DIME
WNBANBAEuroLeagueEuro
Get the picksJoin
points estimatesat home

Napheesa Collier against the Phoenix Mercury

Averaged 19.0 points, 8.9 rebounds and 3.1 assists in 18 games against the Phoenix Mercury.

01

Every stat, vs baseline

hover a row for the gap against its noise
STAT
VS MERCURY
FORM
DIFF
← below baseline · above →
VERDICT
points
19.0
20.9
−1.9
gap is 0.8× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 5.0
NOT MEASURABLE
rebounds
8.9
8.0
+0.9
gap is 1.3× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.4
DIRECTIONAL
assists
3.1
2.5
+0.6
gap is 1.3× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.9
DIRECTIONAL
threes
1.0
1.2
−0.2
gap is 0.5× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.6
NOT MEASURABLE
steals
1.1
1.5
−0.4
gap is 1.2× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.7
DIRECTIONAL
blocks
1.2
1.2
0.0
gap is 0.1× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.5
NOT MEASURABLE
turnovers
2.1
2.0
+0.1
gap is 0.3× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.7
NOT MEASURABLE
pts+reb+ast
31.0
31.4
−0.4
gap is 0.2× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 5.1
NOT MEASURABLE
pts+reb
27.9
28.9
−1.0
gap is 0.4× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 4.8
NOT MEASURABLE
pts+ast
22.1
23.4
−1.3
gap is 0.5× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 5.2
NOT MEASURABLE
reb+ast
12.0
10.5
+1.5
gap is 1.6× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.9
DIRECTIONAL
steals+blocks
2.3
2.7
−0.5
gap is 1.0× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.9
NOT MEASURABLE
field goals made
7.4
7.8
−0.3
gap is 0.5× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.5
NOT MEASURABLE
field goal attempts
15.1
15.5
−0.4
gap is 0.4× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.9
NOT MEASURABLE
three-point attempts
2.8
3.2
−0.4
gap is 0.9× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.9
NOT MEASURABLE
free throws made
3.1
4.2
−1.1
gap is 1.0× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 2.0
DIRECTIONAL
free throw attempts
3.7
5.0
−1.2
gap is 1.1× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 2.2
DIRECTIONAL
offensive rebounds
1.9
2.0
0.0
gap is 0.0× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.8
NOT MEASURABLE
defensive rebounds
6.9
6.0
+0.9
gap is 1.5× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 1.2
DIRECTIONAL
fouls
2.1
2.8
−0.7
gap is 1.5× its noise · smallest gap this sample can see: 0.9
DIRECTIONAL
usage 24.8 vs 27.3true shooting 55.8 vs 60.4minutes 33.8 vs 33.1

Baseline: form going into each game (the average of the previous 10), measured on 128 other games since 2022-08-12.

02

The 18 games

points · her form 20.9 · hover a bar
2021-06-30— 5-game mean2025-09-26 · newest
03

Why — minutes or rate

no difference in this split is larger than the sample can resolve, so there is nothing to explain

04

The matchup

Nothing in this split cleared the noise, so there is no difference to attribute to the opponent. The defensive profile is only worth reading beside a finding.

