WNBA · Finalupdated 17:37 UTC

Indiana Fever vs Dallas Wings

at Dallas Wings

IND expected to win by about 3.5 · both teams together expected to score about 184.5 points · odds to win: IND 1.61, DAL 2.40

Game odds from Pinnacle (the bookmaker we use as the reference), Thu 22:59 UTC

IND 85 – DAL 91

Final · 5 of 8 picks won

8 picks checked: 5 won, 3 lost.

Getting a better price than most bookmakers offer for the same line is the only thing on this page that, measured over many past bets, made money; player rates are context, not tips.

Explore every player and prop

How to read this page

A pick is a player line, for example Under 13.5 points, that we published before the game together with the price we found for it. We do not take bets.
Odds are shown in the decimal format: 1.93 means you get back 1.93 for every 1 staked, so a higher number pays more. The American format (−108 means risk 108 to win 100; +111 means risk 100 to win 111) appears only in the Data log at the bottom of the page.
'Posted at' is the price we found when we published the pick; 'better' is a higher price for the same line at another bookmaker. Taking the better price is the one thing on this page that, measured over many past bets, made money.
'Market puts Under at 48.5%' is the chance implied by all bookmakers' prices together, with their built-in margin removed. Pinnacle is a bookmaker whose prices are widely treated as the most accurate reference, so it is the one we compare against.
A player's rate is how often that player has gone over the line this season, for example over in 41 of 78 games (52.6%), with a likely range such as 32–52%: fewer games means a wider range, and under 10 games we show no rate word at all.
'Past record stronger than the price' means the whole likely range sits above the chance the bookmakers' price implies; 'weaker' means below; 'agrees with the price' means the price sits inside the range, which is the usual case. None of these is a tip.
'Not measurable' is the usual honest answer: too few games to tell a real difference from chance.
'What could go wrong' lists the facts that can change a line: who is out, whether the starting lineup is confirmed, expected playing time (RotoWire's estimate, typically off by about 4 minutes), rest, and how many bookmakers price each line.
After the final, every pick is checked against the official stats and compared with the last price before the game started, the market's most informed price; getting a better price than that is the fairest test of a pick, whether or not it won. A tie means the player landed exactly on the line and the stake is returned; lines ending in .5 cannot tie.
Results are given for every 1 staked: 'would have returned +0.93' means a stake of 1 would have come back with 0.93 in profit. We do not stake anything; the record is what a stake of 1 on each pick would have done. Our record counts a smaller stake when the price advantage was small.
S beside a name marks an expected starter. Times are shown in your device's time zone; our data is recorded in US Eastern Time (ET). Team codes are the league's three-letter abbreviations.
'Your prediction' lets you pick Over or Under on any line before the game starts; we check your predictions the same way and keep your record, and one game of results proves nothing.
Team codes on this page: IND = Indiana Fever, DAL = Dallas Wings.

Picks and prices

Odds of at least 1.70 only · highest odds first · results checked

A line is the number a bookmaker sets, e.g. 13.5 points; Over means more than it, Under fewer. Odds 1.93 pay 1.93 for every 1 staked. 'Posted at' is the price we found when we published the pick; after the game it is compared with the last price before the start.

J. Shepard · Under 13.5 pointsLostPosted at 1.90 · last price before start 1.78Lost −1.00 per 1 staked

Posted at 1.90 · Our price was 3.5% higher than the last price before the start (good: a higher price pays more per 1 staked).

Pinnacle 1.78, 1 min ago

No price history for this line.

Re-checked 1 h before the start not re-checked

In our results this pick counts as a stake of 0.00 (standard 1); smaller when the price gap is small.

