WNBA · Finalupdated 09:48 UTC

Atlanta Dream vs Los Angeles Sparks

at Los Angeles Sparks

ATL expected to win by about 11 · both teams together expected to score about 181.5 points · odds to win: ATL 1.14, LAS 6.31

Game odds from Pinnacle (the bookmaker we use as the reference), Tue 02:11 UTC

ATL 78 – LAS 71

Final · 5 of 6 picks won

7 picks checked: 5 won, 1 lost.

Getting a better price than most bookmakers offer for the same line is the only thing on this page that, measured over many past bets, made money; player rates are context, not tips.

Explore every player and prop

How to read this page

A pick is a player line, for example Under 13.5 points, that we published before the game together with the price we found for it. We do not take bets.
Odds are shown in the decimal format: 1.93 means you get back 1.93 for every 1 staked, so a higher number pays more. The American format (−108 means risk 108 to win 100; +111 means risk 100 to win 111) appears only in the Data log at the bottom of the page.
'Posted at' is the price we found when we published the pick; 'better' is a higher price for the same line at another bookmaker. Taking the better price is the one thing on this page that, measured over many past bets, made money.
'Market puts Under at 48.5%' is the chance implied by all bookmakers' prices together, with their built-in margin removed. Pinnacle is a bookmaker whose prices are widely treated as the most accurate reference, so it is the one we compare against.
A player's rate is how often that player has gone over the line this season, for example over in 41 of 78 games (52.6%), with a likely range such as 32–52%: fewer games means a wider range, and under 10 games we show no rate word at all.
'Past record stronger than the price' means the whole likely range sits above the chance the bookmakers' price implies; 'weaker' means below; 'agrees with the price' means the price sits inside the range, which is the usual case. None of these is a tip.
'Not measurable' is the usual honest answer: too few games to tell a real difference from chance.
'What could go wrong' lists the facts that can change a line: who is out, whether the starting lineup is confirmed, expected playing time (RotoWire's estimate, typically off by about 4 minutes), rest, and how many bookmakers price each line.
After the final, every pick is checked against the official stats and compared with the last price before the game started, the market's most informed price; getting a better price than that is the fairest test of a pick, whether or not it won. A tie means the player landed exactly on the line and the stake is returned; lines ending in .5 cannot tie.
Results are given for every 1 staked: 'would have returned +0.93' means a stake of 1 would have come back with 0.93 in profit. We do not stake anything; the record is what a stake of 1 on each pick would have done. Our record counts a smaller stake when the price advantage was small.
S beside a name marks an expected starter. Times are shown in your device's time zone; our data is recorded in US Eastern Time (ET). Team codes are the league's three-letter abbreviations.
'Your prediction' lets you pick Over or Under on any line before the game starts; we check your predictions the same way and keep your record, and one game of results proves nothing.
Team codes on this page: ATL = Atlanta Dream, LAS = Los Angeles Sparks.

Picks and prices

Odds of at least 1.70 only · highest odds first · results checked

A line is the number a bookmaker sets, e.g. 13.5 points; Over means more than it, Under fewer. Odds 1.93 pay 1.93 for every 1 staked. 'Posted at' is the price we found when we published the pick; after the game it is compared with the last price before the start.

E. Wheeler · Over 8.5 pointsLostPosted at 2.04 · last price before start 1.95Lost −1.00 per 1 staked

Posted at 2.04 · Our price was 2.2% higher than the last price before the start (good: a higher price pays more per 1 staked).

Pinnacle 1.95, 474 min ago

First offered at 2.02 by Pinnacle (Mon 05:37 UTC); latest 1.95 at Pinnacle (Mon 18:19 UTC). The 8.5 line itself has not moved.

Re-checked 1 h before the start not re-checked

This published pick uses a model-sized stake of 0.00 units. The public Results/Ledger CORE benchmark grades each eligible priced signal at a flat 1 unit and can cover more signals than this game card.

