSLOSS −1.00ubet −110 → close −110 · CLV +0.0¢ · bet_clv:307564 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-14T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 PASS · p_hit 50.4% · unexplained · actual 23 · 35.9 min · startedMitchell fell just short despite heavy usage (30%) and high volume (21 FG attempts), hampered by poor three-point shooting (1-7) that kept her efficiency flat at 50% TS. She needed closer to 26 points to cash and came up two short, undone by perimeter struggles in an otherwise high-volume performance.

Kelsey Mitchell Over 24.5 PTSLOSS −1.00ubet −127 → close −123 · CLV −0.8¢ · bet_clv:307563 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-14T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 C · p_hit 54.7% · bad_price · actual 23 · 35.9 min · startedMitchell came up one point short despite heavy usage (30%) and nearly 36 minutes of action, held back by poor perimeter shooting (1-7 from three) that forced her into an inefficient night at 50% true shooting.

Paige Bueckers Under 4.5 REBLOSS −1.00ubet −161 → close −180 · CLV +2.6¢ · bet_clv:307561 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-14T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 B · p_hit 58.8% · conversion_unlucky · actual 6 · 36.5 min · startedBueckers stayed on the floor for 36 minutes and drove offensive rebounding opportunities with 30% usage, grabbing 6 boards to exceed the 4.5 line despite playing on a team that got outscored by 7.

Awak Kuier Under 8.5 PTSWIN +0.93ubet −107 → close −107 · CLV +0.0¢ · bet_clv:307557 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-14T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 PASS · p_hit 50.1% · actual 8 · 27.9 min · startedKuier hit the under on inefficient shooting, going 2-for-6 from the field (33%) and 1-for-4 from three despite playing 28 minutes with 15% usage. Her reliance on free throws (3-4 FT) and low field-goal volume kept her just at the line despite solid minutes.

Odyssey Sims Under 10.5 PTSLOSS −1.00ubet −103 → close −110 · CLV +1.6¢ · bet_clv:307555 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-14T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 PASS · p_hit 49.9% · conversion_unlucky · actual 11 · 23.3 min · startedSims exceeded the under with efficient shooting, going 3-for-6 from three-point range (50%) and 2-for-2 from the free-throw line to reach 11 points in 23 minutes despite a modest 3-7 overall field-goal mark. Her 70% true shooting kept her productive enough to clear the 10.5-point threshold despite low usage at just 19%.

Awak Kuier Under 9.5 PTSWIN +0.65ubet −154 → close −133 · CLV −3.5¢ · bet_clv:307558 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-14T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 B · p_hit 57.9% · actual 8 · 27.9 min · startedKuier's inefficient 2-6 shooting (33% FG) and low 15% usage rate kept her well below the scoring line despite playing 28 minutes. She relied heavily on free throws (3-4) to salvage any points, but her limited offensive touches and poor field-goal conversion made the under a straightforward beat.

Awak Kuier Under 4.5 REBLOSS −1.00ubet −106 · bet_clv:307559 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-14T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 PASS · p_hit 49.3% · unexplained · actual 6 · 27.9 min · started

Monique Billings Over 3.5 REBWIN +0.66ubet −152 · bet_clv:307568 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-14T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 B · p_hit 57.5% · actual 7 · 14.4 min · bench

Monique Billings Over 5.5 PTSLOSS −1.00ubet −139 · bet_clv:307567 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-14T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 B · p_hit 55.6% · unexplained · actual 2 · 14.4 min · bench

Lexie Hull Under 3.5 REBWIN +0.43ubet −233 · bet_clv:307565 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-14T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 A+ · p_hit 66.6% · actual 2 · 12.4 min · bench

Data fetches · 56

sds rest/team (away)ok 200 · 45 ms

sds rest/team (home)ok 200 · 46 ms

sds history (h2h)ok · 50 ms

sds schedule/team (meetings)ok · 57 ms

sds defense/team (home)ok 200 · 58 ms

sds analytics opponent_defense (away)ok 200 · 59 ms

sds analytics opponent_defense (home)ok 200 · 60 ms

sds defense/team (away)ok 200 · 61 ms

sds games/{id}ok 200 · 155 ms

sds lineups/{id}ok 200 · 170 ms

grading picks/nightlyok 200 · 177 ms

sds injuries/date/{date}ok 200 · 199 ms

sds games/{id}/boxscoreok 200 · 202 ms

grading clv/picksok 200 · 109 ms

dh lineups/{id}/deltaok 200 · 389 ms

odds player timeline (rebounds)ok 200 · 803 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 825 ms

odds player timeline (assists)ok 200 · 888 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 896 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 899 ms

odds player timeline (assists)ok 200 · 900 ms

odds player timeline (assists)ok 200 · 1033 ms

odds player timeline (rebounds)ok 200 · 1085 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 1086 ms

odds game timelineok 200 · 1327 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 1211 ms

grading verdict/boardok 200 · 3143 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 25 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 96 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 117 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 121 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 124 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 139 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 143 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 148 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (assists)ok 200 · 181 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 184 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 205 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 218 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (assists)ok 200 · 219 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 247 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 248 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 254 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 261 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 277 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 293 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 312 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 316 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 334 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 344 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 361 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 552 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 560 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 604 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 614 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 620 ms

Classic view →

The older, longer version of this page is still available as the classic view. Nothing there is tracked in our results; this page is.