M. Timpson · Under 6.5 reboundsLostPosted at 1.83 · last price before start 1.71Lost −1.00 per 1 staked

K. Mitchell · Over 23.5 pointsWonPosted at 1.83 · last price before start 1.78Won +0.83 per 1 staked

P. Bueckers · Under 22.5 pointsWonPosted at 1.79 · last price before start 1.79Won +0.79 per 1 staked

A. Smith · Over 5.5 reboundsLostPosted at 1.76 · last price before start 1.76Lost −1.00 per 1 staked

J. Shepard · Under 5.5 assistsWonPosted at 1.74 · last price before start 1.54Won +0.74 per 1 staked

J. Shepard · Under 11.5 reboundsWonPosted at 1.72 · last price before start 1.66Won +0.72 per 1 staked

O. Sims · Under 8.5 pointsWonPosted at 1.82 · last price before start 1.82Won +0.82 per 1 staked

Why the better price matters

In our past tests, simply taking the highest price offered for a line earned more than any of our own forecasts did.

In that test (25 Aug 2026), taking the best price returned about 2.8 more for every 100 staked than the price we posted did.

The players

12 players checked · 10 whose past record points the other way from the bookmakers' price · 0 out · 0 with too few games

Rate: the share of this season's games in which the player finished above tonight's line. S beside a name marks an expected starter.

Against this opponent, 1 of 12 players has performed clearly differently and 5 show a slight hint

Context only A player's rate describes the past; it is not a tip and has not been tested as one. Expected minutes come from RotoWire, a lineup news service.

Sign in to see each player's rate The numbers below (for example 15.5 points) are the lines the bookmakers actually posted.

Indiana Feverplaying DAL

SCaitlin Clark · 34 min expected

points 23.5 → 10 actual

SKelsey Mitchell · 33 min expected

points 23.5 → 37 actual

SAliyah Boston · 30 min expected

points 16.5 → 14 actual

SMakayla Timpson · 29 min expected

rebounds 6.5 → 12 actual

SLexie Hull · 13 min expected

points + assists 4.5 → 9 actual

Sophie Cunningham · 25 min expected

points 7.5 → 0 actual

5 players have no line from any bookmaker: Billings (13 expected minutes) · Harris (13 min) · +3 more

Dallas Wingsplaying IND

SPaige Bueckers · 33 min expected

points 22.5 → 13 actual

SArike Ogunbowale · 32 min expected

points 16.5 → 32 actual

SAlanna Smith · 31 min expected

rebounds 5.5 → 2 actual

SJessica Shepard · 27 min expected

points 13.5 → 26 actual

SAwak Kuier · 20 min expected

points 6.5 → 11 actual

Odyssey Sims · 17 min expected

points 8.5 → 2 actual

3 players have no line from any bookmaker: Clark (20 expected minutes) · Siegrist (15 min) · Sutton (5 min)

What could go wrong

updated 17:37 UTC

Who is out

James · earlier listed as out, now available (changed Sat 22:00 UTC) · 13, 8 and 18 min in the last 3 games

Fudd · earlier listed as out, now available (changed Wed 00:00 UTC) · 35, 24 and 33 min in the last 3 games

Williams · earlier listed as out, now available (changed Sat 22:00 UTC) · 1, 6 and 5 min in the last 3 games

Jones · earlier listed as out, now available (changed Sat 22:00 UTC) · 7, 5 and 7 min in the last 3 games

Yueru · did not play last game

Hall · earlier listed as out, now available (changed Fri 21:00 UTC) · 14, 2 and 1 min in the last 3 games

VanSlooten · did not play last game

Russell · did not play last game

Onyiah · earlier listed as out, now available (changed Fri 21:00 UTC) · 12 and 1 min in the last 2 games

Hines-Allen · earlier listed as may not play, now available (changed Sun 21:45 UTC) · 19, 12 and 15 min in the last 3 games

Johnson · did not play last game

Lineups

Starting lineup confirmed (Fri 00:00 UTC) · RotoWire, a lineup news service, as of game start

Playing time

5 players are expected to play at least 5 minutes more or fewer than in the last 5 games. For 5 players (Hull, Billings, Harris, Kuier, Clark) we have no real minutes estimate, only a default.