Investigate this prop →

M. Akoa Makani · Under 5.5 pointsWonPosted at 1.92 · last price before start 1.92Won +0.92 per 1 staked

A. Gray · Over 2.5 assistsWonPosted at 1.88 · last price before start 1.78Won +0.88 per 1 staked

D. Hamby · Over 12.5 pointsWonPosted at 1.85 · last price before start 1.85Won +0.85 per 1 staked

C. Brink · Over 1.5 assistsWonPosted at 1.80 · last price before start 1.80Won +0.80 per 1 staked

R. Burrell · Over 2.5 assistsWithdrawn: outPosted at 1.78 · last price before start 2.10Refunded +0.00 per 1 staked

C. Brink · Over 7.5 pointsWonPosted at 1.76 · last price before start 1.76Won +0.76 per 1 staked

Why the better price matters

In our past tests, simply taking the highest price offered for a line earned more than any of our own forecasts did.

In that test (25 Aug 2026), taking the best price returned about 2.8 more for every 100 staked than the price we posted did.

The players

12 players checked · 9 whose past record points the other way from the bookmakers' price · 1 out · 0 with too few games · 1 not checked

Rate: the share of this season's games in which the player finished above tonight's line. S beside a name marks an expected starter.

Against this opponent, 1 of 12 players has performed clearly differently and 3 show a slight hint

Context only A player's rate describes the past; it is not a tip and has not been tested as one. Expected minutes come from RotoWire, a lineup news service.

Sign in to see each player's rate The numbers below (for example 15.5 points) are the lines the bookmakers actually posted.

Atlanta Dreamplaying LAS

SAngel Reese · 34 min expected

points 17.5 → 11 actual

SRhyne Howard · 34 min expected

points 19.5 → 18 actual

SAllisha Gray · 33 min expected

assists 2.5 → 6 actual

SJordin Canada · 30 min expected

points 11.5 → 9 actual

SNaz Hillmon · 30 min expected

points 8.5 → 12 actual

Isobel Borlase · 15 min expected

points 4.5 → 6 actual

Madina Okot · 15 min expected

points 6.5 → 2 actual

1 player has no line from any bookmaker: Paopao (9 expected minutes)

Los Angeles Sparksplaying ATL

SNneka Ogwumike · 30 min expected

points 14.5 → 27 actual

SDearica Hamby · 28 min expected

points 12.5 → 15 actual

SErica Wheeler · 28 min expected

points 8.5 → 2 actual

SAriel Atkins · 26 min expected

points 6.5 → 10 actual

SMonique Akoa Makani · 20 min expected

points 5.5 → 2 actual

Cameron Brink · 15 min expected

points 7.5 → 15 actual

Rae Burrell · Out · illness

points 15.5 → did not play, so no result

6 players have no line from any bookmaker: Morgan (14 expected minutes) · Gray (12 min) · +4 more

What could go wrong

updated 09:48 UTC

Who is out

Cannon · earlier listed as may not play, now available (changed Wed 23:30 UTC) · 13, 13 and 12 min in the last 3 games

Burrell · earlier listed as out, now available (changed Fri 00:00 UTC) · 34, 29 and 25 min in the last 3 games

Makani · new starter

Out Nye · earlier listed as unlikely to play (changed Sun 22:00 UTC) · 14, 12 and 0 min in the last 3 games

Nivar · earlier listed as out, now available (changed Sat 21:00 UTC) · 1, 1 and 5 min in the last 3 games

Sherrod · earlier listed as out, now available (changed Fri 00:00 UTC) · 3, 8 and 18 min in the last 3 games

Walker-Kimbrough · did not play last game

Kone · did not play last game

Out Jones · left leg · ATL

Lineups

Starting lineup confirmed (Tue 02:00 UTC) · RotoWire, a lineup news service, as of game start

Playing time

4 players are expected to play at least 5 minutes more or fewer than in the last 5 games. For 4 players (Okot, Borlase, Park, Martin) we have no real minutes estimate, only a default.

