DIME
WNBANBAEuroLeagueEuro
Get the picksJoin
points estimatesat home

Napheesa Collier against the Connecticut Sun

Averaged 22.2 points, 8.3 rebounds and 2.6 assists in 18 games against the Connecticut Sun.

01

Every stat, vs baseline

hover a row for the gap against its noise
STAT
VS SUN
FORM
DIFF
← below baseline · above →
VERDICT
points
22.2
20.9
+1.2
gap is 0.6× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 3.9
NOT MEASURABLE
rebounds
8.3
8.6
−0.3
gap is 0.5× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.5
NOT MEASURABLE
assists
2.6
2.9
−0.3
gap is 0.8× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.7
NOT MEASURABLE
threes
0.9
0.9
0.0
gap is 0.2× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.5
NOT MEASURABLE
steals
1.7
1.7
0.0
gap is 0.0× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.6
NOT MEASURABLE
blocks
1.7
1.4
+0.3
gap is 0.9× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.6
NOT MEASURABLE
turnovers
2.1
2.2
−0.1
gap is 0.5× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.6
NOT MEASURABLE
pts+reb+ast
33.1
32.5
+0.6
gap is 0.3× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 4.4
NOT MEASURABLE
pts+reb
30.4
29.6
+0.9
gap is 0.4× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 4.1
NOT MEASURABLE
pts+ast
24.8
23.9
+0.9
gap is 0.4× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 4.1
NOT MEASURABLE
reb+ast
10.9
11.5
−0.7
gap is 0.7× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.9
NOT MEASURABLE
steals+blocks
3.4
3.1
+0.3
gap is 0.7× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.8
NOT MEASURABLE
field goals made
8.6
7.8
+0.8
gap is 1.1× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.4
DIRECTIONAL
field goal attempts
16.2
15.7
+0.5
gap is 0.5× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 2.0
NOT MEASURABLE
three-point attempts
2.8
2.7
+0.2
gap is 0.4× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.8
NOT MEASURABLE
free throws made
4.1
4.5
−0.4
gap is 0.6× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.4
NOT MEASURABLE
free throw attempts
4.8
5.2
−0.4
gap is 0.5× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.7
NOT MEASURABLE
offensive rebounds
2.1
2.0
+0.1
gap is 0.3× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.9
NOT MEASURABLE
defensive rebounds
6.2
6.6
−0.5
gap is 0.9× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.1
NOT MEASURABLE
fouls
2.4
2.5
−0.1
gap is 0.4× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.6
NOT MEASURABLE
usage 27.1 vs 26.5true shooting 59.3 vs 57.5minutes 35.0 vs 34.7

Baseline: form going into each game (the average of the previous 10), measured on 126 other games since 2022-08-12.

02

The 18 games

points · her form 20.9 · hover a bar
2022-08-14— 5-game mean2026-09-20 · newest
03

Why — minutes or rate

no difference in this split is larger than the sample can resolve, so there is nothing to explain

04

The matchup

Nothing in this split cleared the noise, so there is no difference to attribute to the opponent. The defensive profile is only worth reading beside a finding.