Timpson: expected to play 29 minutes, averaged 19.9 in the last 5 games, about 9.1 more than usual

Boston: expected to play 30 minutes, averaged 23.0 in the last 5 games, about 7.0 more than usual

Cunningham: expected to play 25 minutes, averaged 17.2 in the last 5 games, about 7.8 more than usual

Smith: expected to play 31 minutes, averaged 25.6 in the last 5 games, about 5.4 more than usual

Sims: expected to play 17 minutes, averaged 10.3 in the last 5 games, about 6.7 more than usual

Our check: these minute estimates (RotoWire) are typically off by about 4 minutes.

Rest

Both teams had at least two days between their last game and this one.

Bookmakers

The reference bookmaker, Pinnacle, offers 18 of the 172 lines; the rest rely on other bookmakers.

Every pick is priced by at least 2 bookmakers.

Looking back

Flagged before the game: James out (Sat 22:00 UTC) · did not play

Flagged before the game: Fudd out (Wed 00:00 UTC) · did not play

Flagged before the game: Williams out (Sat 22:00 UTC) · did not play

Flagged before the game: Jones out (Sat 22:00 UTC) · did not play

Flagged before the game: Yueru out · did not play

Flagged before the game: Hall out (Fri 21:00 UTC) · did not play

Flagged before the game: VanSlooten out · did not play

Flagged before the game: Russell out · did not play

Flagged before the game: Onyiah out (Fri 21:00 UTC) · did not play

Flagged before the game: Hines-Allen out (Sun 21:45 UTC) · did not play

Flagged before the game: Johnson out · did not play

3 expected players did not play

When a player is out, that player's lines are removed: in our past results this helped. Guessing which teammates benefit was also tested and lost money, so nothing else on this page is adjusted for it.

What happened

In 6 of 10 cases where a player's past record disagreed with the bookmakers' price, the past record was right in this game. One game proves nothing.

Final · 5 of 8 picks won5 won, 3 lost · +0.91 if you had staked 1 on each · our prices on average 2.3% higher than the last before the start · 21 lines checked, 13 scored but not picked · checked Sun 00:52 UTC

Jessica Shepard · points 13.5 → 26 · 12.5 above the line · played 35.5 min (27 expected)

Pick: Under 13.5 at 1.90 → Lost −1.00 per 1 staked · our note: the shots did not fall

Makayla Timpson · rebounds 6.5 → 12 · 5.5 above the line · played 33.9 min (29 expected)

Pick: Under 6.5 at 1.83 → Lost −1.00 per 1 staked · our note: the shots did not fall

Odyssey Sims · points 8.5 → 2 · 6.5 below the line · played 16.3 min (17 expected)

Pick: Under 8.5 at 1.82 → Won +0.82 per 1 staked

Alanna Smith · rebounds 5.5 → 2 · 3.5 below the line · played 9.6 min (31 expected)

Pick: Over 5.5 at 1.76 → Lost −1.00 per 1 staked · our note: one-sided game or foul trouble · Result skewed by game events

Kelsey Mitchell · points 23.5 → 37 · 13.5 above the line · played 34.7 min (33 expected)

Pick: Over 23.5 at 1.83 → Won +0.83 per 1 staked

Paige Bueckers · points 22.5 → 13 · 9.5 below the line · played 34.7 min (33 expected)

Pick: Under 22.5 at 1.79 → Won +0.79 per 1 staked

6 other players with a posted line

Lexie Hull · points + assists 4.5 → 9 · 4.5 above the line · played 25 min (13 expected) · no final price

Sophie Cunningham · points 7.5 → 0 · 7.5 below the line · played 15.1 min (25 expected) · no final price

Arike Ogunbowale · points 16.5 → 32 · 15.5 above the line · played 34.6 min (32 expected) · no final price

Awak Kuier · points 6.5 → 11 · 4.5 above the line · played 35.7 min (20 expected) · no final price

Caitlin Clark · points 23.5 → 10 · 13.5 below the line · played 34.8 min (34 expected) · no final price

Aliyah Boston · points 16.5 → 14 · 2.5 below the line · played 29.2 min (30 expected) · no final price

Each prediction is recorded as if you had staked 1 at the line you saw, and your record is shown here. One game tells you nothing yet.