Reese: expected to play 34 minutes, averaged 27.4 in the last 5 games, about 6.6 more than usual

Hillmon: expected to play 30 minutes, averaged 24.6 in the last 5 games, about 5.4 more than usual

Wheeler: expected to play 28 minutes, averaged 17.9 in the last 5 games, about 10.1 more than usual

Brink: expected to play 15 minutes, averaged 23.3 in the last 5 games, about 8.3 fewer than usual

Our check: these minute estimates (RotoWire) are typically off by about 4 minutes.

Rest

ATL also played the day before this game · LAS had 7 days off before this game.

Bookmakers

The reference bookmaker, Pinnacle, offers 15 of the 212 lines; the rest rely on other bookmakers.

One team is expected to win by 10 or more. In past games like this, players went over their lines 65.9% of the time; this does not mean the opposite is a good bet.

Looking back

Flagged before the game: Cannon out (Wed 23:30 UTC) · did not play

Flagged before the game: Burrell out (Fri 00:00 UTC) · did not play

Makani new starter · started, 19.1 min

Flagged before the game: Nye out (Sun 22:00 UTC) · did not play

Flagged before the game: Jones out · did not play

Flagged before the game: Nivar out (Sat 21:00 UTC) · did not play

Flagged before the game: Sherrod out (Fri 00:00 UTC) · did not play

Flagged before the game: Walker-Kimbrough out · did not play

Flagged before the game: Kone out · did not play

3 expected players did not play

When a player is out, that player's lines are removed: in our past results this helped. Guessing which teammates benefit was also tested and lost money, so nothing else on this page is adjusted for it.

What happened

In 6 of 9 cases where a player's past record disagreed with the bookmakers' price, the past record was right in this game. One game proves nothing.

Final · 5 of 7 picks won5 won, 1 lost · +3.21 if you had staked 1 on each · our prices on average 0.5% lower than the last before the start · 15 lines checked, 8 scored but not picked · checked Thu 02:52 UTC

Allisha Gray · assists 2.5 → 6 · 3.5 above the line · played 32.5 min (33 expected)

Pick: Over 2.5 at 1.88 → Won +0.88 per 1 staked

Cameron Brink · points 7.5 → 15 · 7.5 above the line · played 24.8 min (15 expected)

Pick: Over 7.5 at 1.76 → Won +0.76 per 1 staked

Erica Wheeler · points 8.5 → 2 · 6.5 below the line · played 25.1 min (28 expected)

Pick: Over 8.5 at 2.04 → Lost −1.00 per 1 staked · our note: the shots did not fall

Monique Akoa Makani · points 5.5 → 2 · 3.5 below the line · played 19.1 min (20 expected)

Pick: Under 5.5 at 1.92 → Won +0.92 per 1 staked

Dearica Hamby · points 12.5 → 15 · 2.5 above the line · played 26.1 min (28 expected)

Pick: Over 12.5 at 1.85 → Won +0.85 per 1 staked

9 other players with a posted line

Nneka Ogwumike · points 14.5 → 27 · 12.5 above the line · played 29.1 min (30 expected) · Pinnacle odds: Over 1.98, Under 1.78

Madina Okot · points 6.5 → 2 · 4.5 below the line · played 8.1 min (15 expected) · no final price

Ariel Atkins · points 6.5 → 10 · 3.5 above the line · played 32.9 min (26 expected) · BetOnline.ag odds: Over 1.88, Under 1.88

Naz Hillmon · points 8.5 → 12 · 3.5 above the line · played 33.6 min (30 expected) · Pinnacle odds: Over 1.80, Under 1.94

Angel Reese · points 17.5 → 11 · 6.5 below the line · played 38.3 min (34 expected) · Pinnacle odds: Over 1.78, Under 1.96

Isobel Borlase · points 4.5 → 6 · 1.5 above the line · played 16.3 min (15 expected) · Caesars odds: Over 1.82, Under 1.92

Jordin Canada · points 11.5 → 9 · 2.5 below the line · played 35 min (30 expected) · Pinnacle odds: Over 1.86, Under 1.88

Rhyne Howard · points 19.5 → 18 · 1.5 below the line · played 31.2 min (34 expected) · Pinnacle odds: Over 1.95, Under 1.79

Rae Burrell · points 15.5 → did not play, so no result · no final price

Each prediction is recorded as if you had staked 1 at the line you saw, and your record is shown here. One game tells you nothing yet.

