← priced_lineedges · WNBA
2026-08-18
Day by day
Latest 1 graded days from the same CORE benchmark shown in the headline, charts and sheet: priced_lineedges.
20–12 · 63% · +3.41u across the last 1 days
08/1820–1263%+3.41u4 games
IND @ TOR6–8−3.48u
- Aneesah Morrow Under 12.5 PTS14 vs 12.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held upMorrow's efficient 6-11 shooting (54.5% FG) on 29 minutes of play pushed her just over the 12.5-point line despite modest usage, as her interior scoring and volume rebounding role kept her productive enough to reach 14 points.
- Makayla Timpson Under 6.5 REB7 vs 6.5 — missed by a hairpaid over the fair numberTimpson exceeded the 6.5 rebound line by one despite minimal offensive involvement (7% usage), benefiting from 32 minutes of floor time and efficient interior presence that generated 7 boards on just 4 shot attempts.
- Kiki Rice Under 4.5 AST6 vs 4.5shots didn't fall — the read held upRice exceeded the under by distributing 6 assists in 30 minutes despite shooting just 4-of-12 from the field, relying on playmaking rather than scoring to impact the game. Her 19% usage rate kept her efficient as a facilitator, allowing her to orchestrate offense without needing to score.
- Kiki Rice Under 5.5 AST6 vs 5.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held upRice just barely cleared the line with 6 assists in 30 minutes despite inefficient shooting (4-12 FG, 39% TS), as her ball-handling responsibilities kept her in a playmaking role even when her own offense stalled.
- Aneesah Morrow Under 11.5 PTS14 vs 11.5shots didn't fall — the read held upMorrow exceeded the 11.5 total on efficient inside scoring, going 5-for-8 on two-pointers while playing a full 29 minutes and dominating the glass with 16 rebounds. Her 61% true shooting and high-volume rebounding opportunities in a competitive game kept her scoring punch above the betting line despite modest overall usage.
- Aneesah Morrow Under 10.5 PTS14 vs 10.5no clean explanationMorrow exceeded the 10.5-point line by converting 6 of 11 field-goal attempts (54.5%) and staying on the floor for 29 minutes despite modest usage, generating efficient scoring that pushed her past the threshold. Her 16-rebound night kept her engaged in the game flow and ensured sufficient shot opportunities to clear the under.
ATL @ LVA2–1+0.40u
- Rhyne Howard Over 3.5 AST3 vs 3.5 — missed by a hairpaid over the fair numberHoward played heavy minutes (39) and scored efficiently (23 pts), but her low usage rate (26%) and primary scoring role limited playmaking opportunities, resulting in just 3 assists despite the volume. She committed 4 fouls that may have caused some caution late, but the assist miss was fundamentally driven by her offensive-centric game plan rather than foul trouble.
NYL @ CHI5–1+2.90u
- Jonquel Jones Over 2.5 AST2 vs 2.5game script — blowout or foul troubleJones played only 6 minutes due to early foul trouble, limiting her involvement as a passer and falling one assist short of the over. With minimal court time, she had fewer opportunities to rack up assists despite efficient shooting.
LAS @ CON7–2+3.60u
- Ariel Atkins Over 2.5 AST2 vs 2.5shots didn't fall — the read held upAtkins finished at exactly 2 assists, one short of the over, despite 26 minutes of floor time; her 13% usage rate kept her out of the primary playmaking flow for the team.
- Leila Lacan Under 5.5 AST10 vs 5.5no clean explanationLacan nearly doubled the projection with 10 assists in 28 minutes, running the offense efficiently despite shooting just 3-9 and posting a quiet 17% usage rate—her playmaking volume far outpaced her scoring opportunities. The under missed because she prioritized ball movement and facilitation over scoring, a role allocation that wasn't reflected in the 5.5 assist line.
Each eligible priced formula signal is normalized to a flat 1-unit outcome at its recorded price. Voids are excluded from the record, hit rate, and units. Open a day for the per-game split and loss review.