More context

Head to head

DAL vs IND · last 16 games · DAL leads · DAL record 9–7 · average score 92.0–92.0 · DAL has won by 0 on average

Team results are background only; they say nothing about any single player's line.

20 Aug · IND 85 at DAL 91DAL won

14 Aug · DAL 87 at IND 98DAL lost

9 May · DAL 107 at IND 104DAL won

What each defense gives up per game

IND gives up90.4 points · 31.9 rebounds · 20.9 assists · 8.0 three-pointers scored against them · opponents make 46.0% of shots · 33.7% from three-point range · 12.7 opponent turnovers

DAL gives up85.3 points · 33.3 rebounds · 19.9 assists · 8.1 three-pointers scored against them · opponents make 44.8% of shots · 33.1% from three-point range · 11.9 opponent turnovers

Defense by position

How much this is worth

Defense-by-position numbers are mostly random from season to season; shown for context only. We tested it: a team's defense-by-position numbers from one half of the season do not predict the other half, so treat them as noise.

IND gives up 90.4 points a game · 11th of 15 · league average 87.0+3.4 vs average

DAL gives up 85.3 points a game · 5th of 15 · league average 87.0−1.8 vs average

How the game odds moved

No history of the game odds on file.

Data log (technical)

Technical detail for auditing; the plain version is above. Internal ids and formula names print here only.

Line-shopping measurement: project_conditional_minutes_refuted

Defense-by-position measurement: split-half reliability r = -0.033 across 12 cells (7 of 12 negative) against a shuffle null of 0.000; a placebo using the wrong position family reproduced the effect to within 0.12pp · project_dvp_blowout_gate_refuted · 2026-08-26

Our picks, raw · 15

Jessica Shepard · U 5.5 assists−135value_edge_pct +1.74 · kelly 0.60u · price_check unchecked · rank 1

Makayla Timpson · U 6.5 rebounds−120value_edge_pct −0.69 · kelly 0.00u · price_check unchecked · rank 4

Jessica Shepard · U 11.5 rebounds−138value_edge_pct −1.90 · kelly 0.00u · price_check unchecked · rank 5

Jessica Shepard · U 10.5 rebounds−114value_edge_pct −2.10 · kelly 0.00u · price_check unchecked · rank 7

Jessica Shepard · U 4.5 assists+106value_edge_pct −2.86 · kelly 0.00u · price_check unchecked · rank 9

Odyssey Sims · U 8.5 points−122value_edge_pct −3.13 · kelly 0.00u · price_check unchecked · rank 10

Jessica Shepard · U 13.5 points−111value_edge_pct −3.14 · kelly 0.00u · price_check unchecked · rank 11

Kelsey Mitchell · O 23.5 points−120value_edge_pct −3.45 · kelly 0.00u · price_check unchecked · rank 12

Kelsey Mitchell · O 24.5 points+100value_edge_pct −3.73 · kelly 0.00u · price_check unchecked · rank 14

Jessica Shepard · U 14.5 points−113value_edge_pct −3.96 · kelly 0.00u · price_check unchecked · rank 15

Jessica Shepard · U 12.5 points−108value_edge_pct −4.24 · kelly 0.00u · price_check unchecked · rank 17

Odyssey Sims · U 9.5 points−128value_edge_pct −4.53 · kelly 0.00u · price_check unchecked · rank 19

Paige Bueckers · U 22.5 points−127value_edge_pct −4.78 · kelly 0.00u · price_check unchecked · rank 22

Alanna Smith · O 5.5 rebounds−132value_edge_pct −4.79 · kelly 0.00u · price_check unchecked · rank 23

Jessica Shepard · U 9.5 rebounds+104value_edge_pct −5.07 · kelly 0.00u · price_check unchecked · rank 24

Checked results, raw (basketball-stats shorthand) · 21

Odyssey Sims Under 3.5 ASTWIN +0.61ubet −163 → close −163 · CLV +0.0¢ · bet_clv:339636 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-20T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 B · p_hit 59.3% · actual 3 · 16.3 min · benchSims' limited 16-minute run and low 16% usage rate kept her playmaking opportunities scarce, resulting in just 3 assists despite playing over 15 minutes. Her inefficient 0-3 shooting also likely forced her into a more passive role rather than setting up teammates.