More context

Head to head

LAS vs ATL · last 16 games · ATL leads · LAS record 3–13 · average score 80.4–89.8 · LAS has lost by 9.4 on average

Team results are background only; they say nothing about any single player's line.

24 Aug · ATL 78 at LAS 71LAS lost

20 Aug · ATL 124 at LAS 88LAS lost

13 Jul · LAS 92 at ATL 101LAS lost

5 Sep · LAS 85 at ATL 104LAS lost

3 Sep · LAS 75 at ATL 86LAS lost

What each defense gives up per game

ATL gives up84.1 points · 31.6 rebounds · 18.9 assists · 8.0 three-pointers scored against them · opponents make 46.6% of shots · 34.7% from three-point range · 15.6 opponent turnovers

LAS gives up91.3 points · 35.5 rebounds · 22.2 assists · 8.9 three-pointers scored against them · opponents make 47.2% of shots · 33.6% from three-point range · 13.9 opponent turnovers

Defense by position

How much this is worth

Defense-by-position numbers are mostly random from season to season; shown for context only. We tested it: a team's defense-by-position numbers from one half of the season do not predict the other half, so treat them as noise.

ATL gives up 84.1 points a game · 4th of 15 · league average 87.2−3.1 vs average

LAS gives up 91.3 points a game · 14th of 15 · league average 87.2+4.1 vs average

How the game odds moved

Pinnacle first had ATL expected to win by 9, expected total 183 (Mon 00:58 UTC) and later ATL expected to win by 11, expected total 181.5 (Tue 02:11 UTC).

The odds at the top of the page are the latest we have, from every bookmaker on file; this is one bookmaker's own history.

Data log (technical)

Technical detail for auditing; the plain version is above. Internal ids and formula names print here only.

Line-shopping measurement: project_conditional_minutes_refuted

Defense-by-position measurement: split-half reliability r = -0.033 across 12 cells (7 of 12 negative) against a shuffle null of 0.000; a placebo using the wrong position family reproduced the effect to within 0.12pp · project_dvp_blowout_gate_refuted · 2026-08-26

Our picks, raw · 8

Erica Wheeler · O 8.5 points+104value_edge_pct −1.56 · kelly 0.00u · price_check unchecked · rank 2

Monique Akoa Makani · U 5.5 points−109value_edge_pct −1.69 · kelly 0.00u · price_check unchecked · rank 3

Allisha Gray · O 2.5 assists−114value_edge_pct −2.04 · kelly 0.00u · price_check unchecked · rank 4

Erica Wheeler · O 7.5 points−117value_edge_pct −2.14 · kelly 0.00u · price_check unchecked · rank 5

Rae Burrell · O 2.5 assists−128value_edge_pct −2.94 · kelly 0.00u · price_check unchecked · rank 6

Cameron Brink · O 1.5 assists−125value_edge_pct −4.77 · kelly 0.00u · price_check unchecked · rank 14

Cameron Brink · O 7.5 points−131value_edge_pct −4.83 · kelly 0.00u · price_check unchecked · rank 15

Dearica Hamby · O 12.5 points−117value_edge_pct −4.94 · kelly 0.00u · price_check unchecked · rank 16

Checked results, raw (basketball-stats shorthand) · 15

Erica Wheeler Over 3.5 ASTLOSS −1.00ubet −161 → close −155 · CLV −0.9¢ · bet_clv:402212 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-24T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 B · p_hit 58.8% · bad_price · actual 3 · 25.1 min · startedWheeler came up one assist short despite playing 25 minutes, finishing with just 3 dimes as her offensive inefficiency (1-6 FG, 15% usage) limited her ability to generate ball movement and create scoring opportunities off the bench.