05

Game log

all 18 · 8 playoff games, marked · click a row for the box score
DATE
OPP
H/A
MIN
POINTS
REB · AST · FG
VS 20.9
2026-09-20
CON
AWAY
34.0MIN
23POINTS
6 · 1 · 9-16
ABOVE
FG
9-16
3PT
0-2
FT
5-5
OREB/DREB
0/6
TS%
63.2
USG%
23.8
STL
2
BLK
0
TOV
1
PF
1
+/−
+10
PRA
30
2025-08-30
CON
AWAY
27.4MIN
17POINTS
9 · 3 · 7-13
BELOW
FG
7-13
3PT
1-2
FT
2-2
OREB/DREB
4/5
TS%
61.2
USG%
25.3
STL
2
BLK
3
TOV
0
PF
3
+/−
+19
PRA
29
2025-06-29
CON
HOME
26.7MIN
23POINTS
9 · 2 · 9-14
ABOVE
FG
9-14
3PT
1-4
FT
4-4
OREB/DREB
3/6
TS%
73.0
USG%
29.7
STL
2
BLK
1
TOV
3
PF
3
+/−
+32
PRA
34
2025-05-23
CON
HOME
38.0MIN
33POINTS
11 · 3 · 11-21
ABOVE
FG
11-21
3PT
3-4
FT
8-10
OREB/DREB
4/7
TS%
65.0
USG%
31.9
STL
3
BLK
3
TOV
2
PF
2
+/−
+8
PRA
47
2024-10-08PLAYOFF R2 G5
CON
HOME
36.9MIN
27POINTS
11 · 4 · 10-16
ABOVE
FG
10-16
3PT
1-2
FT
6-8
OREB/DREB
5/6
TS%
69.2
USG%
26.6
STL
1
BLK
4
TOV
2
PF
3
+/−
+12
PRA
42
2024-10-06PLAYOFF R2 G4
CON
AWAY
37.3MIN
29POINTS
13 · 3 · 9-15
ABOVE
FG
9-15
3PT
2-3
FT
9-10
OREB/DREB
1/12
TS%
74.7
USG%
29.7
STL
1
BLK
1
TOV
3
PF
5
+/−
-8
PRA
45
2024-10-04PLAYOFF R2 G3
CON
AWAY
33.0MIN
26POINTS
11 · 3 · 11-19
ABOVE
FG
11-19
3PT
0-1
FT
4-5
OREB/DREB
2/9
TS%
61.3
USG%
33.9
STL
2
BLK
1
TOV
1
PF
2
+/−
+11
PRA
40
2024-10-01PLAYOFF R2 G2
CON
HOME
40.0MIN
9POINTS
12 · 5 · 3-14
BELOW
FG
3-14
3PT
1-4
FT
2-2
OREB/DREB
5/7
TS%
30.2
USG%
19.1
STL
1
BLK
4
TOV
1
PF
1
+/−
+7
PRA
26
2024-09-29PLAYOFF R2 G1
CON
HOME
37.2MIN
19POINTS
9 · 4 · 7-16
BELOW
FG
7-16
3PT
0-2
FT
5-5
OREB/DREB
3/6
TS%
52.2
USG%
29.2
STL
2
BLK
1
TOV
4
PF
2
+/−
-8
PRA
32
2024-09-17
CON
AWAY
39.0MIN
25POINTS
6 · 2 · 11-16
ABOVE
FG
11-16
3PT
1-3
FT
2-2
OREB/DREB
1/5
TS%
74.1
USG%
24.7
STL
2
BLK
4
TOV
3
PF
2
+/−
+2
PRA
33
2024-07-04
CON
HOME
24.6MIN
9POINTS
6 · 1 · 4-9
BELOW
FG
4-9
3PT
1-2
FT
0-0
OREB/DREB
1/5
TS%
50.0
USG%
19.4
STL
2
BLK
2
TOV
1
PF
1
+/−
+1
PRA
16
2024-05-23
CON
AWAY
43.8MIN
31POINTS
11 · 4 · 13-23
ABOVE
FG
13-23
3PT
0-3
FT
5-9
OREB/DREB
2/9
TS%
57.5
USG%
33.9
STL
4
BLK
2
TOV
4
PF
3
+/−
+2
PRA
46
2023-09-20PLAYOFF R1 G3
CON
HOME
37.3MIN
31POINTS
5 · 2 · 11-19
ABOVE
FG
11-19
3PT
2-3
FT
7-8
OREB/DREB
0/5
TS%
68.8
USG%
34.9
STL
0
BLK
1
TOV
3
PF
3
+/−
-21
PRA
38
2023-09-17PLAYOFF R1 G2
CON
AWAY
38.0MIN
26POINTS
13 · 2 · 12-24
ABOVE
FG
12-24
3PT
0-3
FT
2-3
OREB/DREB
4/9
TS%
51.3
USG%
35.8
STL
2
BLK
1
TOV
2
PF
3
+/−
+11
PRA
41
2023-09-13PLAYOFF R1 G1
CON
AWAY
32.9MIN
14POINTS
6 · 1 · 5-12
BELOW
FG
5-12
3PT
0-0
FT
4-4
OREB/DREB
0/6
TS%
50.9
USG%
22.3
STL
0
BLK
2
TOV
2
PF
2
+/−
-30
PRA
21
2023-06-22
CON
HOME
34.1MIN
21POINTS
7 · 2 · 9-20
ABOVE
FG
9-20
3PT
1-5
FT
2-2
OREB/DREB
2/5
TS%
50.3
USG%
28.8
STL
4
BLK
0
TOV
2
PF
1
+/−
-22
PRA
30
2023-06-01
CON
HOME
40.0MIN
30POINTS
2 · 4 · 10-18
ABOVE
FG
10-18
3PT
3-6
FT
7-7
OREB/DREB
1/1
TS%
71.2
USG%
28.2
STL
0
BLK
1
TOV
3
PF
4
+/−
-5
PRA
36
2022-08-14
CON
AWAY
28.9MIN
6POINTS
2 · 1 · 3-7
BELOW
FG
3-7
3PT
0-2
FT
0-0
OREB/DREB
0/2
TS%
42.9
USG%
11.2
STL
0
BLK
0
TOV
0
PF
2
+/−
-6
PRA
9
every game on file — nothing hidden