Makayla Timpson Under 6.5 REBLOSS −1.00ubet −120 → close −140 · CLV +3.8¢ · bet_clv:339642 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-20T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 C · p_hit 54.2% · conversion_unlucky · actual 12 · 33.9 min · startedTimpson nearly doubled the line with 12 rebounds in 34 minutes, benefiting from heavy offensive rebounding activity and extended floor time in what appears to have been a closely contested game (+1 +/-). The under bet needed her to grab 6 or fewer boards, but her rebounding volume far exceeded that threshold despite modest scoring (11 pts on 15% usage).

Awak Kuier Over 3.5 REBWIN +0.65ubet −155 → close −156 · CLV +0.2¢ · bet_clv:342516 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-20T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 B · p_hit 57.8% · actual 8 · 35.7 min · startedKuier's 36 minutes and active interior presence generated 8 rebounds, doubling the over line despite modest 11% usage, as her elite rim protection (7 blocks) kept her engaged on the glass throughout.

Alanna Smith Over 5.5 REBLOSS −1.00ubet −132 → close −132 · CLV +0.0¢ · bet_clv:339640 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-20T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 C · p_hit 54.2% · blowout_foul_trouble · actual 2 · 9.6 min · bench · excusedSmith was essentially a non-factor with just 10 minutes played and 5% usage, finishing with only 2 rebounds—likely due to limited court time and foul trouble (5 fouls) that kept her benched for stretches of the game.

Jessica Shepard Under 4.5 ASTWIN +1.06ubet +106 → close −109 · CLV +3.6¢ · bet_clv:339643 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-20T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 PASS · p_hit 47.2% · actual 1 · 35.5 min · startedShepard operated almost entirely as a scorer tonight, recording just 1 assist despite 36 minutes and 26% usage—her 11-16 shooting efficiency kept her volume high but her playmaking involvement remained minimal. The under cashed decisively as she prioritized scoring (26 points) over facilitating, turning the ball over only twice while playing a high-volume isolation role.

Alanna Smith Under 2.5 ASTWIN +0.51ubet −196 → close −191 · CLV −0.6¢ · bet_clv:339641 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-20T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 A · p_hit 63.1% · actual 0 · 9.6 min · bench · excusedSmith played only 10 minutes with minimal involvement (5% usage), recording no assists and no field goal attempts in a limited role that made the under an easy cash.

Paige Bueckers Under 22.5 PTSWIN +0.79ubet −127 → close −127 · CLV +0.0¢ · bet_clv:342511 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-20T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 C · p_hit 53.3% · actual 13 · 34.7 min · startedBueckers shot just 5-16 from the field (31%) and misfired on all three-point attempts despite playing 35 minutes, leaving her well short of the 22.5 line. Her poor efficiency and low 22% usage rate limited her scoring despite heavy minutes.

Jessica Shepard Under 5.5 ASTWIN +0.74ubet −135 → close −185 · CLV +7.5¢ · bet_clv:339644 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-20T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 B · p_hit 58.4% · actual 1 · 35.5 min · startedShepard's assist total stayed well below the line as she operated primarily as a scorer rather than a facilitator, recording just 1 assist while posting 26 points on efficient 11-16 shooting with elevated usage (26%) that prioritized her own shot-taking.