Monique Akoa Makani Under 5.5 PTSWIN +0.92ubet −109 → close −109 · CLV +0.0¢ · bet_clv:405565 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-24T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 PASS · p_hit 51.3% · actual 2 · 19.1 min · benchMakani's scoreless night from the field (0-6 FG, 0-3 3PT) despite 19 minutes and decent usage (22%) made the under an easy hit, as her 14% true shooting was well below the scoring efficiency needed to reach 5.5 points.

Rae Burrell Over 1.5 REBVOID +0.00ubet −167 → close −155 · CLV −1.8¢ · bet_clv:402214 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-24T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 A · p_hit 60.0% · actual 0Burrell did not play (DNP), so the bet voided per sportsbook rules rather than losing on the court.

Nneka Ogwumike Over 6.5 REBWIN +0.68ubet −147 → close −149 · CLV +0.3¢ · bet_clv:402207 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-24T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 B · p_hit 56.7% · actual 16 · 29.1 min · startedOgwumike dominated the glass with 16 rebounds in 29 minutes, nearly tripling the 6.5 line, fueled by her team-high 40% usage rate and relentless interior presence on both ends. Her elite efficiency (11-19 FG, 64% TS%) kept her on the floor and in position for offensive boards throughout the game.

Erica Wheeler Over 8.5 PTSLOSS −1.00ubet +104 → close −105 · CLV +2.2¢ · bet_clv:402211 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-24T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 PASS · p_hit 48.3% · conversion_unlucky · actual 2 · 25.1 min · startedWheeler's ice-cold 1-6 shooting (17% TS) left her well short despite 25 minutes of run, as she managed just 2 points on 15% usage in a game where she couldn't find her rhythm from the field.

Dearica Hamby Over 1.5 ASTWIN +0.54ubet −186 → close −182 · CLV −0.5¢ · bet_clv:402209 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-24T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 A · p_hit 62.6% · actual 3 · 26.1 min · startedHamby exceeded the 1.5 assist line with 3 dimes despite modest 26 minutes and 23% usage, as her efficient ball-handling and high-volume touches in the paint created natural kick-out opportunities for open shooters.

Dearica Hamby Over 12.5 PTSWIN +0.85ubet −117 → close −117 · CLV +0.0¢ · bet_clv:402208 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-24T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 PASS · p_hit 51.3% · actual 15 · 26.1 min · startedHamby's efficient 6-11 shooting (55% FG) paired with 26 minutes of run time easily cleared the 12.5-point bar, finishing at 15 points despite a quiet 23% usage rate. Her interior scoring and free-throw reliability (3-4 FT) provided steady offensive output that didn't require high volume.

Rae Burrell Over 2.5 ASTVOID +0.00ubet −128 → close +110 · CLV −8.5¢ · bet_clv:402213 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-24T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 C · p_hit 54.5% · actual 0Burrell did not play (DNP), resulting in a void rather than a loss on the OVER 2.5 assists bet.

Erica Wheeler Over 7.5 PTSLOSS −1.00ubet −117 → close −117 · CLV +0.0¢ · bet_clv:404080 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-24T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 C · p_hit 52.8% · unexplained · actual 2 · 25.1 min · startedWheeler's abysmal 1-6 shooting (17% TS%) left her with just 2 points despite playing 25 minutes, as she couldn't convert opportunities in an efficient offensive system. The combination of poor shot selection and execution—missing all six attempts—made the 7.5-point line unreachable.