05

Game log

all 18 · 5 playoff games, marked · click a row for the box score
DATE
OPP
H/A
MIN
POINTS
REB · AST · FG
VS 20.9
2025-09-26PLAYOFF R2 G3
PHO
AWAY
36.9MIN
17POINTS
6 · 3 · 8-15
BELOW
FG
8-15
3PT
1-3
FT
0-0
OREB/DREB
2/4
TS%
56.7
USG%
23.7
STL
0
BLK
3
TOV
4
PF
5
+/−
-10
PRA
26
2025-09-23PLAYOFF R2 G2
PHO
HOME
38.0MIN
24POINTS
6 · 1 · 10-22
ABOVE
FG
10-22
3PT
2-8
FT
2-2
OREB/DREB
0/6
TS%
52.4
USG%
29.5
STL
3
BLK
2
TOV
1
PF
3
+/−
-11
PRA
31
2025-09-21PLAYOFF R2 G1
PHO
HOME
34.4MIN
18POINTS
9 · 2 · 8-16
BELOW
FG
8-16
3PT
2-6
FT
0-0
OREB/DREB
3/6
TS%
56.3
USG%
24.1
STL
0
BLK
0
TOV
3
PF
1
+/−
+9
PRA
29
2025-07-16
PHO
HOME
26.0MIN
10POINTS
5 · 0 · 4-9
BELOW
FG
4-9
3PT
1-1
FT
1-2
OREB/DREB
0/5
TS%
50.6
USG%
17.4
STL
3
BLK
1
TOV
0
PF
3
+/−
+16
PRA
15
2025-07-09
PHO
AWAY
36.1MIN
18POINTS
7 · 2 · 8-15
BELOW
FG
8-15
3PT
0-3
FT
2-2
OREB/DREB
2/5
TS%
56.7
USG%
22.5
STL
1
BLK
2
TOV
2
PF
0
+/−
-6
PRA
27
2025-06-03
PHO
HOME
31.1MIN
18POINTS
11 · 5 · 8-13
BELOW
FG
8-13
3PT
0-2
FT
2-3
OREB/DREB
2/9
TS%
62.8
USG%
27.8
STL
1
BLK
0
TOV
4
PF
2
+/−
+24
PRA
34
2024-09-25PLAYOFF R1 G2
PHO
HOME
38.1MIN
42POINTS
5 · 4 · 14-20
ABOVE
FG
14-20
3PT
2-3
FT
12-14
OREB/DREB
0/5
TS%
80.3
USG%
34.4
STL
1
BLK
2
TOV
2
PF
2
+/−
+17
PRA
51
2024-09-22PLAYOFF R1 G1
PHO
HOME
39.8MIN
38POINTS
6 · 4 · 11-19
ABOVE
FG
11-19
3PT
3-5
FT
13-14
OREB/DREB
3/3
TS%
75.5
USG%
30.3
STL
0
BLK
1
TOV
2
PF
1
+/−
+9
PRA
48
2024-08-28
PHO
AWAY
32.5MIN
12POINTS
8 · 5 · 5-13
BELOW
FG
5-13
3PT
1-2
FT
1-1
OREB/DREB
3/5
TS%
44.6
USG%
20.4
STL
0
BLK
1
TOV
2
PF
4
+/−
+15
PRA
25
2024-06-22
PHO
HOME
36.9MIN
23POINTS
14 · 2 · 9-16
ABOVE
FG
9-16
3PT
2-2
FT
3-4
OREB/DREB
2/12
TS%
64.8
USG%
27.8
STL
0
BLK
1
TOV
4
PF
1
+/−
+17
PRA
39
2024-06-07
PHO
AWAY
40.0MIN
20POINTS
12 · 6 · 7-19
BELOW
FG
7-19
3PT
2-2
FT
4-4
OREB/DREB
2/10
TS%
48.2
USG%
26.4
STL
1
BLK
1
TOV
3
PF
1
+/−
-1
PRA
38
2024-05-31
PHO
HOME
26.1MIN
14POINTS
11 · 2 · 6-12
BELOW
FG
6-12
3PT
0-2
FT
2-2
OREB/DREB
2/9
TS%
54.3
USG%
25.2
STL
1
BLK
1
TOV
1
PF
2
+/−
+12
PRA
27
2023-09-03
PHO
HOME
35.8MIN
22POINTS
16 · 5 · 8-16
ABOVE
FG
8-16
3PT
0-0
FT
6-7
OREB/DREB
6/10
TS%
57.7
USG%
26.3
STL
1
BLK
3
TOV
3
PF
4
+/−
+18
PRA
43
2023-07-07
PHO
HOME
30.0MIN
12POINTS
12 · 5 · 6-18
BELOW
FG
6-18
3PT
0-2
FT
0-2
OREB/DREB
1/11
TS%
31.8
USG%
29.1
STL
3
BLK
1
TOV
0
PF
0
+/−
+14
PRA
29
2023-07-01
PHO
AWAY
37.1MIN
16POINTS
9 · 3 · 7-16
BELOW
FG
7-16
3PT
0-4
FT
2-2
OREB/DREB
2/7
TS%
47.4
USG%
25.1
STL
2
BLK
0
TOV
4
PF
1
+/−
+5
PRA
28
2023-05-25
PHO
AWAY
29.4MIN
8POINTS
7 · 4 · 3-9
BELOW
FG
3-9
3PT
0-2
FT
2-2
OREB/DREB
2/5
TS%
40.5
USG%
17.6
STL
2
BLK
1
TOV
2
PF
1
+/−
+1
PRA
19
2022-08-10
PHO
AWAY
21.1MIN
11POINTS
5 · 1 · 4-6
BELOW
FG
4-6
3PT
1-1
FT
2-4
OREB/DREB
1/4
TS%
70.9
USG%
16.8
STL
0
BLK
0
TOV
0
PF
3
+/−
-11
PRA
17
2021-06-30
PHO
AWAY
40.0MIN
19POINTS
11 · 2 · 8-17
BELOW
FG
8-17
3PT
1-2
FT
2-2
OREB/DREB
2/9
TS%
53.1
USG%
21.7
STL
1
BLK
1
TOV
1
PF
4
+/−
+6
PRA
32
every game on file — nothing hidden