Odyssey Sims Under 8.5 PTSWIN +0.82ubet −122 → close −122 · CLV +0.0¢ · bet_clv:339638 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-20T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 C · p_hit 53.2% · actual 2 · 16.3 min · benchSims managed just 2 points on 0-3 shooting despite 16 minutes played, as her inefficient offensive touch (26% TS%) and low volume (16% usage) kept her well clear of the 8.5-point line. Her role remained limited to complementary duties, with her impact coming primarily through assists (3) and steals (2) rather than scoring.

Kelsey Mitchell Over 1.5 ASTWIN +0.53ubet −190 → close −210 · CLV +2.2¢ · bet_clv:339635 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-20T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 A · p_hit 63.1% · actual 5 · 34.7 min · startedMitchell's elite offensive efficiency (75% TS, 35% usage) and heavy shot diet kept her heavily involved in the offense, naturally generating 5 assists over 35 minutes despite her primary role as a scorer. The over easily cleared as her playmaking touch complemented her 37-point explosion.

Kelsey Mitchell Over 24.5 PTSWIN +1.00ubet +100 → close −101 · CLV +0.2¢ · bet_clv:339633 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-20T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 PASS · p_hit 48.1% · actual 37 · 34.7 min · startedMitchell's perfect 15-15 shooting from the line combined with efficient three-point shooting (4-7) lifted her well past 24.5, as she dominated usage at 35% while staying on the floor for 35 minutes and avoiding foul trouble with just 4 PF.

Kelsey Mitchell Over 23.5 PTSWIN +0.83ubet −120 → close −128 · CLV +1.6¢ · bet_clv:339634 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-20T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 C · p_hit 52.7% · actual 37 · 34.7 min · startedMitchell's perfect 15-15 from the free-throw line combined with 4-7 three-point shooting propelled her well past the 23.5 line, as she dominated usage at 35% while playing all 35 available minutes. Her elite 75% true shooting efficiency on high volume was the decisive factor in cruising to 37 points.

Paige Bueckers Under 6.5 ASTLOSS −1.00ubet −143 → close −143 · CLV +0.0¢ · bet_clv:339632 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-20T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 B · p_hit 56.8% · unexplained · actual 8 · 34.7 min · startedBueckers exceeded the 6.5 assist line despite inefficient scoring (5-16 FG, 37% TS) because she played heavy usage minutes (35 min) and functioned as the primary ball-handler, recording 8 assists with zero turnovers. The under missed as she prioritized playmaking over scoring efficiency.

Jessica Shepard Under 14.5 PTSLOSS −1.00ubet −113 → close −114 · CLV +0.2¢ · bet_clv:339646 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-20T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 PASS · p_hit 51.0% · conversion_unlucky · actual 26 · 35.5 min · startedShepard was exceptionally efficient from the field, shooting 11-16 (69%) and 1-1 from three, nearly doubling the projection despite modest usage at 26%. She played all 36 available minutes and stayed out of foul trouble with just 2 PF, allowing her to maintain the aggressive offensive role that generated her season-high output.

Jessica Shepard Under 11.5 REBWIN +0.72ubet −138 → close −152 · CLV +2.3¢ · bet_clv:339649 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-20T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 B · p_hit 56.9% · actual 8 · 35.5 min · startedShepard's efficient 26-point night on high volume (26% usage, 11-16 FG) didn't translate to rebounding activity—she grabbed just 8 boards in 36 minutes, falling short of the 11.5 line despite the heavy workload, suggesting limited offensive rebounding opportunities and/or defensive rebounding distribution to teammates.

Jessica Shepard Under 10.5 REBWIN +0.88ubet −114 → close −141 · CLV +5.2¢ · bet_clv:339648 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-20T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 C · p_hit 52.2% · actual 8 · 35.5 min · startedShepard stayed under the 10.5 rebound line despite logging 36 minutes and taking 16 shots, as she pulled down just 8 boards—limited by the game's overall rebounding distribution and her team's offensive efficiency keeping possession chains shorter.