Jordin Canada Under 8.5 ASTWIN +0.69ubet −145 → close −145 · CLV +0.0¢ · bet_clv:402210 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-24T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 B · p_hit 56.3% · actual 4 · 35.0 min · startedCanada's playmaking was severely limited by her own offensive struggles—shooting just 4-for-9 with low usage (14%) forced her into a secondary role rather than a floor-running distribution engine, resulting in only 4 assists despite 35 minutes. The under cashed as she failed to generate enough scoring threat to create easy opportunities for teammates.

Isobel Borlase Under 5.5 PTSLOSS −1.00ubet −159 · bet_clv:402219 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-24T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 B · p_hit 58.6% · unexplained · actual 6 · 16.3 min · benchBorlase's 2-of-8 shooting (25% FG) left little margin for error on the 5.5-point line, and she converted both free throws to reach 6 points despite the poor offensive efficiency. The 16 minutes of playing time gave her enough volume to narrowly exceed the under threshold despite a putrid 34% true shooting night.

Cameron Brink Over 4.5 REBWIN +0.70ubet −143 → close −143 · CLV +0.0¢ · bet_clv:402217 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-24T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 B · p_hit 55.6% · actual 8 · 24.8 min · startedBrink dominated the glass with 8 rebounds in 25 minutes, nearly doubling the 4.5 line despite playing limited time, fueled by her elite shot-blocking (5 blocks) and activity on both ends. Her 25% usage rate and foul trouble (5 PF) limited her offensive touches, but she made up the difference on the boards where she was the most active player available.

Allisha Gray Over 2.5 ASTWIN +0.88ubet −114 → close −128 · CLV +2.9¢ · bet_clv:402218 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-24T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 C · p_hit 52.2% · actual 6 · 32.5 min · startedGray's 6 assists easily cleared the 2.5 line as she ran the offense efficiently in 32 minutes, with strong ball-movement reflected in her 76% true shooting and team-leading +20 rating.

Cameron Brink Over 7.5 PTSWIN +0.76ubet −131 → close −131 · CLV +0.0¢ · bet_clv:402216 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-24T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 C · p_hit 54.0% · actual 15 · 24.8 min · started

Cameron Brink Over 1.5 ASTWIN +0.80ubet −125 → close −125 · CLV +0.0¢ · bet_clv:402215 · priced_lineedges · captured 2026-08-24T00:00:00Z · grade_v2 C · p_hit 52.9% · actual 2 · 24.8 min · started

Data fetches · 55

sds defense/team (away)ok 200 · 39 ms

sds rest/team (away)ok 200 · 41 ms

sds rest/team (home)ok 200 · 42 ms

sds schedule/team (meetings)ok · 49 ms

sds defense/team (home)ok 200 · 50 ms

sds analytics opponent_defense (home)ok 200 · 50 ms

sds analytics opponent_defense (away)ok 200 · 52 ms

sds games/{id}ok 200 · 96 ms

sds games/{id}/boxscoreok 200 · 167 ms

sds history (h2h)ok · 168 ms

sds lineups/{id}ok 200 · 177 ms

grading picks/nightlyok 200 · 181 ms

sds injuries/date/{date}ok 200 · 194 ms

grading clv/picksok 200 · 133 ms

dh lineups/{id}/deltaok 200 · 456 ms

grading verdict/boardok 200 · 571 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 43 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 77 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 79 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 554 ms

odds player timeline (assists)ok 200 · 554 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 195 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 196 ms

odds player timeline (assists)ok 200 · 588 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 215 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 217 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 236 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 238 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 239 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 242 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 664 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (assists)ok 200 · 277 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 281 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 282 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 284 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 285 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 287 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 293 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 294 ms

sds analytics player_vs_teamok 200 · 295 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 297 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 298 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 696 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 309 ms

sds analytics player_vs_line (points)ok 200 · 312 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 710 ms

odds player timeline (assists)ok 200 · 722 ms

odds game timelineok 200 · 918 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 620 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 903 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 904 ms

odds player timeline (points)ok 200 · 906 ms

Classic view →

The older, longer version of this page is still available as the classic view. Nothing there is tracked in our results; this page is.