← priced_lineedges · WNBA
2026-08-14
Day by day
Latest 1 graded days from the same CORE benchmark shown in the headline, charts and sheet: priced_lineedges.
20–13 · 61% · +1.71u across the last 1 days
08/1420–1361%+1.71u2 games
POR @ SEA7–6−1.82u
- Dominique Malonga Under 2.5 AST5 vs 2.5no clean explanationMalonga doubled the projection with 5 assists despite shooting just 30% from the field, leveraging her 30% usage rate and 23 minutes to facilitate offense even as her own scoring dried up. Her playmaking from the post and ball movement kept her well above the 2.5 assist line despite the inefficient shooting night.
- Awa Fam Under 7.5 PTS20 vs 7.5shots didn't fall — the read held upFam torched the under with elite efficiency, shooting 7-12 from the field (58%) including 4-8 from three (50%) while maintaining a 78% true shooting percentage on 25% usage in 22 minutes. Her hot shooting—especially from deep—drove her well past the 7.5-point line despite modest playing time.
- Ezi Magbegor Under 5.5 REB8 vs 5.5shots didn't fall — the read held upMagbegor grabbed 8 rebounds in 26 minutes, exceeding the 5.5 line by banking 3 extra boards despite shooting just 4-for-12 from the field; her rebounding activity held steady even as her offensive efficiency sagged.
- Ezi Magbegor Under 6.5 PTS13 vs 6.5shots didn't fall — the read held upMagbegor doubled the projection by converting all three free throws and hitting 2-of-4 from three, offsetting a poor 4-of-12 overall mark to reach 13 points in 26 minutes of run. Her 20% usage rate provided enough volume to find 6 additional points beyond the 6.5 line despite mediocre efficiency.
- Awa Fam Under 8.5 PTS20 vs 8.5shots didn't fall — the read held upFam torched the line on elite efficiency, hitting 7-of-12 from the field (58%) and 4-of-8 from three (50%) to reach 20 points in just 22 minutes—more than double the 8.5-point prop. Her 78% true shooting and high volume from deep were well above her typical output.
- Ezi Magbegor Under 7.5 PTS13 vs 7.5shots didn't fall — the read held upMagbegor nearly doubled the projection on efficient shooting, converting 3-of-4 from the free-throw line and 2-of-4 from three despite an otherwise modest 4-12 FG performance, while her 26 minutes and 20% usage rate gave her sufficient opportunities to surpass 7.5 points.
DAL @ IND13–7+3.53u
- Paige Bueckers Under 21.5 PTS29 vs 21.5paid over the fair numberBueckers exceeded the under by 8 points on an efficient 11-21 shooting night (52 FG%), converting all five free throws and logging 36 minutes with 30% usage to carry the offensive load. Her 62% true shooting marked a hot performance that overwhelmed the betting line.
- Kelsey Mitchell Over 25.5 PTS23 vs 25.5 — missed by a hairno clean explanationMitchell fell just short despite heavy usage (30%) and high volume (21 FG attempts), hampered by poor three-point shooting (1-7) that kept her efficiency flat at 50% TS. She needed closer to 26 points to cash and came up two short, undone by perimeter struggles in an otherwise high-volume performance.
- Kelsey Mitchell Over 24.5 PTS23 vs 24.5 — missed by a hairpaid over the fair numberMitchell came up one point short despite heavy usage (30%) and nearly 36 minutes of action, held back by poor perimeter shooting (1-7 from three) that forced her into an inefficient night at 50% true shooting.
- Paige Bueckers Under 4.5 REB6 vs 4.5shots didn't fall — the read held upBueckers stayed on the floor for 36 minutes and drove offensive rebounding opportunities with 30% usage, grabbing 6 boards to exceed the 4.5 line despite playing on a team that got outscored by 7.
- Odyssey Sims Under 10.5 PTS11 vs 10.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held upSims exceeded the under with efficient shooting, going 3-for-6 from three-point range (50%) and 2-for-2 from the free-throw line to reach 11 points in 23 minutes despite a modest 3-7 overall field-goal mark. Her 70% true shooting kept her productive enough to clear the 10.5-point threshold despite low usage at just 19%.
- Awak Kuier Under 4.5 REB6 vs 4.5no clean explanation
Each eligible priced formula signal is normalized to a flat 1-unit outcome at its recorded price. Voids are excluded from the record, hit rate, and units. Open a day for the per-game split and loss review.