Jessica Shepard Under 13.5 PTSLOSS −1.00ubet −111 → close −128 · CLV +3.5¢ · bet_clv:339647 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-20T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 PASS · p_hit 51.0% · conversion_unlucky · actual 26 · 35.5 min · startedShepard nearly doubled the projection by shooting 11-16 (69%) from the field with efficient inside scoring, far exceeding the volume and accuracy needed to clear 13.5 points. Her 36 minutes and 26% usage rate provided the opportunity, but the exceptional 67% true shooting—particularly the 2-1 margin in makes despite only 8 free-throw attempts—was the decisive factor.

Odyssey Sims Under 2.5 REBWIN +0.39ubet −256 · bet_clv:339639 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-20T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 A+ · p_hit 68.4% · actual 0 · 16.3 min · bench

Jessica Shepard Under 9.5 REBWIN +1.04ubet +104 → close +104 · CLV +0.0¢ · bet_clv:342521 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-20T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 PASS · p_hit 46.5% · actual 8 · 35.5 min · startedShepard's offensive load (26 pts on 67% TS) kept her usage high but limited rebounding opportunities, and she fell one board short of the 9.5 line despite 36 minutes played. The efficient scoring game—particularly her 11-16 FG night—meant fewer second-chance situations for her to crash the glass.

Jessica Shepard Under 12.5 PTSLOSS −1.00ubet −108 · bet_clv:339645 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-20T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 PASS · p_hit 49.7% · unexplained · actual 26 · 35.5 min · startedShepard's 26 points came on exceptional efficiency, shooting 11-16 from the field (69%) and 3-8 from free throw with minimal volume needed to exceed the 12.5-point line, compounded by her 36 minutes of playing time and 26% usage rate. She more than doubled the projection through elite shot selection and conversion rather than high-volume volume, making the under an easy miss on a night she simply couldn't miss from the floor.

Odyssey Sims Under 9.5 PTSWIN +0.78ubet −128 → close −128 · CLV +0.0¢ · bet_clv:339637 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-20T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 C · p_hit 53.6% · actual 2 · 16.3 min · bench

Data fetches · 55

sds defense/team (away)ok 200 · 59 ms

sds defense/team (home)ok 200 · 60 ms

sds analytics opponent_defense (home)ok 200 · 72 ms

sds history (h2h)ok · 73 ms

sds rest/team (home)ok 200 · 75 ms

sds rest/team (away)ok 200 · 78 ms

grading picks/nightlyok 200 · 95 ms

sds schedule/team (meetings)ok · 100 ms

sds analytics opponent_defense (away)ok 200 · 115 ms

sds injuries/date/{date}ok 200 · 299 ms

sds lineups/{id}ok 200 · 303 ms

sds games/{id}ok 200 · 305 ms

sds games/{id}/boxscoreok 200 · 336 ms

grading clv/picksok 200 · 291 ms

dh lineups/{id}/deltaok 200 · 678 ms

grading verdict/boardok 200 · 921 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 77 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (rebounds)ok 200 · 94 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 175 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 192 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 253 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 255 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 257 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 275 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 298 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 330 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 333 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 339 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 397 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 400 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 439 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 441 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 465 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 466 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 470 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 472 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 476 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 492 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (pa)ok 200 · 524 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (rebounds)ok 200 · 547 ms

odds game timelinefailed · 6003 ms

odds player timeline (assists)failed · 6002 ms

odds player timeline (rebounds)failed · 6002 ms

odds player timeline (rebounds)failed · 6003 ms

odds player timeline (points)failed · 6002 ms

odds player timeline (points)failed · 6003 ms

odds player timeline (rebounds)failed · 6003 ms

odds player timeline (points)failed · 6001 ms

odds player timeline (points)failed · 6002 ms

odds player timeline (points)failed · 6004 ms

odds player timeline (points)failed · 6003 ms

odds player timeline (points)failed · 6004 ms

odds player timeline (pa)failed · 6004 ms

Classic view →

The older, longer version of this page is still available as the classic view. Nothing there is tracked in our results; this page is.